Dr.
Rupali Madan
Assistant Prof.
J C Bose University of Science and Technology,
YMCA, Faridabad
Dr.
Rachna Agrawal
Associate
Prof.
J C
Bose University of Science and Technology,
YMCA
Faridabad
Abstract
The business challenge
for banks is to retain customers. If they are satisfied, banks can move towards
extension of its customers’ base and survival for long-term. In this regard,
banks must have reliable bond with customers so that they can be connected for
a long run. Banks have to follow different strategies to achieve their
retention targets and increase in the existing numbers. Relationship marketing
is a technique by which banks can make the relationship with customers by
giving them better services, wishing them in their special occasions, etc. In
this way, customers feel related themselves with banks.
This study is to
know the impact of relationship marketing on customer satisfaction. To achieve
the objective, the study has been divided into three parts. The first part
explores about the customer perception regarding the relationship marketing
strategies in public and private sector banks in National Capital Region and
the second part confirms and validates the factors extracted.The third part
calculates the impact of relationship marketing on customer satisfaction. Data
was collected from 450 customers of public and private sector banks.
Exploratory
Factor Analysis and confirmatory Factor Analysis have been used for the purpose
of data analysis. The different
statements representing the customer relationship strategies can be reduced
into five significant Factors extracted are services of customers, management of data, healthy communication with customers, strong
bond with very important customers and technical support. The factors score of
all the extracted relationship marketing factors are estimated in the study
while applying principal component analysis in factor analysis. These factors
have confirmed later by using AMOS software.
Multiple regression method has been used to check the impact of
relationship marketing on customer satisfaction. The results of the multiple
regression analysis indicate that the probability value of all the t statistics
for relationship marketing factors is found to be less than 5 percent level of
significance. The results of the regression analysis also indicate that the
major influencing factor ismanagement of database followed by strong bonding
with important customers, technical support, healthy communication and services
to customers.
The conclusion
of the study is positive impact of relationship marketing on the customer
satisfaction. This study has been done from the perspective of customers. Five
constructs have been found to be important for the relationship marketing.
Keywords:
Customer satisfaction, relationship
marketing, management of data, services to customers, technological support.
Introduction
After reforming
of an economy in 1991, banks in India are performing in dynamic, competitive
and globalized environment. They have crossed a long journey of struggle and
nurture themselves compactable with rapid changing environment. These
transformations are branch automation, automatic telling machines, electric
fund transfer, mobile applications, anywhere and anytime banking, home banking,
telebanking and plastic card etc. Indian banks whether they are public or
private took every challenge as opportunity and turn weakness as strength to
cope up with the demanding innovative practice. Relationship marketing is one
of the strategies that banks have applied. Competent authorities of these banks
understand the significance of relationship marketing and its pivotal impact to
ensure long-term profitability. An aim of relationship marketing is to shift
the customer towards satisfaction with essence of loyalty.
Significance of
relationship marketing can be understood with its objective as to maintain
relationship for their loyalty. The goals of relationship marketing are to
generate and maintain never-ending relationships between the banksand customers
that will be beneficial for both sides. However the main focus is to create
customer loyalty. Kotler (2000) has supported the same view that customers’
feeling would reflect the product’s perceived performance from the customers’
expectations. If the perceived performance is not matched with expectation,
customer would not be satisfied and vice-versa. When banks market their
products, customers’ satisfaction is important for long-term profitable
survival.
Satisfied
customers used to increase the customer-base by spreading awareness through
mouth. It is considered as the most effective tool of marketing. In today’s
scenario, customers become more demanding for better services and they believe
that looking them after by banks must be there as they are giving business to
banks. These days, the banks are towards the strategy of relationship building
so that existing customers may feel more satisfaction and may add new in
existing customers’ pool.
These days, all
the banks have incorporated the concept of relationship marketing in their
banks because it is profitable to focus on existing customers rather than
attracting the new ones, so this study also focuses on this matter rigorously.
Few researches and contributions have been made research studies regarding
relationship impact of customer satisfaction of banks and other organizations.
However the study the study regarding this aspect with taking public and
private banks in national capital region has not been found.
The reason
behind the selection of banks is that banking sector is growing sector with a
lot of potentials. The sector is facing certain challenges regarding retention
of customers especially for public sector banks in India. On the other side,
banking sector is now becoming more dynamic and competitive due to fast moving
economy and demand of customers. When the banks adopt certain strategy like
relationship marketing, it is essential see its effect on customers’
satisfaction because customers are ultimate assets of the banks.
