A Critical Review of Antecedents and Consequences of Employee LoyaltyUsing NVIVO
Komal Goyal
Dept. of management studies
J. C. Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA
Faridabad, India
Prof. Ashutosh Nigam
Dept. of management studies
J. C. Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA
Faridabad, India
Neha Goyal
Dept. of management studies
Faridabad, India
Abstract
Achievement of employee loyalty has become a critical task for the HR practitioner. Loyalty defines itself as being loyal, for something, or in favor of someone. When the employees do work in the favor of the organization as consider themselves fully committed towards the organization and brings the organization to the top place where the top authority wants, loyalty exists there. The purpose of this paper is to explore the antecedents of employee loyalty using NVIVO v12 software. Findings revealed that antecedents based on frequency occurrence (word frequency) and which are revolving around the word “loyalty” (word cloud) are job crafting, empowerment, enrichment, trust, job satisfaction, work-life policies. Job satisfaction is highly attributed to employee loyalty. Also, the study found theoretically organization commitment as the behavior outcome of employee loyalty.
Keywords: employee loyalty, trust, whistle blowing, empowerment, job crafting.
Introduction
Employee loyalty
Maintaining Employee loyalty has become a competitive advantage for companies. According to a survey it has been found that 76% of respondents leave the organization for availing next best opportunities. Employee loyalty is depending on employer loyalty [i]. An employer recruits, selects, trains the employees. But it’s not enough for keeping them in the long run. For that must provide various best HRM Practices (Nigam, Goel, & Goyal, 2020). People who have more experiencing at one place, are less likely to quit (Cotton et.al, 1986). Too much cost associated with the employee turnover like recruitment cost, selection cost, training cost, and opportunity cost, replacement cost, etc. Keeping away from these costs to the organization, retention is required. The factors which are attributed to employee turnover are lack of job satisfaction, poor working conditions, low compensation, and inadequate benefits (Carraher, 2011; Milman, 2003; Wasmuth and Davis, 1983). The term loyalty defines the quality of being loyal, feeling of support or duty towards someone or something. Employee loyalty means when the employee is faithful, bonds, cares and feels responsible for the organization. He or she does the work for the favor of the organization and whatever responsibility or work is given by the employer he or she fulfill that with full enthusiasm, trust, etc. Employee loyalty and organization commitment both are interchangeable words (Abd Ghani et.al, 2018). According to JosjeHoek “Loyalty is first and foremost about reciprocity. Employees should have the feeling that the organization wants the best for them, and as a result, they will continue to do their best and not look for another job. Employee loyalty is thus above all determined by how the organization has arranged things and the way this is conveyed to the employee”. A loyal employee is an asset to the organization. Fostering employee loyalty is the success for the organization not only in the short run but also in long run. By increasing, loyalty among employees decrease labor turnover cost, absenteeism and ultimately achieve the business objectives by increasing productivity, increasing efficiency, and stable the environment of business (Cotton & Tuttle et.al, 1986). An organization should concern about the welfare of employees by educating them about various benefits plans and the process of availing of those. This gives not only employee job security but ultimately achieves employee loyalty. Job insecurity and turnover are responded positively (Sverke et.al, 2003). The researcher has studied 27 Papers and based on word frequency related to employees’ words are 4091 which is shown below in table1. After that satisfaction comes. For maintaining loyalty, employee satisfaction is the foremost duty of an employer. Followed by management of workforce, committed, and many more (Sharma, & Gupta, 2015).
