Impact of IND-AS First Time Application on Financial
Performance of Indian Metal Sector Companies
Rakesh Kumar
Assistant Professor
Department of Accountancy & Law,
Faculty of Commerce,
Dayalbagh Educational Institute (Deemed University),
Dayalbagh, Agra, India
Rishika Agarwal
Research Scholar
Department of Accountancy & Law,
Faculty of Commerce,
Dayalbagh Educational Institute (Deemed University),
Dayalbagh, Agra, India
Abstract
A notable and breakthrough change is made in India
through transition from IGAAP to IND-AS in the financial reporting.
Implementation of IND-AS introduced new concepts in accounting which lead to
changes in the recognition, measurement, disclosure and presentation of the
financial data. Thus, the present study is a small attempt to know the impact
of implementation of IND-AS on the financial performance of the Indian
companies. This study mainly aims to empirically evaluate the impact of IND-AS
implementation on the financial performance of metal sector companies in India.
This study has been conducted on top six companies of the metal sector of NSE-NIFTY
for the financial year 2015-16 (whose financial reports are available as per
both the accounting standards viz., IGAAP and IND-AS) for calculating
the financial ratios. Afterwards, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests have
been used for checking the normal distribution of data, on the basis of results
of which Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and Paired T-test have been employed for
analyzing the data generated for the study. As per the results of Wilcoxon
Signed Ranks test, three ratios of profitability viz. Return on Assets,
Return on Equity and Return on Capital Employed of the selected companies have
significant impact of IND-AS implementation. But the profitability of companies
have no impact according to the results of Paired T-test. As per the results of
both the tests, the liquidity, solvency and efficiency (except Inventory
Turnover ratio) of selected companies have no significant impact of IND-AS
implementation.
Keywords:
IGAAP, IND-AS, Financial performance, financial ratios, Paired T-test, Wilcoxon
Signed Ranks test.
Introduction
Accounting standards are a set of rules and guidelines
which are aimed at making the financial statements consistent, comparable and
standardized. In India, accounting standards, known as IGAAP (Indian Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles) are issued by Accounting Standards Board (ASB) established
by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) in 1977.
In the global business environment, companies need to
present their financial statements as per a common set of accounting standards
which will be globally accepted, as presentation of financial statements
according to different frameworks leads to a confusion for users in
understanding the financial statements. In the last few years, adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and national accounting
standards convergence with IFRS gained the ground across the globe. In the
light of this, India too decided to adopt IFRS and made a commitment regarding
this at G20 Summit in 2009. The initial attempt to implement the IFRS converged
accounting standards was made by Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) in 2011.
A notable and breakthrough change was made in India on
16th February, 2015, when MCA notified the final roadmap for
implementation of Indian Accounting Standards (IND-AS) i.e., transition
from IGAAP to IND-AS in the financial reporting. IND-AS has been implemented in
a phased manner, to be adopted on voluntary basis from the financial year
beginning on or after 1st April, 2015 and from 1st April,
2016, on a mandatory basis for the companies listed or unlisted on Indian stock
exchanges with net worth equal to or greater than 500 crore INR.
Literature Review
Literature revealed that various aspects of IFRS and
IFRS converged accounting standards like effect of or impact of IFRS
convergence, implementation and adoption on financial ratios, financial
indicators and financial performance of companies of various countries have
been widely studied by the researchers across the globe. Lantto and Shalström
(2009), Ibiamke and Ateboh-Briggs (2014), Abdul-Baki et al. (2014), Donwa et
al. (2015), Emoarehi et al. (2017) and Erin et al. (2018) in their studies
investigate the impact of IFRS adoption on the financial ratios of different
companies. The results of such studies vary from each other, Abdul-Baki et al.
(2014), Donwa et al. (2015) and Erin et al. (2018) concluded no significant
impact while Lantto and Shalström (2009), Ibiamke and Ateboh-Briggs (2014) and
Emoarehi et al. (2017) concluded in their studies that IFRS adoption has
significant impact on financial ratios.
In the Indian context, Patil (2015) and Desai (2016)
take review of the problems faced by Indian Corporates while implementing New
Indian Accounting Standards. Jain (2011), Vinayagamoorthy (2014) and Parvathy
(2017) throws the light on the opportunities and challenges faced by Indian
companies while implementing IFRS. Thomas and Mathew (2019) investigate the
impact of implementation of IND AS and concluded a significant difference in
the ratios as per IGAAP and IND AS.
Statement of the Problem
Adoption and implementation of new accounting
standards introduce new concepts in the accounting practice which further bring
changes in the recognition, measurement, disclosure and presentation of the
financial data. These changes in the financial data bring forth more
transparency and understandability of data and increased transparency leads to
more disclosure of relevant information for investors to better understand the
financial information. Changes in the recognition, measurement, disclosure and
presentation of the financial data also lead to changes in the valuation of
assets and liabilities. Across the globe, several researchers have analyzed the
effect of IFRS implementation and adoption on financial ratios, financial
indicators and financial performance of companies of developing countries. In
India also, several studies have been conducted on IFRS adoption for examining
its various aspects, but very few studies have been conducted relating to IND-AS.