Literature
Review
Colgate, Mark R. and Hedge, R. (2001)
writes paper on an interesting issue that is switching behavior of the
customers in banks. Data has been collected from 694 customers from Australia
and New Zealand by mail survey. The main
issue in this paper is pricing factor and others are failure of services and
denied services by banks. These are the standing factors with customers for
making them switched from banks. Malhotra, M. and Arora, S. (1997) focuses on
the comparison between the satisfaction level of customers of private and
public sector banks to frame the new marketing strategy to sustain the existing
customers’ base and attract the potentials. In this paper, three cities are
taken of state, Punjab with twenty variables to measure satisfaction. Factor analysis
has been used and has been found that there is significant difference between
the satisfaction level of customers of private and public banks. In the end of
paper, customization, reducing waiting time, training to the staff and good
surroundings are strategies suggested for banks especially public sector banks.
Malyadri, P. and Kumar, V.D. (2002)
emphasize in study of banks with objectives of providing value added services
and satisfaction to customers, these banks sustain for long run survival and
growth prospects. Due to cut-throat competition, banks are compelled for
adoption of customer relationship management (CRM). Retention of customers for
long time is big challenge for both private and public sector banks. On
conclusion note, public banks must do more efforts to fulfill demands and by
this way, they are able to compete with private sector banks.
Anders Gustafsson, Michael D. Johnson,
IngerRoos (2005) study the
effects of customer satisfaction, affective commitment, and calculative
commitment in research. They also represent the present and potential of
satisfaction-retention relationship. The conclusion reflects the effects of
customer satisfaction and calculative commitment. The authors provide
implications for relationship managers and for performing their duties for
making customers satisfied. The researchers also emphasize on satisfaction
survey to predict behavior.
Lynette J. Ryals, Simon Knox, (2005)
measure risk-adjusted customer lifetime value and its impact on relationship
marketing strategies and shareholder value. These calculations suggest the
review of portfolio of key account customers which make the changes in
relationship marketing strategies and improvements in shareholder value for the
firm.
Frow& Payne
(2009) summarize that modern marketing is all about customer satisfaction
rather than sales volumes. Other strategies to attract new customers are costly
but relationship management strategy is smooth and less costly so this strategy
is actually advocated by the researchers. Willingness to involve in
relationship marketing concept is advantageous for both customer and
organizations. Chung(2012) studies the effect of relationship
marketing on customer loyalty in Nigeria. He narrates that firms have initiated
focusing on long term relations rather than short term relations. The
relationship marketing leads to customer satisfaction and after sometimes, it
leads to customer loyalty.
Hersh Abdullah Mohammad, Abdul-AzizAbdelmo'ti
Suleiman and SaatyAbdalelah S. (2014) study the impact of customer relationship
marketing on customer satisfaction in banking sector KSA and Jordan. Questionnaire
has been received from 500 customers through email. The findings of the study
show medium to high degrees of positive attributes of the two samples toward
various dimensions: trust, commitment, communication, empathy, social bonding
and fulfilling promises on customer satisfaction. It has been found that level
of customer satisfaction regarding Relationship Marketing was different due to
gender, age and educational level.
Ennew, C.T., Binks, M.R., Chiplin, B.
(2015) studyabout the customer satisfaction and retention in UK banks and small
business firms where key strategy is building and maintaining database of loyal
customers. The preliminary model is developed. Discriminant Analysis is used
for this study. Ngo Vu Minh, Nguyen HuanHuu (2016) research and test the
interrelationships among service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer
loyalty in a retail banking sector. As competition is increasing, these
variables customer satisfaction, service quality and customer loyalty have
become important factors for the firm’s performance. In this study, model for
these variables has been developed. The data has been collected from the 261
respondents. The structural equation modeling (SEM) has been used for the
analysis purpose. The study concludes that service quality and customer
satisfaction are important factors of customer loyalty and customer
satisfaction. A non-linear relationship is found between three constructs. This
study also emphasizes that more focus should be given to customer loyalty
management.
