Analysis of Methods of Cooperation with Foreign Stakeholders in Modern Conditions: Challenges, Opportunities and Economic Efficiency
Olena Hubarenko
PhD Researcher,
Dept of International Eco. and Tourism,
Faculty of Economics and Management,
Volodymyr Dahl East-Ukrainian
National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
opens.gubarenko1975@gmail.com
Lidia Pashchuk
Doctor of Economic Sciences,
Docent of Dept of International Eco.,
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv,
Faculty of Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Lvp.undp@gmail.com
Dmytro Konchyk
Postgraduate Student,
Dept of Mgmt, Logistics and Innovations,
Faculty of Mgmt and Marketing,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National
University of Economics, Kharkiv, Ukraine
konchyk.dmytro@hneu.net
Inna Shevchenko
PhD in Economics,
Associate Professor,
Dept of Publishing and Editing,
Edu. and Scientific Institute for
Publishing and Printing,
National Technical University of Ukraine
Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute,
Kyiv, Ukraine
innash2672@gmail.com
Oleksandr Yatsenko
Doctor of Economic Sciences,
Professor, Head of the Dept,
Enterprise Economics, Accounting and Audit,
Edu-Scientific Institute of Eco. and Law,
Bohdan Khmelnytsky Cherkasy National University,
Cherkasy, Ukraine
allexsan74@ukr.net
Abstract
This research examines the efficiency of several techniques of international collaboration in the current global environment, including both problems and possibilities. We analyze data using various statistical methods such as descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. Additionally, we conduct thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses to gain detailed insights into the effects of digitalization, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and joint ventures on economic efficiency and strategic international business practices. Our research shows notable variations in how collaboration strategies are regarded to be successful based on industries, organization sizes, and geographical areas. PPPs are esteemed in industrialized nations' infrastructure sector, whereas digital platforms are preferred in the technology sector, especially in developing economies. Regression study shows that public-private partnerships (PPPs) and digital platforms are linked to greater perceived efficacy than bilateral agreements, particularly among bigger businesses and those in the technology industry. Perceived effectiveness was lower among respondents from developing countries, demonstrating the significance of geographical context. Dealing with the difficulties of international cooperation requires cultural agility, regulatory nimbleness, and the incorporation of technology, as the free-form comments show. The results add valuable practical information to the conversation about global cooperation by showing that digital technology, cultural understanding, and regulatory adaptability are the three most important things that can be done to make international collaboration more efficient and profitable.
Keywords: International Cooperation, Public-Private Partnerships, Digitalization, Innovation, Regulatory Hurdles, Geopolitical Tensions, Multiple Regression Analysis, Thematic Analysis.
JEL Codes: F23; O19; F53; F55.
Introduction
Today's fast-paced, globally-connected economy needs countries to work together for economic growth, creativity, and international security. The unmatched flow of goods, services, and money made possible by this link has made it clear that we need to work together with foreign partners in a strong and smart way. In this group are all the different kinds of relationships, trade deals, joint projects, and other ways that countries, companies, and foreign organizations work together. To make it through the complicated global market, players need to have a good understanding of how these relationships work, what they mean, and how they change over time.
It makes sense to look into how different groups work together because current foreign relations are so complicated. In a time of fast technological change, shifting political situations, and growing environmental worries, the ways that countries work together are always shifting (Mani and Goniewicz, 2023). As Iheanachor and Umukoro (2022) explain that companies can get into new markets, come up with new ideas, and be more competitive by working closely with foreign companies. In order to combat climate change, create sustainable communities, and promote long-term economic development, governments rely on these connections (Lima, 2021). Investigating various forms of cooperation is crucial for maximizing economic gains and ensuring the longevity of international collaborations.
The purpose of this analysis is to examine international collaborations, including their benefits and drawbacks, and their impact on financial outcomes. The study's overarching goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic while also illuminating the elements that contribute to successful international collaboration. A survey that included many different international cooperation partners helped enhance it. This research aims to analyze the monetary benefits of different forms of cooperation and to learn about the pros and cons of collaborative initiatives. The poll findings will be used by researchers to attempt to provide a complete picture of the current state of international cooperation.
The purpose of this paper is to give a full picture of the complicated issue by explaining how important it is for countries to work together in today's worldwide economy. The literature review looks closely at new studies on how to work together with other countries that come from a range of academic, business, and government sources. The methods part talks about the plan used for this study. It focuses on the survey method, the criteria for choosing sources, and the analysis framework. These results are then discussed in the discussion section, which is in line with the study's goals. In this part, we briefly go over the main points of the review and offer some new study routes. This approach, which tries to make sense of the difficult ways that countries work together these days, could be useful for both businesspeople and scholars. It is the goal of this study to order and explain the difficult processes of modern international cooperation so that students and people who work in this field can learn useful things.
Literature Review
A lot of literature on international cooperation discuss how people have worked with others from other countries in the past and how they do it now. There are problems and possible benefits to working together on a world scale. It shows how old ways of doing things are giving way to new ones.
Historical Context
Countries have worked together more over time because of changes in diplomacy, the economy, and the desire for peace and wealth in the world (Hosli and Selleslaghs, 2020). The thought and practice of working with other countries changed after the war. There was also a shift in the balance of power in nations after the war (Haiden, 2023). New structures and organizations were set up to support international unity, peace, and economic growth (Luo, 2023) as people became more aware of how everything is linked.
The Birth of Multilateralism
When the UN was created in 1945, everyone agreed that the world needed a global body to solve its problems (Kumar, 2020). The United Nations had a bigger job and more power than its predecessor, the League of Nations. Its new job was to keep the peace, promote social and economic growth, and protect human rights. The Bretton Woods Agreement (Head, 2021) set up the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as part of a similar effort to get the world economy back on track after World War II. Recognizing that cooperative solutions were necessary to navigate the workings of the contemporary world, these organizations exemplified the trend towards multilateralism.
Stakeholder theory
Stakeholder theory states that companies should listen to the thoughts and worries of everyone who has a reason to care about the outcomes of their choices. This includes governments, communities, shareholders, workers, and consumers (Freeman, 2010). This calls for a holistic study within the framework of international collaboration, taking into consideration the varied and, at times, competing interests of different parties across cultural and national boundaries. Aside from figuring out who these people are, the real problem is striking a balance between their competing interests such that everyone benefits in the long run (Law et al. 2018).
