Pacific B usiness R eview (International)

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management Indexed With Web of Science(ESCI)
ISSN: 0974-438X
Impact factor (SJIF):8.603
RNI No.:RAJENG/2016/70346
Postal Reg. No.: RJ/UD/29-136/2017-2019
Editorial Board

Prof. B. P. Sharma
(Principal Editor in Chief)

Prof. Dipin Mathur
(Consultative Editor)

Dr. Khushbu Agarwal
(Editor in Chief)

Editorial Team

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management

An Empirical Study on Consumer Attitude towards Web Advertising

Pravin Chandra Singh,

Assistant Professor,

Alabbar School of Management,

Raffles University

pravinchandrasingh@fmsbhu.ac.in

Corresponding Author

 

 

Avinash Kumar Singh,

Manipal University Jaipur

avinashsingh1982@gmail.com

 

Vinod Pandey

Lecturer,

Institute of Hotel Management, Lucknow

vinodpandey1311@gmail.com

 

Abhishek Kumar Pandey

Research Scholar,

Department of Business Administration

Lucknow University

Abhishekmba0811@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abstract:

This paper explores and investigates the belief factors and their influence on attitude towards web advertising among Indian consumers. A quantitative, non-experimental, and descriptive – analytic survey design was used and data were collected from national capital territory of Delhi. A total of 325 questionnaires were provided useable data which were analyzed through SPSS. The study indicates that ‘Good for economy’ belief factor is the strongest predictor of consumer attitude towards web advertising while ‘Materialism’ is the weakest predictor. Out of the eight belief factors only five belief factors (product information, falsity/no sense, hedonic/pleasure, good for economy and materialism) have significant relationship with consumer attitude towards web advertising while rest of the three belief factors (social role / image, irritation, and value corruption) do not show any relationship. This study primarily focuses on the banner form of web advertisement and based on the work of (wolin et al., 2002) with one more dimension thus, this study will enrich the body of knowledge on web advertising by investigating one more dimension.

Keywords: Consumer Attitude, Web Advertising, Belief Factors.

Introduction:

Advertising space has changed over the years, and it has happened due to the change in technology which leads to the growth and development of the internet, in 2020 the number of internet users in India were 749 million, and at the end of 2040, the number of internet users in India will be 1.5 billion. India was the second-largest online market globally after China who still stands number one in the year 2019 (Statista, 2021). Internet has changed the way of getting required information (Syrett & Lammiman, 2004; Cheung, 2006; Wang & Chen 2009) and has created a whole new channel of advertising known as web advertising. Web advertising has become a significant medium for advertisers to advertise their products and services since 1994 when first banner ad for AT & T appear on hotwired (Brackett & Carr, 2001; Choi & Rifon, 2002) and both academicians and practitioners treated it as a revolution after the television. The objective of any advertisements is to persuade the targeted consumers in a more effective and efficient manner and make them to buy the advertised brand. Previous studies done on advertising suggests that through the hierarchy of effect the consumer attitude towards advertisements (AD) effects attitude towards brands (AB) and purchase intention (PI) AD             AB       PI (MacKenzie & Lutz, 1989; Mitchell & Olson, 1981; Shimp, 1981). Thus, consumer attitude became a vital factor that can predict the effectiveness of web advertising (Brackett & Carr, 2001; Bruner & Kumar, 2000; Ducoffe, 1996; Moore, Stammerjohan, & Coulter, 2005; Singh & Dalal, 1999; Wang, Zhang, Choi, & Daeredita, 2002; Saadeghvaziri and Hosseini, 2011). Companies are looking forward to advertise their brand, services on the web medium because of the following features like control advertising exposure, global reach, audience selectivity (Aziz and Ariffin, 2010). There are different forms of web advertising available like banner, pop-up and email messaging, official websites (Rodgers and Thorson, 2000; lAB, 2001) out of which banner form is the oldest having standard size graphic images with advertising messages (Hoffman and Novak, 1996; lAB, 2001), standardized (Moller and Eisend, 2010) and effective one (Silk et al., 2001) but its effectiveness is contradictory as it is seen that sometimes consumers like it (Sharif, 2017) and sometimes don’t (Tanyel, Stuart, and Griffin, 2013; Tomse, Dumicic, and Snoj, 2015) and vary according to different culture and economies (Hofstede’s, 2018). This study is based on the work of (wolin et al., 2002) along with one additional dimension i.e., irritation hence this study will also extend the previous work on web advertising by investigating the role of irritation towards attitude towards web advertising. Most of the previous studies done in the past with respect to consumer attitude towards advertising mostly done in the developed economies (Mittal, 1994; Dan Petrovici and Marine Marinov, 2007) and there is a shortage of work on advertising attitudes in developing economies having different culture (Hiram, et al. 2015; Oumil and Balloun, 2019), so the findings cannot be applied or generalized in developing economies like India and government has also put some restrictions  on the content of the advertising messages which influences consumer’s attitude formation towards advertising (Mittal, 1993. Thus, in this study, research also tried to find out the answer to the following research questions (Q -1) what are the factors that influence web users' attitudes towards banner form of web advertising and which factors have the most significant contribution in doing so? (Q - 2) How strategically designers and advertisers better utilize their expertise and resources in creating advertisements by the factors identified in this study? Thus, investigating consumers' attitudes towards web advertising in term of banner form will extend the previous work on web advertising to a different cultural context and different stages of economic development.

