Factors Determining Switch from Traditional to Contemporary Investment Avenues: An Empirical Study
Dr. Ashutosh Gupta,
Associate Professor,
Department of Commerce and Business Management,
DAV University, Jalandhar
Email: gupta.ashutosh@yahoo.co.
Dr. Gitika Nagrath,
Associate Professor,
Department of Commerce and Business Management,
DAV University, Jalandhar
Email: gitika.nagrath@yahoo.co.in
Abstract
In the present study, factors contributing switch from traditional to contemporary avenues have been identified. The viewpoint of the investors who have invested both in contemporary and traditional investment avenues has been taken on the reasons for shifting from traditional to contemporary avenues. The study is based upon primary data consisting of thirty three variables which are focused on exploring the responsible factors which have insisted this change. The universe of the study is the Indian Punjab. As a measuring instrument, structured questionnaire on a likert scale has been drafted. In this regard, the data from four hundred forty nine respondents have been collected and principal component analysis has been carried out. Hence, on the basis of 14187 observations the study has explored ten factors which have motivated the investors to shift from traditional to contemporary investment avenues. The study revealed that monetary benefits, services and network, risk factor and maturity, regulation and control, risk taking ability of investors, past experience, cost of purchasing investments, availability of information, sources of information and management of the avenues to be the crucial factors for such paradigm shift. Out of these factors, monetary benefits are the most significant factor as maximum amount of variance (17.851 per cent) is explained by it. Thereafter, services and network, risk factor and maturity are the subsequent factors. The study concluded that there is a paradigm shift in the choice of the alternatives available in the investment avenues. This particular shift is the result of the satisfactory outcome of the contemporary avenues as expected by the investors. However, there are lot of parameters which need to be looked upon and hence, the study on the basis of such inferences suggested various measures so that improvement in the contemporary investment avenues can be done. These suggestions can be considered as guide for the regulatory bodies, government, sponsors, management and various stakeholders so that investments in contemporary avenues can be boosted. These measures will ensure the convenience, transparency and reliability of the investors as in the times to come the contemporary investments can be a big lift to the Indian investment sector.
Keywords: Contemporary Investments, Traditional Investments, Investors, Factor Analysis, Financial Benefits, Paradigm shift, Punjab
Introduction
People invest the money in order to secure themselves against the future needs and they have several options available that vary in term of risk, return, repayment, liquidity, timing and gender etc. (Dulebohn and Murray, 2007 Bajtelsmit & Bernasek, 1996; Herrmann, 2007; Khare, 2007; Asness, Tobias and Lasse, 2013; Wang and Vargne, 2017; Liu and Tsyvinski, 2018; Hesneati and Lasmiyanto, 2020). These options are available in the form of bank deposits, shares, commodity market, crypto currency, exchange traded funds, retirement investment, real estate investment, gold investment, business investment etc. (Vidhyashankar, 1990; Panear and Aggarwal, 2018). These options can be categorized as traditional and contemporary investment avenues. The investment in these both kinds of avenues is individual specific and directed towards specific set of objectives (Dulebohn and Murray, 2007).
The availability of contemporary investment avenues have shown its remarkable presence and investors have conveyed big yes to these avenues. In the recent past, there has been paradigm shift in the investment priorities from traditional investment avenues with special reference to the bank deposits, gold and real estate etc. (Vidhyashankar, 1990, Business standards 2017 Swami and Jain, 2019; Jha, 2020). So, the current study is an endeavor to determine the factors explaining the shift in the investment patterns over the recent period of time.
The development of this study is motivated by new tendencies with respect to the investment avenues. These new tendencies are the outcome of different investment priorities being considered by the investors. In the current study these variables are explored through a questionnaire and various factors have been identified. These factors not only explain the causes of investments in the contemporary avenues but also shows the causes of limiting the investments into the traditional avenues of investments.
