Role of Project Manager’s
Competencies towards Project Success: An Empirical Evidence from Public Art and
Construction Industry of Pakistan
Romana Yasmin Khan
Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
and
Islamic
International University Islamabad ,Pakistan
JianJun Huang
Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Moazam Abas
Huazhong
University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Zafar Iqbal
Islamic International University Islamabad ,Pakistan
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the role of project
manager’s competencies towards success of construction project, because the project manager is the one who drives the
projects through thick and thin. The study is quantitative in its essence, and
an adapted questionnaire is used for data collection. The primary responses
were collected to represent the actual scenario regarding examination of
project managers’ competencies on project success. The sample comprised of
project managers and front-line managers working on construction projects of New
Housing Societies Pakistan. Research findings suggest that project integration
management competency, project quality management competency, project
communication management competency and project interpersonal management
competencies plays significant role in success of Public Art and construction
projects. The study suggests useful implications for the managers to develop
their competencies for better performance and managing the project team
members.
Keywords: Project Success, Construction Management,
Manager’s Competencies, Public Art
Introduction
Project success
remained an ever-interesting area, and primary concern for the project
managers. This is not only limited to the employees, but imperative concern for
all internal and external stakeholders. According to Crawford (2005) project
success is an important project management issue and one of the most frequently
discussed topics in construction management. Research studies examined the
project success from various angles; few were concerned with the time factor (Thomas,
2018; Wateridge, 1998), others were found curious about the cost factor (Baccarini,
1999; Marchewka, 2015), and few studies also highlight quality concerns related
to project success (Kerzner, 2017; Marchewka, 2015). Furthermore, studies also
emphasized on leadership styleswhich play pivotal role in people management and
leads towards project success (Turner and Müller, 2005). There is lack of
agreement concerning the criteria by which project success should be judged
(Baccarini, 1999; Pinto and Slevin, 1988; Prabhakar, 2008).
Construction industry
and the public art construction activities are one of the major sources of
economic growth and economic development of the country (Arshad et al., 2017).
It helps in economic uplift of the country, and provides employment
opportunities to several unskilled, semi-skilled and skilled people (Khan,
2008). Moreover, it helps in earning foreign exchange by dealing in Public Art
and Building construction material and engineering equipment.GDP From Construction in Pakistan
increased to 343183 PKR Million in 2018 from 320769 PKR Million in 2017. GDP from
Construction in Pakistan averaged 247347.62 PKR Million from 2006 until 2018;
reaching an all-time high of 343183 PKR Million in 2018 and a record low of
186380 PKR Million in 2006.Roughly 30-35% of employment is
directly or indirectly affiliated with the construction sector. As such, the
construction sector in Pakistan has played an important role in providing jobs
and facilitating revival of the economy. The construction activity has
decreased by 7.57 percent due to conservative construction-related expenditure
reported in rest of the economic activities.
Economic Survey
of Pakistan (2017) indicates impressive growth of 9.1 percent in the construction
industry as compared to the previous year and contributed in 2.7 percent of GDP
(Husain, 2017). It is expected to grow further in the near future due to mega
projects of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
According to
economic survey of Pakistan (2019), GDP from Construction in Pakistan increased to 343183 PKR
Million in 2018 from 320769 PKR Million in 2017. GDP From Construction in
Pakistan averaged 247347.62 PKR Million from 2006 until 2018, reaching an
all-time high of 343183 PKR Million in 2018 and a record low of 186380 PKR
Million in 2006. Apart from tremendous growth in the public
Art and construction sector of Pakistan, this sector is one of the most
neglected areas in the research. In the light of the facts provided above it stands necessary
to investigate the factors affecting growth in the construction projects in
Pakistan and the construction industry as a whole.
To understand dynamic environment of construction
industry of Pakistan, there is intense need to conduct studies that help
project managers to identify critical factors which ensure success in
construction projects (Ahmad et al., 2015). Wang (2009) has reported
that factors effecting project success in China are different from the main
stream of project management, and thus recommended to examine the factors
influencing project success in different countries of the World. Moreover,
their study suggests that interpersonal relationships of project managers with
stakeholders play significant role in success of Chinese construction and
public art projects, along with conventional factors of time, cost and quality.
By considering the nationality prospective (Müller and Turner, 2007), Public
artwork is usually dedicated to the particular site location, which means it is
created based on where it is located. Although this is a characteristic of
society, the development and management of public art can be a complex process.
The research also focuses on public art project management capabilities of the
housing society, including murals, sculptures, memorials, mixed-use buildings
or landscapes art in developing and building new housing communities.
