Scrutinizing the Performance of the Shariah Indices in Malaysia Before and After the Covid-19 Era
Saif Siddiqui
Professor,
Department of management studies,
Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi
Sumbul
Research scholar,
Department of Management Studies,
Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi
Abstract
In previous research, Islamic stock market performance has been extensively and profoundlyconferred byresearchers. The key objective of the present study is to focus on Malaysian shariah indices before and after Covid-19.
For this purpose, we collect day-to-day data of certain indexes i.e. {titan 25Index (DJMY25D) and FBMKLCI. The data have been split into before and after Covid-19 duration. Before Covidperiod is from9th June’2017 to 31st Dec.’2019 and after Covid period covered the duration of 1st Jan.’2020 to 9th June’2022. We apply the Cointegration, Granger Causality Test, and GMM by analyzing Descriptive statistics and Unit root tests.
The findings show that, in terms of the risk and returns, the Islamic finance indices outperforms the conventional index. Since both indices show cointegration according to the cointegration test over both time periods, the pandemic has not altered the long-term connection. A similar pattern has also been seen in the short-term relationship.
The Islamic stock index and the conventional stock index might be seen to be in contradiction to one another. The Islamic market relies on lower risk and no interest, while the conventional market relies on higher interest and more risk. Despite the epidemic having a comparable effect on both the long-term and short-term relationships of both indexes, the returns are often higher in the Islamic index.
Keywords: Shariah Index, Covid-19, GMM, Granger Causality, Cointegration,
Introduction
To allowIslamic investmentfund managers to list companies on the markets, The Dow Jones Market launched the first Islamic Index in December 1995. Investment in Islamic stocks has grown significantly since its foundation. A total of 105 Islamic equities funds existed by the end of 2002, with a market value of around $5 billion with 48% of them being based in the Gulf area, 30% in North America and Europe, and 22% in Asia(Falaika, 2002). As a result, a number of financial institutions and capital markets have developed their own Islamic Indices. For instance, Bursa Malaysia, Malaysian Stocks Exchange, developed Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Sharia Index (KLSESI). This is regarded as a crucial tool for enhancing the success of the plan for Islamic finance markets. (Walkshäusl and Lobe, 2012) estimate that about 600 Islamic funds and $939 billion worth of Shariah-compliant assets are accessible globally. Investors instead of investing in mutual funds are now turning to passive investment.
Islamic investment,which is based on principles of Shariah, which forbid activities that involve usury (riba), ambiguity (gharar), and gambling (Maisir), and also actions that produce or provide services that are against Islamic law, such as pornography, the production or sale of alcohol, casinos, etc. “Islamic investment is also based on Shariah principles”(Securities Commission announcement, 2002). Consequently, Shariah compliance is required for all the instruments listed in the Islamic Index compulsorily. Several other criteria are often used to reduce the number of permitted businesses.
(Walkshäusl and Lobe, 2012) state that Shariah law governs every feature of a Muslim's lifespanand places a significant focus on Islamic investment that fulfills it.Shariah-compliant investments are another name for these investments. Investments in fixed-income financial securities, like as bonds, stocks, and other derivatives (such as options), are inappropriate since they guarantee a fixed income due to their predetermined rate of return and do not grant investors any voting rights. (Islamic Finance & Investment, 2014) state "In addition, Islamic stockholders aren’t allowed to buy shares of those companies whose key businesses include tobacco,traditional financial services, alcohol, entertainment,gambling, pork-relatedproducts, or conventional financial services." Moreover, companies can be shortlisted on the basis of the selected financial ratios. For example, Stocks are allegedly not Shariah-compliant when a company's debt level surpasses one-third of its market value, according to (Hussein and Omran, 2005).Elimination of non-permissible income sources needs to be done by carrying out a purification process. Abdelsalam, Duygun, Matallín-Sáez, and Tortosa-Ausina (2014) state a way to carry out this by carrying out in the form of donations to charitable institutions.