Literature review:

Consumer attitude towards web advertising: Attitude of a person is a psychological inclination and willingness towards responding in a particular manner and it has happened because of their traits (Pickens, 2005). It is the inner feeling of the person indicative of their behaviour whether they behave in favourable or unfavourable manner towards an object. Consumer attitude towards advertising is the favourable or unfavourable evaluation of advertisements and it has got substantial significance in the literature because it shows the effectiveness of advertising (Lutz, 1985, p. 16; MacKenzie & Lutz, 1989; Mittal, 1993; 1994; Bamoriya and Singh, 2011; Saadeghvaziri and Hosseini, 2011; De Pauw et al., 2018; Oumlil & Balloun, 2019; Wiese & Akareem, 2020). Consumer attitude towards web advertising depends upon the perception developed through the following belief factors product information, social role / Image, Hedonic/Pleasure, falsity / No sense, good for economy, value corruption, materialism, and irritation and how the consumer choose to react it (Rau et al., 2013; Wang, Sun, Lei & Toncar, 2009; Sheehan’s, 2014; Aziz and Ariffin, 2010; Dao et al., 2014; Wolin et al., 2002; Pollay and Mittal, 1993; Ducoffe, 1996). Consumer attitude towards advertising have direct effect of brand attitude, advertising exposure, purchase intention and behaviour (Shavitt, Lowrey & Haefner, 1998; Ha, John, Janda, & Muthaly, 2011; Suh and Yi, 2006; Mehta and Sivadas, 1995; Jalees, 2014; Leung et al., 2015; Zaman et al., 2018; Chen & Chen, 2020). Depending upon these definitions, web advertising is defined as consumers' evaluation of web advertising either as positive or negative. Thus, if a person holds a positive attitude towards any advertised brands, the likelihood of buying this brand will be high.

 

Product information: There are many belief factors, but product information is the most significant one because it plays a vital role in informing the targeted audiences about the product features and thus helps in making better decisions and information is positively associated with attitude towards web advertising (Wang and Sun, 2010; Speece, 2017).  The information providing utility of an ad supports and survives the advertising industry (Dutta-Bergman, 2006; Sheehan’s, 2014). A significant role of advertising is to create awareness about how the competing products are different (Soberman, 2004; Ling et al., 2010; Huang and Benyoucef, 2013) and this role of advertising helps the consumers to choose the exact match of products they are looking for satisfying their own needs and wants moreover it creates more efficient market place (Pollay and Mittal, 1993). As more consumers have more knowledge about the product features, it helps in selecting products and brands, and that is why marketers should try to enhance the knowledge base of consumers (Coulter and Price, 2005; Hayes & King, 2014). It is evident from the literature that providing the information is the vital and personal use of advertising, and it does influence positively the general consumer attitude towards advertising (Petrovici and Marinov, 2007; Kotler and Keller, 2016; Thangam, 2018).

 

Social role and image: Social role and image in advertisements show that ads influence an individual's lifestyle and how he seeks to present himself more appropriately in society. Advertisements not only used to sell services and products but it also sells image and different lifestyle and advertisement broadcasted on the web influences users' lifestyles, by showing the position of an ideal consumer and stimulates social action towards the purchase (Pollay and Mittal, 1993; Ball and Tasaki, 1992; Burns, 2003; Wang, Sun, Lei & Toncar, 2009).

 

Hedonic/pleasure: Advertisements can be exciting, enjoyable and entertaining through the hedonic/pleasure belief factor (Pollay and Mittal,1993). If the people feel excitement and enjoyment in ads, it plays a vital role in consumers' general attitude formation towards advertising (Saadeghvaziri and Seyedjavadain, 2011; Vieira, 2013; Sheehan’s, 2014). Creativity in web advertising gave an extra edge and add extra value to the company’s products and services (Aziz and Ariffin, 2010). Web advertising can be produced by using several methods like use of videos, sound clips, text, and combination thereof (Tavor, 2011). The advertisers believe that if there is a proper flow of entertainment in the advertising, it will cut the clutter and easily persuade the consumers to buy the products (Wells et al., 2000; Weerapat et al., 2017; Shareef et al., 2019).

 

Falsity/no sense: Advertisements can be misleading, deceitful, and confusing and reflected through the falsity /no sense belief factor (Pollay and Mittal, 1993). Online advertisements are believed to be deceptive and not appropriately inform the targeted consumers, dodging consumers' rational decision-making process (Aziz and Ariffin, 2010). Web advertising makes the false promise that they are selling the products having magical powers, and there the web advertisements are fuelling falsity (Wolin et al., 2002).