The study also aims to promote best practices in public art construction
and raise the level of urban art and culture. Large-scale projects with
well-developed housing societies have increasingly focused on building
innovative public art for local communities alongside the roads, canals, parks,
museums, shopping centers, mosques, stadiums and squares. Pakistan, the current study provides the insights by investigating
the success factors in the construction industry of Pakistan. Although the
design of public art affect its use, the
public space project states that 80% of the success of public art space is the
result of its constructed "management", which refers to the
maintenance of the space and the planning of activities.
In furthermore, even in the best-designed public
interactive spaces, activities need to be well managing build planned. The
space must be clean, safe, and well maintained; otherwise it will not be
possible to serve people well. Various public
art project managers, administrators and cultural planners can play an
important role in designing, managing and planning public spaces. Progressively,
project manager are being tapped to collaborate with artists, architects,
landscape designers, engineers, and city developers in the design and creation
of public spaces.
Various public art project managers, cultural
planners can play an important role in designing, managing and planning public
places. Project managers are gradually being used to design and create public
spaces in collaboration with artists, architects, landscape designers,
engineers and urban developers. The current study examines the factors that are
responsible for the project success and also provide insights about personalized
competencies which project manager should possess to ensure project success. The
competencies considered for the study include quality management, communication
management, interpersonal linkages and project integration management. It is
among the aims of the study to determine the relative importance of each factor
towards project success.
Fig:1
Bahria Town phase map with construction planning source author
Bahria Town Karachi construction
Map phases 1,3,4,5 BahriaTown Islamabad construction
Map phases 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 BahriaTown Lahore construction Map
phases 1, 3,4,5,6
Building construction projects Public Art and Parks Shoping Malls Houses Public institutes
Literature
Review
Project
success
A project is a
sequence of tasks, performed in a specific time period, in a manner to achieve
specific objectives. As the project has following characteristics; it is likely
to be a one-time program having a life cycle beginning at specific start date
and closing at an end date. It has a budget and likely to require the use of
multiple resources, most of which may be scarce and have to be shared among
others. It may require the establishment of a special organization or the
crossing of traditional organizational boundaries (Akewushola et al., 2012;
Kerzner, 2017; Pasian and Silvius, 2016).
Project success
is defined as, “the project is completed satisfactorily and is acceptable to
the client”. The project is acceptable to the clients when it is completed in
time, within budget and with the predetermined features (Ika et al., 2011) .Additionally,
project success can be defined in terms of two dimensions that are the
technical performance and the efficiency of execution (Maylor and Turkulainen,
2019).
Competencies related to the project manager are a part of
critical success factors that have influence on the functioning and successful
completion of the project (Pasian and Silvius, 2016; Turner and Müller, 2005).
A competency refers to the knowledge, skill, trait, motive, attitude, value or
other personal characteristics pre-dominant in performing a job. It can be
developed on the basis of the hard skills in which the technical abilities are
required or on the basis of the soft skills in which the interpersonal skills
are practiced (Alam et al., 2010).Success without competencies cannot be
ensured. The incompetence leads to re-work, and the re-work leads to the
wastage of resources such as time, cost and stakeholder’s trust in the project
manager and the project team. On the basis of previous literature, we suggest
following competencies for project in the construction and public art industry.
As a new public art construction commission in new housing societies cities
Drafting the "Administrative and management on the Construction of public
art Sculptures” Improve the level of urban public art.
Quality
management and project success
Ensuring quality
is the key to ensure project success, whether it is a case of organizations or
projects, it is true for all. Project managers have recognized that quality
assurance is one of themost influential factors of project success (Rose,
2013). The quality management is about ensuring that the project,
organizations, products or services are consistent. Generally quality
management has four major areas to be covered including quality planning,
quality assurance, quality control and quality improvement. Quality is a
subjective criterion, and assessment of quality can be done with the help of
pre-defined standards and scope of the project. Functionality within the scope
of project is an important indicator of project success (Agarwal and Rathod,
2006).Project success and evaluation criteria in construction industry is
different from other industries.Huang and Chan(2006) examined the success
factors for Chinese construction industry and came to know that besides the
factors like time, cost and quality the building up of the relationships of the
project managers with all the stakeholders, especially with the clients is most
important to get the project completed well in time.In another studyrelated to
the IT projects , it was found that the scope of the project and more
specifically functionality within the scope defined was the most important
factor that ensured success (Agarwal and Rathod, 2006).
In construction
projects, managers identify critical success factors for evaluation of quality
management.