Literature review
(Siddiqui, 2023)compared the results of traditional and Islamic indexes. The author used data from the Nifty 50, Nifty 500, and their underlying for the past two years. During the COVID-19 pandemic, they discovered their dependence on one another. They made use of econometric tools like cointegration, correlation, and GMM. The study came to the conclusion that investing in Islamic indices is safe during times of crisis since they are less risky than conventional ones.
(Trabelsi et al, 2020)This paper examined the Islamic and traditional indices of proportional performance. Are Islamic indices differing from traditional indices in terms of heterogeneity? The Markov switching model,Sharpe ratio, and the Maximum Sharpe ratio algorithm difference test these three steps of the methodology are used for data analysis taken by the closing price of MSCI Islamic and their conventional counterpart for US. The test results show that Islamic indices perform better than traditional and mixed portfolios.Investors will not get worse if they choose the Islamic index over the conventional index.
(Erdoğan et al., 2020) The author inspected the effect of volatility spillovers among Islamic Indices in countries with emerging economies and foreign exchange markets in this paper. Causality in variance has been checked by Garch and MGarch using daily data from 2013 to 2019. In Turkey, they discovered volatility spillover on the foreign currency market to the Islamic indices. The FE market has an effectonIslamic indices, demonstrating causation inmean.
(Indrabudiman& Winarningsih, 2018) Studied the relationships and impact of the international DJI and DJIM worldwide. This study used the correlation and causality method to analyze seven variable data sets. Results show no direct influence on each other, but they are correlated and concord.
(Imed& Mustapha, 2016) Examined the existential research on the performance of shariah stock market indexes in comparison to that of traditional markets has very several studies. They take conventional and 5 Islamic indexes, using secondary for 4 years. As a result, this research reveals a strong interconnection between traditional and Islamic stock market indices, suggesting that Islamic indices might be a valuable tool for investors by allowing them to mix with conventional stock indices and provide them with the opportunity for increased portfolio diversification.
(Salisu et al.,2021)analyzed the portfolio designs and hedging efficacy in the gold and the US aggregate and sectoral indices during pandemic, using a multivariate volatility framework. According to the findings, adding gold in a portfolio will be helpfulsecurity which can boost the performance of risk-adjustedstocks. The authors also speculate that the shocks brought on by COVID-19's exceptional emergence may have made it harder for investors to react to market shocks, delaying their ability to rebalance their investments.
(Shear & Ashraf, 2022)uses data from 100 significant Ethical compliant and non-ethical firms listed on the PSX to compare the performance of the Ethical compliant and non-ethical stocks, particularly during the pandemic. The authors note that shariah compliance firms performed better since the adverse stock market effect to the Covid-19 verified instances, and government retaliation actions were less severe for businesses that adhered to shariah
(Salisu & Shaik, 2022)examines the role of epidemic in estimation of Shariah stocks by constructing a predictive model and examining the hedging potential and vulnerability of the Shariah Indices. The authors covered Shariah indices as well as their conventional counterparts. The authors further suggest the role of risks attributed to climate change in the valuation of stocks.
(Candera& Indah, 2021) The pandemic significantly influenced the banks' financial performance, according to the research comparing the financial performance of Islamic banking before and after the pandemic at 34 Islamic banks in Indonesia. The author’s analysis demonstrates that, The Sharia Business Unit before and during the COVID-19 epidemic did not significantly differ from the CAR and ROA indicators, with the exception of NPF, which had a considerable change, and Islamic banking financial institutions were rarely impacted by the pandemic.
(Elshqirat et al.,2021) studied how Shariahstock indexes fared during the COVIDepidemic, and contrasted those results with their conventional equivalents in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations. The study's findings demonstrated that theepidemic impact on ethical and traditional indexes in parallel pattern in relation to their performance, the ethical indices didn’tgive any opportunities for diversification to the investors during the epidemic. These findings conflict with those of several other research.