Literature and Background
Several studies have been conducted on the behavioral aspects of investments. In the year 2002, Michael Schwarz described about the decision problem related to the investments. Thereafter, the studies have elaborated investors portfolio choices, asset prices and the reasons for making such investment (Sharpe, 2008; Jariwala,, 2015). Apart from it, in some of the studies the decisions regarding investment patterns have been correlated with the different demographic variables (Herrmann 2007; Khan, 2010; Bhaskaran, Murthi and Arivazhagan, 2012; Bhavani & Shetty 2017) Regarding gender, the studies have shown that females are more interested in performing the tasks related to managing the household but as per the egalitarian approach this has changed over a period of time (Croson and Gneezy 2009; Boehnke 2011). Further, literature also advocated the influence of information available on the investment decisions (Samsani and Wagner, 2021). Regarding contemporary investment avenues, studies have also shown the importance of stock market, crypto currency and mutual funds as investment avenues (Baig & Joubi, 2017; Abadi and Brunnermeier 2018; Lad, 2018; Liu &Tsyvinski, 2018; Singh, 2018).
The above literature has made it evident that behavioral aspects of investments have become more familiar with the researchers, investors and academicians but there is dearth of literature available which has explored the factors explaining the shift of investor’s choice from the traditional to contemporary investment avenues.
Objectives of the Study:
Methodology:
The study is focused upon the shift of traditional investment avenues to the contemporary investment avenues. In this regard, the traditional investment avenues are considered as bank, real estate, gold, insurance and the contemporary investment avenues are regarded as crypto currency, mutual funds, shares and commodity market instruments. The categorization has been done of the basis of available literature. The study has been undertaken on the basis of the shift in the investment pattern i.e. from traditional to contemporary. In this regard, the investors who have invested the money both in the contemporary and traditional investment avenues have been considered.
Data and Sample:
The universe of the study is the Indian Punjab. The districts with the highest total and urban population have been considered for the study. The sample has been taken on the basis of proportional representation of the urban population. The reason behind selecting the urban population is the availability of the infrastructure and resources for investing into the contemporary investment avenues.
Table1: Sampling of Data
Districts |
Total Population |
Urban Population |
Portion of urban population |
Sample size |
Jalandhar |
2193590 |
1161171 |
25.43 |
112 |
Amritsar |
2490656 |
1334611 |
29.23 |
134 |
Ludhiana |
3498739 |
2069708 |
45.33 |
201 |
Source: Statistical Abstract f Punjab2020
As per table1, the data has been collected from three districts having highest population covering Doaba, Majha and Malwa region of Punjab. Specifically, the investors who have been investing the money for the last 10 years both in the traditional and contemporary avenues are taken for the study. The reason behind is to notice the paradigm shift in the investment behavior of the investors. Referral sampling method has been used because the investors who have shifted from traditional to contemporary avenues have only been considered for the study. These references have been taken through depositary participants, mutual fund agents, commodity market participants and the entities who deal in the contemporary investment alternatives.
Measuring Instrument and Tools for Analysis:
Structured questionnaire is prepared for conducting the study which consisted of close-ended statements. Statements have been derived on the basis of available literature considering the fact that statements are able to measure the reasons for the paradigm shift from traditional to contemporary avenues. In total 33 statements have been considered for exploring the factors explaining the reasons of shift. These variables have been asked on the five point likert scale where 1 represents strongly disagree and 5 represents strongly agree. Most of the statements have been asked positively. But in order authenticate the responses some of the statements have been asked in the opposite direction. However, the coding has been reversed for these statements to carry the research. Thereafter, principal component analysis has been applied with varimax rotation.
Result and Discussion:
First of all factor analysis technique has been used to analyze the data. The suitability of the data for factor analysis has been tested for 33 statements. In this regard, the communalities for all the statements were found to be fit to run the factor analysis as the value is found to be more than 0.5, presented in the table 2. Further, the value of KMO (0.628) also advocates the appropriateness of the model.
