A Study of Factors that account for the success of SMEs in the Western Region of Cameroon
Ndindah Ndifor Clement
Research Scholar, PhD,
School of Business,
UNICAF University
Dr. Abhishek Tripathi
Associate Professor,
Department of Management & Information Systems,
College of Business Administration,
University of Ha’il,
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Abstract
The extreme relevance of SMEs to the economy is a truism. They generally employ the most significant percentage of the labor force in most economies and contribute considerably to the GDP, economic stability, and growth. They are even more important in developing economies, given that they contribute significantly to the fight against extreme hunger and poverty. However, despite their significant role, this category of businesses still experiences a very high failure rate in most economies, especially in Africa, Cameroon inclusive. Nevertheless, while SMEs in Cameroon suffer a high failure rate, the inhabitants of the Western Region of Cameroon thrive considerably in their entrepreneurial activities. While their success is highly recognized, empirical studies that determine which factors are responsible for this success are inexistent. Therefore, this study aims to identify which factors are determinants of this success empirically. This survey study was conducted on 403 SME owners/managers in the region of Cameroon. Binary Logistic Regression was used to analyses the collected data. This study revealed that access to capital, industry experience and availability of markets are determinants of SME success/failure in this region. From these findings, it is recommended that existing entrepreneurs and potential entrepreneurs consider getting into industries with already established and available markets to increase success chances. In the same light, more has to be done to boost SME access to traditional financing. Finally, entrepreneurship training programs should include modules that provide learners with experience in relevant industries
Keywords: SMEs, ROSCAs, success
Introduction
Importance of SMEs to the Economy
The extreme importance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) to the economy is recognized worldwide (Blackburn, Hart &Wainwright, 2013; &Nowicka, 2015). In Africa, for example, SMEs make up 90% of all businesses; they contribute up to 50% of the African GDP and account for 50% of the total employment (Djoumessi&Akinboade, 2011; Akinboade, 2015; Akinboade&Kinfack, 2012). In Cameroon, SMEs constitute about 99% of all businesses; they account for about 61% of employment and contribute 36% of the GDP (Tsambou&Fomba, 2017). In addition to that, this category of businesses is being more and more recognized as significant contributors to the fight against extreme hunger and poverty in developing economies (Roa, 2014; Ul Haq, Usman, Hussain, & Anjum, 2014).
However, despite their significant contributions, they still experience high failure rates. According to the Small Business Administration (SBA) (2018), only half of all small businesses will not live more than 5years, and only about one-third will survive for up to 10years and above. Acrob (in Muriithi, 2017), on his part, posits that in Africa, five out of seven SMEs die within their first year of operations. It is difficult to determine the SME failure rate in Cameroon due to its considerable informal sector. As for the formal sector, statistics from Research and Analysis Centre on Cameroon's Economic and Social Policies (CAMERCAP-PARC) reveal that 61,366 SMEs were created in Cameroon between 2010 and 2016, with 59,200 being local enterprises and 2,166 foreign. However, 72.24% of these businesses, according to CAMERCAP-PARC (2016), were inexistent on the taxation department’s database as of May 2016. This implies a considerable failure rate as less than 28% of businesses created were still operational by the end of the period.
However, despite this indication of high failure rates in Cameroon, the inhabitants of the Western Region of Cameroon, also known as the Bamilekes, are thriving in business ventures. Multiple studies attest that the Bamilekes are distinguishing themselves through their success in business (Hogenboom, &Jilberto, 2007; Johnson, 2011). In their paper, Komo and Takor (2019) refer to the entrepreneurial success of the Bamileke people as an economic miracle. Henry (2003), on his part, while recognizing the outstanding success of Bamilekes in business, blames this success on the extensive use of tontines or Rotatory Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCA).
Problem Statement
The problem that calls for research here is: while statistics imply alarming failure rates in Cameroon (CAMERCAP-PARC, 2016; Muriithi, 2017), the inhabitants of the Western Region of Cameroon (also called the Bamilekes) are proving to be quite successful in their entrepreneurial ventures. Their business success is strongly recognized, and they are even considered the business tribe of Cameroon (Hogenboom, &Jilberto, 2007; Arriola, 2012). However, despite acknowledging their success, there has been no empirical study that sheds light and establishes which factors are responsible for this success. In addition to this, up till date, most studies on SME and entrepreneurial success studies like those of Tsambou, and Fomba, (2017); Akinboade (2015); Djoumessi&Akinboade, (2011); Akinboade&Kinfack, (2012) have been limited to the Central and Littoral Regions of Cameroon since they are the most populated regions of the country (Mbodiam, 2021). This tendency of focusing research in these two regions has left SMEs in the Western Region of Cameroon without sufficient investigations.