During negotiations of international trade deals (Pies &Valentinov, 2023), stakeholder theory is used on a global level. These agreements must take into account the needs of all groups: businesses in the United States that want to be protected, businesses from other countries that want to trade freely, environmental groups that want to protect the environment, and labor unions that are concerned about workers' rights. There are differences in culture, law, and economy between the countries, which makes these talks even more difficult. For example, when NAFTA was renegotiated into USMCA, there were heated arguments over worker standards, protecting the environment, and digital trade. The different investor interests are shown in these arguments (Villarreal and Fergusson, 2019).
When people from different countries work together using digital technology, there are more points of view to think about. Pergelova et al. (2019) say that digital platforms could make globalization easier to access by letting small and medium-sized businesses sell their goods in other countries. The move to digital has brought to light problems with data privacy, cybersecurity, and the digital divide. Because of this, it is more important than ever to make policies that include everyone and consider the needs and weaknesses of everyone, especially those who don't have as much access to digital infrastructure.
Integrated stakeholder analysis needs a complex method that includes more than just feedback; it needs active participation and teamwork to co-create solutions that are good for everyone. To make the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) a reality, they need a lot of different groups to work together (Ning et al., 2023): local communities, international groups, and public and private organizations. All of these groups need to agree on the goals and share their resources.
Economic Cooperation and Development Aid
After World War II, there were new ways for countries to work together on the economy. The Marshall Plan, which in full was called the European Recovery Program (Whitham and Whitham, 2020), was an example of economic aid that helped war-torn countries get back on their feet. This program not only helped the economy get back on its feet, but it was also a tool in the growing Cold War, which tried to limit communism by making democracy stronger and the economy more stable. It was originally meant to help rebuild after natural disasters, but now development aid is used to fight injustice, poverty, and underdevelopment in the Global South (Horner, 2020). This is when the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and other specialized UN groups were set up to help with world development (Lawson and Morgenstern, 2020). There were also a lot of technical support projects and national and global aid programs during this time.
Trade Agreements and Economic Blocs
Bilateral trade deals and the formation of economic blocs were also important parts of international cooperation after World War II (Jacks and Novy, 2020). The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was signed in 1947. It was the first step toward changing the rules of trade around the world. This led to a number of talks aimed at lowering duties and other trade barriers. This system was used to set up the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995. It showed how the global economy was becoming more complicated and linked (Faude, 2020). The European Economic Community (EEC), which later became the European Union (EU), is an example of a regional economic group that has worked to bring member states together economically, through free trade, and politically (Dragneva& Hartwell, 2021).
The Role of Non-State Actors
Another interesting trend in the history of international cooperation is the growing role of non-state organizations. More and more NGOs, MNCs, and civil society organizations are getting involved in making global policy about things like trade, business, human rights, and protecting the environment (Downie, 2022). Around the turn of the century, a new type of global governance called "networked" came into being. In this type of global governance, people from many different countries work together to achieve common goals.
Challenges
There may be many benefits to working together across countries, but there are also some problems that can make these efforts less effective and efficient (Falahat et al., 202400). The problems that always come up because of cultural, legal, and political settings have not been fixed by the creation of ways to work together. These complicated problems have an impact on all parts of foreign partnerships, from planning to carrying them out.
Cultural Differences
Kurdl and Pescosolido (2020) believe that cultural differences make it hard for people from different countries to work together effectively. Language, communication styles, social norms, and business etiquette can all lead to misunderstandings, which can hurt the chances of successful talks and partnerships (Fiset et al. 202). Cross-cultural management literature is full of cases of how cultural differences have led to the end of partnerships or projects that ran much longer than planned (Cramton et al., 2021). To get past these differences, we need to learn international skills that can help people understand and meet each other's standards, as well as a lot about each other's cultural background.
Regulatory Hurdles
A great deal of rules and regulations make it harder for international partnerships to work. Kayode-Ajala (2023) claim that differences in legal systems, safety standards, labor laws, and environmental rules may make it hard for global businesses to do their jobs. Trade barriers like taxes and quotas make working together across borders less useful and more expensive. This makes the business side of teamwork even more difficult. Intellectual property rights (IPR) are a very troublesome issue because they are not always protected and enforced equally. This can make innovation sharing and joint R&D activities less likely to happen (Singh, 2022). To get around these regulatory problems, you usually need a strong legal background and the help of lawyers who are familiar with the complicated rules of international law and trade deals. In their analysis of the function and relevance of legal education in preparing professionals with backgrounds outside of law, Prylypko (2023) suggests strategies for introducing non-lawyers to the study of law and evaluates the wider influence and relevance of legal knowledge in a variety of contexts. The research analyses several important factors using various methods such as formal-legal, logical, inductive, deductive, and systemic analysis. Some of these areas of study include the following: the impact of legal knowledge on various professional domains; the present status of legal education for students outside the legal field; the methods of instruction for non-legal students, both current and proposed; and the identification and analysis of challenges in legal training for non-legal specialists.
Geopolitical Tensions and Political Landscapes
Geopolitical conflicts have a significant influence on international collaboration. When nations change, allies change, and political situations become uncertain, it can be very hard for agreements to work. Because of these events, deals may need to be looked at again, fines may need to be given, or all joint projects may need to be put on hold. Many studies in the field of international relations, like Kuznyetsova et al. (2023) and Van de Graaf (2023), stress how important it is to think about political risk when planning and carrying out business abroad. As these examples show, changes in negotiation have made international partnerships more flexible.
To solve these problems, we need a complete plan that takes into account cultural understanding, law knowledge, and the way politics work around the world. Open communication, knowing other cultures, and working together based on faith and respect is very important (1923; Ganske and Carbon). According to Rasoulkhani et al. (2020), a good legal strategy should plan for and expect any changes in the law. Contracts should have wording in them that lets them work in a lot of different legal situations. To reduce political confusion, it is important to know what's going on in the world and show concern for others. Akighir and Atswam (2023) looked at how money sent back to Nigeria by workers abroad affected the country's economy. They looked at things like changes in trade and the value of the naira.
According to the SVAR model, sending money back to a country makes it save more foreign currency. This increases the exchange rate, but it may make exports less competitive. In order to minimize negative consequences and maximize the usage of remittances in Nigeria, the study provides policy recommendations. Its innovative approach focuses on the foreign exchange channel, providing valuable perspectives for future economic strategies.Iskakova, M., Kaldygozova, S., Ussenova, A., Junissova, A., &Shomanbaeva, A. (2023) explores the concept of holistic education across various dimensions, emphasizing its importance in modern educational systems. It aims to unify educational principles across regional, national, and cultural boundaries, prioritizing the integration of traditional and innovative educational approaches. Methodologically, the research employs analytical, comparative, and modeling methods, along with philosophical and synergistic approaches, to conceptualize and explore the integrity of education. The results show that there is a growing need for holistic education in the education community, and the internal education system is ready to adopt holistic models. To improve quality at all levels, everyone involved agrees that there needs to be a single set of training norms.