Table-1 Depicting word frequency
Word |
|
Count |
Similar Words |
employees ‘perception |
|
4091 |
employee, employee’’, employees, employees', employees'', employees’, employees’perception |
Satisfactions |
|
1814 |
satisfaction, satisfaction’’, satisfactions |
Managing |
|
1685 |
manage, managed, managed'', management, management’, managements, manager, managers, managers', managers’, manages, managing |
loyalty’ |
|
1655 |
loyalties, loyalties’, loyalty, loyalty', loyalty’ |
Committed |
|
919 |
commit, commitment, commitment’, commitments, commits, committed, committing |
Organizing |
|
840 |
organ, organization, organization’, organizations, organizations’, organize, organized, organizers, organizing |
Engagement |
|
764 |
engage, engaged, engagement, engagement’, engages, engaging |
Source: NVIVO plus v12 output
Antecedents of employee loyalty
Employee satisfaction is considered to be one of the most important drivers of quality, customer satisfaction, and productivity. The underlying factors related to human resources focussed TQM (total quality management) are employee training, employee empowerment, teamwork, appraisal system, and employee compensation made a conceptual model and led to job satisfaction. If a person is satisfied concerning his job then it automatically develops loyalty among members. Where job satisfaction is alive, employee loyalty exists (Jun et.al, 2005). Employees must satisfy regarding the task or duties that are given to them so that they work with full energy, vigor, and dedication (Schaufeli et al, 2002). It does not give rise only to work engagement but also employee satisfaction with their jobs (Jun 2005; Hassen, 2013 &Matzler, 2006). The employer must appreciate the employee’s performance if possible, by doing so they will work with full efficiency & would feel motivated. Don’t criticize them for their mistakes in front of third parties. Maintaining Employee loyalty has become a competitive advantage for companies. According to a survey it has been found that 76% of respondents leave the organization for availing next best opportunities. Employee loyalty is depending on employer loyalty.
Interpersonal trust (trust in management and trust in peers) strongly influences satisfaction and, as a consequence, employee loyalty (Matzler, &Renzl, 2006). Organizing so many plans for the betterment of the employees like succession planning, which ultimately fill the key position of the organization to keep in mind vacancy would arise in future. Deciding in advance which employee must place for that key job. Such practices should come into an organization.
Empowerment is giving the power or autonomy or self-determination to the employees for responsibly deciding on their workplace. Niehoff et al, (1983) defined empowerment does not have a direct effect on loyalty but affects loyalty indirectly through job enrichment. MBO (management by objective), given by ‘Peter F Drucker’ in 1954, refers to include the employees in the decision-making activity. In this activity employees and employers sit together to decide the objectives of the organization. MBO plays the role of empowering the human capital but for making successful implementation of empowerment concept, there must have self-motivation too among employees (Coleman, 1996). Whistleblowing is the act of about the illegal matters or immoral practices, occurring in the organization by the employees to the organization or the public so that can eradicate the unethical behavior from the workplace. Whistleblowing is entirely compatible with employee loyalty(Larmer, 1992).
Job enrichment and enlargement are the components of job design. By job, enrichment refers to give a new task or job to the employee, not related to an earlier job, and by enlargement refers to add in the existing job. The former is vertical while the latter is horizontal. The main motto for both the concept is to reduce monotony or boredom regarding the job and create the challenging work environment. Both these concepts create employee loyalty for the organization.
Job crafting Amy Wrzesniewski has given this concept in 2001. It refers to employees decides their jobs profiles as per their skills and abilities. Job crafting emerges where employees have full autonomy to decide how to complete a particular target given by their employers. It is a very powerful tool that can grow the organization and engaged the workforce towards their work & place (Ahuja et al, 2017). Engaged workplace makes their work place. Employee engagement is positively associated with employee loyalty (Bakker, 2010).
Work-life balance or policies impact of loyalty is differing by age, informal support, and gender. Informal support by their colleagues, supervisors led to loyalty. When the employees able to manage their both lives (personal and professional) then this indirectly increase the interest of employee which ultimately led to employee loyalty.