Table 2: Rotated factor score coefficient matrix and communalities
Statements ↓ |
|
|
|||||||||
Factor 1 |
Factor 2 |
Factor 3 |
Factor 4 |
Factor 5 |
Factor 6 |
Factor 7 |
Factor 8 |
Factor 9 |
Factor 10 |
Communalities |
|
S1 |
.089 |
.178 |
.017 |
.112 |
.782 |
.038 |
-.015 |
.263 |
.139 |
.096 |
.763 |
S2 |
-.116 |
.032 |
-.260 |
.595 |
.013 |
-.274 |
-.077 |
.107 |
-.092 |
.278 |
.615 |
S3 |
-.072 |
-.004 |
-.156 |
-.484 |
.489 |
-.159 |
.480 |
.142 |
-.126 |
.175 |
.825 |
S4 |
.148 |
.593 |
.312 |
-.166 |
.169 |
.323 |
.321 |
-.047 |
-.129 |
-.213 |
.799 |
S5 |
.054 |
-.054 |
-.034 |
-.040 |
.839 |
-.052 |
.055 |
-.016 |
-.331 |
-.011 |
.828 |
S6 |
.864 |
-.038 |
.007 |
-.057 |
.064 |
-.156 |
.220 |
.224 |
-.056 |
-.054 |
.885 |
S7 |
.206 |
.467 |
.311 |
-.081 |
.135 |
-.074 |
.416 |
.461 |
-.039 |
.101 |
.785 |
S8 |
-.897 |
-.185 |
-.017 |
.001 |
.030 |
.043 |
.040 |
-.111 |
-.087 |
.021 |
.863 |
S9 |
-.133 |
-.225 |
.097 |
-.086 |
-.308 |
-.306 |
-.091 |
-.374 |
-.013 |
.480 |
.652 |
S10 |
.038 |
.672 |
.073 |
.363 |
.245 |
.254 |
-.072 |
.103 |
-.009 |
-.156 |
.755 |
S11 |
-.502 |
.102 |
-.095 |
-.539 |
-.087 |
.059 |
-.226 |
.075 |
-.355 |
-.246 |
.817 |
S12 |
-.105 |
-.100 |
-.047 |
.864 |
-.064 |
.107 |
-.182 |
-.114 |
.028 |
-.198 |
.871 |
S13 |
.487 |
.048 |
.154 |
.429 |
.094 |
-.088 |
-.007 |
-.511 |
-.251 |
.094 |
.798 |
S14 |
.255 |
-.538 |
-.291 |
-.020 |
.100 |
-.211 |
-.008 |
.174 |
.481 |
.219 |
.803 |
S15 |
-.027 |
-.003 |
.021 |
.019 |
.011 |
.832 |
.065 |
-.124 |
-.005 |
-.089 |
.721 |
S16 |
.496 |
.209 |
-.214 |
-.086 |
-.014 |
-.021 |
.565 |
.319 |
.091 |
.111 |
.784 |
S17 |
.096 |
.240 |
.205 |
-.053 |
.407 |
-.173 |
.581 |
.028 |
-.149 |
.192 |
.705 |
S18 |
-.163 |
.136 |
.848 |
.128 |
-.151 |
-.040 |
.047 |
.184 |
.105 |
.117 |
.866 |
S19 |
.200 |
-.284 |
.282 |
.352 |
-.359 |
.294 |
-.261 |
-.118 |
.375 |
.183 |
.796 |
S20 |
-.103 |
.067 |
.151 |
.015 |
.069 |
-.269 |
-.725 |
.012 |
.149 |
.184 |
.696 |
S21 |
-.011 |
.035 |
-.019 |
.043 |
-.149 |
-.157 |
.001 |
-.072 |
.117 |
-.730 |
.603 |
S22 |
.108 |
.236 |
.664 |
-.185 |
.046 |
-.008 |
-.199 |
.477 |
-.214 |
.017 |
.858 |
S23 |
.026 |
.125 |
.054 |
-.030 |
-.154 |
.081 |
-.183 |
.047 |
.810 |
-.190 |
.779 |
S24 |
.286 |
-.390 |
-.185 |
-.250 |
-.381 |
.254 |
.111 |
.320 |
-.133 |
-.081 |
.679 |
S25 |
-.241 |
.076 |
.233 |
.236 |
.021 |
.416 |
.081 |
-.133 |
-.349 |
.244 |
.552 |
S26 |
.066 |
-.104 |
-.030 |
.065 |
.171 |
-.783 |
-.021 |
-.198 |
-.092 |
-.302 |
.802 |
S27 |
-.553 |
.245 |
.315 |
-.042 |
-.199 |
-.340 |
-.054 |
.151 |
-.159 |
.143 |
.693 |
S28 |
.063 |
-.092 |
.673 |
-.022 |
.060 |
.066 |
.004 |
-.113 |
.002 |
-.023 |
.487 |
S29 |
.228 |
.333 |
.073 |
.597 |
.217 |
-.010 |
.344 |
.028 |
-.155 |
-.173 |
.744 |
S30 |
-.050 |
-.517 |
.234 |
.031 |
-.347 |
.077 |
.472 |
.007 |
.453 |
-.011 |
.880 |
S31 |
.054 |
.837 |
-.169 |
-.096 |
-.065 |
-.155 |
.076 |
.027 |
.168 |
.077 |
.810 |
S32 |
-.321 |
-.200 |
.551 |
-.206 |
.014 |
.482 |
-.184 |
.094 |
.119 |
-.080 |
.785 |
S33 |
-.262 |
.062 |
-.175 |
-.014 |
-.254 |
.068 |
-.100 |
-.833 |
-.084 |
-.060 |
.887 |
Eigen Values |
5.09 |
3.79 |
3.23 |
3.13 |
2.38 |
2.03 |
1.72 |
1.45 |
1.27 |
1.10 |
|
%age of variance |
15.44 |
11.49 |
9.78 |
9.49 |
7.20 |
6.14 |
5.22 |
4.38 |
3.84 |
3.34 |
|
Cumulative %age of variance |
15.44 |
26.93 |
36.70 |
46.20 |
53.40 |
59.54 |
64.76 |
69.15 |
72.99 |
76.32 |
|
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure |
.628 |
|
Source: Author’s Work
Hence as per table 2, the output of factor analysis extracted significant ten factors explaining 76.32 percent of the variance. Thereafter, on the basis of factor loadings the allocation of the variables to the respective factors has been done. The highest loadings are considered as the best fit for the concerned factor of each statement.
Table 3: Naming of factors
Factors |
Factor Interpretation (% of variance) |
Variables |
Statement Number |
Loading |
Factor 1 |
Monetary benefits (15.437) |
Returns from contemporary investment avenues are more than expected |