Research Purpose
The purpose of this quantitative study is to shed light and empirically establish which of those factors that determine the success/failure of SMEs around Sub-Saharan Africa also assess the success of businesses owned by inhabitants of the Western Region of Cameroon. Therefore, this study is out to provide generalizable findings of what factors are determinants of the success of entrepreneurial ventures in the Western Region of Cameroon.
Literature Review
The Lussier’s model for the predicting the success or failure of SMEs, which is declared by multiples studies as considerably extensive (Bunyaminu, Mohammed, &Issah, 2019; Rolleri, Nadim, & Lussier, 2016; Lussier, Bandara, Marom, 2016; Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019). This model contains 15 factors that can predict the success/failure of small businesses. They include Capital, Record keeping and financial control, Industry experience, Planning, Management experience, Professional advisors, Education, Staffing, Product/service timing, Economic timing, Age of owner, Partners, Parents owned a business, Minority, Marketing skills (Lussier, Bandara, Marom, 2016; Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019). This model has beentestedd in multiple countries worldwide, including Croatia, the USA, Chile, Israel, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Palestine, and Ghana (Bunyaminu, Mohammed, &Issah, 2019; Hyder, & Lussier, 2016). Despite its declared extensiveness, it can be argued that this model completely excludes external environmental factors which have proven relevant to SME success/failure in sub- Saharan Africa (Balbontin, &Hensher, 2019; Abioye, Adeniyi, & Mustapha, 2017; Akinboade, 2015).
While the factors in the aforementioned model quite relevant, the model is not exhaustive. This limit of the Luissier’s lead to the development of the exploratory business success versus failure prediction model. This model which contains 25 variables in the includes all 15 variables of the Luissier’s model. The 10 other variables contain in the exploratory model come from other SME success / failure studies in Asia. This model has proven to be a better predictor of SME success/failure in Singapore (Siow, Singh & Anwar, 2011).
The use of a model like that Lussier will usually require modifications to the original model given that the factors that determine SME success/ failure have proven to vary significantly from one economy to another (Hyder, & Lussier, 2016; Lussier, Bandara, Marom, 2016; Bunyaminu, Mohammed, &Issah, 2019). This study follows in the same light by using factors from the Lussier’s that have proven relevant to SME success/ failure in Africa and other success/failure studies conducted around Sub-Saharan Africa.
Table 2.1: The factors considered in this study are found on the below:
Variable |
Description |
Capital |
The greater the access to capital the business has, the greater the likelihood of success given that capital pemits the business to qauire other factors of production. It also enhances the ability to seizing opportunities as well as increased in scale of business activities (Agostini, Nosella, &Soranzo, 2017, Meflinda, Mahyarni, Indrayani, &Wulandari, 2018; Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019, Foleu, Abdulnour, Nomo, &Fouda, 2015; GICAM, 2017). |
Education |
The higher the level of education owner/ manager, the higher the chances of success. This is because increased education implies improved knowledge (Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019; Karadag, 2017). |
Record keeping and Financial control. |
Paying attention to record keeping and financial control increases the chances of the business succeeding. This factor informs business decision and can improve access to formal financing as it provides relevant information to financial institutions and investors (Ajibade, &Khayundi, 2017; Wamukoya, &Otike, 2017; Andoh, Quaye, & Isaac, 2018; Anggraini, &Purwohedi, 2018). |
Planning |
Planning, especially written plans improve business success chances. It increases a basis for the evaluation of the business. In addition to that, quality written business plan is increasingly becoming a requirement for obtaining formal financing (Bogáth, 2017; KahMarn, Hin, &Bohari, 2016). |
Staffing |
Getting and retaining qualified staff increases the chances of success. This is because the staff makes use of the technology and other resources to carry out the required business operations. Staffing is generally a challenge for SMEs because they generally require more work from employees for lesser pay thereby rendering them less attractive for qualified staff (Ugoani, 2016; Waqas, Naqvi, Imran & Anjum, 2018; Al-Bdareen, &Khasawneh, 2019; Kankaras, Kapor, Petrovic, & Petrovic, 2018; Garg, 2018). |
Location |
A business with good location has increased chances of success. This is because suitable location can contribute to the reduction of the cost of operations as well as enhance exposure to customers (Chang, & Li, 2019; Mutti, &Ohrn, 2019; Balbontin, &Hensher, 2019). |
Professional Advisors |