Good for economy: Good for economy belief factor indicates that advertisements enhance the standards of living, helps in employment generation, encourage healthy competition between the competitors, and decrease the average cost of production (Pollay and Mittal, 1993; Klein and Nason 2001; Jin and Lutz 2013; Dao et al., 2014). Web advertising helps the consumers to purchase any products without any hassle; thus, it helps in saving time for consumers, it also helps in accepting the new services and products (Pollay and Mittal, 1993; Wolin et al., 2002; Sheehan’s, 2014).

 

Value corruption:  According to value corruption belief factor web advertising has the power to destroy the societal values prevailing in the society (Wolin et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2008) although ad blocks are available to screen out the unwanted advertisements on the web but web advertisements are very effective and they make their way to the targeted consumers (Bridis, 1998) and that is why concern for influence of web advertisements on children has increased significantly because children easily get influenced (Hudson et al., 2008). There is a higher perception that web advertising leads to value corruption; that is why web advertising has a lower clicking rate (Aziz and Ariffin, 2010).

 

Materialism: Materialism belief factor of advertising reflects that the sole purpose of advertising is to influence society and encourage them to buy products and services more than they required just for pleasure. (Pollay and Mittal, 1993) defined materialism belief factor that consumption is the ultimate route to satisfaction. Advertising always criticized for promoting materialism because it creates the need and desire for those tempting products which a consumer never require and this leads to materialism (Wang and Sun, 2010; Pollay and Mittal, 1993; Wolin et al., 2002).

 

Irritation: Advertisers adopt specific tools and techniques to peruse and end up annoying and offending and, in this condition, consumers perceived advertising as unwanted or irritating (Aaker et.al, 1985; Ducoffe, 1996; Saxena and Khanna, 2013). Those advertisements which provides lots of information could create confusion and distract the consumers cause irritation leads to loss of behaviour and reduce the effectiveness of advertisements (Stewart, et, al., 2002; Luo, 2002; Edwards, et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2012). In the previous studies, it is seen that irritation in web advertising negatively influences consumer attitude (James and Kover, 1992; Rettie, 2001; Xu, 2007; Tavor, 2011; Nabizadeh and Gharib, 2012).

 

Hypothesis development:

H01: Product information will have a positive influence on attitude towards web advertising.

H02: Social role/image will have a positive influence on attitude towards web advertising.

H03: Hedonic/Pleasure belief factor will have a positive influence on attitude towards web advertising.

H04: Irritation belief factor will have a negative influence on attitude towards web advertising.

H05: Good for economy belief factor will have a positive influence on attitude towards web advertising.

H06: Value corruption belief factor will have a negative influence on attitude towards web advertising.

H07: materialism belief factor will have a negative influence on attitude towards web advertising.

H08: Falsity/No sense belief factor will have a negative influence on attitude towards web advertising

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conceptual framework:

 

 

                                                                          

 
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                     Source Adapted From: (wolin et al., 2002)

 

Methodology:

Data Collection:

A survey instrument was prepared for this study; the instrument mainly consisted of close-ended questions using 7-points Likert scale – a type of scale because scaling helps measure the intensity of the respondent's answers (Churchill and Brown, 2004, p. 329), and the questionnaire has been sent to the respondents through email, and some questionnaires were filled through personal interviews as well. The study consists of 325 consumers from National Capital Territory of Delhi and the result was analyzed using SPSS 20.0.

 

 

Construct Measures:

The items considered for this research were taken from different sources available in the literature and were modified to fit in the context of chosen web advertising. The items for the dependent variable consumer attitude towards web advertising was adapted from (choi et al., 2008). Items for independent variable product information, social role and image, hedonic/pleasure, Good for economy, Falsity/no sense, Materialism, Value corruption were adopted from (wolin et al., 2002) and at last items for 'irritation' were adopted from (Pyun and James, 2009).

Respondent's Profile:

The male respondents were 55.3% and female respondents were 44.7% with the age of 18 years and above. Most of the respondents were between 25 and 35 years (80.6%), followed by 18–24 years (13.7%) and ad chosen for this study was the ad of ‘savlon liquid handwash’, a product of Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. (ITC Ltd.). For sample adequacy, the KMO test was conducted, and the value of the KMO was found to be 0.774, which proves the sample was adequate (See table- 1).

(Table – 1)

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

0.774

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

7968.937

Df

 276

Sig.

.000

Source: Analysis Output

Data analysis and findings

 Reliability test:

The reliability of the entire construct was tested by using the Cronbach alfa reliability analysis technique. Based on the finding (See table – 2), the entire considered construct has the Cronbach alfa above the threshold of 0.70 (cavana et al., 20/01).

 

Validity test:

The findings of this study suggest that factor analysis was appropriate reason being the value of KMO was 0.774 (See table-1) bartlett's test of sphericity was significant P=0.000; df= 136 for all the correlations within the matrix. After doing principal component analysis and varimax rotation, all the constructs with an eigenvalue of more than 1 which is significant, were retained (See table – 3). The variances between the factors are strong, which explains their explanatory power was significant enough and these factors contribute more than ninety percent of total variance. The Cronbach alfa value of each construct has oscillated between 0.93 and 0.94 (See table- 2). The variance between the factors was substantial, which shows that the factors have good explanatory power. After the varimax rotation, all the total variance is redistributed over eight extracted factors. The weight of irritation is more than the rest of the extracted factors. As far as convergent validity of the construct, the factor loading of each construct is above the threshold value of 0.50 and discriminant validity shows that all the items were allocated according to their respective construct, and they were not overlapping each other, and the relationship between the factors are significant.