Malarvizhi,
Chinnasamy Agamudai; Jayashree, Sreenivasan; Nahar, Rezbin; Manzoor, Shamima Raihan
(2018) state that relationship marketing strategies are very essential in case
of banking industry. Private sector banks have shown better performance than
public sector banks using relationship marketing strategies. The study identifies
the success factors of post-implementation relationship marketing for the
private banks of Bangladesh. Data has been collected from five leading private
banks in the country. The questions are
asked from the relationship managers regarding 10 items. Factors are reduced
from the ten items using exploratory factor analysis. The factors are
operational, competence and satisfaction.
Sayil, A Akyol, G
Golbasi Simsek (2019) examine the relationships among the components of relationship marketing components – trust,
competency, commitment, communication,
conflict handling, relationship investment, relationship quality,
perceived customer value, satisfaction and loyalty in an integrated framework
in the Turkish retail banking sector. This study is different from the previous
studies because it evaluates the customer satisfaction and loyalty from the
aspect of actual consumers. The data has been collected from 685 retail banking
customers. The findings show that relationship marketing inculcates loyalty
through relationship quality, customer value, and satisfaction which are mainly
built up by trust, communication, and relationship investment. Relationship
investment and quality are the most important factors of customer value,
satisfaction, and loyalty. The emotional value has the strongest effect on
customer satisfaction and customer loyalty. Grace Al Khoury, AlkisThrassou and
Ioanna Papasolomou (2020) propose a new model that seems the emotional
intelligence and customer relationship marketing and the model shows the
concerns of emotional intelligence and relationship marketing in retail banking
sector. It is concluded that emotional intelligence significantly affects the
retail banking sector. The study also link emotional intelligence theory with
frontline employees’ behavior in regard to customer relationship management.
The above
literature is beneficialto make the base of the research and it is an
appropriate to the actual concerns with relationship marketing. The objectives
of the study have been framed after through literature review and thought
process researchers for making pivotal contribution in this area.
Objectives
of the Study
·
To study the customer satisfaction level
regarding relationship marketing strategies in banks.
·
To know the effect of relationship
marketing on customer satisfaction.
Hypothesis of the study: There is significant effect of
relationship marketing strategies on the customer satisfaction.
Research
Methodology
Research
methodology is backbone of the study and is particular to each study to find
out output of the study. Exploratory cum descriptive research design has been
used for this study. The source of collection of data is primary in which
customers of seven banks are marked up for collection of data. Selection of
these banks are determined with the non-probability sampling i.e., convenience
sampling. Banks selected are Bank of India, State Bank of India, Punjab
National Bank and Syndicate Bank from public sector and Axis Bank, ICICI bank
and HDFC Bank are from private sector. However these seven banks are top ten
banks in their sector as per their market value.
(source:https://www.moneycontrol.com/stocks/marketinfo/marketcap/bse/bank-private.html)
The customers for
collecting data for the study must have association with particular banks for
five years or more than five years. In this regard, purposive sampling has been
used. The objective is to collect data that must be correct and
authenticated. Structure questionnaire
has been used printed in English and Hindi languages with twenty one statements relating to relationship
marketing oncustomer satisfaction. In this research, for getting more specific
results, five point Likert scale has been exercised. Integers 1 to 5 is
strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree respectively.
In the
statements, rating has been done on the various relationship marketing
strategies opted by the banks. They are
focused with customers’ satisfaction. 600 questionnaires were distribution to
cover large sample size but 479 questionnaires were received. The collected
questionnaires have been cleaned to ensure that questionnaires are adequately
and appropriately filled. After filtering with non-filled and half –filled
questionnaires, 450 questionnaires are finalized and used for this research
study. The purpose is to get rid of non-respondents and extreme entries.
Validity and Reliability of the questionnaire has been tested. Five factors
have been extracted from the 21 variables with the aid of the Statistical
Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 21 program. By using SPSS,
exploratory factor analysis has been applied on the 21 statements and
confirmatory factor analysis has been done using AMOS. Regression analysis has
been applied for find the effect of relationship marketing on customers’
satisfaction.
Data
Analysis and Discussions
In this part of
research, data analysis has been used and this section is framed to represent
the analysis and interpretation with clear discussion so that the result can be
better visible and maximum advantage out of it can be taken out.
