Interrelationship between Factors Affecting Online
Shopping of Electronic Products
Manisha Yadav
Research
Scholar,
JC
BOSE UST, YMCA Faridabad
Dr. Manisha Goel
Associate
Professor,
JC
BOSE UST, YMCA Faridabad
singla_manisha@rediffmail.com
Abstract
E-commerce has changed our lifestyles entirely because
we don't have to spend time and money in traveling to the market. We can do our
online payment with help of e-commerce. The trend of online shopping is getting a boom in today’s time. Online shopping is a platform which permits consumers to
directly purchase different goods or services electronically. The rate of adoption is defined as the
relative speed at which individual adopt an innovation i.e. online shopping.
The study aims to find out the factors that affect adoption of online shopping
of consumer electronic products. The survey was conducted using
self-administered questionnaire. Google forms were used to collect data from
respondents. 252 respondents participated in the survey conducted in 2019. In
the present study factors affecting adoption
of online shopping consumer electronic products have been explored with the
help of exploratory factor analysis. Analysis of results has been conducted with the help of SPSS 21. The effect of demographic variables on adoption of online
shopping has been analyzed with the help of ANOVA. The interrelationship
between various variables has been established with the help of correlation and
regression. The results show that there
is moderate correlation between RE & PU
and between PR &PEU whereas there exists high correlation between PEUand PU.
Keywords: Online
shopping, Adoption, purchase intention, purchasing behavior, online shopping
experience, responsiveness (RE), perceived
Usefulness (PU), Perceived Risk (PR), and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU).
INTRODUCTION
Internet shopping(also known as online
shopping) is the process where consumers buy products/services over the
Internet. It is a network of linked computers enabling millions of people to
communicate and search for the information as well as to sell and buy products.
Online shopping is a recent phenomenon. The declining cost of PCs, the
development of search engine, and the consumers growing interest in the
Internet has enabled online shopping to gather significant attention in recent
years. Online shopping is becoming most accepted medium to purchase a wide
range of goods and services. It offers a new environment distinguished from the
traditional ways of doing business. It allows shopping for required products
without going to the store physically. Internet shopping i.e online shopping is
adopted by the people because they are able to shop 24 hours a day without
having to leave their home of work place.The objective of this study is to find
out the factor that affect adoption of online shopping of consumer electronic
products.
LITERATURE
REVIEW
In this chapter reviews literature related to
the study have been presented. The former previous research studies are
abstracted, and significant writings of authorities in the area under study
have been reviewed. The research scholar has given deep thinking to those
studies and has gained valuable literature from their findings which were of
great help in developing the researchwork.
Many researchers have been done to understand
online shopping: Evaluating the relationship among perceived value satisfaction
and trust based customer perspectives. The review has led to the development of
an understanding the factors affecting online shopping. A brief review of the
related literature is givenbelow:
Khurana
& kaur (2017)
the dynamics of consumer behavior is ever evolving with continuous
technological up gradations.. In order to understand online consumer behavior,
various models and frameworks have been derived by academicians &
researchers. These models are composed of different factors which are variable
in nature. The key objective of this exhaustive review is to analyze evolution
of online consumer behavior models associated to the change in variables. This
review also facilitates future researchers in understanding and selecting most
advanced models based on their relevance of variables in terms factors
affecting online consumer buying behavior. For this study, we reviewed
textbooks and research papers published.
My
Loan, Chan Yin Fah, & Behrang Samadi (2015) investigated customer Purchasing
Intention over Online Store. They examined the correlation among perceived
benefits, perceived risks and perceived website quality towards online
purchasing intention with one of the online store in Singapore. This study used
online questionnaire survey to collect 180 completed responses of male and
female Singaporean aged 20 and above.The findings showed that there was asignificant correlation between
perceived benefits, perceived website quality and online purchasing intention
while there was no significant
correlation between perceived risks and online purchasingintention.
Kumar and Maan (2014) examined scope of online shopping on the basis of
literature review. This paper analyzed the different issue of online shopping.