In the previous
studies, Wateridge (1988)
has found that the critical success factors with respect to the projects may
include the success factors like project results based on the time, cost and
quality, appreciation of the client about the accomplishment of the project,
project human resources, users, contracting partners and the stakeholders. Success
factors responsible for making projects different from others included
leadership and team building, policy making and development of the strategy,
management of the stakeholders, management of resources and contracting (Westerveld,
2003).
Communication
management and project success
Communication is
a key to the soft flow of information, ensuring success throughout the projects
(Andersen et al., 2006). Communication has a common nature for all the projects
and is equally applied to all the projects being done across the sectors (Ammeter
and Dukerich, 2002). Communication as a competency can be defined as, the
skills possessed by the project manager to convey the relevant information to
the right person at the right time for better utilization of the information.
Monitoring and Feedback are considered important activities for better
communication of the project related information (White and Fortune, 2002).The
project managers dealing with different projects may use different types of
techniques for communication. Majority of the projects and project managers
prefer to have sound communication system for effective operations during the
commencement of the projects leading to favorable outcomes.
Sumner and
Powell (2013) stated that the project managers should possess soft skills and
hard skills to be a successful manager. The soft skills are related to the
intangible skills possessed, i.e. communication skills and the people
management skills. The hard skills are related to the skills that have the
technical nature and pertain to the solution of problems, dealing with the
financial figures and physical operating the machinery etc. Looking into the
importance of the project communication, Frank Cervone (2014) reported that
several horrible stories exist regarding non-effective communication between
project team members and stakeholders leading to project failures. To avoid the
project failures, it is necessary to implement effective communication with the
project team members. The effective communication can be practiced by removing
and avoiding the barristers and errors that come in the way of effective
communication (Choudhry et al., 2017). Removing barriers will help in ensuring
project success for all the stakeholders.
Interpersonal
Linkage with Project Success
Management of
interpersonal linkages is key to better outcomes of the project. The project
managers having the ability to handle the human resources in an appropriate
manner to ensure commitment and better performance of employees. It is
prerequisite for successful project managers to have emotionally intelligent. They
can be emotionally intelligent if they have the capability to understand the
feelings of others working under his span of control. This is commonly known as
the ability of the project managers to lead, direct and guide, as well as
maintain relationships based on harmony is called as the interpersonal
competencies possessed by the project manager (Ofori, 2014; Rose, 2013).
The linkage
between the project manager and the project success has been examined by
various research studies. Turner and Muller (2005) highlighted that the success
of the projects is dependent upon the competencies possessed by the project
manager. These competencies of the project managers pertained to the leadership
strengths reflected by the project managers. Furthermore, they highlighted that
the leadership style adopted by the project managers particularly including the
dimensions like the emotional intelligence and management focus and intellect
can be of ultimate use for achieving success. Assaf, Hassanain, Mughal (2014) highlighted
the importance of effective teamwork for the construction projects. They
reported that interpersonal relationships are necessary to develop better
linkages between team members and project success. Effective team management requires
healthy relationships with all the team members i.e. architects, contractors,
material suppliers, government planners and engineers (Winch, 2009).
Moreover, it has
been noted that the project managers having control over the employees in terms
of motivating them is another part of effective interpersonal management. The
higher the motivation of employees also leads to better and positive outcomes
(Juli, 2010).The interpersonal relationship leading to highly effective teams
helps in understanding the prevailing characteristics in the project teams.
Managers have to develop those competencies that support making strong bond
between the project team members and the related personnel.
Project
Integration and Project Success
Project
Integration is about making key choices and decisions about resource
coordination and control on competing objectives and differing alternatives.
These are supposed to be the key to project success (Ofori, 2014).Since, the
project manager is the one who ensure resource availability,allocate resources
to work units and make critical decisions about scheduling; he is responsible
for integration of the whole process.
Project manager
plansintegration points before and during the completion of projects. Project
managers are under constant pressure to deal with different kinds of problems
occurring during accomplishment of unique outcomes (Takey and Carvalho, 2015).
Additionally, they are expected to coordinate the work of people from different
disciplines in order to accomplish defined tasks while coping with the
complexity, uncertainty and constraints of the project itself (Anantatmula,
2010). For dealing with the complex and ever-changing environment they have to
develop certain competencies, and these competencies lead towards project
success.
Conceptual framework
Hypotheses
H1: There is a positive impact of quality management
competencies on construction project success in Pakistan.
H2: There is a positive impact of communication management competencies
on construction project success in Pakistan
H3: There is a positive impact of interpersonal linkages
competencies on construction project success in Pakistan
H4: There is a positive impact of
project integration competencies on project success
in construction projects in Pakistan.