Table 1: KMO TEST for
Sampling Adequacy |
|||
KMO Test for
sampling adequacy |
Bartlett’s
Test |
||
Test
Statistics |
Chi- Square |
Degree of
freedom |
P-Value |
.901 |
6515.082 |
210 |
.000 |
Source:
Calculated
and complied by researchers using SPSS |
The Table 1 shows that sample size is
adequate. So the sample size of 450 is assumed for accepted and study is based
on it. Table 2 represents that on the basis of exploratory factor analysis,
five factors have been extracted from the twenty one variables. Factors
extracted are services to customers, management of database, strongbond with
very important customers,healthy communication and technical support.
Services of customers are factor which
represents S1 to S5 as per Table 2. Customers of banks expect good services and
prompt response from the employees of banks. Quarries and complaints are
expected to be dealt with time. Quality of services is an important parameter.
Customers are comfortable to know about other products of bank like insurance
policies. Management of database is a pivotal factor representing S6 to
S10.Banks have personal information of their customers. They also expect the
privacy of data and information desired by them must be provided. Updating of
the record with banks is also sought.
Table 2 :Matrix showing
statements with value and Factors |
|||||
Factors |
Statements |
||||
Services
to customers (F1) |
S1 (0.863) |
S2
(0.862) |
S3(0.861) |
S4(0.845) |
S5(0.823) |
Management
of database (F2) |
S6 (0.858) |
S7 (0.846) |
S8(0.842) |
S9(0.793) |
S10(0.766) |
Strong
bond with important customers (F3) |
S11(0.852) |
S12(0.837) |
S13(0.831) |
S14(0.806) |
-- |
Healthy
Communication (F4) |
S15(0.854) |
S16(0.842) |
S17(0.839) |
S18(0.799) |
_ |
Technical
support (F5) |
S19(0.854) |
S20(0.822) |
S21(0.789) |
_ |
_ |
Source:
Calculated
and complied by researchers using SPSS |
During this research, an interesting
factor–strong bond with very important customers representing from S11 to S14
has been highlighted. The word ‘very important’ denotes customers who give notable
business to banks for a long time. Customers feel that they must be treated as
very important person for banks by wishing them on special occasions, creating
personal touch with phone calls, delighting them with surprises and designing
products customary nature. Healthy Communication
is an important factor indicating S15 to S18. Banks offer a number of channels
to interact with customers. Banks also collect the information about the channel
preferred by the customers. In most of cases, record of communication is
maintained and it may be used in future purposes. The factor aspects related
technical support is significant representing S19 to S21 in the area of
relationship marketing. Banks offer mobile apps to serve customers and other
related facilities to make them comfortable.
Reliability
and Validity Analysis
Reliability was checked through the
Cronbach alpha. It has been found 0.902 in case of services to customers, 0.903
in case of management of
database, 0.911 in case of strong bond with customers, 0.894 in case of healthy
communication with customers and 0.891 in case of technical support. The
Cronbach’s alpha is found to be greater than 0.7 in case of every construct and
it shows the presence of internal consistency reliability of the responses of
the customers for all the constructs variables which are included in
questionnaire.
Although the validity of the factors can
also be analyzed with the help of exploratory factor analysis only, but due to
the availability of more robust method for testing the validity of the
extracted factors, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has been used on the
extracted factors.
The objective is to test the
discriminant validity of the scale is to investigate whether the bank customers
are able to differentiate the statements of relationship marketing related to
different factors. The discriminant validity analyses the level of cross
correlations of the statements of one extracted factor with the statements of
other extracted factors emerges as a result of factor analysis. In order to
analyze the presence of convergent validity of the extracted factors the
composite reliability statistics and average variance extracted measure are
estimated. The confirmatory
factor analysis is represented by the figure 1.