(Table – 2)

Factor loading and Cronbach alfa

Construct

Items

Factor loading

Product information

 

Alfa = 0.94

web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash tells me which brands have the features I am looking for.

web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash helps me keep up to date about products available in the marketplace.

web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash is a very valuable source of information about sales.

0.90

 

0.92

 

0.88

Social role/Image

 

 

Alfa = 0.94

 

web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash tell me what people like myself are buying and using.

From web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash I learn what is in fashion and what I should buy for keeping a good social image.

web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash helps me know which products will or will not reflect the person I am.

0.92

 

0.92

 

 

0.92

 

Hedonic/Pleasure

 

Alfa = 0.94

Sometimes Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash is even more enjoyable than Web advertising of other liquid handwashes.

Sometimes I take pleasure in thinking about what I saw or heard on Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash.

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash make me feel good.

0.89

 

 

0.90

 

0.88

Irritation

 

Alfa = 0.94

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash is irritating.

I feel sometimes the number of Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash is too often.

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash is annoying.

0.94

0.95

 

0.94

Good for economy

 

Alfa = 0.94

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash improves people's standard of living.

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash to support the nation.

There have been times when I have bought savlon liquid handwash because of the Web advertisements.

0.91

 

0.94

 

0.92

Falsity / No sense

 

 

Alfa = 0.93

One can put more trust in savlon liquid handwash advertised on the Web than in those liquid handwashes which are not advertised on the Web (R).

savlon liquid handwash plays a vital role in my life, and Web advertisements of liquid handwash reassure me that I am doing the right thing in using it (R).

Web advertisements of savlon liquid helps the consumer buy the best brand for the price (R).

0.94

 

 

0.94

 

 

0.93

 

 

 

Value corruption

 

 

Alfa = 0.94

 

 

 

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash makes people live in a world of fantasy.

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash takes undue advantage of children.

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash leads children to make unreasonable purchase demands to their parents.

 

 

 

0.87

 

0.90

 

0.88

Materialism

 

 

Alfa = 0.94

Web ads of savlon liquid handwash make you buy it but you do not really need it.

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash increases dissatisfaction among consumers by showing it, which some consumers cannot afford.

Web advertisements of savlon liquid handwash making us a materialistic society – interested in buying and owning things.

0.90

 

0.91

 

 

0.89

Source: Analysis Output

(Table -3)

Total Variance Explained

Component

Initial Eigenvalues

Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% of Variance

Cumulative %

1

5.806

24.193

24.193

5.806

24.193

24.193

2.733

11.389

11.389

2

3.765

15.689

39.882

3.765

15.689

39.882

2.730

11.375

22.764

3

2.987

12.447

52.329

2.987

12.447

52.329

2.730

11.373

34.137

4

2.449

10.205

62.534

2.449

10.205

62.534

2.717

11.321

45.458

5

2.388

9.949

72.483

2.388

9.949

72.483

2.711

11.298

56.756

6

1.617

6.739

79.222

1.617

6.739

79.222

2.685

11.187

67.943

7

1.578

6.575

85.797

1.578

6.575

85.797

2.674

11.140

79.083

8

1.038

4.324

90.121

1.038

4.324

90.121

2.649

11.038

90.121

9

.357

1.487

91.608

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

.222

.924

92.532

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

.202

.841

93.373

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

.199

.830

94.203

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

.173

.722

94.925

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

.158

.659

95.584

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

.154

.643

96.227

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

.144

.600

96.827

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

.130

.542

97.369

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

.120

.501

97.870

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

.107

.445

98.315

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

.102

.425

98.740

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

.088

.367

99.107

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

.080

.334

99.441

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

.075

.314

99.755

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

.059

.245

100.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Analysis Output

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

(Table – 4)

Model summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.708a

.501

.488

3.33784

Source: Analysis Output

Predictors: (Constant), Materialism, irritation, social role, hedonic/pleasure, good for economy, product information, falsity, value corruption.

 

The estimation of 'R,' that is, the correlation coefficient was 0.708, which reflects a significant level of the forecast for the consumer attitude towards web advertising.  The segment R2, known as the coefficient of determination, explains the variability between the independent and the dependent variables. The estimation of R2 = 0.501 (see table - 4) this estimation implies that the 50.01% variability of the dependent variable (consumer attitude towards web advertising) is explained by the independent variable (product information, social role/image, hedonic/pleasure, irritation, good for economy, falsity/no sense, value corruption and Materialism).