Methodology
Population is
the generalization region in the form of the subject or the object under study
to be learned and conclusions drawn, while the sample is a portion of the
population studied. Population of the study is employees working in the
construction firms, and employees working in Bahria Town projects were chosen
as sample of the study. Bahria Town has over 100,000 employees working in it
(“Bahria Town,” 2019).
A convenient
sampling technique was adopted. The total number of responses included in the
study was 255. The sample unit for the study was project managers and
front-line managers. A questionnaire was adopted from study of Ofori (2014), in
order to measure project manager’s competencies which includes quality
management, communication management, interpersonal linkage and project
integration. For project success, items were adopted from study of Dvir, Raz
and Shenhar (2003). Five points Likert type scale was used to assess each
measure. The five-points Likert type scale comprised of 1 to 5 response
options, where 1 represented “strongly disagree” response, 2 represented
“disagree” response, 3 represented “neither disagree nor agree response”, 4
represented “agree” response and 5 represented “strongly agree response”.
To measure the
project integration competencies of the project managers six statements were
used ranging from PI1 to PI6, stated in the questionnaire attached.
For the purpose of interpersonal or human
resources competencies eleven statements ranging from PH1 to PH11 were used. To
measure the project communication competencies again eleven statements were
used following a sequence of PC1 to PC11 and for examining the project quality
competencies seven statements were used ranging from PQ1 to PQ7.The statements
used to measure meeting planning goals comprised of five statements ranging
from PS1 to PS5 and to examine the project success seven statements were used
ranging from PS 6 to PS 12.
Analysis
Table 1 shows demographic
information of the sample. Majority of
the respondents were under the age limit of 41 to 45 years that comprised 34.1%
of the total sample size. Second major category was 46 to 50 years age, which
comprised 22.7% composition of the total sample size. Followed by third major
age category ranges from 36 to 40 comprised 19.6% of the total sample size.
This shows that majority of the respondents working in the Bahria Town were
having age between 36 years to 50 years. Majority of the project managers were
having bachelor’s degree, comprised nearly half of the sample size. Followed by
this group, the next category of the respondents was having Masters of Sciences
(MS) comprised of 42.7 %. The people having PhD’s were very limited comprising
0.8% and were only two in number.
Bahria Town is
the equal opportunity employer and focuses on providing employment to male as
well as female candidates.
But at the time
when the data was gathered from the project managers, it was found that all the
respondents were male and none of the female candidate took part in the survey.
The tenure of the respondent was necessary to be recorded for the reason that
the respondents must know the project well and should be in a position to
respond to the statements in a well manner. 54.9% people were having tenure
more than 6years. It means that the responses gathered are genuine and people
had an adequate experience in the construction
Projects
considered for the current study
Table 1. Demographics source: author own research |
||||
Variables |
class |
Frequency |
Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
26
to 30 years |
7 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
|
31
to 35 years |
17 |
6.7 |
9.4 |
Age |
36
to 40 years |
50 |
19.6 |
29.0 |
|
41
to 45 years |
87 |
34.1 |
63.1 |
|
46
to 50 years |
58 |
22.7 |
85.9 |
|
51
to 55 years |
26 |
10.2 |
96.1 |
|
56
to 60 years |
10 |
3.9 |
100.0 |
|
Bachelors |
121 |
47.5 |
47.5 |
Education |
Masters |
23 |
9.0 |
56.5 |
|
MS |
109 |
42.7 |
99.2 |
|
PhD |
2 |
.8 |
100.0 |
Gender |
Male |
255 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
1
to 5 |
27 |
10.6 |
10.6 |
Experience |
6
to 10 |
140 |
54.9 |
65.5 |
|
11
to 15 |
88 |
34.5 |
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance based PLS-SEM
approach is gaining popularity in social sciences. SmartPLS3 software was used
for data analysis, because it is suited for exploratory studies and provides
path analysis by reduced error term (Hair et al., 2012). Data analysis is
performed in two phases; measurement model and structural model as recommended
by Hair et al., (2014).
Phase1: Measurement Model
In the measurement model, we assess reliability and
validity of first order constructs. The
reliability is the degree of consistency of the scale, while validity refers to
truthfulness of scale. In the first step, we extract outer loadings with the
help of PLS-SEM algorithm.
In order to increase overall
significance of the model, we remove items which do not meet the sufficiency
criteria suggested by (Hair et al., 2012). Table 2 shows outer loadings of the
items, which are above the criteria of 0.7 (Wong, 2013).Table 3 shows that
Cronbach’s Apha values for all the variables are above 0.7, and scale exhibit
good inter-rater consistency. Furthermore, composite reliability values are
also above the cutoff value 0.7, which means scale meets the criteria of
reliability.