(Bhatia & Gupta, 2020) With the help of the general banking index, looked into the volatility of Indian banking sectoral indices for dual shocking occurrences: the sub-prime catastrophe and COVID-19. Comparing symmetric and asymmetric models, the shocks that cause the volatility of these indexes have been compared. The results of this study demonstrate that despite the leverage effect that existed during the subprime crisis, these indices' volatility behavior has been sufficient to last in the market.
(Abbes, 2012) compared the risk and returned characteristics of the Islamic market indexes to those of their conventional equivalent indices after adjusting for systematic risk. The author also investigates the existence of a leverage impact across all examined indices and the significance of performance differences between Islamic stock market indexes and their traditional equivalents. A vast international dataset of 35 indexes, combining developed, GCC and emergingmarkets from June 2002 to April 2012, is employed for this purpose. The mean return differences between the two types of indexes have been investigated using the t-test. Except for Italy and Australia, the data indicate no apparent variance in mean among Islamic and traditional indices. All examined indices have a leverage impact risk, according to the EGARCH estimation results. Except for The United Arab Emirates, Mexico, Australia, Norway, Canada, and Brazil,the beta of Islamic index is below one in the majority of markets. indicates it is less hazardous and subtle to financial market fluctuation.
(Ali et al., 2021) examined how various Dow Jones Islamic indices respond to theCOVID-19 outbreak. The findings demonstrate that dynamic conditional correlations (DCCs) among our chosen financial assets unexpectedly increase throughout the COVID-19 era, with Japan and gold having relatively lower mean DCC values. The authors of the study conclude that gold is the most crucial lustrous metal because it helps investors in Islamic stock manage their downside risk in variousthe conclusion that gold is the essential most essential polished metal. After all, it helps investors in Islamic stock manage their downside risk in various it helps investors in Islamic stock manage their downside risk in a variety of market conditions.
Objective
Hypothesis
H00 = There is no relationship among Islamic and conventional indices.
H01 = Islamic finance and conventional finance do not granger causes.
H02 = Shariah indices are significance determine to conventional indices.
H03 = Islamic index has a lower standard deviation than conventional indices.
H04 = Islamic index is not significantly influenced by conventional index.
Sr.no |
Index name |
symbol |
1 |
titan 25 Index (DJMY25D) Pre covid |
D25A |
2 |
FBMKLCI Pre covid |
FBA |
3 |
titan 25 Index (DJMY25D) Post covid |
D25B |
4 |
FBMKLCI Post covid |
FBB |
|
Pre Covid-19 |
Post Covid-19 |
||
|
FBA |
D25A |
FBB |
D25B |
Mean |
0.017841 |
0.020763 |
-0.007962 |
-0.011503 |
Standard deviation |
0.531218 |
0.516764 |
0.918897 |
0.911117 |
Probability |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
0.0000 |
Skewness |
0.762129 |
0.774503 |
-0.126788 |
-0.500914 |
Jarque- Bera |
411.6338 |
490.3836 |
1624.160 |
2723.703 |
|
Pre Covid-19 |
Post Covid-19 |
||||
Indices |
Level |
First Difference |
Resulti0/i1 |
Level |
First Difference |
Resulti0/i1 |
D25 |
0.6225 |
0.0000 |
NS/S |
0.1880 |
0.0000 |
S/S |
FB |
o.4587 |
0.0000 |
S/S |
0.1117 |
0.000O |
S/S |
|
HypothesizeNo. of CEs |
Eigen Value |
T Stat |
Critical Value 0.05 |
Probability |
Pre Covid-19 |
None |
0.010262 |
10.66241 |
20.26184 |
0.5479 |
At most 1 |
0.005799 |
3.844499 |
9.164546 |
0.4358 |
|
Post Covid-19 |
None |
0.007785 |
4.951670 |
12.32090 |
0.5743 |
At most 1 |
6.89E-05 |
0.043252 |
4.129906 |
0.8648 |
At the 0.05 level, the trace test results in two cointegrating equations, which *indicates rejection of the hypothesis**P-values from Mackinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999)
Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)
|
HypothesizeNo. of CEs |
Eigen Value |
T Stat |
Critical Value 0.05 |
Probability |
Pre Covid-19 |
None |
0.010262 |
6.817814 |
15.89210 |
0.6917 |
At most 1 |
0.005799 |
3.844499 |
9.164546 |
0.4358 |
|
Post Covid-19 |
None |
0.007785 |
4.908418 |
11.22480 |
0.4903 |
At most 1 |
6.89E-05 |
0.043252 |
4.129906 |
0.8648 |
Maximum eigenvalue test indicates 2 cointegrationeqn(s) at the level of 0.05.