The research aims to provide theoretical contribution in understanding the
present status of online shopping and explores the factors that affecting the
online shopping. The study has explored the factorsaffects the consumer
attitude towards online shopping such as Privacy, security,convenience,
immediate possession, information seeking and social interaction.
Guoet. al. (2011)investigated factors towards online shopping in China. On the basis of study of
350 respondents, they explored factors such as; website design, security,
information quality, payment method, e-service quality, product quality, product
variety and delivery service. The study also emphasized that these factors are
positively related to customer satisfaction towards online shopping in china.
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
A survey was conducted in order to study the
factors affecting adoption of online shopping of consumer electronic products
in NCR. The survey questionnaire constituted questions related to level of adoption
of online shopping of consumer electronic products. Table 1 shows 27 items
related to level of adoption of online shopping. Adoption of online shopping of
consumer electronic products attributes are identified and adapted through a
comprehensive review of various studies on adoption of online shopping.
OBJECTIVES
OF THE STUDY
1. To find
out the factors that affect online shopping of consumer electronics in NCR.
2. To study the difference in perception
about factors affecting adoption on the basis of demographic variables.
3. To study the interrelationship between
various factors affecting online shopping of consumer electronics in NCR.
Scope
of the study
The present studyis based on factors
affecting online shopping of consumer electronic products in NCR. The study has
been conducted over a period of 6 months. The data has been collected through
closed ended questionnaire including 30 statements.
Data
Collection
The study is based on primary data. For the
purpose of study, secondary data has been retrieved from the research papers
published in various journals and magazines. The questionnaire designed to
collect the primary data. The questionnaire is based on 5 point Likert scale.
Sample
design:
On the basis of non-probability sampling, 350
respondents from the age group between20-30 have been selected for the purpose
of the study.
Data
Analysis and Interpretation:
Out of total 350 respondents distributed,
total 270 have been collected and 252 are found complete in all aspects to
conduct the analysis. For the purpose of data analysis, statistical techniques
such as Exploratory Factor Analysis, ANOVA have been applied. The captured
responses were entered, coded and tabulated in SPSS software. The demographic
profile of respondent has been depicted in table1.
Table 1 Respondent’s Profile
Gender |
Male |
126 |
Female |
126 |
|
Marital
status |
Single |
178 |
Married |
74 |
|
Highest
level of education |
Undergraduate |
52 |
Graduate |
68 |
|
Masters |
132 |
|
Family
income per month |
Less than 20000 |
118 |
20000-40000 |
62 |
|
Above 40000 |
72 |
Factors
affecting adoption of online shopping:
Total27 items affecting adoption of online
shopping of consumer electronic products as shown in table 2 has been used for
the purpose of study. EFA has been applied to explore the factors affecting adoption
of online shopping.
Table 2 Items affecting adoption of online
shopping
Item Code |
Description |
V1 |
Proper physical address of company selling the product is disclosed. |
V2 |
Company is being well known to public. |
V3 |
Company is being very well known to me. |
V4 |
Company is recommended to me by friends or relatives. |
V5 |
I order the products of popular brand. |
V6 |
I trust the brand name. |
V7 |
I order the brand which I have previously used. |
V8 |
I order the brand which I believe gives value for money. |
V9 |
In online shopping agreed amount of money is being charged. |
V10 |
In online shopping, money back guarantee if product is not fully satisfactory. |
V11 |
In online shopping, the quality of product purchased is fully guaranteed. |
V12 |
In online shopping, the product purchased is exactly same as shown in picture. |
V13 |
In online shopping, there is facility of returning the product anytime. |
V14 |
In online shopping, easy and convenient online ordering layout is available. |
V15 |
In online shopping, company homepage is clear and easily understandable. |
V16 |
In online shopping, purchase procedure is simple. |
V17 |
In online shopping, character font size is very easy to read. |
V18 |
In online shopping of electronic goods, its manual is easily readable and understandable. |