Consulting professionals increases the business’ chances of success. Professional guidance in decision making contributes to making better business choices (Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019; Kavvadia, Hezron, 2019; Haliso, Chima, & Jeremiah, 2019; Idris, & Saad, 2019) |
Industry Experience |
Prior industry experience of the owner / manager augments the likelihood of success. Experience within the industry improve industry knowledge as well as relevant networks and skills (Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019; Chinomona ,2013; Agustina, 2018). |
Management Experience |
More management experience will increase the probability of success. Management experience improves awareness and ability to manage managerial functions (Flynn 2017; Heileman, Pett, &Mayer, 2016 ). |
Availability of markets |
The more the number of consumers who are willing and capable of paying adequate price for the product/service, greater the chances of success (Bongini, Ferrando, &Rossolini, 2017; Pemer, &Skjølsvik, 2017; Febrianti, 2016). |
Corruption |
Fraudulent use of power by public authorities on SMEs increases chances of failure for the business. Curroption increases the burden on SMEs as they bear extra cost not relevant to the business (Abioye, Adeniyi, & Mustapha, 2017; Appiah, Possumah, Ahmat, & Sanusi, 2018; Shaikh, &Khoso, 2019). |
Public Infrastructure |
Poor state of roads, access to water and electricity increases the cost of operations, thereby laying extra burden on SMEs (Abioye, Adeniyi, & Mustapha, 2017; Akinboade, 2015). |
Perceived Government Support |
Financial, technical and advisory support from government increases the chances of success (Al-Tit, Omri, &Euchi, 2019; Hyder, & Lussier, 2016; Lussier, Bandara, Marom, 2016; Virglerova, Dobes, Kramolis, &Kotaskova, 2017). |
Methodology
Sampling and Data Collection
The primary data collection for this study was done using an adequate questionnaire. Before the actual research, a pilot study was conducted to reduce the chances of misrepresentation and improve the study's internal validity. During the actual study, the questionnaire was administered to a sample of 500 participants in the major settlements of the Western Region of Cameroon: Bafoussam, Dschang, Mbouda, and Bandjoun. The sample was mapped out using the stratified random sampling technique. Data from 403 SMEs were used for analysis after verifying the consistency of returned questionnaires. The sample consisted of SMEs from the retailing, service, handcraft, and manufacturing sectors. Participants were recruited from both the formal and informal sectors. The questionnaire was administered to participants on a face-to-face bases, given that owners/managers in this region are less inclined to respond to internet-administered questionnaires.
Data analysis
The analytical tool used in this study is the binary logistic regression analysis.
Measure of SME Success / Failure. SME Success/Failure
What criteria should be used to determine whether a business is successful? This question is still debated. According to Lua and Lim (in Teng, Bhatia, & Anwar, 2011), success means continued business activities. In order words, a successful business survives one that stays alive despite the state of the company. However, this definition is considerably limited, given that a business that depends on non-business financing for survival is considered successful. Alfoqahaa (2018) on his part posits that success should be evaluated based on the goals set by the business. This implies that non-business-related objectives pursued by the business should be considered in assessing whether the business is successful. In addition to that, the difference in standards for the evaluation of success that comes with this approach limits it generalizability as each business is to be compared exclusively with itself and not with other business. Luissier (in Teng, Bhatia, & Anwar, 2011) on his part, posits that for a business to be considered successful, it should have been making profits that are above the industry’s average profits for three years prior to the period of the evaluation. While this definition is widely used, it excludes businesses younger than three years. As for Akinboade (2015), success should be evaluated in terms turnover and turnover growth. Therefore, a successful business has a constant or positive turnover growth rate for a defined period. In this study, we will use this definition to evaluate SME success/failure, given that it allows the business to be compared with other businesses and itself. More to that it, reasonably practical compared to the other definition
Reliability Test
Reliability generally refers to the internal consistency and reproducibility of a study (Leung, 2015; Morse, Barrett, Mayan, Olson & Spiers, 2002). In this study makes use of the Cronbach’s alpha test which is one of the most popular reliability tests to measure internal consistency by measuring the correlation between the items used in the measurement.
Findings
The findings form this study are presented below.
Reliability Test.