(Table – 5)

Anova

Model

Sum of Squares

Df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

3531.160

8

441.395

39.618

.000b

Residual

3520.612

316

11.141

 

 

Total

7051.772

324

 

 

 

Source: Analysis Output

a. Dependent Variable: attitude towards web advertising            

b. Predictors: (Constant), Falsity/ no sense, social role/ image, hedonic/pleasure, good for economy, product information, Irritation, Value corruption, Materialism.

In (see table- 5) it is illustrated that the considered independent variables are statistically significant enough, and it can predict the dependent variable, that is, consumer attitude towards ad creativity. F (8, 325) = 39.618, P < 0.05. Thus, we can conclude that the above-discussed regression model is a good fit for data.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Table – 6)

Regression Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

T

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

4.389

.889

 

4.936

.000

Falsity/ no sense

.429

.152

.162

2.823

.005

Social role/image

-.058

.108

-.022

-.541

.589

Hedonic/pleasure

.588

.140

.222

4.195

.000

Good for economy

.758

.113

.287

6.724

.000

Product information

.476

.152

.180

3.139

.002

Irritation

.167

.104

.065

1.598

.111

Value corruption

.178

.154

.067

1.153

.250

Materialism

.397

.114

.149

3.484

.001

Source: Analysis Output

The P-value of the T-test (P = 0.000) of the five factors, i.e., Falsity/ No sense, Hedonic/pleasure, Good for economy, Product information and Materialism, is less the alpha value of 0.05. Therefore, the null hypothesis formulated for these factors (i.e., H08, H03, H05, H01, H07,) is accepted here (see table - 6). The rest of the three factors, i.e., social role/ image, irritation, and value corruption, have the P-value of the T-test (P = 0.000) more than the prescribed value, i.e., 0.05, the null hypothesis formulated for these factors is rejected (HO2, HO4, H06).

Thus, the equation for multiple regressions for this study:

Attitude towards web advertising = 4.389 + 0.758 (Good for economy) + 0.588 (Hedonic/pleasure) + 0.476 (product information) + 0.429 (Falsity/ no sense) + 0.397 (Materialism) + 0.178 (Value corruption) + 0.167 (Irritation) – 0.058 (Social role / Image).

In the above regression coefficient table, the value of the unstandardized beta coefficient among the independent variable oscillates in between the weakest relationship of 0.397 (between ‘Materialism’ and consumer attitude towards web advertising) to the most robust relationship of 0.758 (between ‘Good for economy’ and consumer attitude towards web advertising). Therefore, these findings suggest that the ‘Good for economy’ belief factor is the most significant antecedent in influencing consumer attitude towards web advertising followed by Hedonic/pleasure (0.588), product information (0.476), Falsity/no sense (0.429), Materialism (0.397).

Conclusions:

     Theoretical and managerial implications:

This study has produced both theoretical and managerial implications, in case of theoretical implications are concerned it help the researchers to better understand the nature, belief and attitude of consumers towards web advertising. This study conceptually and empirically added new knowledge in terms of web advertising by investigating new dimension (I.e., irritation). The result shows that attitude is significantly influenced by product information, materialism, good for economy, hedonic/pleasure, and falsity / No sense. Out of these five belief factors two belief factors are negatively corelated and three of them are positively corelated belief factors and all these belief factors can be implemented in highly regulated media environment. Marketers/practitioners must invest their time and money to provide the targeted consumers afore-mentioned belief, which helps in the formation of a positive attitude towards advertised brands, which in turn creates a positive purchase intention towards the advertised brands. Product information belief factor leads to a positive consumer attitude towards web advertising, and it was also confirmed in the previous studies (Wang and Sun, 2010), so the marketers must effectively and efficiently utilize the informative power of advertising (Petrovici and Marinov, 2007). This study shows that the hedonic/pleasure belief factors lead to the formation of positive consumer's attitudes towards web advertising. Thus, advertising practitioners who want to produce effective advertising campaigns must employ creative, enjoyable, and beautiful designs and themes (Simola et al., 2013; Syed et al., 2018). This study suggests that at the time of placing advertising campaigns on the web advertisement medium, advertisers must employ strategies that help the consumers believe that web advertisements help them buy the products and services at the best available price in a hassle-free environment and save time for the consumers and this is achieved through good for economy belief factor and it is further suggests that advertisements having more ‘Good for economy’ attributes will make a long-lasting impression in positive attitude formation towards web advertising because in this study it is the strongest predictor of consumer attitude towards web advertising.

For the negatively correlated belief factors (i.e., ‘falsity/no sense’ and ‘materialism’), the advertisers must design web advertisements that induce trust and avoid misleading, confusing implications and to accomplish this, advertisers must employ a trust-building element in advertisements like true claims, less fascination which in turn reduce the consumer scepticism and induce positive attitude towards web advertising at last materialism belief factor indicates that the attitude of consumers diminishes when they feel that the web advertisements are over tempting. Results indicates that the three belief factors i.e., social role / image, irritation and value corruption are not significant to consumer attitude towards web advertising and reason for this inconsistency is cultural influences (Okazaki, 2007; La Ferle, 2016) and thus, people from different cultural backgrounds will have different approaches towards the belief factors of web advertising (Saadeghvaziri and Hosseini, 2011).