V19 |
In online shopping, display of product picture is very clear. |
V20 |
In online shopping, goods can be delivered quickly right after the order. |
V21 |
In online shopping too much time is not consumed in placing order. |
V22 |
Online shopping provides wider range of Electronic goods on one website. |
V23 |
Online shopping provides wider range of electronic goods to choose from different websites. |
V24 |
Online shopping provides more choice of producers of electronic goods. . |
V25 |
Online shopping offers lower price than conventional stores. |
V26 |
Online shopping offers more discounts as compared to conventional stores. |
V27 |
Online shopping provides more offers than conventional stores. |
L1 |
I would like to purchase more electronic products online in future. |
L2 |
I will recommend my friends to buy electronic products online. |
L3 |
I have a plan to make online purchase in next 6 months. |
To identify the factors, the
factor analysis has been applied to the captured responses from 252 respondents
corresponding to 27 items. Factors have been extracted considering the Eigen
value of each factor to be more than one. The variables having loadings of at
least 0.5 have been considered for the purpose of further analysis. As a
result, one variable (V9 i.e. In online shopping agreed amount of money is
being charged) has been deleted due to its loading value of < 0.5. The
remaining 26 variables yielded six factors structure. The Varimax rotation
method has been applied on the extracted factors. The variable constituents of
all extracted factors along with their factor loadings have been presented in
table 3. On the basis of study of literature, these factors have been named as
Perceived usefulness, Responsiveness,Perceived ease of use, Brand value,Companyattributes,
Perceived risk andLoyalty.
Table 3 Factor Loading based on Rotational
Matrix
Factor Name |
Item Code |
Items |
Factor Loading |
Cronbach' s Alpha |
||
Perceived
Usefulness (PU) |
V22 |
Online shopping provides wider range of Electronic
goods on one website. |
0.692 |
0.853 |
||
V23 |
Online shopping provides wider range of electronic
goods to choose from different websites. |
0.589 |
||||
V24 |
Online shopping provides more choice of producers of
electronic goods. |
0.605 |
||||
V25 |
Online shopping offers lower price than conventional
stores. |
0.687 |
||||
V26 |
Online shopping offers more discounts as compared to
conventional stores. |
0.768 |
||||
V27 |
Online shopping provides more offers than
conventional stores. |
0.64 |
||||
Perceived ease of use (PEU) |
V13 |
In online shopping, there is facility of returning
the product anytime. |
0.655 |
0.847 |
||
V14 |
In online shopping, easy and convenient online
ordering layout is available. |
0.687 |
||||
V15 |
In online shopping, company homepage is clear and
easily understandable. |
0.669 |
||||
V16 |
In online shopping, purchase procedure is simple. |
0.631 |
||||
V17 |
In online shopping, character font size is very easy
to read. |
0.7 |
||||
Responsiveness (RE) |
V18 |
In online shopping of electronic goods, its manual
is easily readable and understandable. |
0.625 |
0.768 |
||
V19 |
In online shopping, display of product picture is
very clear. |
0.77 |
||||
V20 |
In online shopping, goods can be delivered quickly
right after the order. |
0.542 |
||||
V21 |
In online shopping too much time is not consumed in
placing order. |
0.67 |
||||
Brand Value (BV) |
V5 |
I order the products of popular brand. |
0.613 |
0.800 |
||
V6 |
I trust the brand name. |
0.748 |
||||
V7 |
I order the brand which I have previously used. |
0.75 |
||||
V8 |
I order the brand which I believe gives value for
money. |
0.525 |
||||
Company Attributes (CA) |
V1 |
Proper physical address of company selling the
product is disclosed. |
0.752 |
0.864 |
||
V2 |
Company is being well known to public. |
0.505 |
||||
V3 |
Company is being very well known to me. |
0.697 |
||||
V4 |
Company is recommended to me by friends or
relatives. |
0.73 |
||||
Perceived Risk (PR) |
V10 |
In online shopping, money back guarantee if product
is not fully satisfactory. |
0.685 |
0.741 |
||
V11 |
In online shopping, the quality of product purchased
is fully guaranteed. |
0.704 |
||||
V12 |
In online shopping, the product purchased is exactly
same as shown in picture. |
0.62 |
||||
Loyalty (L) |
L1 |
I would like to purchase more electronic products
online in future. |
0.879 |
0.751 |
||
L2 |
I will recommend my friends to buy electronic
products online. |
0.847 |
||||
L3 |
I have a plan to make online purchase in next 6
months. |
0.833 |
||||
1.