Table 4.1: Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Test
Variable |
Cronbach’s alpha |
Capital |
0.856 |
Financial Control and Record keeping |
0.935 |
Planning |
0.752 |
Location |
0.901 |
Professional Advisor |
0.879 |
Availability of Markets |
0.803 |
Corruption |
0.789 |
Public Infrastructure. |
0.845 |
Perceived Government Support |
0.967 |
As can be seen from the table above, the Cronbach’s alpha value is greater than 0.70 (which is the minimum) for all variables implying that this study can be considered reliable.
Results
Table 4.2: Binary logistic Regression
Variable |
Nagelkerke |
Significance of Hosmer and Lemeshow Test |
Probability of correct prediction without independent variable (%) |
Probability of correct prediction with independent variable (%) |
Capital |
0.712 |
0.113 |
57.1 |
86.1 |
Education |
0.020 |
0.30 |
57.1 |
59.8 |
Financial Control and Record keeping |
0.083 |
0.952 |
57.1 |
62.3 |
Planning |
0.103 |
.60 |
57.1 |
63.0 |
Staffing |
.011 |
.374 |
57.1 |
67.8 |
Location |
0.008 |
.696 |
57.1 |
57.4 |
Professional Advisor |
0.007 |
0.007 |
57.1 |
0.571 |
Industry Experience |
0.543 |
0.774 |
57.1 |
81.6 |
Management Experience |
0.409 |
0.000 |
57.1 |
79.2 |
Availability of Markets |
0.639 |
0.573 |
57.1 |
79.9 |
Corruption |
0.004 |
0.034 |
57.1 |
57.1 |
Public Infrastructure (state of public infrastructure). |
0.017 |
0.634 |
57.1 |
58.6 |
Perceived Government Support |
0.00 |
|
57.1 |
57.1 |
From the analysis of the 13 variables identified as influential to SMEs' success/failure around sub-Saharan Africa, the variables capital, industry experience, and availability of markets proved to be determinants of the success/failures of SMEs in the Western Region of Cameroon. These variables present regression coefficient ( ) 0.712, 0.639, 0.543 respectively. This means they account for substantial variations in the dependent variable. They also show statistically insignificant values of 0.113, 0.774, 0.573 for the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. This test is a goodness of fit test, and statically insignificant values imply that the misspecifications in these variables' predictive capacity are statistically insignificant, thus implying that they are good fits. It can equally be seen from the table above that they all present predictor accuracy of 79.9% and above.
Table 4.3: Source of Capital
Source of Capital |
Usage (%) |
|
Informal |
Capital from savings, family and friends |
20.8% |
Capital from tontine (ROSCA) |
38.1% |
|
Capital from reinvestment |
24.4% |
|
Formal |
Capital from banks |
6.3% |
Capital from microfinances |
10.4% |
|
|
Total |
100.0% |
From the table above, SMEs in this region make more use of informal sources of financing for their business with ROSCAs being used most extensively.
Discussion and Conclusion
Discussion
The findings from this study highlight the relevance the capital for SMEs in this region. It is equally important to note that access to formal capital is still a problem for most SMEs in other economies (Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019; Hyder& Lussier, 2016; Guzmán, & Lussier, 2015). This study affirms that the formal banking system is failing when it comes to SMEs. This category of businesses that generally have limited collateral security are disadvantaged when it comes to obtaining business financing from these institutions (Agostini, Nosella, &Soranzo, 2017, Meflinda, Mahyarni, Indrayani, &Wulandari, 2018; Gyimah, Marom, & Lussier, 2019; Akinboade, 2015, Bunyaminu, Mohammed, &Issah, 2019). In addition to that, financing from investors is even more difficult given the issue of information asymmetry (Wang, Lin, & Luo, 2019; Rad, Yazdanfar, &Öhman, 2014). Our study also revealed that SMEs in this region are making significant use of informal funding sources. They make extensive use of ROSCA (Rotating Savings and credit associations) as a source of financing. Instead of collateral, ROSCA permits SME owners/managers to leverage social networks for businesses financing (Boutchang, 2019; Nomoto, 2004; Tchuindjo, 1999). In addition to that, the structure of these associations permits them to overcome the information asymmetry barrier that hinders investors from providing financing for SMEs (Wang, Lin, & Luo, 2019; Rad, Yazdanfar, &Öhman, 2014). In the same light, these organizations do not require all transactional costs, which are reported to place a significant burden on SMEs that seek to obtain financing from banks and other financial institutions (Bechri, Najah & Nugent 2001; Ghana, &Darwanto, 2016; Ramlee, &Berma, 2013). This, therefore, renders them an attractive source of financing for SMEs. The extensive use of these ROSCAs suggests that they might be an adequate alternative or substitute for formal financing. However, it is still clear that significant efforts are still to be made to improve SMEs' access to formal financing since formal financial institutions usually have more finances.