Limitations and scope for future research:

Although the research finding provides us with some significant insightfulness, there are few limitations of this research. This study is based on cross-sectional data so it will only reveal the net effects of the predictor variable at a certain point (Cavana et al., 2001). Due to the inherited limitation of cross-sectional data, this study could not satisfactorily explain the observed changes in patterns and causality of 'consumer attitude towards web advertising' (Easterby-Smith et al., 2003, p.45).  This study cannot be generalised to other product category and other ad format other than ‘liquid handwash’ and banner form of web advertisements. Future research is needed to examine other web advertising formats like email and pop-up messages and other business areas i.e., business to business (Strauss and Frost, 2001). Web advertising has been developing as an effective channel for advertising in developing economies like India; thus, it is necessary to investigate more belief dimensions and by better understanding of other belief dimensions, advertisers/practitioners can develop more effective and efficient web advertising campaigns that affect attitude positively.

 

 

 

References:

  • Aaker, D.A. & Bruzzone, D. E. (1985). Causes of Irritation in Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 49(2): 47-57.
  • Aziz, N.A. and Ariffin, A.A. (2010). "Exploring consumers attitude toward web advertising and its influence on web ad usage in Malaysia", Journal Pengurusan, No. 31, pp. 55-63.
  • Ball, A.D., and Tasaki, L.H. (1992). "The role and measurement of attachment in consumer behaviour", Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 155-172.
  • Bamoriya, H. Singh, R. (2011). Information seeking and attitude towards advertising – a cross-sectional empirical study. Journal of Applied Management & Computer Science, 3, 1, pp. 1–21.
  • Brackett, L. K., & Carr, B. N. (2001). Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: Consumer vs. mature student attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 23–32.
  • Bridis, T. (1998). "New users battle advertising: 'ad blocker' prevent commercials from appearing on page".  Detroit News, 27 august.
  • Bruner, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2000). Web commercials and advertising hierarchy-ofeffects. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(1/2), 35–42.
  • Burns, K.S. (2003). "Attitude toward the online advertising format: a re-examination of the attitude toward the ad model in an online advertising context", unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  • Cavana, R.Y., Delahaye, B.L. and Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Queensland.
  • Cheng, J. M. S., Blankson, C., Wang, E. S. T., & Chen, L. S. L. (2009). Consumer attitudes and interactive digital advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 501–525.
  • Cheng, J.M., Blankson, C., Wang, E.S. & Chen, L.S. (2009). Consumer Attitudes and Interactive Digital Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3): 501-525.
  • Cheung, R. C. T. (2006). Case Study of a Successful Internet Advertising Strategy in Hong Kong: A Portal for Teenagers. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 24(4): 393- 405.
  • Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of Web advertising credibility: A study of consumer response to banner Ads. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 3(1), 1–23.
  • Choi, Y.K., Hwang, J.-S. and McMillan, S.J. (2008). "Gearing up for mobile advertising: a cross-cultural examination of key factors that drive mobile messages home to consumers", Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 52 No. 8, pp. 756-768.
  • Churchill, G.A. and Brown, T.J. (2004). Basic Marketing Research, 5th edn. South-Western, Ohio.
  • Coulter, R.A. and Price, L.L. (2005). "The evolution of consumer knowledge and sources of information: Hungary in transition", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 604-619.
  • Dan Petrovici, Marin Marinov. (2007). "Determinants and antecedents of general attitudes towards advertising: A study of two EU accession countries", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41 Issue: 3/4, pp.307-326.
  • Dao, W. V. T., A. N. H. Le, J. M. S. Cheng, and D. C. Chen. (2014). Social media advertising value: The case of transitional economies in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Advertising 33 (2):271–94.
  • De Pauw, P., De Wolf, R., Hudders, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2018). From persuasive messages to tactics: Exploring children’s knowledge and judgement of new advertising formats. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2604–2628.
  • Ducoffe, R.H. (1996). "Advertising value and advertising on the web", Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 21-35.
  • Dutta-Bergman, M.J. (2006). "The demographic and psychographic antecedents of attitude toward advertising", Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 102-112.
  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Lowe, A. (2003). Management Research: An Introduction, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, California.
  • Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J. (2002). Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-up Ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3): 83-95.
  • Ha, H.-Y., John, J., Janda, S., & Muthaly, S. (2011). The effects of advertising spending on brand loyalty in services. European Journal of Marketing, 45(4), 673-691.
  • Hayes, J. L., & King, K. W. (2014). The social exchange of viral ads: referral and co-referral of ads among college students. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(2), 98–109.
  • Hiram. Ting, De Run. Cyril, Earnest. And Thurasamy. Ramayah. (2015). "Young Adults' Attitude towards Advertising: A Multi-Group Analysis by Ethnicity", Rev. bus. manag., São Paulo, Vol. 17, No. 54, pp. 769-787, Jan./Mar. 2015.