Perceived
usefulness:
Perceived usefulness is the degree to
which a person believes that his or her personal growth will be accelerated by
using a particular system which will further enhance his or her job performance
(Davis 1989).This construct is taken from the original Technology Acceptance
Model. Perceived usefulness is considered to have a high impact on the behavioral
intention to adopt technological products (Davis, Bagozzi&Warshaw1989). It is
the most important factor influencing behavioral intention especially when
making an adoption decision. Total six items loaded on this factor.The factor included following items: online shopping
provides wider range of Electronic goods on one website, online shopping
provides wider range of electronic goods to choose from different websites,online
shopping provides more choice of producers of electronic goods,online shopping
offers lower price than conventional stores,online shopping offers more
discounts as compared to conventional stores,online shopping provides more
offers than conventional stores.
2.
Perceived
ease of use:
Perceived ease of use is the degree to
which a person believes he or she can use a particular system very easily (Davis
1989).According to the previous research on the Technology Acceptance Model, though
perceived ease of use has little direct effect on behavioral intention yet its
effect is largely an indirect mediating factor of perceived usefulness (Chau
1996; Igbaria, Guimaraes, & Davis 1995; Davis, Bagozzi, &Warshaw 1989.Total five
items loaded on this factor. The factor included following items: in online
shopping, there is facility of returning the product anytime,In online
shopping, easy and convenient online ordering layout is available, in online
shopping, company homepage is clear and easily understandable,in online shopping,
purchase procedure is simple,in online shopping, character font size is very
easy to read.
3. Responsiveness:
Responsiveness
is related to quick response and the ability to get help if there is a problem
or question related to online shopping Total four items loaded on this factor.
The factor included following items: In online shopping of electronic goods,
its manual is easily readable and understandable,In online shopping, display of
product picture is very clear,In online shopping, goods can be delivered
quickly right after the order, In online shopping too much time is not consumed
in placing order.
4. Brand value:
Brand is one of the most important intangible assets in today's enterprises and in many cases; an enterprise is mostly valued mainly based on its brand. During the past few two decades, there have been numerous efforts to find out the impact of brand on customer's purchasing intention.Total four items loaded on this factor. The factor included following items: I order the products of popular brand. I trust the brand name, I order the brand which I have previously used, I order the brand which I believe gives value for money.
5.Company Attributes:
The literature review in theprevious section
also indicates that product and company related factors were foundin past
empirical studies to be related to the purchase intention of consumer
whenbuying products online (Phau & Poon 2000; Nowlis & McCabe 2000;
Novak,Hoffman & Yung 2000)
Total
four items loaded on this factor. The factor included following items:Properphysical address of company selling the product is
disclosed, Company is being well known to public, Company is being very well
known to me, Company is recommended to me by friends or relatives.
6.Perceived risk:
Consumers generally perceive a risk in
almost all storepurchase decisions (Cox 1967). A recent survey of 9,500 online
shoppers revealedthat 55 percent of online shoppers stopped the buying process
prior to check out and32 percent stopped at the point of sale mainly due to the
fact that they did not want togive personal information and their credit card
number (Shop.org. 2001). Liang andHuang (1998) found that online shopping
intention depends on the degree ofperceived risk. Consumers generally associate
a higher level of risk with non-storepurchase rather than store purchase (Akaah
&Korgaonkar 1988). Total four items loaded on this factor. The
factor included following items: In online shopping, money back guarantee if
product is not fully satisfactory, In online shopping, the quality of product
purchased is fully guaranteed, In online shopping, the product purchased is
exactly same as shown in picture.