Thus, the present study is a small attempt to know the impact of implementation
of IND-AS on the financial performance of the Indian companies.
Objectives of the Study
Following
objectives have been taken into consideration to conduct the study:
1.
To analyze and
compare the IND-AS implementation impact on profitability of selected Indian metal
sector companies.
2.
To analyze and
compare the IND-AS implementation impact on efficiency of selected Indian metal
sector companies.
3.
To analyze and
compare the IND-AS implementation impact on liquidity of selected Indian metal sector
companies.
4.
To analyze and
compare the IND-AS implementation impact on solvency of selected Indian metal sector
companies.
Research Methodology
IND-AS becomes mandatory for all the listed as well as
unlisted companies in India, whose Net Worth is greater than or equal to INR
500 crore, from the accounting years beginning on or after 1st
April, 2016 and the comparative financial statements are required to be
rendered retroactively adjusted to IND-AS for the financial year 2015-16 or
afterwards. This study is an initiate to check the IND-AS implementation impact
on the financial performance of selected listed metal sector companies of
India. So, to conduct the study, the ratios calculated from the standalone
financial statements prepared as per IGAAP and IND-AS are compared for the financial
year 2015-16 of top six Indian metal sector companies selected on the basis of
market capitalization on 31st March, 2016 of NSE-NIFTY Metal Index.
The annual reports were utilized for the financial years 2015-16 and 2016-17 (for
comparative financial statements of 2015-16).
Financial performance of selected metal sector companies,
viz. TATA Steel Limited, Coal India Limited, JSW Steel Limited, Hindalco
Industries Limited, NMDC Limited and Vedanta Limited have been checked through
various financial ratios under the category of profitability, efficiency,
liquidity and solvency. Net Profit Ratio (NPR), Return on Assets(ROA), Return
on Equity(ROE) and Return on Capital Employed(ROCE) under profitability
category; Inventory Turnover Ratio (ITR), Receivables Turnover Ratio (RTR),
Total Assets Turnover Ratio (TATR) and Fixed Assets Turnover Ratio (FATR) under
efficiency category; Current Ratio (CR) and Liquid Ratio (LR) under liquidity
category; and Debt-Equity Ratio (D/ER) under solvency category. The ratios have
been calculated on the basis of financial statements prepared in accordance
with IGAAP and IND-AS.
For ascertaining whether the data is normally
distributed or not, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests of normality have
been employed. The preliminary analysis of the data revealed that some of the
financial ratios do not follow normal distribution. Consequently, both
parametric and non-parametric tests have been performed. On the financial ratios
calculated, empirical analysis has been performed by using the statistical
tools like Wilcoxon-Signed Ranks test and Paired T-test to examine and know
whether there is any difference between the financial ratios calculated as per
IGAAP and IND-AS.
Hypotheses
Following hypotheses have been formulated for examining
the impact of IND-AS implementation on financial performance of selected Indian
metal sector companies.
Regarding measuring the impact of IND-AS on
profitability, hypotheses are:
H01 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on net profit ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
H02 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on return on assets of selected Indian metal sector companies.
H03 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on return on equity of selected Indian metal sector companies.
H04 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on return on capital employed of selected Indian metal sector companies.
Regarding measuring the impact of IND-AS on
efficiency, hypotheses are :
H05 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on inventory turnover ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
H06 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on receivables turnover ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
H07 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on total assets turnover ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
H08 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on fixed assets turnover ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
Regarding measuring the impact of IND-AS on liquidity,
hypotheses are :
H09 : There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on current ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
H010
: There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on liquid ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
Regarding measuring the impact of IND-AS on solvency,
hypotheses are:
H011
: There is no
significant impact of IND-AS on debt-equity ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies.
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Table 1: Financial Ratios for
2015-16 of Indian Metal Sector Companies
Ratios |
TATA Steel Ltd. |
Coal India Ltd. |
JSW Steel Ltd. |
Hindalco Industries Ltd. |
NMDC Ltd. |
Vedanta Ltd. |
||||||
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
|
NPR (in %) |
12.83 |
2.24 |
10017.49 |
9500.17 |
-9.53 |
-8.64 |
1.77 |
1.50 |
46.91 |
42.00 |
18.36 |
-33.05 |
ROA (in %) |
4.10 |
0.91 |
76.00 |
75.75 |
-4.77 |
-4.71 |
0.80 |
0.68 |
8.93 |
8.12 |
6.27 |
-6.38 |
ROE (in %) |
504.52 |
98.38 |
258.75 |
262.70 |
-327.80 |
-1173.04 |
294.04 |
269.36 |
763.82 |
684.09 |
1845.49 |
-3202.75 |
ROCE (in %) |
6.00 |
1.83 |
87.45 |
86.45 |
-10.13 |
-10.13 |
1.15 |
0.96 |
14.87 |
13.89 |
8.01 |
-15.58 |
ITR (in times) |
5.05 |
5.63 |
1.55 |
1.66 |
4.78 |
5.34 |
3.98 |
4.27 |
9.72 |
9.90 |
5.70 |
6.66 |
RTR (in times) |
67.97 |
38.99 |
32.18 |
34.45 |
16.18 |
18.01 |
17.82 |
19.10 |
3.54 |
7.41 |
5.76 |
16.54 |
TATR (in times) |
0.31 |
0.41 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.51 |
0.56 |
0.45 |
0.46 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.31 |
0.20 |
FATR (in times) |
0.73 |
0.55 |
0.49 |
0.51 |
0.76 |
0.77 |
0.96 |
1.04 |
0.56 |
0.56 |
0.67 |
0.66 |
CR (in ratio) |
0.68 |
0.72 |
3.22 |
3.23 |
0.63 |
0.62 |
1.96 |
1.97 |
6.34 |
5.86 |
0.60 |
0.52 |
LR (in ratio) |
0.35 |
0.38 |
3.15 |
3.15 |
0.32 |
0.31 |
1.27 |
1.29 |
6.13 |
5.67 |
0.42 |
0.44 |
D/ER (in ratio) |
0.33 |
0.51 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.19 |
1.48 |
0.65 |
0.57 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.53 |
0.29 |
Source: Author’s Computation.