Literary contributors
Loyalty depends on the mutual relationship in both ways. If an employer shows interest in an employee then the employee would perform better as Duska demands, ideally, of course, one expects that if one is loyal to another person that person will reciprocate in kind (Ogunyemi, 2014). Whistleblowing is entirely compatible "with employee loyalty (Larmer, 1992). To retain employees with high levels of performance, companies try to foster positive organizational attitudes like job satisfaction and organizational commitment. With the rise of the ‘knowledge economy, employee satisfaction and loyalty have become critical issues. An empirical study was made in the banking sector using 3 HR practices i.e. compensation, empowerment, appraisal system. Combining all led to employee satisfaction and loyalty (Hassan, et al.2013). further stating that interpersonal trust (between management and employees) positively leads to employee satisfaction, which ultimately brings employee loyalty to the organization (Matzler, et.al. 2006). During the downsizing phase, it’s hard to retain all employees but can’t give mental or psychical stress to the employees due to unemployment, then there are numerous approaches to manage the surplus manpower like outplacing, flexible hours, work-sharing, and many more. Niehoff et al, (1983) described, in that situation empower them to handle such type issues in the organization by themselves. Empowerment can be regarded as an HR practice (Hassan, et al.2013). The best strategies to maintain loyalty during the downsizing phase are empowerment and enrichment. Arnold B Bakker &Demerouti, Wrzesniewski (2008) have given the concept of job redesign known as job crafting and with the help of JDR or job demand resource model, they created a linkage between the job demand and resources. Also, they explained high job demands lead to workload pressure, role conflicts, role stress, ambiguity, etc., which ultimately led to job burnout of the employees on the other hand positive job resources (are the resources or supporting activities that help the employees in achieving their goal in their work environment) also these high job resources reduces the job demands which led to employee engagement towards their work as well their organization. Employees with job crafting behavior has a tendency to be more engaged as they have the habit of frequently balancing their working atmosphere to be more resourceful and yet challenging (Bakker, Tims, and Derks, 2012)
Need of the study
The study is done in isolation so far, but here researcher has explored all antecedents of employee loyalty using qualitative software NVIVO v12. and identified all variables which led to employee loyalty. HR practitioners, come to know that how can maintain the existing workforce and escape from various unwanted expenses by this study.
Figure-1 Conceptual framework
Antecedents Consequences
Employee satisfaction, interpersonal trust, empowerment, enrichment & enlargement, job crafting, work life policies |
Employee loyalty |
Organization commitment |
Source: Author own compilation
Research methodology
Design
The researcher has decided to identify the antecedents of employee loyalty. This qualitative research is found to be a good approach. Data is analyzed with NVIVO v12 software by reviewing various research papers.
Data collection process
Two steps were used viz journal selection and paper selection. Journal is selected from highly impacted databases like; SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, and science direct. After selecting a journal, a paper is selected using keywords like employee satisfaction, empowerment, enrichment, employee loyalty, job crafting, and interpersonal trust, etc. The researcher then reviewed the abstracts of all articles and identified the research gap and find out the scope of the study in the HR area. Variables were found out by observing word cloud and word frequency, for this researcher relied mostly upon used nowadays qualitative software NVIVO v12.
Data analysis & result
Words that are evolving around employees are employee satisfaction, relationship. Engagement, empowerment, job enrichment, job crafting, supporting staff, and many more. Job satisfaction is highly attributed to employee loyalty which is shown below in figure 2.
Figure-2 Word cloud
Figure 2 word cloud diagram using NVIVO
Conclusion
Employee loyalty has become the key component for the organization for retaining employees. For attaining it, not only an employer but also the entire organization has to do many things. Creating a positive environment by having good communication and encourage them to participate in the business decision-making process and update them by providing knowledge about various benefits plans. Loyal employees are less sensitive to salary. They feel as the organization’s “Loss” is our “Loss”. Organizational commitment is enhanced when loyalty exists. Employees stay in the organization for a long time. With this staying, reduces the various costs & risk, associated with employee turnover & hiring of a new employee with the old one. Employee loyalty is a significant indicator of employee satisfaction. It demonstrates to employers that there are workers who enjoy working for them. As a result, as employers, you must do everything possible to ensure that your employees are of high quality. Leaders of today must recognize that while integrity can be taught, loyalty cannot. It only gets better with time. So, put in your best efforts while remaining patient. Soon enough, you'll have a group of dedicated workers eager to evolve alongside you.