As for industry experience, our findings imply that first-hand knowledge about an industry which can be obtained from experience within that industry is essential to success within that industry. This, to some extent, can be considered evident since sectors are different, and the specificity of an industry can be properly captured through experience (Chen, & Cheng, 2019; Snider & Davies, 2017; Awad&Amro, 2017). This might also imply that informal industry learning works for SMEs in this region. This is understandable given that formal learning structures that provide sufficient industry learning are almost inexistent. In addition to that, experience within an industry implies the development of the required skills and the networks necessary to set up and properly run the business. Though not documented, it is observable that this region's inhabitants have developed a culture whereby business owners/managers employ the younger generation from within their families or network of friends and acquaintances. While working for the business, the younger generation gets the necessary industry experience and then moves on to start a business similar to that they worked.
Our findings on the availability of markets imply the apparent need for businesses to succeed and survive. Businesses exist because there exist markets to which they can sell their products/services. While this finding is consistent with that of other studies (Hyder, & Lussier, 2016; Guzmán, & Lussier, 2015; Cameroon Chamber of Commerce, Industry, mines and handcraft 2016; Febrianti, 2016), it implies that SMEs will do well in industries or sectors that have well-developed markets. Dealing with products or services that are already well known and consumed by the market is beneficial for the business. This implication is not strange given that it is generally advised that SMEs make use of the niche strategy, and this strategy implies that there are already big organizations satisfying the needs of the greater market share while the SME focuses on satisfying the needs of a smaller neglected market segment (Nilasari, 2019; Xie, 2016). Therefore, the product/service the SME deals in is already well known in the market. This might also indicate that SMEs, contrary to popular belief, is not the adequate drivers of innovation since innovation is usually capital and implies entry into a not yet adequately developed (Edwards, 2017; Apanasovich, Heras, &Parrilli, 2016).
Limitations
This study is survival biased as it uses only exiting SMEs. Its findings are therefore generalizable only to existing SMEs in this region. More to that, it is a quantitative survey. The quantitative approach is not designed to get in contact with reality as it focuses on getting generalizable findings (Amina & Rosman, 2015; Alvi, 2016). Therefore, the use of the quantitative approach might be associated with some risk of misrepresentation (Yilmaz, 2013; Fekede, 2010). However, this risk is mitigated in the pilot study conducted before this actual study. This preliminary study provided adequate adjustments before the actual research.
Recommendations
It is important that significant actions be taken to enhance SME access to formal capital. It is also recommended that SME owners/managers who have limited access to formal capital explore informal capital sources like those provided by ROSCAs. In addition to that, entrepreneurship training programs should consecrate significant space for learners to obtain relevant industry experience. It is equally recommended that SME owners/managers in this region go in for business in industries with well-established and developed markets to improve the success rate.
As for future studies, this study is an early one. There is a need for similar studies for triangulation purposes. This research also highlighted the extensive use of ROSCAs as source of SME financing. The lack of studies in this area creates the need for investigation. In addition to that, existing SME S/F models are not quite suitable for sub-Saharan Africa, hence the need for sub-Saharan Africa model(s).