Overall validity of scale is assessed with the help
of convergent and discriminate validity. Convergent validity reflects the level
of agreement among multiple indicators related to one construct. For
establishment of convergent validity AVE, CR and outer loadings should be above
0.5. table 3 shows that AVE and CR values for each variable is higher than 0.5,
and table 2 shows outer loadings with are also above the criterion of 0.5.
Hence, measurement model exhibits convergent validity.
Table
2. Factor Loadings source :author research |
|||||
Items |
Communication
Management |
Interpersonal
Linkages |
Project
Integration |
Project
Success |
Quality
Management |
PC1 |
0.81333 |
||||
PC10 |
0.8011 |
||||
PC11 |
0.77695 |
||||
PC2 |
0.95474 |
||||
PC3 |
0.97951 |
||||
PC4 |
0.97886 |
||||
PC5 |
0.95085 |
||||
PC6 |
0.81169 |
||||
PC7 |
0.76227 |
||||
PH1 |
0.8157 |
||||
PH10 |
0.81077 |
||||
PH11 |
0.77295 |
||||
PH2 |
0.75965 |
||||
PH3 |
0.81958 |
||||
PH4 |
0.7925 |
||||
PH5 |
0.75473 |
||||
PH6 |
0.80257 |
||||
PH8 |
0.72458 |
||||
PH9 |
0.70901 |
||||
PI1 |
0.84682 |
||||
PI2 |
0.90112 |
||||
PI3 |
0.76617 |
||||
PI4 |
0.72581 |
||||
PI5 |
0.71058 |
||||
PI6 |
0.70942 |
||||
PQ2 |
0.81693 |
||||
PQ3 |
0.88901 |
||||
PQ4 |
0.80671 |
||||
PQ6 |
0.86684 |
||||
PS1 |
0.82655 |
||||
PS10 |
0.7713 |
||||
PS11 |
0.80197 |
||||
PS12 |
0.84668 |
||||
PS2 |
0.7582 |
||||
PS3 |
0.77701 |
||||
PS4 |
0.75824 |
||||
PS5 |
0.84034 |
||||
PS6 |
0.843 |
||||
PS8 |
0.8071 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table
3. Measurement Model source: author
research |
|||||
Cronbach's
Alpha |
rho_A |
Composite
Reliability |
|
Average
Variance Extracted (AVE) |
|
Communication Management |
0.96005 |
0.9726 |
0.96657 |
|
0.76445 |
Interpersonal Linkages |
0.93416 |
0.9252 |
0.9383 |
|
0.60384 |
Project Integration |
0.89553 |
1.0338 |
0.90239 |
|
0.60852 |
Project Success |
0.94231 |
0.9725 |
0.94796 |
|
0.64599 |
Quality Management |
0.87221 |
0.9382 |
0.90924 |
|
0.71498 |
Discriminant validity shows that
all the indicators have strong association within specified factor as compared
to other factors in the model. For discriminant validity, square root of AVE
should be greater the correlations of other constructs. In Table 4, diagonal
values represent square root of AVE, which are greater than other correlation values
in rows and columns. So, measurement model holds good reliability and validity.
Table
4. Discriminant Validitysource:author research |
|||||
Communication Management |
Interpersonal
Linkages |
Project
Integration |
Project
Success |
Quality
Management |
|
Communication Management |
0.87433 |
|
|
|
|
Interpersonal Linkages |
0.7048 |
0.77707 |
|
|
|
Project Integration |
0.62946 |
0.69702 |
0.78008 |
|
|
Project Success |
0.12986 |
0.08912 |
0.11218 |
0.80373 |
|
Quality Management |
0.66002 |
0.70383 |
0.56124 |
0.04561 |
0.84556 |
Phase 2: Structural model
Hair
et al, (2014) and Wong (2013) suggests that in PLS-SEM after checking the
quality standard for reflective model, coefficient of determination and inner
model path coefficient must be assessed. So, the current study applied PLS
algorithm to assess the quality of reflective model. Circles in the figure
shows that how much the variance in the dependent variables are explained by
independent variables and values on arrows represents how strong one variable
have effect on other (Wong, 2013).
The
coefficient of determination is 0.23 for project success which means research
model explains 23% variances in project success. PLS-SEM result shows that
quality management, communication management, interpersonal linkages and
project integration has significant and positive impact on project success. Path
coefficient for reflective model shows that communication management (0.764)
has strong effect on project success as compared to the other variables.