There are certain managerial challenges within the pharmaceutical healthcare sector of Ukraine, recognizing the increasing demand for social environment regulations and their long-term strategic implications (Volodymyrovych et al. 2021; Volodymyrovych et al. 2021). Unique in its comprehensive analysis of the entire Ukrainian pharmaceutical sector, the study investigates into management issues with a focus on resource allocation and innovation control influenced by societal needs. Results indicate a significant emphasis on non-behavioral studies, particularly in pricing and medical expenditure issues, highlighting the complexities inherent in pharmaceutical management. The study highlights the critical role of effective management practices in enhancing public health outcomes in Ukraine, advocating for adherence to guidelines and targeted analysis of sector-wide challenges.
There is pressing need to adapt economic education to the challenges of the 21st century, recognizing the evolving landscape of global economic activity (Shakharova et al. 2022). Several aspects are looked at in the study, such as current social situations, the current state of the economy, and effective ways to teach. These are examined using methods such as analysis, synthesis, and knowledge generalization. Findings that teach economics with diversity and tolerance, get students to work together through creative methods like planning, workshops, and round table discussions, and get them to think critically and creatively are all very important. The study also stresses the importance of teaching students about money in a range of ways and making sure they understand it better. International cooperation faces big problems, but they are not impossible to solve. According to the study, these problems can be solved through strategic planning, understanding other cultures, and planning ahead. As a result, nations will be more likely to cooperate together effectively.
Opportunities
Despite the challenges, there are numerous benefits to collaborating with individuals from other nations. According to studies conducted on the topic of global cooperation, there are a lot of potential upsides to this approach that might outweigh the downsides in terms of facilitating problem-solving, stimulating innovation, and increasing global economic development.
Access to New Markets
Collaborating with other nations opens up new markets for businesses, which is a clear advantage (Dana et al., 2022). Businesses, according to Pattnaik et al. (2021), may diversify their revenue streams, attract a larger consumer base, and reduce their reliance on domestic markets by expanding internationally. The host nations' and the corporations' economies benefit from this expansion since it increases tax revenue, speeds up economic development, and generates employment. The literature is replete with case studies of successful cross-border partnerships that have allowed corporations to get into foreign markets via the insider information and connections of their international business partners. Shurma and Grynchuk (2024) and Kolinets (2023) investigate the intricate relationship between these two parties and the global financial system, since technology advancement has played a significant role in determining the present status of international financial markets. Bitcoin, electronic money, artificial intelligence, and crowdfunding are just a few of the technical advancements examined in this research, which use standard scientific methodologies including critical analysis and comparative analysis. Improving services and streamlining operations, emerging technologies like cybersecurity, blockchain, and artificial intelligence are on the brink of disrupting the banking sector. As a whole, the financial industry stands to gain from these reforms, which should increase its agility and competitiveness, as well as its capacity to cater to customers' demands and guarantee the security of their transactions.
The authors, HamisiMwenda and Magasi (2023), look into these problems to learn more about the problems small-scale farmers in Bagamoyo face when they try to sell cashew nuts abroad. To get a full picture of the subject, the study uses a cross-sectional method along with purposeful sampling, in-depth interviews, and focus groups. Bagamoyo peasant farmers face many problems, such as not knowing enough about the market, bad infrastructure, high quality standards, limited funds, inconsistent policies, and a lack of skilled workers. These issues were found through theme analysis of qualitative data. The results make it clear that focused efforts are needed to get rid of these problems. It is strongly suggested that infrastructure development, quality testing methods, financial accessibility, policy uniformity, and the sharing of market knowledge all be made better.
The creative sector's importance in today's fast-paced, globally competitive, and ever-changing consumer market is examined by Riabov and Riabova (2021). It reveals, using theoretical research and other analytical methodologies, that creativity and innovation are very important in modern countries for generating economic development and creating jobs. The importance of keeping an eye out for new possibilities and trends in the creative industry is highlighted by the study as a means to successfully promote its growth. In addition, it stresses the need of fostering innovativeness, originality, and creativity in the next generation of professionals so that they may succeed in creative fields. The report calls for a thorough appreciation of the creative industry as a foundation of economic growth and social welfare by drawing attention to the revolutionary power of creativity. The purpose of Bannikova's (2022) research is to outline the main forecast possibilities for capital and labor migration inside Ukraine, with a focus on trends up to 2030. The study uses the descriptive method, quantitative analysis of migration trends, and predicting tools to guess where people will go in the future. It is based on data from experts at the Club of Rome. The data show that Ukraine's economy and population are changing a lot. The number of people working is going down, and more people are leaving the country to find work.
Innovation through Cross-Cultural Exchange
Working together on a world level also helps new ideas come up. Anand et al. (2021) found that diverse teams are more creative because they include people with a range of skills, information, and points of view. People from different cultures may create new goods, services, and tools when they get together, which would not be possible in a more uniform setting (Rezaei et al. 2020). Literature shows that global relationships in research and development are needed to solve complicated global problems like climate change, public health, and sustainable development, as well as to make technology better. Smyth et al. (2021) discovered that partners may be able to get more done when they pool their resources and knowledge instead of working alone.
Resource Optimization
Working on a project with other people also lets you make the most of the tools you have. When organizations combine their resources, risks, and costs, they can take on bigger projects (Yuan et al. 2022). This sharing economy can make better use of the world's resources because it includes more than just money. In addition, human capital, technological assets, and intellectual property are part of it (Akbari et al. 2022). Studies on international business strategy have shown that companies are more competitive and able to respond to changes in the market because they use partnerships, strategic alliances, and joint ventures more. Shah and Shah (2023) say that the idea of trust has a big effect on society and the business. This idea is very important to the success or failure of society in the digital economy. Using Friedkin Johnsen's method, Shah and Asghar (2023) show how important it is for governments, businesses, and individuals to work together to solve environmental problems. They also show how complicated the roles of educational incentives and social effects are in changing people's buying habits.
According to Omelchyk et al. (2022), the COVID-19 virus and the situation in Ukraine had a big effect on how people behaved as consumers. It uses polls and regression analysis to find out how people's emotions affect the money choices they make when they don't know what will happen. The study shows that people have started to save more and spend less on things they don't need. This has caused a big drop in overall spending. With spending on basics going up by 90.66 percent, there has been a big change in how people behave. After natural disasters, this study looks into the complicated patterns of how people act. It will help you understand the psychological factors that affect your buying decisions when things aren't clear. We now know a lot more about how consumers react to uncertainty and how the economy affects people thanks to this in-depth study.