S6 |
.864 |
Contemporary investment avenues provide better tax benefits |
S8 |
-.897 |
||
Contemporary investment avenues have shown growth over a period of time |
S27 |
-.553 |
||
Factor 2 |
Services and Network (11.488) |
There is total transparency in contemporary investment avenues operations |
S4 |
.593 |
Better services of sponsors, brokers are available for investing in contemporary investment avenues. |
S7 |
.467 |
||
Contemporary investment avenues provide innovative schemes with different objectives |
S10 |
.672 |
||
Contemporary investment avenues have wider network |
S14 |
-.538 |
||
The price of the contemporary investment avenues have same price at all vendors |
S24 |
-.390 |
||
The chances of fraud are more in contemporary investment avenues |
S30 |
-.517 |
||
Contemporary investments are more receptive to technological advancements |
S31 |
.837 |
||
Factor 3 |
Risk factor and Maturity (9.780) |
The liquidity in the contemporary investment avenues is low |
S18 |
.848 |
The investment in contemporary investment avenues are carried out by renowned vendors |
S22 |
.664 |
||
The market has become less volatile over the years with respect to contemporary investment avenues |
S28 |
.673 |
||
The formalities at the time of withdrawal are less in comparison to the traditional investment avenues |
S32 |
.551 |
||
Factor 4 |
Regulation and control (9.494) |
The frequency and authenticity of getting the record statement are better in contemporary investment avenues |
S2 |
.595 |
Regulatory bodies like SEBI and others are able to control contemporary investment avenues |
S11 |
-.539 |
||
Contemporary investment avenues are effective and are healthy for Indian environment |
S12 |
.864 |
||
Most of the vendors of contemporary investment avenues are registered with our state securities regulator |
S29 |
.597 |
||
Factor 5 |
Risk Taking ability of Investors (7.202) |
Contemporary investment avenues are useful for small investors |
S1 |
.782 |
Contemporary investment avenues are more useful for the investors giving more weightage to higher gains instead of assure returns of investments |
S3 |
.489 |
||
The traditional investment agents have started to influence the investors to invest in the contemporary investment avenues mentioning less risk |
S5 |
.839 |
||
Factor 6 |
Past experience (6.140) |
Contemporary investment avenues are able to create better liquidity in past for you |
S15 |
.832 |
The return in the past from contemporary investment has given better output than the traditional avenues |
S25 |
.416 |
||
The growth in the past from contemporary investment has given better results than the traditional avenues |
S26 |
-.783 |
||
Factor 7 |
Cost of purchasing the investments (5.222) |
Maintaining of funds/assets does not subject to any additional cost |
S16 |
.565 |
Total fees to purchase these investments is low |
S17 |
.581 |
||
Total fees to sell this investment is low |
S20 |
-.725 |
||
Factor 8 |
Availability of information (4.383) |
Information on contemporary investment avenues is easily available. |
S13 |
-.511 |
Investment in contemporary investment avenues gives more options for diversified portfolio |
S33 |
-.833 |
||
Factor 9 |
Sources of information (3.840) |
Shifting to contemporary avenues is more suggested through personal linkages |
S19 |
.375 |
The media is also highlighting the growth of contemporary avenues more than the traditional avenues |
S23 |
.810 |
||
Factor10 |
Management of the Avenues. (3.335) |
Management of contemporary investment avenues is more efficient than traditional avenues |
S9 |
.480 |
The availability of rankings have been instrumental in deciding the source of investment |
S21 |
-.730 |