Due to time limitation the researcher has studied less number of articles. One can make cluster analysis and thematic analysis using NVIVO v12 so as to make your research more presentable.
References
Abd Ghani, Z., Hashim, J., & Rahman, R. A. (2018). Factors Influencing the Loyalty of Employee in Relation to Organizational Climate from an Islamic Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd Advances in Business Research International Conference (pp. 233-241).
Ahuja, J., & Chaturvedi, N. (2017). Job Crafting and Employee Engagement: A multivariate study. NMIMS Management Review, 34(1), 106-120.
Bakker AB, Tims M and Derks D, (2012) Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations 65(10): 1359–1378.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands–resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43, 83–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm .20004
Bakker, A.B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.
Berg, J.M., Dutton, J.E. and Wrzesniewski, A. (2008), “What is job crafting and why does it matter?”, available at: www.bus.umich.edu/Positive/POS-Teaching-and-Learning/ ListPOS-Cases.htm (accessed June 22, 2012).
Carraher, S. M. (2011). Turnover prediction using attitudes towards benefits, pay, and pay satisfaction among employees and entrepreneurs in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Baltic Journal of management.
Coleman, H.J. (1996), "Why employee empowerment is not just a fad", Leadership Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739610120574
Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 55-70.
Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2006). A practitioner perspective on drivers of employee loyalty. Association for Information Systems - 12th Americas Conference On Information Systems, AMCIS 2006, 6, 3648–3653.
Fullagar, C., & Barling, J. (1989). A Longitudinal Test of a Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Union Loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.213
hang, C. C., Chiu, C. M., & Chen, C. A. (2010). The effect of TQM practices on employee satisfaction and loyalty in government. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 21(12), 1299–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.530796
Hassan, M., Hassan, S., Khan, M. F. A., & Iqbal, A. (2013). Impact of HR practices on employee satisfaction and employee loyalty: An empirical study of government owned publicrec sector banks of Pakistan. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.16.01.11638
Jun, M., Cai, S., & Shin, H. (2006). TQM practice in maquiladora: Antecedents of employee satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Operations Management, 24(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.09.006
Larmer, R. A. (1992). Whistleblowing and employee loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2), 125-128.
Matzler, K., & Renzl, B. (2006). The relationship between interpersonal trust, employee satisfaction, and employee loyalty. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 17(10), 1261–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360600753653
Milman, A. (2003). Hourly employee retention in small and medium attractions: The Central Florida example. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22(1), 17-35.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 36(3), 527-556.
Niehoff, B. P., Truitt, M. R., Moorman, R. H., Daugherty, R. B., Blakely, G., & Fuller, J. (2001). The Influence of Empowerment and Job Enrichment on Employee Loyalty in a Downsizing Environment. Group and Organization Management, 26(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601101261006
Nigam, A., Goel, N., & Goyal, K. (2020). Study of HRM Practices on Employees Retention: A Review of literature. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(19), 3742-3747.
Ogunyemi, K. (2014). Employer Loyalty: The Need for Reciprocity. Philosophy of Management, 13(3), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom201413315
Rastogi, M., & Richa, C. (1999). Job crafting and work-family enrichment: the role of positive intrinsic work engagement Mansi. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954864
Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 6(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034
Sharma, V., & Gupta, N. (2015). Systematic literature review of quality management in healthcare organisations: exploring and organising extant research using nVivo. International Journal of Services and Standards, 10(1-2), 2-16.
Si, S., & Li, Y. (2012). Human resource management practices on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Organizational commitment as a mediator. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(8), 1705–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.580099
Sverke, M., &Goslinga, S. (2003). The consequences of job insecurity for employers and unions: Exit, voice and loyalty. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(2), 241-270.
Wasmuth, W. J., & Davis, S. W. (1983). Managing employee turnover. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 15-22.
Yee, R. W. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Edwin Cheng, T. C. (2010). An empirical study of employee loyalty, service quality and firm performance in the service industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.015