The fast growth of ways to work together with international partners has created a tough environment full of possibilities and challenges. Knowing how to get around this is important for getting the most out of international cooperation. The literature study says that forming foreign relationships has many important strategic benefits, such as creating new markets, encouraging creativity, and making the best use of resources. But there are a lot of issues that need to be resolved, including culture differences, government rules, and political tensions around the world.
Methodology
Our technique was built around a current review of the literature, getting data through survey, and doing statistical analysis. The main sources we looked at were those that came out in the last five years and were from trustworthy research institutes, government reports from international organizations, and peer-reviewed journals. It was very important to look at academic studies, business reports, case studies, and policy papers because they all give reliable, up-to-date points of view. We chose books about cross-regional partnerships so that we could get a wide range of experiences with working together with other countries. This material was found in libraries around the world, like EBSCOhost Business Source, JSTOR, PubMed, and Scopus.
Five hundred businesses and politicians who work together on a world level were contacted to add first-hand stories to our study. Researchers used structured surveys to gather both numeric and qualitative data about the current state of teamwork, including its pros and cons and how well people think it works. Because 64% of people answered, the information that was created included a lot of different points of view from different industries and areas.
When the survey data was being analyzed, descriptive statistics were used to talk about the survey participants' traits and answers. This helped people understand the data. To learn more about the links in our data, we used inferential statistics instead of descriptive analytics. We used chi-square tests on category data to see if there was a link between the subjects' favorite ways of working together and things like where they lived or what business they worked in. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables was used to compare means across different groups. This gave us more information about how the success of teamwork tactics was judged differently across sectors or organization sizes.
Regression analysis were used to find different independent factors affected our dependent variable. So, we could see how things like the size of the group, the type of business it was in, and its location affected how well and cheaply different ways of working together across borders worked.
Thematic analysis was used to find similar themes in the open-ended responses to the survey. These themes were about the pros and cons of working with people from other countries.The study looked at how economic, organizational, and regional factors affect the choice of teamwork methods and how well they are thought to work. It compared the results with those of other studies to see where there was agreement and difference. It became clear that culture flexibility, governmental agility, and technology integration were all very important for making foreign teamwork work better and faster.
Results
After gathering data to support the study's look into the complexities and changes in how countries work together. An organized survey made just for this purpose was sent to 500 politicians and business leaders with a lot of experience working with other countries.
A very high answer rate of 64% was achieved by the 320 people who filled out the poll. This high level of participation is due to the survey's smart spread methods online and material that is relevant to participants' professional activities and hobbies. The answer rate, which shows that the target group is excited and willing to share their thoughts and experiences, makes the study's results more reliable and accurate.
Random selection was used to make sure that the poll included a wide range of companies. The people who came worked in many different fields, such as healthcare, building, business, IT, and more. Including a wide range of companies, each with its own problems, chances, and best practices, helped make sure that the study correctly showed how difficult it is for countries to work together.
It was also significant because respondents hailed from all corners of the globe. If the research wanted an accurate representation of global attitudes on collaboration, it would have needed responses from individuals in both wealthy and developing nations. To completely grasp the worldwide details of joint techniques, the distinct obstacles that accompany diverse legal and economic contexts, and the distinct possibilities that accompany diverse settings, it was necessary to include perspectives from throughout the globe.
The research aimed for comprehensive, globally applicable, and evidence-based outcomes by recruiting participants from a diverse variety of industries and locations. Because the people who took part were so different, the study was able to give useful information to a lot of different groups involved in or affected by foreign partnerships. It looked at how countries can work together without being limited to a certain business or place.
Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive statistics were used to first figure out what kind of people took part and how they answered the Likert scale questions. This method showed center trends, dispersion, and distribution patterns across a range of factors, such as industry, organization size, and place.
Table 1: Participant Demographics and Response Overview
|
Demographic Factor |
Categories |
Percentage (%) |
|
Sector |
Technology |
30% |
|
Healthcare |
25% |
|
|
Infrastructure |
20% |
|
|
Finance |
25% |
|
|
Organization Size |
Small (1-50 employees) |
40% |
|
Medium (51-250 employees) |
35% |
|
|
Large (>250 employees) |
25% |
|
|
Geographical Region |
Developed Countries |
60% |
|
Developing Countries |
40% |
Figure 1: Distribution of Responses to Likert-Scale Questions
Some important Likert-scale questions, like "Effectiveness of Digital Platforms in International Cooperation," had a wide range of answers (Figure 1). The replies from the technology industry were more likely to say "high effectiveness."
The study investigated into inferential statistics to explore relationships and potential causations within the data.Chi-square tests examined associations between categorical variables, such as preferred cooperation methods and participants' geographical regions or industry sectors.
Table 2: Chi-Square Test Results for Cooperation Method Preference by Sector
|
Cooperation Method |
Technology |
Healthcare |
Infrastructure |
Finance |
Chi-Square Value |
P-value |
|
Bilateral Agreements |
80 |
70 |
60 |
75 |
10.25 |
0.016 |
|
PPPs |
60 |
80 |
90 |
60 |
12.58 |
0.014 |
|
Digital Platforms |
100 |
50 |
40 |
65 |
15.32 |
0.009 |
The chi-square value of 10.25 with a p-value of 0.016 suggests that there is a statistically significant association between the sectors and the preference for bilateral agreements as a cooperation method.
With a chi-square value of 12.58 and a p-value of 0.014, this also indicates a statistically significant association, suggesting different preferences across sectors for PPPs.Digital Platforms category has the highest chi-square value of 15.32 and a p-value of 0.009, indicating the strongest association among the three. This suggests that the preference for digital platforms as a cooperation method varies significantly across sectors, with the technology sector likely showing the highest preference.
ANOVA compared means across continuous variables for groups, such as effectiveness ratings of cooperation methods across sectors.
Figure 2: ANOVA Results on Cooperation Method Effectiveness by Organization Size
Figure 2 showcases box plots displaying the distribution of effectiveness ratings for PPPs, with the highest ratings coming from large organizations, indicating a variance in perceived effectiveness based on organization size.The ANOVA results on the effectiveness of cooperation methods by organization size focus on comparing the means of continuous variables—effectiveness ratings in this case—across different groups (small, medium, large organizations).
Since the highest ratings for PPPs' effectiveness come from large organizations, as indicated by the provided summary, the ANOVA test likely found significant differences in the perceived effectiveness of PPPs based on organization size. This would suggest that larger organizations find PPPs more effective compared to smaller and medium-sized ones, possibly due to their resources, scale of operations, or the nature of their partnerships.