* Denotes rejection of hypothesis at the 0.05 level
Intended for r=2, r=3, and various no. of equivalences, we tested hypothesis. While examining the hypothesis used for multiple numbers of equivalences, we came to the same conclusion we got.This leads to the assumption that the indexesnot be co-integrated, which results in the null hypothesis being accepted. The second test analyzes the max eigenvalue. In the max Eigen, the critical value is the less trace value (Values are 15.89210 and 20.26184), and the p value is higher than 5% that means null hypothesis is accepted. Cointegration test shows that there is Cointegration among both indices during both the periods, hence the pandemic has not changed the long-term relation. The short-term association has also demonstrated a similar trend.
|
Pre Covid-19 |
Post Covid-19 |
||
|
D25A |
FBA |
D25B |
FBB |
D25A |
0.955504 |
1.000000 |
------------- |
---------- |
FBA |
1.000000 |
0.955504 |
----------- |
----------- |
D25B |
--------- |
--------- |
0.969600 |
1.000000 |
FBB |
--------- |
-------- |
1.000000 |
0.969600 |
|
Null Hypothesis |
Obs. |
F- Statistic |
Prob. |
Pre Covid-19 |
D25A does not Granger Cause FBA |
664 |
7.58537 |
0.0006 |
FBA does not Granger Cause D25A |
664 |
0.90695 |
0.4043 |
|
Post Covid-19 |
D25A does not Granger Cause FBB |
629 |
0.32924 |
0.8584 |
FBB does not Granger Cause D25A |
629 |
1.44852 |
0.2165 |
|
Endogenous |
Coefficient |
Std. Err. |
t-Stat |
P |
β1 |
FBA |
0.191638 |
0.000321 |
596.7558 |
0.0000 |
β2 |
D25A |
5.216226 |
0.008757 |
596.6756 |
0.0000 |
β3 |
FBB |
0.190289 |
0.000218 |
874.6413 |
0.0000 |
β4 |
D25B |
5.254329 |
0.005978 |
878.9670 |
0.0000 |
Abbes, M. B. (2012). Risk and return of Islamic and conventional indices. International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40321-012-0001-9
Abduh, M. (2020). The volatility of Malaysian conventional and Islamic indices: does financial crisis matter? Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2017-0103
Abdul Rahim, F., Ahmad, N., & Ahmad, I. (2009). Information transmission between Islamic stock indices in South East Asia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 2(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538390910946230
Abuoliem, N., Kalyebara, B., & Ibrahim, C. W. S. C. W. (2021). Revisiting Portfolio Optimization and 1/N Rules: Shariah Vs Conventional Stocks’ Performance During the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(November), 1–14. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/revisiting-portfolio-optimization-1-n-rules/docview/2603245576/se-2?accountid=10297%0Ahttps://media.proquest.com/media/hms/PFT/1/JAqdL?_a=ChgyMDIyMDYxMzE2Mjg1NzU4NDozMzMzMjkSBjEwNjMwNBoKT05FX1NFQVJDSCIOMTM4LjI1M
Adam, N., Sidek, N. Z. M., & Sharif, A. (2022). the Impact of Global Economic Policy Uncertainty and Volatility on Stock Markets: Evidence From Islamic Countries. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 12(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.18488/5002.v12i1.4400
Albaity, M., & Ahmad, R. (2008). Performance of Syariah and Composite Indices : Evidence From Bursa Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4(1), 23–43.