As per table 3, the naming of the various factors considering the nature and essence of statements has been done. In this regard, the literature has also been given due weightage and hence the factor model structure identified ten factors as monetary benefits, services and network, risk factor and maturity, regulation and control, risk taking ability of the investors, past experience, cost of purchasing the investments, availability of information, source of information and management of the avenues. The extracted factors explain about 76.29 percent of the total variation. The first five factors explain about 54 percent of the total variation. Out of these factors, monetary benefits are the most significant factor for the determination of quality of management education as maximum amount of variance (17.851 per cent) is explained by it. Thereafter, services network, risk factor and maturity are the subsequent factors explaining 11.48 and 9.78 percent of the variation respectively. The dimension for this shift has arisen in the form of regulation and control contributing 9.4 percent of the variation.
In the light of the above discussion it has become evident that there is a paradigm shift in the choice of the alternatives available in the investment avenues. This particular shift is the result of the satisfactory outcome of the contemporary avenues as expected by the investors. However, there are lot of parameters which need to be looked upon and hence, the study on the basis of such inferences has drawn the intentions of the various stakeholders so that the improvement in the contemporary investment avenues can be done.
Suggestions:
Limitations and scope for future research
The limitations of the study include absence of proper domain knowledge about the contemporary avenues among the respondents of the study. Due to which, the exact viewpoint of some of the respondents could hardly be retrieved. Further, in the region of Punjab the contemporary avenues are not very popular and very less agencies are in existence to provide appropriate knowledge about it. So, approaching the investors became an operational challenge. Thirdly, some of the avenues taken for the study have gained momentum within few past years. So, it was difficult to take the sample by the method of randomization. Regarding the scope for future, such studies can be carried in the other parts of the country where the people are investing in the contemporary avenues. In addition, the relation between the investors who shifted from the traditional investment avenues with the demographics can be observed. Apart from it, the comparison at the regional or international front regarding the paradigm shift towards the contemporary investment avenues can be observed.
Conclusion
The present study has been carried with the essence of exploring the factors which have lead to shift from traditional to contemporary investment avenues. In this regard, primary data through questionnaire has been collected revealing that the people have positively responded to shift from the traditional to the contemporary investment alternatives. The principal component analysis approach has been applied to explore the factors. In total, 33 statements have been asked from the investors who have invested both in traditional and contemporary investment avenues. As per the results, the reason for such paradigm shift considered by the investors are monetary benefits, services and network, risk factor and maturity, regulation and control, risk taking ability of the investors, past experience, cost of purchasing the investments, availability of information, source of information and management of the avenues. Out of these all, the monetary benefit is the most crucial factor for such shift. Apart from it, the study has recommended various suggestions for the regulatory bodies, government, sponsors, management and various stakeholders for the upliftment of investments in contemporary avenues. These measures will ensure the convenience, transparency and reliability of the investors as in the times to come the contemporary investments can be a big lift to the Indian investment sector.
References
Abadi, J., & Brunnermeier, M. (2018). Blockchain economics. Tech. report, the NYU Intermediation Conference, Princeton. https://scholar.princeton.edu/ sites/default/files /markus/files/blockchain_paper_v3g.pdf.