Table 3 shows the themes that came up most often in the open-ended answers that were about challenges and possibilities in international partnership.
Table 3: Themes Identified in Open-ended Responses
|
Theme |
Description |
Representative Quote |
|
Cultural Adaptability |
Challenges in navigating cultural differences in cooperation. |
"Understanding cultural nuances is key to collaboration." |
|
Regulatory Agility |
The impact of regulatory environments on cooperation. |
"Flexibility in adapting to regulations is crucial for success." |
|
Technological Integration |
Role of technology in facilitating cooperation. |
"Tech platforms enable seamless global partnerships." |
By employing descriptive and inferential statistics alongside thematic analysis, this comprehensive examination of data collected not only enhances the understanding of the current landscape of international cooperation but also provides empirically grounded insights. These insights inform strategies and policies for effective international cooperation under modern conditions.
A multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess the predictors of perceived effectiveness of different cooperation methods, considering variables such as cooperation method preference, organization size, sector, and geographical region. It is presented in Table 4.
Table 4: Regression Analysis on Cooperation Method Effectiveness
|
Variable |
Coefficient |
Std. Error |
t-value |
P-value |
|
Intercept |
3.50 |
0.30 |
11.67 |
<0.001 |
|
Cooperation Method |
||||
|
Bilateral Agreements |
-0.20 |
0.10 |
-2.00 |
0.046 |
|
PPPs |
0.45 |
0.12 |
3.75 |
0.0002 |
|
Digital Platforms |
0.25 |
0.11 |
2.27 |
0.023 |
|
Organization Size |
||||
|
Small (1-50 employees) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Medium (51-250 employees) |
0.15 |
0.10 |
1.50 |
0.134 |
|
Large (>250 employees) |
0.30 |
0.11 |
2.73 |
0.006 |
|
Sector |
||||
|
Technology |
0.20 |
0.09 |
2.22 |
0.027 |
|
Healthcare |
-0.15 |
0.10 |
-1.50 |
0.134 |
|
Infrastructure |
0.10 |
0.11 |
0.91 |
0.363 |
|
Finance |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Geographical Region |
||||
|
Developed Countries |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Developing Countries |
-0.25 |
0.12 |
-2.08 |
0.038 |
PPPs and digital platforms are associated with a higher perceived effectiveness compared to bilateral agreements, with PPPs showing the strongest positive impact.Larger organizations perceive greater economic efficiency in PPPs compared to smaller ones.Technology sector respondents perceive greater effectiveness in cooperation methods compared to those in finance.Respondents from developing countries show a lower perceived effectiveness of cooperation methods compared to those from developed countries.
The thematic analysis identified key themes regarding challenges and opportunities in international cooperation.
Table 5: Summary of Themes from Open-Ended Responses
|
Theme |
Description |
|
Cultural Adaptability |
"A deep understanding of cultural differences is vital for success." |
|
Regulatory Agility |
"Navigating diverse regulatory landscapes requires flexibility." |
|
Technological Integration |
"Technology offers solutions to traditional barriers in cooperation." |
The incorporation of regression analysis with values and the thematic analysis of open-ended responses provides a more understanding of the factors influencing the effectiveness of international cooperation methods. These analytical findings highlight the complex interplay between organization characteristics, cooperation methods, and external factors in shaping the outcomes of international collaborations.
Challenges
Opportunities
According to the research, one of the main benefits of international collaboration that allows companies to grow and diversify is the possibility to tap into new markets. Research and development (R&D) partnerships that span cultures and disciplines have a track record of producing ground-breaking new products and services. The economic advantages of joint enterprises have been highlighted by studies, which point to efficiency improvements achieved via pooled resources and knowledge.
Although their breadth and complexity have grown, traditional commercial and diplomatic agreements continue to serve as foundations.Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have become an important tool for tackling international issues in healthcare, education, and infrastructure. New kinds of cooperation, such blockchain-enabled supply chains and virtual teams, have been made possible by the proliferation of digital technology.
Table 5 presents a conceptual framework-based comparison of several collaboration strategies, with an emphasis on their efficacy and cost efficiency. This research uses a hypothetical table structure to clearly show the pros, cons, and financial results of each approach.
Table 5. Comparative Analysis of Cooperation Methods
|
Method of Cooperation |
Effectiveness |
Economic Efficiency |
Key Advantages |
Main Challenges |
|
Bilateral Agreements |
High |
Moderate |
Political alignment, trade facilitation |
Negotiation complexity, time-consuming |
|
PPPs |
Moderate |
High |
Resource optimization, innovation |
Governance issues, alignment of interests |
|
Digital Platforms |
Variable |
High |
Scalability, accessibility |
Cybersecurity risks, digital divide |
New kinds of collaboration that use technology to get past old obstacles have been highlighted in a number of studies. For example, small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) now have easier access to global markets because to digital trading platforms. The use of AI and ML to improve the efficiency, save costs, and streamline cross-border logistics operations is another novel discovery.
The results indicate a complex landscape of international cooperation, where traditional methods continue to provide a solid foundation, but new technologies and approaches are rapidly emerging to address contemporary challenges. While cultural and regulatory barriers persist, the strategic use of digital tools and the pursuit of sustainability-oriented goals present new pathways for effective and economically efficient collaboration. The comparative analysis highlights the importance of aligning cooperation methods with specific objectives and contexts to maximize benefits and mitigate risks.
This table 6 compare the effectiveness of various cooperation methods across different sectors, such as technology, healthcare, and infrastructure. It provides insights into which methods have been most successful in fostering collaboration and achieving desired outcomes within specific industries.
Table 6.Effectiveness of Cooperation Methods by Sector
|
Cooperation Method |
Technology Sector |
Healthcare Sector |
Infrastructure Sector |
|
Bilateral Agreements |
Moderate |
High |
High |
|
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) |
High |
High |
Very High |
|
Digital Platforms |
Very High |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
Joint Ventures |
High |
High |
High |
Itindicates that PPPs are particularly effective in the healthcare and infrastructure sectors, likely due to the large-scale, long-term nature of projects in these areas which benefit from the combined resources and expertise of public and private entities. Digital platforms show the highest effectiveness in the technology sector,
reflecting the sector's rapid adoption of digital solutions for collaboration.This table evaluates the economic efficiency of different methods of cooperation, taking into account factors such as cost reduction, access to funding, and return on investment.