7. Loyalty:
arises despite different clues and
loyalty is a conscious customer behavior
and/or attitude (Jacoby and Chestnut, 1978; Huang and Yu, 1999; Solomon et al.,
2006; Kotler and Keller, 2006) comments on the issue.According to the approach
based on behavior, loyalty is the behavioral reaction based on prejudice as the
function of psychological processes by the decision maker in the existence of
one or more alternative in time (Jacoby and Keyner, 1973).
Comparison between
perceptions of different customers:
To study the difference in the perceptionof different
customers towards factors affecting adoption of online shopping of consumer
electronic products, the following hypothesis have been formulated.
H1: There is significant difference in
perception of respondents from different educational background about factors
affecting level of adoption of online shopping.
Table 4. Difference in perception about
factors affecting
Level of adoption of online shopping based on
education
|
ANOVA |
|
|
Dependent Variable |
|
F |
Sig. |
Perceived Usefulness |
|
5.644 |
.004 |
Perceived Ease of Use |
|
2.463 |
.087 |
Responsiveness |
.224 |
.799 |
|
Trust on Brand |
.035 |
.966 |
|
Company Attributes |
3.251 |
.040 |
|
Perceived Risk |
.597 |
.551 |
|
Loyalty |
3.591 |
.029 |
As per results of the study depicted in table
4, there is significant difference in perception of respondents from different
educational background about perceived usefulness and loyalty since the p value
is less than 0.05 whereas in all other cases, the level of difference is not so
significant as the p value is more than 0.05.
H2: There is significant difference in
perception of respondents having different level of income about factors
affecting level of adoption of online shopping.
Table 5. Difference in perception about
factors affecting
Level of adoption of online shopping based on
level of income
ANOVA |
|
|
Dependent Variable |
F |
Sig. |
Perceived Usefulness |
2.230 |
.110 |
Perceived Ease of Use |
3.695 |
.026 |
Responsiveness |
.272 |
.762 |
Brand Value |
1.024 |
.361 |
Company Attributes |
.471 |
.625 |
Perceived Risk |
.277 |
.758 |
Loyalty |
.129 |
.879 |
As per results of the study depicted in table
5, there is significant difference in perception of respondents from different
educational background about perceived ease of use since the p value is less
than 0.05.Whereas in case of perception of respondents from different
educational background about perceived usefulness, responsiveness, brand value,
company attributes, perceived risk and loyalty, there is no significant
difference as the p value is more than 0.05.
H3: There is significant difference in
perception of married and unmarried about factors affecting level of adoption
of online shopping.
Table 6. Perception of married and unmarried
about factors
Affecting level of adoption of online
shopping
|
Independent Samples Test |
|
|
Dependent Variable |
Levene's Test for Equality
of Variances |
t-test for Equality of
Means |
|
F |
Sig. |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
Perceived Usefulness |
.275 |
.600 |
.518 |
Perceived Ease of Use |
.247 |
.619 |
.315 |
Responsiveness |
.007 |
.932 |
.654 |
Trust on Brand |
.172 |
.678 |
.437 |
Company Attributes |
1.192 |
.276 |
.552 |
Perceived Risk |
1.813 |
.179 |
.104 |
Loyalty |
1.493 |
.223 |
.624 |
As per the results of t-test for Equality of
Means depicted in table 6, there is no significant difference in perception of
married and unmarried about all the factors affecting level of adoption of
online shopping as the value is more than 0.05.
H4: There is significant difference in
perception of male and female about factors affecting level of adoption of
online shopping.
Table 7. Perception of male and female about
factors
Affecting level of adoption of online
shopping
Independent Samples Test |
|
||
Dependent Variable |
Levene's Test for Equality
of Variances |
t-test for Equality of Means |
|
F |
Sig. |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
Perceived Usefulness |
1.076 |
0.301 |
0.072 |
Perceived Ease of Use |
0.021 |
0.886 |
0.773 |
Responsiveness |
1.473 |
0.226 |
0.118 |
Brand Value |
6.559 |
0.011 |
0.028 |
Company Attributes |
3.655 |
0.057 |
0.930 |
Perceived Risk |
0.623 |
0.431 |
0.012 |
Loyalty |
1.727 |
0.190 |
0.112 |
As per the results of t-test for Equality of
Means depicted in table 7, there is significant difference in perception of
male and female about brand value and perceived risk as the value is less than
0.05 whereas there is no significant difference in perception of male and
female about perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, responsiveness, company
attributes and loyalty as the value is more than 0.05.