Asness, C.S., Tobias, J.M., & Lasse, H.P. (2013). Value and momentum everywhere. The Journal of Finance, 68 (3), 929–985.
Baig, A., & Joubi, J.R. (2017). A study of preferred avenues of investment of investors and their exposure to equity market. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8 (4), 172-180.
Bajtelsmit, V. L., & Bernasek, A. (1996). Why Do Women Invest Differently Than Men? Financial Counseling and Planning, 7, 1-10. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers .cfm?abstract_id=2238.
Bhaskaran, N., Murthi, S.S., & Arivazhagan, M. (2012). Investors behavior in various investment avenues- a study. International Journal of Technology Marketing 2(7), 164-189.
Bhavani, G., & Shetty, K. (2017). Impact of demographics and perceptions of investors on investment avenues. Accounting and Finance Research, 2, 198- 205.
Boehnke, M. (2011). Gender Role Attitudes around the Globe: Egalitarian vs. Traditional Views. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(1), 57–74. www.jstor.org/stable /43500538.
Business Standard (2017, July 15). How investors are moving from traditional to new investment avenues. https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/how-investors-are-moving-from-traditional-investments-to-new-alternatives-117071500209_1.html.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. www.jstor.org/stable/27739928.
Dulebohn, J. H., & Murray, B. (2007). Retirement Savings Behavior Of Higher Education Employees. Research in Higher Education, 48(5), 545–582. www.jstor.org/stable/ 25704517.
Herrmann, A. F. (2007). People get emotional about their money: performing masculinity in a financial discussion board. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 499–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00335.x
Hesniati, H., & Lasmiyanto. (2020). Analysis of factors influencing investment decision. Journal of Global Business and Management Review. DOI: 10.37253/jgbmr.v2i1.805
Jha, A.K. (2020). Comparative study of mutual fund and traditional investment. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 6(5), 105-116. http://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/Comparative_Study_of_Mutual_Fund_and_Traditional_investment_ijariie12639.pdf
Khan , M.C. (2010). Investment avenues of salaried class people. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 9(9), 781 -793.
Khare, S.K. (2007). Mutual funds: a refuge for small investors, Southern Economist, 15(2) , 21-24.
Lad , S.H. (2018). A Study of Investment Pattern and Awareness of Rural Investors. Sankalan, 3(1), 59-65.
Liu, Y., &Tsyvinski, A. (2018). Risks and returns of cryptocurrency Working Paper 24877 http://Www.Nber.Org/Papers/W24877 National Bureau Of Economic Research 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge.
Khan, M.Y., & Jain, P.K. (2018). Financial Management (8th edition). Tata McGraw-Hill: New Delhi.
Panear, M.S., & Aggarwal, K. (2018). A study on investment options available in modern era. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovation Technology. 4(2), 34-37.
Samsami,M., & Wagner, R. (2021) Investment Decisions with Endogeneity: A Dirichlet Tree Analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(7). 1-19. https://doi.org/10. 3390/jrfm14070299
Schwarz, M. A. (2002). Investment Tournaments: Should a Rational Agent Put All His Eggs in One Basket? Harvard Institute of Economic Research. . Discussion Paper No. 1980. https://ssrn.com/abstract=343801
Sharpe, W.F. (2008). Investors and Markets: portfolio choices, asset prices, and investment advice, Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/ 978069 1138503/investors-and-markets
Singh, T. (2018). An Empirical Investigation Into Investor Awareness of Modern Investment Avenues- A Case Study of Kharar, Punjab. Pramana Research Journal 8(9) 223-234.
Statistical Abstract of Punjab (2020). Area and Population, District wise Rural and Urban Population. 17-19. https://punjabassembly.nic.in/images/docs/Statistical%20Abstract .pdf
Swami, R., & Jain, T.K. (2019) Managing Investment Risks: Modern V/s Traditional Knowledge and Practices. https://www .researchgate. net/publication/330521805_
Vidhyashankar, S. (1990). Mutual funds: emerging trends in India. Chartered Secretary, 20(8) ,639-640.
Wang, S., & Vergne, J.P. (2017) Correction: Buzz Factor or Innovation Potential: What Explains Cryptocurrencies' Returns?. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/jo rnal.pone.0177659