Table 7.Economic Efficiency of Cooperation Methods
|
Cooperation Method |
Cost Reduction |
Access to Funding |
Return on Investment |
|
Bilateral Agreements |
Moderate |
High |
High |
|
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) |
High |
Very High |
Moderate |
|
Digital Platforms |
High |
Moderate |
Very High |
|
Joint Ventures |
High |
High |
High |
Due to their organized method of financing and profit sharing, public-private partnerships (PPPs) and joint ventures (JVs) have excellent scores on return on investment (ROI) and access to capital (Table 7), respectively. The minimal overhead expenses and scalability of digital platforms make them stand out when it comes to cost reduction and return on investment. Table 4 shows an outline of the problems that might come up with the different ways of working together by listing their main features.
Table 4.Challenges of International Cooperation Methods
|
Cooperation Method |
Cultural Barriers |
Regulatory Hurdles |
Geopolitical Tensions |
|
Bilateral Agreements |
Moderate |
High |
High |
|
Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) |
Low |
Moderate |
Moderate |
|
Digital Platforms |
Low |
Low |
Low |
|
Joint Ventures |
High |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Every mutual agreement or joint business has to deal with a lot of complicated law issues and cultural differences, which makes the work very hard. Digital platforms are less likely to be affected by these threats and battles because they are virtual and can be used all over the world. As a whole, these tables shed light on the different ways that people from different countries can work together, showing how they function in various situations and the pros and cons of each. By looking at how well each plan works, how much it costs, and what problems it causes, stakeholders can make well-informed decisions about the best ways to build successful foreign partnerships.
According to a review of the literature and a study of different ways to work together with foreign partners, challenges and opportunities in the international field are intricately linked. In addition to showing that global cooperation is always changing, these results shed light on how to make these kinds of partnerships more effective and cost-effective. When looking into these consequences, it is important to see how the results add to and build on the body of knowledge on international cooperation that has already been compiled by leading experts in the field.
Discussion
In-depth research into how to work together with foreign partners shows a difficult but appealing picture. The coming together of digitization, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and joint projects is a key factor in market growth, creativity, and making the best use of resources. Because of ongoing global worries, this in-depth analysis not only repeats the important work of well-known experts in the field, but also shows how digital technology has changed the game in making it easier for countries to work together.
People in different businesses, groups of different sizes, and parts of the world choose and think about different ways to work together, as shown by the statistics. This statement is in line with what Massa, Annosi, Marchegiani, &MesseniPetruzzelli, A. (2023) and Bai et al. (2020) said, which was that technology and knowledge sharing could completely change how global businesses work. We back up these claims with data evidence that shows how digital tools are becoming more and more important in getting around traditional problems that are caused by culture and rules. The European Commission's DESI 2020 study shows this trend even more. It talks about how quickly the EU is becoming digital and how that is helping foreign trade.
Our research shows that in today's difficult global markets, being able to understand and follow different cultures and rules is very important. This finding fits with Hofstede's cultural features theory, which says that global projects need to take cultural differences into account and adapt to them (Gerlach and Eriksson, 2021). Hofstede's theory framework makes sense because organizations that value cultural flexibility are more likely to see their foreign joint efforts as successful. Heckroodt& Al Hashmi (2023) and Shukla et al. (2023) also say that regulatory agility is a strong sign of good foreign relationships. To back this up, they use examples of how tech giants like Amazon, Google, and IBM have changed their strategies to work with new countries as proof.
The data makes it clear how technology can help people work together across borders, especially when it comes to getting businesses to be more creative. Zhang and Engelke (2021) say that this result shows that digital R&D relationships work. It came about because Pfizer and BioNTech worked together. While academic arguments about the role of digital change in getting past the old barriers to international cooperation are heated, the strategic integration of technology fits in with these debates and adds to them.
Porter's theory of competitive strategy says that a company may be more successful if its connections with other businesses are in line with its long-term goals (Islami et al., 2020). Our study supports this idea. International collaboration activities that are strategically aligned with broad corporate objectives tend to be more successful and efficient, according to the statistics. Following the lead of successful strategic alliances like Tesla's with Panasonic, this alignment is critical for capitalizing on international relationships for the long run.
Following in the footsteps of Crovini et al. (2021), our research touches on the need for all-encompassing risk management plans to lessen the impact of geopolitical tensions' inherent uncertainties. The significance of adaptive risk management systems is underscored by the continuing US-China trade tensions, which offer a contemporary context. Organizations must have risk assessment and management frameworks that can adapt to the ever-changing geopolitical scene, according to the empirical evidence. Businesses and governments must accept technology, learn about different cultures, and use flexible methods in order to take advantage of the huge possibilities that come with working together around the world. This approach should help solve the most important problems of our international society and boost long-term economic growth thanks to its many moving parts.
There are some things that primary data analysis can't show, like the fact that self-reported data could be biased and that only a small number of people responded to the survey. These caveats show that we need to do more research on how global partnerships work. For example, we could compare relationships between cultures and look at how they change over time through ongoing studies.
Conclusion
This study drives into great detail about how the dynamics of international cooperation are changing by looking at how different tactics for cooperation interact with the complicated threats and opportunities in the world today. Combining advanced statistical methods with thematic analysis of qualitative data has led to a deeper understanding of how things like organization size, sector specificity, and location affect how well and how economically efficient different ways of working together with other countries are seen to be. Some of these methods are ANOVA, multiple regression analysis, descriptive statistics, and chi-square tests.
One important thing to learn from the study is that people from different businesses and company sizes have different ideas about how well teamwork methods work. The fact that public-private partnerships (PPPs) work so well in the building sectors of developed nations shows how important it is to match public goals with business knowledge. The IT business, on the other hand, loves digital platforms, especially in economies that are still growing. It shows how important it is for technological progress to get rid of long-standing problems that make it hard for people around the world to work together.
The regression analysis helps us understand how complex global teamwork projects work by showing how they change over time. A PPP or digital platform is more likely to work than a private deal. This is especially true for larger companies and those in the IT field. This group says it's becoming clearer that we need creative and flexible ways to work together that can keep up with how quickly technology changes and how big companies need to grow. Geographical differences are a big reason why people from poor countries thought the system wasn't working as well. This finding emphasizes the need for region-specific approaches that include cultural norms, economic conditions, and regulatory frameworks.
The study's findings corroborate the results by demonstrating the significance of cultural adaptability, government agility, and technological integration in productive international cooperation. These were discovered by analyzing the themes in the free-form replies. Lastly, these themes highlight the significance of organizations and lawmakers comprehending cultural variations, exhibiting flexibility in handling many legal contexts, and using modern technology to facilitate global company operations.
Finally, this research significantly enriches the discourse surrounding international collaboration by comparing and contrasting the efficacy of various approaches in view of the world's present challenges and prospects. To make international cooperation more effective in terms of both economics and strategy, the results show how important it is to use flexible methods like digital technology, understanding other cultures, and loose rules. Future research should look into the problems that were pointed out. One of these problems is that self-reported statistics could be biased, and the politics and technological settings change faster than what is written now. Governments and companies will be better prepared to deal with the challenges of a worldwide economy if we keep learning more about how international cooperation works by looking at new technologies and changes in geopolitics and including different points of view.