Figure
1:Confirmatory Factor Analysis complied by researchers
In the confirmatory factor analysis
figure, the factors of relationship marketing strategies are represented by the
eclipses and the related statements of respective relationship marketing factor
are used in order to measure the factors are represented with the help of
rectangles. The rectangles are connected to the factors of relationship
marketing strategies in the figure. The double sided arrows between different
pairs of factors of relationship marketing strategies represent the correlation
between the factors of relationship marketing strategies. The error terms are also connected to each
statement used in order to measure the factors of relationship marketing
strategies. The confirmatory factor analysis is based on the assumption that
the expected variance covariance matrix is similar to the observed variance
covariance matrix between the variables. The standardized regression weights each
statement as well as the correlation between the constructs is also shown in
the confirmatory factor analysis figure.The results of the validity measures
are shown below in table:
Table 3: Measures of Validity |
||||
CR |
AVE |
MSV |
ASV |
|
Strong Bond with very important
Customers |
0.912 |
0.725 |
0.341 |
0.198 |
Management of database |
0.904 |
0.654 |
0.190 |
0.131 |
Serviceto customers |
0.913 |
0.678 |
0.097 |
0.057 |
Healthy Communication |
0.897 |
0.686 |
0.229 |
0.157 |
Technical Support |
0.894 |
0.738 |
0.342 |
0.212 |
Source:
Calculated
and complied by researcher using AMOS |
The results of
validity of relationship marketing factors as shown above indicates that the CR
value in case of all the selected relationship marketing factors in the study
are found to be higher than 0.7. Also the AVE measure of all the relationship
marketing factors constructs are found to be higher than 0.5. Thus it can be
established from the results of confirmatory factor analysis that the
relationship marketing factors used in the study have acceptable convergent
validity. In case of discriminant validity among relationship marketing
factors, low level of correlation is expected between different pairs of
statements representing different relationship marketing factors. In other
words, the low levels of cross correlations between the statements of different
relationship marketing factors are expected. In order to examine the
discriminant validity in the relationship marketing factors used in the scale
the MSV between different relationship marketing factors was compared with the
AVE measures of different factors. The discriminant validity is confirmed if it
is found that the MSV is lower than AVE. The results indicate that MSV of each
relationship marketing factor is lower than AVE measure for all factors which
ensured the presence of discriminant validity. The results also indicate that
the CR measures of all the relationship marketing factors are found to be
greater than 0.7 and AVE statistic is greater than 0.5. Hence the convergent
validity of the scale for the relationship marketing by banks is also ensured.
The variance covariance matrix between the different pairs of relationship
marketing factors is shown below:
Table No. 4 : Variance
Covariance Matrix |
|||||
Strong Bonding |
Management of database |
Serviceto customers |
Healthy Communication with customers |
Technical Support |
|
Strong Bong with very important customers |
0.851 |
__ |
___ |
___ |
__ |
Managementof database |
0.413 |
0.809 |
|
__ |
__ |
Service of customers |
0.220 |
0.170 |
0.823 |
__ |
__ |
Healthy Communication |
0.479 |
0.366 |
0.234 |
0.828 |
|
Technical Support |
0.585 |
0.436 |
0.311 |
0.462 |
0.859 |
Source:
Calculated
and complied by researcher using AMOS 21 |
Effects
of relationship marketing strategies on Customers satisfaction
The banks are
active to adopt latest strategies for relationship marketing with an objective
to maintain and enhance the number. Five factors extracted with 21 statements
used with scale of 1 to 5 where 1 means strongly dissatisfied and 5 means strongly
satisfied. The factors scores of all the extracted relationship marketing
factors are estimated in the study while applying principal component analysis
in factor analysis.
The multiple
regression method has been used to analyze the effect of factors representing
the relationship marketing strategies adopted by the banks. It is done by using
OLS method assuming linear relationship between the dependent and independent
variables. The overall perception of
customers about the satisfaction level is assumed as a dependent variable and
the estimated factor scores are considered as independent variables. The
regression model is mathematically expressed as:
Y
= α + b1X1 +b2X2 +b3X3+ b4X4+b5
X5
X1= Service to customers
X2= Management of database
X3=Strong Bondwith very important
Customers
X4= Healthy Communication
X5=Technical support
Where Y is the
dependent variable and Xi represent the independent variables. The
standardized beta of the independent variables in the regression model
indicates the comparative impact of the estimated factor scores of relationship
marketing on the overall rating of customer perception towards relationship
marketing strategies.
The results of
the multiple regression analysis indicate that the probability value of all the
t statistics for relationship marketing factors is found to be less than 5
percent level of significance. Hence with 95 percent confidence level, the null
hypothesis of no significant effect of selected relationship marketing factors
(estimated factor scores) on rating of customers satisfaction cannot be
accepted. Therefore it can be summarized that there exist significant effect of
the different relationship marketing strategies adopted by the banks on the
overall satisfaction of the customers. The standardized beta estimates of the
relationship marketing factor scores as independent variables indicate their
comparative influence on customer’s satisfaction. The results of the regression
analysis also reflect that the major influencing factor is Management of databasefollowed by strong bong with very important
customers, technical Support, healthy communication with customersand servicesto
customers.The F statistics which represents the statistical fitness of
the regression model is found to be 123 with the p value of 0.000. This
represents that the applied regression model is statistically fit and can be
used for generalized interpretations. The R square of the regression model is
found to be 58.2 percent which indicates that the customer satisfaction can be
explained by 58 percent with the help of extracted factors of relationship
marketing. The regression equation can be expressed as:
Y = 3.204 + 0.311X1
+0.606X2 +.530X3+ .435X4+.476X5
With the help of
the above equation, it is clear that the customer satisfaction can be explained
by 58 percent. Every factor of relationship marketing strategies reflect
pivotal stand to make the customers satisfied.