References
Abioye, L. A., Adeniyi, A. W., & Mustapha, W. B. (2017). The status of entrepreneurship support agencies (ESAs) in Lagos state, Nigeria. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 10(4), 853-881. doi :http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2017.229310.672578
Agostini, L., Nosella, A., &Soranzo, B. (2017). Measuring the impact of relational capital on customer performance in the SME B2B sector. Business Process Management Journal, 23(6), 1144-1166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2016-0205
Agustina, T. S. (2018). Business Owner’s Expertise and Business Performance of the Finalists of the Young Entrepreneurs Competition and the Role of Employee Skills Training as a Moderating Variable. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 126–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3366
Ajibade, P., &Khayundi, F. E. (2017). The role of records management in small micro and medium enterprises (SMMEs) in South Africa and its implications for business sustainability. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 27(2), 175-188. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2236645113?accountid=188730
Akinboade, O. A. (2015), Determinants of SMEs growth and performance in Cameroon’s central and littoral provinces’ manufacturing and retail sectors. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 6 (2), 183-196. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-03-2013-0033
Akinboade, O. A., &Kinfack, E. (2012). Regulation, awareness, compliance and SME performance in Cameroon's manufacturing and retail sectors. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(12), 933-950. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068291211269073
Al-Bdareen, R., &Khasawneh, H. (2019). Human resources staffing process and its impact on job involvement: Irbid district electricity company as a case study. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2), 254-266. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.19
Al-Tit, A., Omri, A., &Euchi, J. (2019). Critical Success Factors of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Saudi Arabia: Insights from Sustainability Perspective. Administrative Sciences, 9(2), 32, 1-12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/admsci9020032
Alvi, M. H. (2016), A manual for selecting sampling techniques in research. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70218/1/MPRA_paper_70218.pdf
Amina I., & Rosman M. Y. (2015), Empirical validation of qualitative data: A mixed method approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(Special Issue), 389-396. Retrieved from: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/viewFile/1511/pdf
Andoh, C., Quaye, D., & Isaac, A. F.(2018). Impact of fraud on Ghanaian SMEs and coping mechanisms. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 400-418..doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2017-0050
Apanasovich, N., Heras, H. A., &Parrilli, M. D. (2016). The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-soviet transition economies: The case of Belarus. Technovation, 57/58, 30. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/impact-business-innovation-modes-on-sme/docview/1848485439/se-2?accountid=188730
Appiah, M. K., Possumah, B. T., Ahmat, N., & Sanusi, N. A. (2018). External environment and SMEs investment in the Ghanaian oil and gas sector. Economics & Sociology, 11(1), 124-138. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-1/8
Awad, I. M., &Amro, A. A. (2017). The effect of clustering on competitiveness improvement in Hebron: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(5), 631-654. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2016-0181
Balbontin, C., &Hensher, D. A. (2019). Firm-specific and location-specific drivers of business location and relocation decisions. Transport Reviews, 39(5), 569-588. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1559254
Blackburn, R. A., Hart, M., & Wainwright T. (2013) Small business performance: business, strategy and owner‐manager characteristics. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 20 (1),8 – 27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001311298394
Bogáth, Á. (2017). Opportunities and limitations of business planning of SME. Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21st Century, 9-21. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/opportunities-limitations-business-planning-sme/docview/1945203266/se-2?accountid=188730
Bongini, P., Ferrando, A., Rossi, E., &Rossolini, M. (2017). Suitable or non-suitable? an investigation of eurozone SME access to market-based finance. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/working-papers/suitable-non-investigation-eurozone-sme-access/docview/1895667288/se-2?accountid=188730
Boutchang, A. (2019), La place de la tontine dans l’économie. La Tontine : Réflexions sur l’institutionnalisation d’un système financier éprouve (pp 24-34), Beau Bassin, International Book Market service Ltd.
Bunyaminu, A., Mohammed, I., &Issah, M. (2019). Business failure prediction: A tri-dimensional approach. Journal of Applied Business Economics, 21(2), 80-100. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammed_Issah4/publication/333084665_Business_Failure_Prediction_A_Tri-dimensional_Approach/links/5d016b694585157d15a69ebf/Business-Failure-Prediction-A-Tri-dimensional-Approach.pdf?origin=publication_detail
Cameroon Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Crafts, (2017) Survey of SMES in Cameroon. Retrieved from http://www.ccima.cm/en/phocadownload/2016_OPINION_SURVEY_OF_SMEs.pdf
Cameroon Policy Analysis and Reseach Center (2016), Suivi de la démographie des petites et moyennes entreprises au Cameroun. CAMERCAP-PARC. Retrieved from:https://media.africaportal.org/documents/Etude.Demo_PME.vol1.pdf
Febrianti, A. M. (2017). The influence of creativity, price determination to publicity and their impact to the purchasing power of customers. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 8(6), 1189-1197. Retrieved from: doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v8.6(22).05