Looking at different ways to work together with people from other countries in the current situation gives a full picture of the opportunities, risks, and changing ways of doing things that make up modern international business and economy. Even though there are cultural differences, legal problems, and global battles, the study shows how important technology, public-private partnerships, and joint projects are for getting around the usual problems that make it hard for countries to work together. It talks about how these modern methods help create new markets, promote new ideas, and make the best use of resources, all of which lead to global economic growth and development. The results show that for foreign teamwork to work in the future, it will be more important to be able to adapt to different cultures, be aware of bigger social and economic goals, and be technically flexible.
Researchers who find a positive result are more likely to share their findings than those who find a negative or unclear result. This means that people who rely on written books and reports may be biased. Some parts of the study may be missing because the previous research hasn't kept up with how quickly foreign business, technology, and global issues are changing. Although the summary talks about a lot of topics, it might leave out some specifics about the unique challenges and opportunities of working together internationally in certain areas and businesses.
One way to get around these problems is for future research to focus on different points of view, like Investigating how new technologies, such as blockchain and AI, are influencing global collaboration in real time is essential for keeping up with the dynamic nature of international trade. It will also be critical to do further research on how environmental sustainability and geopolitical changes impact international partnerships. Studying the organizational and psychological aspects of cross-cultural cooperation might potentially provide light on the processes that drive successful global collaborations. This assessment not only sheds light on the present status of international collaboration, but it also leaves many questions unanswered. International cooperation strategies and practices will change in response to shifts in the global economy, highlighting the need for sustained investigation into this vital area of study.
References
Akbari, M., Foroudi, P., Khodayari, M., Fashami, R. Z., &Shahriari, E. (2022). Sharing your assets: A holistic review of sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 140, 604–625.
Akighir, D. T., &Atswam, M. T. (2023). Remittances, exchange rate and exports in Nigeria: Investigating the foreign exchange channel for future optimization. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(3), 139–159.https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.09.25.08
Anand, J., McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., &Narula, R. (2021). Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research.Journal of International Business Studies,52, 545–559.
Bai, J., Cao, L., Mosbach, S., Akroyd, J., Lapkin, A. A., & Kraft, M. (2022). From platform to knowledge graph: Evolution of laboratory automation.JACS Au,2(2), 292–309.
Bannikova, K. (2022). To the question of migration of capital and labor force of Ukraine: Forecast of future trends. Futurity Economics&Law, 2(2), 32–41.https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2022.06.25.04
Cramton, C. D., Köhler, T., & Levitt, R. E. (2021). Using scripts to address cultural and institutional challenges of global project coordination. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 56–77.
Crovini, C., Santoro, G., &Ossola, G. (2021). Rethinking risk management in entrepreneurial SMEs: Towards the integration with the decision-making process.Management Decision,59(5), 1085–1113.
Dana, L. P., Salamzadeh, A., Mortazavi, S., &Hadizadeh, M. (2022). Investigating the impact of international markets and new digital technologies on business innovation in emerging markets.Sustainability,14(2), Article 983.
Downie, C. (2022). Transnational actors: Nongovernmental organizations, civil society and individuals. InRoutledge handbook of global environmental politics(pp. 187–199). Routledge.
Dragneva, R., & Hartwell, C. A. (2021). The Eurasian Economic Union: Integration without Liberalisation?.Post-Communist Economies,33(2–3), 200–221.
Falahat, M., Chong, S. C., &Liew, C. (2024). Navigating new product development: Uncovering factors and overcoming challenges for success.Heliyon,10(1) Article e23763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23763
Faude, B. (2020). Breaking gridlock: How path dependent layering enhances resilience in global trade governance. Global Policy, 11(4), 448–457.
Fiset, J., Bhave, D. P., &Jha, N. (2024). The effects of language-related misunderstanding at work. Journal of Management, 50(1), 347–379.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Ganske, P., & Carbon, C. C. (2023). Successful clusters through successful communication: Why clusters should be managed by Place Leaders. Frontiers in Communication, 8, Article 1194103.
Gérard, T., &Niyonzima Thomas, G. (2023). The Past and the Future Effects of Russian-Ukrainian Conflict on the Democratic Republic of Congo Economic Policy. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(3), 201–218.https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.09.25.12
Gerlach, P., & Eriksson, K. (2021). Measuring cultural dimensions: External validity and internal consistency of Hofstede's VSM 2013 Scales.Frontiers in Psychology,12, Article 662604.
Goldstein, J., &Gulotty, R. (2022). Trading away tariffs: The operations of the GATT system.World Trade Review,21(2), 135–158.
Haiden, L. (2023). Geopolitics by Metaphor: The Sweet Spot between Specificity and Ambiguity.Defence Strategic Communications,12(12), 101–134.
HamisiMwenda, T., &Magasi, C. (2023). Exploring constraints facing smallholder cashew nut farmers in Bagamoyo towards accessing the foreign markets. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(4), 18–31.https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.12.25.02
Head, J. (2021). The future of the global economic organizations: an evaluation of criticisms leveled at the IMF, the multilateral development banks, and the WTO. In The future of the Global Economic Organizations. Brill Nijhoff.
Heckroodt, S., & Al Hashmi, W. S. G. (2023).Cultural competence: The intrinsic strategic advantage. Taylor & Francis.
Horner, R. (2020). Towards a new paradigm of global development? Beyond the limits of international development.Progress in Human Geography,44(3), 415–436.
Hosli, M. O., &Selleslaghs, J. (2020). The changing global order. Springer International Publishing.
Iheanachor, N., &Umukoro, I. (2022). Partnerships in digital financial services: An exploratory study of providers in an emerging market.Journal of Business Research,152, 425–435.
Iskakova, M., Kaldygozova, S., Ussenova, A., Junissova, A., &Shomanbaeva, A. (2023). Towards holistic education: Synthesizing personality consciousness, emerging technologies, and philosophical considerations in education system evolution. Futurity Philosophy, 2(2), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2023.06.30.02
Islami, X., Mustafa, N., &TopuzovskaLatkovikj, M. (2020). Linking Porter’s generic strategies to firm performance.Future Business Journal,6, 1–15.
Jacks, D. S., &Novy, D. (2020). Trade blocs and trade wars during the interwar period.Asian Economic Policy Review,15(1), 119–136.