Quality management (0.715) competency is second most influential factor for project success.
Project integration (0.609) and interpersonal linkage (0.604) are third and fourth
important factors for project success respectively.
Table
5. Structural Model source :author research |
||||||
Variables |
Original
Sample (O) |
Sample
Mean (M) |
Standard
Deviation (STDEV) |
T
Statistics (|O/STDEV|) |
P-Values |
Hypothesis
|
Communication Management |
0.764 |
0.744 |
0.078 |
9.826 |
0 |
Accepted |
Interpersonal Linkages |
0.604 |
0.523 |
0.15 |
4.024 |
0 |
Accepted |
Project Integration |
0.609 |
0.533 |
0.161 |
3.772 |
0 |
Accepted |
Quality Management |
0.715 |
0.621 |
0.157 |
4.548 |
0 |
Accepted |
Fig
2: villas,shoping malls ,institutes and
public Art under construction and completed projects Bahria Town Lahore ,islamabad and
karachi pakistan
Discussion and Conclusion
The aim of the study was to examine the impact of
project manager’s competencies on project success in the context of
construction projects in Pakistan. The results showed that competencies are
necessary components for ensuring construction project success. Quality
management competency, communication competency, interpersonal linkage
competency and project integration competency has significant impact on project
success. Furthermore, it can be concluded that out of four competencies
considered for the study, quality management and communication management have critical
importance in ensuring project success. It is also important to keep in mind that
individual competency could not ensure project success, managers have to master
all the necessary competencies. Previous studies also suggest that individual
characteristics of the project managers are important but the project related
factors are also importance in achieving success (Bakhsheshi and Nejad, 2011). Quality
management can be considered as a key to ensure project success, especially in
the construction industry of Pakistan. Quality management leads towards client
satisfaction, and client often generate positive words of moth about project
manager and construction firm (Lim and Mohamed, 1999). Rose (2013) has
mentioned quality management as one of the major areas of project management.
This is a necessary area for managers to develop as a skill area and develop it
as a competency. The competency is bit different form developing a skill. The
competency is developed after practicing the skill again and again. Higher the
exposure in dealing with the project difficulties, higher will be the level of
competencies.
Moreover, Quality
management is not the only competency which ensure success. In fact, in case of
construction industry, overall quality can only be managed if manager have
communication competency, interpersonal linkage competency and integration
competency. Majority of the research studies have considered examining the
effects of quality related issues in the organizational context and have
generated a gap to examine the quality related issues in the project settings.
Project
manager’s communication skills are necessary to deal with different
stakeholders (Pasian and Silvius, 2016; Takey and Carvalho, 2015) to complete
projects successfully. Communication helps in shaping the personality of the
project managers and in this regard Wang (2009) presented a view point that the
personality of project managers has influential effects on attaining the success
of the projects. Better communication skills help in removing the ambiguities
and conflicts prevailing in the projects. Frank Cervone(2014) reported the
effective communication as a backbone for the successful achievements in the
projects.
Further it is
highlighted that the small teams may be managed well by having an ordinary
level of communication skills but managing large teams is tough challenge for
the project managers especially the construction projects(Winch, 2009).People
management skills are also very crucial for project success. Employees
satisfaction leads towards project success. It is responsibility of the project
managers to keep plausible relationship with the project team and try to
maintain interpersonal linkages. Maintaining formal and informal relationships
with the stakeholders help project managers to resolve many issues without
bringing them on record. Interpersonal linkages help in making the project
teams more effective and the result in better productivity and ultimately
project success (Assaf et al., 2014).
The achievement
of team effectiveness is necessary and can be attained by utilizing the
interpersonal competencies by the project managers. Construction projects need
high level of involvement in the construction activates and the activities can
be accomplished having well-knit team. Well-knit team becomes an asset for the
project and helps in reduced wastage of the project resources and further help
in time delivery of information to the relevant personnel. The project managers
can take help of appointing right man for the right job by practicing the
interpersonal relationships. The interpersonal relationships help them to know
the requirements of the team members very well. Smith, Bruyns and Evans (2011) suggested
that project managers should develop optimism to reduce stress in the projects.
For better management of the interpersonal linkages the project managers have
to think and practice optimism.
Project
integration is the decisions regarding key aspects of the project. The decision
about choices of resources, coordination etc. Integration is an important part
of the project. Managers are concerned about the integration of the project
because the project integration is linked to commencement of the project.