Ali, F., Jiang, Y., & Sensoy, A. (2021). Downside risk in Dow Jones Islamic equity indices: Precious metals and portfolio diversification before and after the COVID-19 bear market. Research in International Business and Finance, 58(November 2020), 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101502
Bhatia, P., & Gupta, P. (2020). Sub-prime Crisis or COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of Volatility in Indian Banking Sectoral Indices. FIIB Business Review, 9(4), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520972210
Candera, M., & Indah, K. D. (2021). Financial Performance Islamic Banking: a Comparative Analysis Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 1(2), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.47747/ijbmer.v1i2.201
Chee-Jiun, R., Khim-Sen, V., Chee-Jiun Chia, R., Khim-Sen Liew, V., & Rowland, R. (2021). Munich Personal RePEc Archive Daily New Covid-19 Cases, The Movement Control Order, and Malaysian Stock Market Returns Daily New Covid-19 Cases, The Movement Control Order, And Malaysian Stock Market Returns. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(2), 553–568.
Dedi, L., & Yavas, B. F. (2017). Equity Returns and Volatilities Before and After the 2007-08 Financial Crisis. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 20(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/zireb-2017-0008
Elshqirat, M., Equity, C., In, I., Indices, I., & Indices, S. (2021). Performance of Islamic and Conventional Equity Indices in GCC Countries during Covid-19. 18(8), 2627–2647.
Erdoğan, S., Gedikli, A., & Çevik, E. İ. (2020). Volatility spillover effects between Islamic stock markets and exchange rates: Evidence from three emerging countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.04.003
Haddad, H. Ben, Mezghani, I., & Al Dohaiman, M. (2020). Common shocks, common transmission mechanisms and time-varying connectedness among Dow Jones Islamic stock market indices and global risk factors. Economic Systems, 44(2), 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100760
Hasan, M. B., Mahi, M., Hassan, M. K., & Bhuiyan, A. B. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on stock markets: Conventional vs. Islamic indices using wavelet-based multi-timescales analysis. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58(February), 101504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101504
Ho, C. S. F., Abd Rahman, N. A., Yusuf, N. H. M., & Zamzamin, Z. (2014). Performance of global Islamic versus conventional share indices: International evidence. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 28, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.09.002
Imed, M., & Mustapha, C. (2016). Islamic versus conventional stock market Indices synchronization. African Journal of Business Management, 10(11), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm2016.8028
Indrabudiman, A., & Winarningsih, S. (2018). Relationship and Effect on the Dow Jones. 119(12), 16483–16492.
KR, K. R., & Fu, M. (2014). Does Shariah Compliant Stocks Perform Better than the Conventional Stocks? A Comparative Study Stocks Listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v6i2.6072
Salisu, A. A., & Shaik, M. (2022). Islamic Stock indices and COVID-19 pandemic. International Review of Economics and Finance, 80(January), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.073
Salisu, A. A., Vo, X. V., & Lucey, B. (2021). Gold and US sectoral stocks during COVID-19 pandemic. Research in International Business and Finance, 57(April), 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101424
shear, F., & Ashraf, B. N. (2022). The performance of Islamic versus conventional stocks during the COVID-19 shock: Evidence from firm-level data. Research in International Business and Finance, 60(January), 101622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101622
Siddiqui, S. (2023). GMM dependency model for Shariah and underlying indices of India during Covid-19 period. European Journal of Islamic Finance, 10(1), 24-33.
Trabelsi, L., Bahloul, S., & Mathlouthi, F. (2020). Performance analysis of Islamic and conventional portfolios: The emerging markets case. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.09.002
Yusof, R., & Majid, M. (2007). Stock Market Volatility Transmission in Malaysia: Islamic Versus Conventional Stock Market. Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Islamic Economics, 20(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.4197/islec.20-2.2