Hypothesis:
5 Perceived riskwill directly affects perceived ease of use
In order to study the effect of PR on PEU,
regression has been applied in SPSS. The results have been depicted as below;
Table
8 Model Summaryb |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Model |
R |
R
Square |
Adjusted
R Square |
Std.
Error of the Estimate |
Durbin-Watson |
|
||||||||||||
1 |
.538a |
.289 |
.286 |
.5885 |
1.876 |
|
||||||||||||
a.
Predictors: (Constant), PerceivedRisk |
|
|||||||||||||||||
b.
Dependent Variable: Perceivedeaseofuse |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Table
9 ANOVAa |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Model |
Sum
of Squares |
D
F |
Mean
Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
||||||||||||
1 |
Regression |
35.189 |
1 |
35.189 |
101.606 |
.000b |
|
|||||||||||
Residual |
86.583 |
250 |
.346 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total |
121.773 |
251 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
a.
Dependent Variable: Perceivedeaseofuse |
|
|||||||||||||||||
b.
Predictors: (Constant), PerceivedRisk |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Table
10 Coefficientsa |
||||||||||||||||||
Model |
Unstandardized
Coefficients |
Standardized
Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||||||||||||||
B |
Std.
Error |
Beta |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
(Constant) |
2.245 |
.166 |
|
13.492 |
.000 |
||||||||||||
PerceivedRisk |
.448 |
.044 |
.538 |
10.080 |
.000 |
|||||||||||||
a.
Dependent Variable: Perceivedeaseofuse |
||||||||||||||||||
The results of the Karl Pearson correlation shows that
value of R is 0.538 which reflects
moderate correlation between PR and PEU. The value of R square shows that PR
explains only 28.9 percent variations in PEU. Since the value as per Durbin
Watson statistics is 1.876 that liesbetween 0to2, indicates the existence of
positive autocorrelation between PR and PEU.
Hypothesis
6: Perceived ease of use will directly
affect perceived usefulness
In order to study the effect of PEU on PU,
regression has been applied in SPSS. The results have been depicted as below;
Table
11 Model Summary |
|||||
Model |
R |
R
Square |
Adjusted
R Square |
Std.
Error of the Estimate |
Durbin-Watson |
1 |
.619a |
.383 |
.380 |
.560046586231282 |
1.920 |
a.
Predictors: (Constant), Perceivedeaseofuse |
|||||
b.
Dependent Variable: PerceivedUsefulness |
Table
12 ANOVAa |
|
||||||||||
Model |
Sum
of Squares |
DF |
Mean
Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
|||||
1 |
Regression |
48.626 |
1 |
48.626 |
155.032 |
.000b |
|
||||
Residual |
78.413 |
250 |
.314 |
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
127.039 |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
a.
Dependent Variable: PerceivedUsefulness |
|
||||||||||
b.
Predictors: (Constant), Perceivedeaseofuse |
|
||||||||||
Table
13 Coefficientsa |
|||||||||||
Model |
Unstandardized
Coefficients |
Standardized
Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
|||||||
B |
Std.
Error |
Beta |
|||||||||
1 |
(Constant) |
1.404 |
.200 |
|
7.021 |
.000 |
|||||
Perceivedeaseofuse |
.632 |
.051 |
.619 |
12.451 |
.000 |
||||||
a.
Dependent Variable: PerceivedUsefulness |
|||||||||||
The results of the Karl Pearson correlation show that
value of R is 0.619 which reflects high correlation between PEU and PU. The value
of R square shows that PEU explains only 38.3 percent variations in PU. Since
the value as per Durbin Watson statistics is 1.920that
lies between 0to2, indicates the existence of positive autocorrelation between
PEU and PU.