Conclusion
This study can be concluded that relationship marketing
strategies have effects on customers’ satisfaction. There exist that
relationship marketing strategies are being adopted by both public and private
sector banks. The five factors extracted in the research are able to describe
the effects on customers’ satisfaction. The banks should have done more efforts
to make relationship marketing so that customers can feel connected and loyalty
may be enhanced. On the basis of research, management of database has shown its
more weightage therefore banks should maintain customers’ database with full
care and priority. The banks should focus about preferred mode of payment, mode
of contact and privacy of data. Out of the professional boundaries, banks are
expected to enhance their reach up to personal occasions of very important
customers to make good bond with them. Technical supports
helps in knowing the needs of customers and support it in relationship
marketing. E-mails and mobile are important tools to make the relationship with
customers by sending them instant messages and electronics mails.
Relationship
marketing is best practice in banking sector due to competitive market of
banks. Relationship marketing is able to make the long-term relationship with
the customers. In fact relationship marketing supports the banks to design the
marketing tools inspiring with customers’ real needs and preferences. In this
dynamic market, it is important to retain customers and with this marketing
strategy, banks can have more customers in their list as relationship marketing
strategies influence the customers a lot and they used to spread with their
connections like family, relatives and friends.
Scope
of future research
An empirical
study to confirm the findings of the study is a strong evident to direct for
future research. This research may lead towards more number of banks and make
comparative study between public and private sector banks. Inclusion of foreign
banks may add value to the research. It is interesting to know how foreign
banks apply relationship marketing with their customers. Quality of services
provided by banks in regard to relationship marketing can be analyzed in future
research. It is assumed that the same relationship marketing strategy will be
applicable to each demographic segment but this pivotal aspect that
relationship marketing may be different as per demographic sub-division, is
enthusiastic to find out in future research.
References
1.
Al
Khoury, G., Thrassou, A., &Papasolomou, I. (2020). Emotional Intelligence
towards Customer Relationship Marketing: The Case of Retail Banking in Lebanon,
Handbook of Research on Contemporary Consumerism, IGI Global pp. 263-284.
2.
Sayil, E. M., Akyol, A., &GolbasiSimsek, G. (2019). An
integrative approach to relationship marketing, customer value, and customer
outcomes in the retail banking industry: a customer-based perspective from
Turkey. The Service Industries Journal, 39(5-6), pp. 420-461.
3.
Solangi, B., Talpur, U., Shaikh, S. S., Mushatque, T.,
&Channa, M. A. (2019). Relationship Marketing as an Orientation to Customer
Retention: Evidence from Banks of Pakistan, International Business
Research, 12(7), pp. 133-140.
4.
Malarvizhi, C. A., Jayashree, S., Nahar, R., &Manzoor, S.
R. (2018). Identifying Post-Implementation Success Factors of Relationship
Marketing: A Study on Private Banking Industry in Bangladesh, Advanced
Science Letters, 24(1), pp. 220-222.
5.
Ngo, V. M., & Nguyen, H. H. (2016). The relationship
between service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: An
investigation in Vietnamese retail banking sector. Journal of
Competitiveness, pp.212-221.
6.
Soimo,
Wagok&Okello (2015). Influence of Relationship Marketing on Customer
Retention in Commercial Banks in Nakuru Town, Kenya, International Journal
Economics, commerce and Management, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 1305-1319.
7.
Ennew,
C. T., Binks, M. R., &Chiplin, B. (2015). Customer Satisfaction and
Customer Retention: An Examination of Small Businesses and their Banks in the
UK. In Proceedings of the 1994 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual
Conference, Springer International Publishing, pp. 188-192.
8.