  • Hoffman, D.L. and Novak, T.P. (1996). "Marketing in hypermedia computer mediated environments: conceptual foundations", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 50-68.
  • Hofstede, G. 2018. Hofstede insights: Compare countries.
  • Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2013). From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 246–259.
  • Hudson, S., Hudson, D. and Peloza, J. (2008). "Meet the parents: a parents' perspective on product placement in children's films", Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 80 No. 2, pp. 209-304.
  • Jalees, T. (2014). Influence of idealized fashion models on purchasing behaviour. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 29(2), 299-314
  • James, W.L. and Kover, A. (1992), “Do overall attitudes toward advertising affect involvement with specific advertisements?”, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 78-83
  • Jin, H. S., and R. J. Lutz. (2013). The typicality and accessibility of consumer attitudes toward television advertising: Implications for the measurement of attitudes toward advertising in general. Journal of Advertising 42 (4): 343–57.
  • Klein, T. A., and R. W. Nason. (2001). Marketing and development: Macro-marketing perspectives. Handbook of Marketing and Society, 263–97. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kotler, P. Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management. Pearson International Ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
  • La Ferle, C. (2016). The intersection of culture and advertising ethics in a global marketplace. In Persuasion ethics today, eds. M. Duffy and E. Thorson, 162–81. New York: Routledge.
  • lAB (2001) 'iab', http:/ /www.iab.net.
  • Leung, X. Y., Bai, B., & Stahura, K. A. (2015). The marketing effectiveness of social media in the hotel industry: A comparison of Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research39(2), 147-169.
  • Ling, K. C. Piew, T. H. Chai, L. T. (2010). The determinants of consumers’ attitude towards advertising. Canadian Social Science, 6, 4, pp. 114–126.
  • Liu, C. L-E. Sinkovics, R. R. Pezderka, N. Haghirian, P. (2012). Determinants of Consumer Perceptions toward Mobile Advertising — A Comparison between Japan and Austria. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 1, pp. 21–32.
  • Luo, X. (2002). Uses and Gratifications Theory and E-Consumer Behaviours. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2, 2, pp. 34–41.
  • Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude towards ad: a conceptual framework. In L. F. Alwitt, & A. A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects (pp. 45- 63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the Ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65
  • Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malásia.
  • Mehta, A. (2000). "Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness", Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 67-72.
  • Mehta, R. and Sivadas, E. (1995). "Direct marketing on the internet: an empirical assessment of consumer attitudes", Journal of Direct Marketing, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 21-32.
  • Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318–332.
  • Mittal, B. (1994). Public Assessment of TV advertising: faint praise and harsh criticism. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(1), 35-53.
  • Moller, J., and M. Eisend. (2010). A global investigation into the cultural and individual antecedents of banner advertising effectiveness. Journal of International Marketing 18 (2):80–98.
  • Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-Web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 71–84.
  • Nabizadeh, T. Gharib, T. Z. (2012). Investigating effective factors on the perceived values and attitudes of Internet advertisements users. Journal of Basic Applied Scientific Research, 2, 5, pp. 4392–4399.
  • Okazaki, S. (2007). "Exploring gender effects in a mobile advertising context: on the evaluation of trust, attitudes and recall", Sex Roles, Vol. 57 Nos 11-12, pp. 879-908.
  • Oumlil, A. B., and J. L. Balloun. (2019). Millennials' attitude toward advertising: An international exploratory study. Young Consumers 21 (1),17–34.
  • Pickens, J. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions. Organizational behaviour in health care4(7), 43-76.
  • Pollay, R.W. and Mittal, B. (1993). "Here's the beef: factors, determinants and segments in consumer criticism of advertising", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 99-114.
  • Pyun, D.Y. and James, J.D. (2009). "Enhancing advertising communications: developing a model of beliefs about advertising through sport", International Journal of Sport Communication, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-20.
  • Rau, P. L. P., Liao, Q., & Chen, C. (2013). Factors influencing mobile advertising avoidance. International Journal of Mobile Communications11(2), 123-139.
  • Rettie, R. (2001). “An exploration of flow during internet use”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 103-113.
  • Saadeghvaziri, F. and Hosseini, H.K. (2011). "Mobile advertising: an investigation of factors creating positive attitude in Iranian customers", African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 394-404.
  • Saadeghvaziri, F. and Seyedjavadain, S. (2011). "Attitude toward advertising: mobile advertising vs advertising-in-general", European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, Vol. 28 No. 28, pp. 104-114.
  • Saadeghvaziri, F., Dehdashti, Z., & Askarabad, M. R. K. (2013). Web advertising. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences.
  • Saxena, A.–Khanna, U. (2013). Advertising on social network sites: a structural equation modeling approach. The Journal of Business Perspective, 17, 1, pp. 17–25.
  • Shareef, M. A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Islam, R. (2019). Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46, 58–69