Chang, X., & Li, J. (2019). Business performance prediction in location-based social commerce. Expert Systems with Applications, 126, 112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.086
Cheng, T. (2019). The study of relationship for personality traits, perception risk, motivation, business strategies environment factors and business performance to entrepreneurs. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 12(2), 360-371. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2303167719?accountid=188730
Chinomona, R. (2013) Business owner’s expertise, employee skills training and business performance: a small business perspective. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(06),1883-1896. Retrieved from https://clutejournals.com/index.php/JABR/article/download/8224/8262
Dan, S., &Comarmond P., (1971). Savings associations among the Bamileke. Traditional and modern cooperation in south West-Cameroon.Journal de la Société des Africanists, 41(2), 189-201. doi; https://doi.org/10.3406/jafr.1971.1689
Djoumessi, E. C. K., &Akinboade, O. A. (2011) Regulation, SME performance and growth in Cameroon’s manufacturing and retail sectors. Investment Climate and Business Environment Research Fund. Retrieved from http://www.trustafrica.org/en/publications-trust/icbe-research-reports?download=226:regulation-sme-performance-and-growth-in-cameroon-s-manufacturing-and-retail-sectors
Edwards, Thomas V, Jr, D.P.S. (2017). Sme Innovation: A Case Study. Huntsville: American Society for Engineering Management. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/conference-papers-proceedings/sme-innovation-case-study/docview/2010278622/se-2?accountid=188730
Fekede, T. (2010), The basis of distinction between qualitative and quantitative research in social science: Reflection on ontological, epistemological and methodological perspectives. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Science, 6(1), 97-108. doi: 10.4314/ejesc. v6i1.65384
Flynn, A. (2017). Re-thinking SME disadvantage in public procurement. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(4), 991-1008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2017-0114
Ghasia, B. A., Wamukoya, J., &Otike, J. (2017). Managing business records in small and medium enterprises at Vigaeni ward in Mtwara-Wikindani municipality, Tanzania. International Journal of Management Research & Review, 7(10), 974 -986. Retrieved from http://ijmrr.com/admin/upload_data/journal_Sulaman%20%205oc17mr.pdf
GICAM (2017). Tournant pour le GICAM et pour l’économie Camerounaise. Retrieved fromhttps://www.legicam.cm/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Bulletin-du-GICAM-n69.pdf
Grant, K. A., Aziz, O., &Arshed, N. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurial activity on poverty alleviation. Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2230264329?accountid=188730
Gyimah, P., Marom, S., & Lussier, R. N., (2019). Small business success or failure prediction: a comparative study in Ghana and Israel. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 21(3), 37-52. doihttps://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v21i3.2079
Heileman, M. D., Pett, T. L., & Mayer, A. J. (2016). Small- to medium-sized enterprise characteristics and performance: an exploratory examination of the census bureau's survey of business owners. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 28(1), 145-164. R etrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1943590014?accountid=188730
Hogenboom, B., &Jilberto, A. E. (2007), Theneoliberalising African States and private capital accumulating. Big Business and Economic Development: Conglomerates and Economic Groups in Developing Countries and Transition Economies under Globalization (pp.251-273). New York: Routledge
Hyder, S., & Lussier, R. N. (2016). Why businesses succeed or fail: a study on small businesses in Pakistan. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 82-100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2015-0020
Johnson, M. C. (2011). Lobbying for trade barriers: A comparison of poultry producers' success in Cameroon, Senegal and Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 49(4), 575-599. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X11000486
KahMarn, J. T., Hin, C. W., &Bohari, A. M. (2016). Antecedents of strategic planning of SMEs in Malaysia: The influence of ownership motivations and environmental uncertainty. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(7) Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1836591415?accountid=188730
Kankaras, M., Kapor, N., Petrovic, I., & Petrovic, D. (2018). Model Of Small Business Monitoring. Varazdin: Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2058257284?accountid=188730
Karadag, H. (2017). The impact of industry, firm age and education level on financial management performance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 300-314. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2016-0037
Komo, R.M, &Takor, N.K. (2019) The Bamileke Economic Ground-Breaking Mission in the Bamenda Grasslands (Cameroon), 1961- 2010. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education 6 (3), 6-18. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.060300
Leboea, T., S. (2017) The Factors Influencing SME Failure in South Africa. University of Cape Town. Retrieved from https://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11427/25334/thesis_com_2017_leboea_sekhametsi_tshepo.pdf?sequence= 1
Leung L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 4(3), 324–327. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.161306
Lussier, N. R., Bandara, C. and Marom, S. (2016), Entrepreneurship success factors: an empirical investigation in Sri Lanka, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-10-2015-0047