Vijayakumar,
T. &Sharmilee, S.R. (2014). Customer Satisfaction towards CRM in KVB at
Dindigul, Journal of Exclusive Management Science, Vol. 3, No.4, pp 1-10.
9.
Robert
K. Dzogbenuku, Godson K. Ahiabor (2014). Customer Service and Customer
Retention in Ghana's Banking Sector: The Case of SG SSB Bank, Indian Journal of
Marketing, 44(1), 33 -43 44 (1), 33-43.
10. Hersh Abdullah Mohammad, AbdulazizAbdelmo'ti
Suleiman, SaatyAbdalelah S. (2014). The Impact of Customer Relationship
Marketing on Customer Satisfaction of the Arab Bank Services, International
Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 5,
pp. 67-100.
11. Chirica, Catalina (2013). Relationship
Marketing - Best Practice in the Banking Sector, Amfiteatru Economic, Vol. 15
No. 33, pp. 288-300.
12. Hashem, T. N. (2012). The impact of customer
relationship marketing on customers' satisfaction for the banking industry in Jordan,
Journal of Management Cases, pp. 142-53.
13. Chung Lo Sheng (2012). A study of
relationship marketing on Customer Satisfaction, Journal of Social Sciences,
Vol 8, No.2, pp 91-94
14. Dasari, S., Gunaseelan, R. (2012),
Relationship Marketing: An Overview, Indian Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42 No.
12, pp.5-15.
15. Alrubaiee, Laith, and Nahla Al-Nazer (2010).
Investigate the impact of relationship marketing orientation on customer
loyalty: The customers’ perspective. International Journal of Marketing
Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 155.
16. Kuria, E.W. (2010). A survey of relationship
marketing practices among commercial banks in Kenya, MBA thesis, University of
Nairobi, Kenya.
17. Das K., Parmar J., Sadanand Vijay, K. (2009).
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Best Practices and Customer Loyalty: A
Study of Indian Retail Banking Sector, European journal of social Sciences Vol.
11 No. 1, 61-85.
18. Padhy, Prasanta K. and Swar, Biranchi Narayan
(2009), A Study on Customer Satisfaction & Service Gaps in Selected
Private, Public & Foreign Banks, 3rd IIMA Conference, Marketing Paradigms
for Emerging Economics, Indian Institute of Management.
19. Andreas Leverin, Veronica Liljander, (2006).
Does relationship marketing improve customer relationship satisfaction and
loyalty?, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp.232-251
20. Anders Gustafsson, Michael D. Johnson,
IngerRoos (2005). The Effects of Customer Satisfaction, Relationship Commitment
Dimensions, and Triggers on Customer Retention. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69,
No. 4, pp. 210-218.
21. Lynette J. Ryals, Simon Knox, (2005).
Measuring risk adjusted customer lifetime value and its impact on relationship
marketing strategies and shareholder value, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.
39, No. 5/6, pp.456-472,
22. Goodhue, D.L.; Wixom, B.H.; and Watson, H.J.
(2002). Realizing Business Benefits through CRM: Hitting the Right Target in
the Right Way, MIS Quarterly Executive, Vol. 1, No.2, pp.79-94.
23. Malyadri, P., and Kumar, V.D. (2002).
Customer Relationship Management, Banking Finance, June, pp. 3-6.
24. Colgate, Mark R.; and Hedge, R. (2001). An
Investigation in to Switching Process in Retail Banking Service, International
Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 19(5), pp. 201-212.
25. Parker, C. and Mathews, B.P. (2001). Customer
satisfaction: contrasting academic and consumers' interpretations, Marketing
Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 19 No.1, pp. 38-46.
26. Kotler, P (2000) Marketing Management,
Prentice Hall, New Delhi.
27. Christian, Grönroos (1997). Keynote paper
from marketing mix to relationship marketing towards a paradigm shift in
marketing, Management Decision, Vol. 35 No.
4, pp.322-339
28. Doreswamy, S. (1997). Customer Service and
Satisfaction: An Indian Scenario, IBA Bulletin, Special Issue, March, pp.61-64.
29. Malhotra, M and Arora, S. (1997). Customer
Satisfaction: A comparative Analysis of Public and Private Sector Bank,
Decision Vol.24 (1-4). pp. 109-130.
30. Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994), The
commitment trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, Vol.
58 No. 3, pp. 20-38.
31. https://www.moneycontrol.com/stocks/marketinfo/marketcap/bse/bank-private.html