Kayode-Ajala, O. (2023). Establishing cyber resilience in developing countries: An exploratory investigation into institutional, legal, financial, and social challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Infrastructure for Cities and Societies, 8(9), 1–10.
Kolinets, L. (2023). International financial markets of the future: Technological innovations and their impact on the global financial system. Futurity of Social Sciences, 1(3), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2023.09.20.01
Krendl, A. C., &Pescosolido, B. A. (2020). Countries and cultural differences in the stigma of mental illness: The east–west divide. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(2), 149–167.
Kumar, R. (2020). The United Nations and global environmental governance.Strategic Analysis,44(5), 479–489.
Kuznyetsova, A., Garafonova, O., Yankovoi, R., Zhosan, H., &Lomachynska, I. (2023). Development of an international marketing strategy for domestic enterprises during a state of war.Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(4), 200–211.
Law, E. A., Bennett, N. J., Ives, C. D., Friedman, R., Davis, K. J., Archibald, C., & Wilson, K. A. (2018). Equity trade‐offs in conservation decision making. Conservation Biology, 32(2), 294–303.
Lawson, M. L., & Morgenstern, E. M. (2020). Foreign assistance: An introduction to US programs and policy.Congressional Research Service Report.
Lima, V. (2021). Collaborative governance for sustainable development. In Peace, justice and strong institutions (pp. 79–90). Cham: Springer.
Luo, Y. (2023). Paradigm shift and theoretical implications for the era of global disorder.Journal of international business studies, 1–9.
Mani, Z. A., &Goniewicz, K. (2023). Adapting disaster preparedness strategies to changing climate patterns in Saudi Arabia: A rapid review.Sustainability,15(19), Article 14279.
Massa, S., Annosi, M. C., Marchegiani, L., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2023). Digital technologies and knowledge processes: New emerging strategies in international business. A systematic literature reviews.Journal of Knowledge Management,27(11), 330–387.
Maus, S. (2020). Human Rights in UN Peace Operations Practice. In United Nations peace operations and human rights (pp. 204–311). Brill Nijhoff.
Ning, L., Abbasi, K. R., Hussain, K., Alvarado, R., &Ramzan, M. (2023). Analyzing the role of green innovation and public-private partnerships in achieving sustainable development goals: A novel policy framework. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-17.
Omelchyk, O., Ivanashko, O., Sipko, L., Virna, Z., Saienko, V., &Tolchieva, H. (2022). Economic behavior of consumers during instability. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Special Issue 12/02-XXVIII, 89–95.
Oriji, O., Shonibare, M. A., Daraojimba, R. E., Abitoye, O., &Daraojimba, C. (2023). Financial technology evolution in Africa: A comprehensive review of legal frameworks and implications for AI-driven financial services.International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research,5(12), 929–951.
Pattnaik, C., Singh, D., & Gaur, A. S. (2021). Home country learning and international expansion of emerging market multinationals.Journal of International Management,27(3), Article 100781.
Pergelova, A., Manolova, T., Simeonova‐Ganeva, R., &Yordanova, D. (2019). Democratizing entrepreneurship? Digital technologies and the internationalization of female‐led SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(1), 14–39.
Pies, I., &Valentinov, V. (2023). Trade-offs in stakeholder theory: An ordonomic perspective. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(5), 975–997. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2023-0321
Prylypko, V. (2023). Current issues and problems of legal training of specialists in non-legal specialties. Futurity Economics&Law, 3(1), 53–62.https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.06
Rasoulkhani, K., Brannen, L., Zhu, J., Mostafavi, A., Jaselskis, E., Stoa, R., ... Chowdhury, S. (2020). Establishing a future-proofing framework for infrastructure projects to proactively adapt to complex regulatory landscapes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(4), Article 04020032.
Rezaei, M., Jafari-Sadeghi, V., &Bresciani, S. (2020). What drives the process of knowledge management in a cross-cultural setting: The impact of social capital.European Business Review,32(3), 485–511.
Riabov, I., &Riabova, T. (2021). Development of the creative sector of the world economy: Trends for the future. Futurity Economics&Law, 1(4), 12–18.https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.12.25.02
Shah, S. S., &Asghar, Z. (2023). Dynamics of social influence on consumption choices: A social network representation. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e17146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17146
Shah, S. S., & Shah, S. A. H. (2024). Trust as a determinant of Social Welfare in the Digital Economy. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 14(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-024-01238-5
Shakharova, A., Beisenova, L., & Amerkhanova, A. (2022). Economic education of the future for the XXI century: Challenges, problems, prospects. Futurity Education, 2(1), 19–28.https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.21
Shukla, S., Bisht, K., Tiwari, K., & Bashir, S. (2023). Comparative study of the global data economy. InData economy in the digital age(pp. 63–86). Singapore: Springer.
Shurma, A., &Grynchuk, F. (2024). Possibilities of local effect the healing of small bowel sutures in a rat model of acute intra-abdominal infection. Futurity Medicine, 3(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEM.2024.03.30.02
Singh, M. (2022). Standard-setting organization’s IPR policies: Intellectual property and competition issues.Singapore: Springer Nature.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2623-5
Smyth, S. J., Webb, S. R., & Phillips, P. W. (2021). The role of public-private partnerships in improving global food security.Global Food Security,31, Article 100588.
Van de Graaf, T. (2023). The geopolitics of energy after Russia's war in Ukraine. In Forging Europe’s leadership: Global trends, Russian aggression and the risk of a regressive world Ukraine World (pp. 25–40). Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
Villarreal, M. A., & Fergusson, I. F. (2019). NAFTA renegotiation and the proposed United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Congressional Research Service, 26, 1–49.
Volodymyrovych, T. Y., Ivanovich, S. V., Tetiana, K.,&Yaroslavovych, T. B. (2021).Pharmacoeconomics analysis of COVID-19 vaccines in Ukraine.Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 33(32A), 140–147. https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/120228/papers/A_16.pdf
Volodymyrovych, T. Y., Tetiana, K.,&Yaroslavovych, T. B. (2021). Social management in pharmaceutical healthcare sector.Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 33(39B), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i39B32196
Whitham, C., &Whitham, C. (2020). Winning the peace, 1946–1948. In Corporate conservatives go to war: How the National Association of Manufacturers planned to restore American free enterprise, 1939–1948(pp. 271–299).Cham: PalgraveMacmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43908-8_8
Yuan, R., Luo, J., Liu, M. J., &Yu, J. (2022). Understanding organizational resilience in a platform-based sharing business: The role of absorptive capacity.Journal of Business Research, 141, 85–99.
Zhang, P., &Engelke, P. (2021). LAC 2025: Three post-COVID scenarios. Atlantic Council.