Project integration pertains to choosing the best resources for the project
(Ofori, 2014). The best combination of resources especially the human capital is
essential for the project success. The current study shows that the project
managers were competent in developing the best combination of resources that
helped them in managing project success. This is the reason that Bahria Town
has developed its name not only in Pakistan but has been regarded as the Asia’s
best and largest construction project. Moreover Pasian and Silvius (2016) affirmed
that sustainability of the projects rests in the competencies held by a project
manager. The integration of all the aspects of project ensures removing
ambiguities and smooth running and completion of the project.
Implications
The managers
having project management competencies including integration of the project,
managing the quality, using effective means of communication and interpersonal
relationship are really helpful in ensuring success of the construction
projects. Although a sample examined had positive impact on the success but
still there is need to refine it to the highest level for developing a
competitive edge in the construction projects.
Keeping in view
the four competencies selected it is recommended that quality of the
construction projects can be achieved and maintained for a longer period of
time by using these competencies, firstly ensuring the well integration of the
projects, secondly managing the human resources by using interpersonal
competencies and lastly by using effective ways of communication.
Besides
development of the formal networks, the informal networking is good to handle
the complex situations arising during commencement of the construction
projects. The main challenge of the construction projects is to achieve all the
goals set. This can be managed by using the four competencies selected for the
study.
Since
communication is the clarity of the goals to achieve and it can be done by
delivering the in time and clear messages to the relevant people working in the
project. The clarity of the tasks assigned and the communication of the right
expectations for the right people will enable the project manager to avoid
conflicts and get the job done in time and within the cost boundaries.
The higher level
of competencies means having diverse experience for the managers. The stronger
the competency the stronger will be the success of construction projects. The
competencies not only look at the soft side of the skills but also require
building the hard/ technical skills.
Development of
the interpersonal skills as competencies is linked to having strong leadership
skills and having strong potential for team work. This can be ensured by
monitoring the project team members and providing the feedback to the relevant
personnel in time. If the manager develops the informal networks it will become
easy for the managers to get closer to the people and the employees will not
hesitate to share the difficulties arising out of the tasks performed.
Communication
methods are to be kept in mind; the use of effective and more appropriate
methods also leads to having successful commencement and completion of the
projects. The project managers may consider using face-to face communication
frequently and besides using this they can use the video conferencing for
developing an understanding of the employees working under his supervision. The
expert opinion can also be shared using this technique. The projection of the
designs for better understanding can be made using the PowerPoint presentations
and other technology-based tools.
Limitations and future recommendations
We strongly recommend that future studies
incorporate more competencies including technical and non-technical
competencies which effect project success in the construction industry. The
sampling technique used for the study was non-probability sampling and future
studies can use sampling frame for random sampling. It will be interesting to
explore success factors at different managerial positions. Sample size can also
be considered as limitation, and future studies should consider large sample size.
References
Agarwal,
N., Rathod, U., 2006. Defining ‘success’ for software projects: An exploratory
revelation. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24, 358–370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.11.009
Ahmad,
A., Younis, M.S., Ahmad, N., Anwar, N., 2015. Critical Factors Influencing the
Project Success in Pakistan. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci.
https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3p815
Akewushola,
R.O., Olateju, O.I., Hammed, O.G., 2012. Effect of project management on
project success. Aust. J. Bus. Manag. Res. 2, 1–11.
Alam,
M., Gale, A., Brown, M., Khan, A.I., 2010. The importance of human skills in
project management professional development. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 3,
495–516. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011056101
Ammeter,
A.P., Dukerich, J.M., 2002. Leadership, Team Building, and Team Member
Characteristics in High Performance Project Teams. Eng. Manag. J. 14, 3–10.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2002.11415178
Anantatmula,
V.S., 2010. Project Manager Leadership Role in Improving Project Performance.
Eng. Manag. J. 22, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2010.11431849
Andersen,
E.S., Birchall, D., Arne Jessen, S., Money, A.H., 2006. Exploring project
success. Balt. J. Manag. 1, 127–147.
Arshad,
H., Qasim, M., Thaheem, M.J., Gabriel, H.F., 2017. Quantification of material
wastage in construction industry of Pakistan: An analytical relationship
between building types and waste generation. J. Constr. Dev. Ctries. 22, 19–34.
Assaf,
S., A. Hassanain, M., Mughal, H., 2014. Effectiveness of Project Teams and
their Impact on the Performance of Saudi Construction Projects. Res. J. Appl.
Sci. Eng. Technol. 7, 5148–5156. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.911
Baccarini,
D., 1999. The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Proj.
Manag. J. 30, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
Bahria
Town, 2019. URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahria_Town (accessed 9.16.19).
Bakhsheshi,
H., Nejad, R., 2011. Impact of project managers’ personalities on project
success in four types of project. Presented at the International Conference on
Construction and Project Management, pp. 181–86.