Hypothesis
7: Responsiveness will directly affect perceived usefulness
In order to study the effect of RE on PU,
regression has been applied in SPSS. The results have been depicted as below;
Table
14 Model Summaryb |
|||||
Model |
R |
R
Square |
Adjusted
R Square |
Std.
Error of the Estimate |
Durbin-Watson |
1 |
.520a |
.271 |
.268 |
.608678334196313 |
2.101 |
a.
Predictors: (Constant), Responsiveness |
|||||
b.
Dependent Variable: PerceivedUsefulness |
Table
15 ANOVAa |
||||||
Model |
Sum
of Squares |
DF |
Mean
Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
1 |
Regression |
34.417 |
1 |
34.417 |
92.896 |
.000b |
Residual |
92.622 |
250 |
.370 |
|
|
|
Total |
127.039 |
251 |
|
|
|
|
a.
Dependent Variable: PerceivedUsefulness |
||||||
b.
Predictors: (Constant), Responsiveness |
Table
16 Coefficientsa |
||||||
Model |
Unstandardized
Coefficients |
Standardized
Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
B |
Std.
Error |
Beta |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
1.904 |
.206 |
|
9.239 |
.000 |
Responsiveness |
.526 |
.055 |
.520 |
9.638 |
.000 |
|
a.
Dependent Variable: PerceivedUsefulness |
The results of the Karl Pearson correlation shows that
value of R is 0.520 which reflects
moderate correlation between RE and PU. The value of R square shows that RE
explains only 27.1 percent variations in PU. Since the value as per Durbin
Watson statistics is 2.101that lies between 2 to 4, indicates the existence of negative autocorrelation
between RE and PU.
Conclusion
In this article, it has been pointed that
various factors perceived ease of use, responsiveness,perceived usefulness, brand
image, loyalty, company attributes, and perceived risk affecting online
shopping. Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness provides good factor
loading that influence online shopping. Online shopping attracts huge people on
one platform.The results shows that there is moderate correlation
between RE and PU,PR and PEUand high correlation between PEU and PU.The value
of R square shows that RE explains only 27.1 percent variations in PU, PR
explains only 28.9 percent variations in PEU, PEU explains only 38.3 percent
variations in PU. As per the Durbin Watson, there is existence of negative autocorrelation
between RE and PU, Positive autocorrelation between PEU and PU,positive
autocorrelation between PR and PEU.As
per the results of t-test for Equality of Means, there is significant
difference in perceptions of male and female about brand value and perceived
risk ,whereas there is no significant difference in perceptions of male and
female about perceived ease of use,perceived usefulness, responsiveness, company
attributes and loyalty.
REFERENCES:
·
Chau, P. Y. (1996). An empirical assessment of
a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of management
information systems, 13(2), 185-204.
·
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness,
perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS
quarterly, 319-340.
·
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P.
R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two
theoretical models. Management science, 35(8),
982-1003.
·
Jun, G., & Jaafar, N. I. (2011). A study on
consumers’ attitude towards online shopping in China. International
Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(22), 122-132.
· Khurana & kaur (2017). Online Consumer Behaviour Models: A Literature Review . Biz and Bytes (Vol. 8. Issue: 1, 2017).
·
Kumar, S., & Maan, S. (2014). Status and
scope of online shopping: An interactive analysis through literature
review. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science
and Management Studies, 2(12), 100-108.
·
My
Loan, Chan Yin Fah, & Behrang Samadi
: Exploring Customer Purchasing Intention over Online Store .International
Journal of Business and Social Research , 05 (05), 2015.
·
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F.
(2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural
modeling approach. Marketing science, 19(1), 22-42.
·
Nowlis, S. M., & McCabe, D. B. (2000).
Online vs. offline consumer decision making: The effect of the ability to
physically touch merchandise. In Second Marketing Sci. Internet Conf.,
USC, Los Angeles, CA.
·
Phau, I., & Poon, S. M. (2000). Factors
influencing the types of products and services purchased over the Internet. Internet
Research.