  • Sharif, K. (2017). Determinants of young consumers’ attitude towards mobile advertising in a technologically and a socially dynamic market. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing 8 (1):21–44.
  • Shavitt, S., Lowrey, P., & Haefner, J. (1998). Public attitudes toward advertising: more favourable than you might think. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(4), 7-22.
  • Sheehan, K. B. (2014). Controversies in contemporary advertising. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Shelly Rodgers & Esther Thorson (2000) The Interactive Advertising Model, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1:1, 41-60.
  • Shimp, T. A. (1981). Attitude toward the Ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9–15.
  • Silk, A.J., Klein, L.R. and Berndt, E.R. (2001). "The emerging position of the internet as an advertising medium", Netnomics, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 129-148.
  • Simola, J. Kivikangas, M. Kuisma, J.–Krause, C. M. (2013). Attention and memory for newspaper advertisements: Effects of ad-editorial congruency and location. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 4, pp. 429–442.
  • Singh, S. N., & Dalal, N. P. (1999). Web home page as advertisements. Communications of the ACM, 42(8), 91–98.
  • Soberman, D.A. (2004). "Research note: additional learning and implications on the role of informative advertising", Management Science, Vol. 50 No. 12, pp. 1744-1750.
  • Speece, M., and S. L. M. So. (2017). Gaps between managerial and consumer attitudes toward advertising in China. Euro Asia Journal of Management (Macau) 14 (7):29–48.
  • Statista, (17August, 2021). Number of internet users in India 2010-2040.
  • Stewart, D. W. & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). From Consumer Response to Active Consumer: Measuring the Effectiveness of Interactive Media. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4): 376-396.
  • Strauss, J. & Frost, R. (2001). E-Marketing, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Suh, J.C. and Yi, Y. (2006). "When brand attitudes affect the customer satisfaction-loyalty relation: the moderating role of product involvement", Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 145-155.
  • Syed R. Bakar, A. Bahtiar, M. (2018). Relationships between the Advertising Appeal and Behavioural Intention: The Mediating role of the Attitude towards Advertising Appeal. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12, 2, pp. 185–193.
  • Syrett, M., & Lammiman, J. (2004). Advertising and millennials. Young Consumers, 5(4), 62-73.
  • Tan, S. J. & Chia, L. (2007). Are we measuring the same attitude? Understanding media effects on attitude towards advertising, 7(4).
  • Tanyel, F., E. W. Stuart, and J. Griffin. (2013). Have “millennials” embraced digital advertising as they have embraced digital media? Journal of Promotion Management 19 (5):652–73.
  • Tavor, T. (2011). "Online advertising development and their economic effectiveness", Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, Vol. 1 No. 6, pp. 121-133.
  • Tavor, T. (2011). “Online advertising development and their economic effectiveness”, Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, Vol. 1 No. 6, pp. 121-133.
  • Thangam, A. M. C. (2018). Online Advertisement and Attitude of Web Users. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research (IJETER), 6, Special Issue 1, pp. 46–49.
  • Tomse, D., K. Dumicic, and B. Snoj. (2015). Beliefs, attitudes, and behaviour towards marketing communication on social networks-the case of Central and Eastern European country. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising 9 (4):286–302.
  • Vieira, V. A. (2013). Stimuli-organism-response framework: a meta-analytic review in the store environment. Journal of Business Research, 66, 9, pp. 1420–1426.
  • Wang, C., Zhang, P., Choi, R., & Daeredita, M. (2002). Understanding consumers attitude toward advertising. In Eighth Americas conference on information systems (pp. 1143–1148).
  • Wang, Y. and Sun, S. (2010). "Assessing beliefs, attitudes and behavioural responses toward online advertising in three countries", International Business Review, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 333-344.
  • Wang, Y., & Sun, S. (2010). Examining the role of beliefs and attitudes in online advertising. International Marketing Review Vol. 27 (1,) 87-107.
  • WANG, Y., SUN, S., LEI, W., & Toncar, M. (2009). Examining beliefs and attitudes toward online advertising among Chinese consumer. Journal of International Direct Marketing, 3(1), 52-66.
  • Weerapat, R. Chaipoopirutana, S. Combs, H. (2017). Factors Influencing Consumer Attitudes toward Social Media Advertising. In: International Conference on Humanities, Social Sciences and Education (HSSE’17) London (UK) March 20-21, 2017. Social Sciences and Education (HSSE’17), London. pp. 32–36.
  • Wells, W.D., Burnett, J. and Moriarty, S. (2000). Advertising: Principles and Practice, 5th ed., Prentice Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Wiese, M., & Akareem, H. S. (2020). Determining perceptions, attitudes and behaviour towards social network site advertising in a three-country context. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5–6), 420–455.
  • Wolin, L., Korgaonkar, P. and Lund, D. (2002). "Beliefs, attitudes and behaviour towards web advertising", International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 87-113.
  • Wu, S.-I., Wei, P.-L. and Chen, J.-H. (2008), “Influential factors and relational structure of Internet banner advertising in the tourism industry”, Tourism Management, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 221-236
  • Xu, D. J. (2007). The Influence of Personalization in Affecting Consumer Attitudes Toward Mobile Advertising in China. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(2): 9-19.
  • Zaman, S., Jalees, T., Jiang, Y., & Kazmi, S. (2018). Testing and incorporating additional determinants of ethics in counterfeiting luxury research according to the theory of planned behaviour. Psihologija, 51(2), 163–196.