Choudhry,
R.M., Gabriel, H.F., Khan, M.K., Azhar, S., 2017. Causes of discrepancies
between design and construction in the Pakistan construction industry. J.
Constr. Dev. Ctries. 22, 1–18.
Crawford,
L., 2005. Senior management perceptions of project management competence. Int.
J. Proj. Manag. 23, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.005
Dvir,
D., Raz, T., Shenhar, A.J., 2003. An empirical analysis of the relationship
between project planning and project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 21, 89–95.
F.
Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., G. Kuppelwieser, V., 2014. Partial
least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in
business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26, 106–121.
Frank
Cervone, H., 2014. Effective communication for project success. OCLC Syst.
Serv. Int. Digit. Libr. Perspect. 30, 74–77.
https://doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-02-2014-0014
Hair,
J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Mena, J.A., 2012. An assessment of the use of
partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J.
Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
Huang,
J.-H., Chen, Y.-F., 2006. Herding in online product choice. Psychol. Mark. 23,
413–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20119
Husain,
T., 2017. Pakistan’s construction industry – the hot cake for foreign
investors. EXPRESS Trib.
Ika,
L.A., Diallo, A., Thuillier, D., 2011. The empirical relationship between
success factors and dimensions: The perspectives of World Bank project
supervisors and managers. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 4, 711–719.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111164092
Juli,
T., 2010. Leadership principles for project success. CRC Press.
Kerzner,
H., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and
controlling, Twelfth edition. ed. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Khan,
R.A., 2008. Role of Construction Sector in Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence
from Pakistan Economy, in: 279First International Conference on Construction In
Developing Countries. Presented at the Advancing and Integrating Construction
Education, Research & Practice, Karachi, Pakistan.
Lim,
C., Mohamed, M.Z., 1999. Criteria of project success: an exploratory
re-examination. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 17, 243–248.
Marchewka,
J.T., 2015. Information technology project management: providing measurable
organizational value, Fifth edition. ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Maylor,
H., Turkulainen, V., 2019. The concept of organisational projectification:
past, present and beyond? Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. ahead-of-print.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0202
Müller,
R., Turner, R., 2007. The Influence of Project Managers on Project Success
Criteria and Project Success by Type of Project. Eur. Manag. J. 25, 298–309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.003
Ofori,
D., 2014. An Exploratory Study of Project Management Competency in Ghana. J.
Afr. Bus. 15, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2014.956644
Pakistan
economic survey 2016-2017, 2017. . Ministry of Finance, Pakistan.
Pakistan
Economic survey 2018-2019, 2019. . Ministry of Finance, Pakistan.
Paksian,
B., Silvius, A.G., 2016. A Review of Project Management Research in IRNOP and
PMI Conferences from 2009 to 2014 to Identify Emerging Perspectives. Eur. Acad.
Manag. EURAM Paris.
Pinto,
J.K., Slevin, D.P., 1988. Project success: definitions and measurement
techniques. Project Management Institute.
Prabhakar,
G.P., 2008. What is project success: a literature review. Int. J. Bus. Manag.
3, 3–10.
Rose,
K.H., 2013. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®
Guide)—Fifth Edition. Proj. Manag. J. 44, e1–e1.
Smith,
D., Bruyns, M., Evans, S., 2011. A project manager’s optimism and stress
management and IT project success. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 4, 10–27.
Sumner,
M., Powell, A., 2013. What Project Management Competencies are Important to Job
Success?
Takey,
S.M., Carvalho, M.M. de, 2015. Competency mapping in project management: An
action research study in an engineering company. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33,
784–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.013
Thomas,
B., 2018. Four key steps to great Employees Value Proposition.
Turner,
J.R., Müller, R., 2005. The project manager’s leadership style as a success
factor on projects: A literature review. Proj. Manag. J. 36, 49–61.
Wang,
Y., 2009. Building the linkage between project managers’ personality and
success of software projects. Presented at the 2009 3rd International Symposium
on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, IEEE, pp. 410–413.
Wateridge,
J., 1998. How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? Int. J. Proj. Manag.
16, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00022-7
Westerveld,
E., 2003. The Project Excellence Model®: linking success criteria and critical
success factors. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 21, 411–418.
White,
D., Fortune, J., 2002. Current practice in project management—An empirical
study. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 20, 1–11.
Winch,
G.M., 2009. Managing construction projects. John Wiley & Sons.
Wong,
K.K.-K., 2013. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
techniques using Smart PLS. Mark. Bull. 24, 1–32.