Mahadea, D., &Kaseeram, I. (2018). The relationship between unemployment, entrepreneurship, rising income in South Africa: an exploratory study. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 13(2), 203-226. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2018/v13n2a10
Marom, S. & Lussier, R.N. (2014), A business success versus failure prediction model for small businesses in Israel. Business and Economic Research, 4(2), 63-81. doihttps://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v4i2.5997
Mbodiam, B. R. (2021), The informal sector weighs as much in GDP as in South Africa and Mauritius, but less than in Nigeria. Business Cameroon. Retrieved from https://www.businessincameroon.com/companies/1307-7263-in-cameroon-the-informal-sector-weighs-as-much-in-gdp-as-in-south-africa-and-mauritius-but-less-than-in-nigeria
Meflinda, A., Mahyarni, M., Indrayani, H., &Wulandari, H. (2018). The effect of social capital and knowledge sharing to the small medium enterprise’s performance and sustainability strategies. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(4), 988-997. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2017-0073
Muriithi, M., S. (2017) African small and medium enterprises (SMEs) contributions, challenges and solutions. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Management Sciences, 5 (1) 36-48. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Samuel_Muriithi4/publication/315516536_AFRICAN_SMALL_AND_MEDIUM_ENTERPRISES_SMES_CONTRIBUTIONS_CHALLENGES_AND_SOLUTIONS/links/58d3720592851c319e56facb/AFRICAN-SMALL-AND-MEDIUM-ENTERPRISES-SMES-CONTRIBUTIONS-CHALLENGES-AND-SOLUTIONS.pdf
Mutti, J., &Ohrn, E. (2019). Taxes and the location of U.S. business activity abroad. National Tax Journal, 72(1), 165-191. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2019.1.06
Nilasari, I. (2019). From key characteristics of owners and business towards sustainability distro business life. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 1-9. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/key-characteristics-owners-business-towards/docview/2493872070/se-2?accountid=188730
Nomoto, M. (2004) The meanings of money in tontines (ROSCAs): The case of the Bamileke of Cameroon. Japanese Journal of Cultural Anthropology, 69 (3), 353-372. doi: https://doi.org/10.14890/jjcanth.69.3_353
Nowicka, O. (2015), Small business, big opportunities? TTIP and the EU’s SMEs. The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 4(4), 79-90. Retrieved from https://www.pism.pl/eksiegarnia/The_Polish_Quarterly_of_International_Affairs/?category_year=2015
Pemer, F., &Skjølsvik, T. (2016). Purchasing policy or purchasing police? The influence of institutional logics and power on responses to purchasing formalization. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(4), 5-21. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1827605938?accountid=188730
Radzi, K. M., Nor, M. N. M., & Ali, S. M. (2017). The impact of internal factors on small business success: a case of small enterprises under the FELDA scheme. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 22(1), 27-55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/aamj2017.22.1.2
Rao, S. (2014), Nurturing entrepreneurial women: insights from a developing country, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 6(3), 268-297. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2014-0014
Rolleri, M., Nadim, A., & Lussier, R. N. (2016). Improving small business viability through the strategic longevity and health maintenance evaluation. Small Business Institute Journal, 12(1) 10 – 20. Retrieved from https://www.sbij.org/index.php/SBIJ/article/download/255/197
Sarwoko, E., &Frisdiantara, C. (2016). Growth Determinants of Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Universal Journal of Management, 4(1), 36-41. doi: 10.13189/ujm.2016.040105
Shaikh, S., &Khoso, I. U. (2019). Corruption – A grease on wheels or an obstruction for SMEs in developing economies. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 11(1), 112-130. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2308456107?accountid=188730
Siow Song Teng, H., Singh Bhatia, G., & Anwar, S. (2011). A success versus failure prediction model for small businesses in Singapore. American Journal of Business, 26(1), 50-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/19355181111124106
Snider, J. H., & Davies, K. J. (2017). Success strategies for small financial planning firms. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 16(1), doi: https://doi.org/10.5590/IJAMT.2018.17.1.02
Teng, H. S. S., Bhatia, G. S. & Anwar, S., (2011). A success versus failure prediction model for small businesses in Singapore. American Journal of Business, 26(1), 50-64. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/19355181111124106
Tsambou, A. D., &Fomba, K. B. (2017), Performance perspectives for small and medium enterprises in Cameroon: innovation and ICTs. Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, 10(1), 68–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/tjeb-2017-0005
Ugoani, J., N. (2016). Employee turnover and productivity among small business entities in Nigeria. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 7(4), 1063-1082. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v7i4.466
Ul Haq, M., Usman, M., Hussain, N. & Anjum, Z. (2014), Entrepreneurial activity in China and Pakistan: a GEM data evidence, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 6(2), 179-193. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2014-0006
Wang, F. (2020). Digital marketing capabilities in international firms: A relational perspective. International Marketing Review, 37(3), 559-577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2018-0128
Xie, C. (2016). How do small firms survive competition in china's emerging air purifier industry? The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 18(6), 67-77. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/how-do-small-firms-survive-competition-chinas/docview/1890206559/se-2?accountid=188730