Table 2: Summary of Results of
Normality Tests
Ratios |
Kolmogorov-SmirnovTest |
Shapiro-WilkTest |
|||||||
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
IGAAP |
IND-AS |
||||||
Statistic |
Sig. |
Statistic |
Sig. |
Statistic |
Sig. |
Statistic |
Sig. |
|
|
NPR |
.489 |
.000 |
.488 |
.000 |
.500 |
.000 |
.502 |
.000 |
|
ROA |
.416 |
.002 |
.387 |
.005 |
.651 |
.002 |
.644 |
.001 |
|
ROE |
.221 |
.200 |
.328 |
.043 |
.917 |
.483 |
.797 |
.055 |
|
ROCE |
.368 |
.011 |
.323 |
.050 |
.725 |
.011 |
.747 |
.019 |
|
ITR |
.249 |
.200 |
.179 |
.200 |
.930 |
.582 |
.972 |
.905 |
|
RTR |
.267 |
.200 |
.276 |
.170 |
.842 |
.135 |
.911 |
.444 |
|
TATR |
.196 |
.200 |
.199 |
.200 |
.955 |
.781 |
.948 |
.720 |
|
FATR |
.180 |
.200 |
.229 |
.200 |
.968 |
.881 |
.853 |
.168 |
|
CR |
.255 |
.200 |
.253 |
.200 |
.803 |
.062 |
.831 |
.110 |
|
LR |
.280 |
.153 |
.274 |
.181 |
.785 |
.042 |
.800 |
.058 |
|
D/ER |
.175 |
.200 |
.265 |
.200 |
.919 |
.501 |
.850 |
.156 |
|
Source: Author’s Computation using SPSS version 2016.
On the financial ratios calculated (as shown in Table
1), normality tests have been applied. After observing the results of both the normality
tests, that is Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk test presented in Table
2, it has been found that most of the financial ratios calculated from the
financial statements prepared as per IGAAP and IND-AS were normally distributed
while some were not normally distributed (as sig.< 0.05). In this instance,
it can’t be said that which test should be the best option for analyzing the
data, parametric or non-parametric. Therefore, both parametric and
non-parametric tests have been used to identify whether the differences between
the financial ratios as per two regimes are statistically significant or not.
Table
3 : Summary of Results of Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Ratios |
Z-statistic |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
Profitability |
NPR |
-1.782 |
.075 |
ROA |
-1.992 |
.046 |
|
ROE |
-1.992 |
.046 |
|
ROCE |
-2.023 |
.043 |
|
Efficiency |
ITR |
-2.201 |
.028 |
RTR |
-.943 |
.345 |
|
TATR |
-.677 |
.498 |
|
FATR |
-.271 |
.786 |
|
Liquidity |
CR |
-.530 |
.596 |
LR |
-.406 |
.684 |
|
Solvency |
D/ER |
-.365 |
.715 |
Source: Author’s Computation using SPSS version 2016.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test has been conducted on the
financial ratios calculated (as shown in Table 1), whose results are presented
in the Table 3. In majority of the financial ratios, p-value or the
significance value is greater than 0.05 (p>0.05), which indicates that there
is no significant difference between the financial ratios computed under IGAAP
and IND-AS of the selected Indian metal sector companies. The results of the
study infers that null hypotheses H02, H03, H04
and H05have been rejected as the p-value is less than 0.05, showing
that IND-AS implementation has significant impact on Return on Assets, Return
on Equity, Return on Capital Employed and Inventory Turnover Ratio.
Profitability position of the selected Indian metal
sector companies have been significantly impacted by the IND-AS implementation,
as three null hypotheses (H02, H03 and H04)
have been rejected under this category. Secondly, under efficiency measurement,
out of four null hypotheses only one null hypothesis (H05) has been
rejected, which show that Inventory Turnover Ratio has a significant impact of IND-AS
implementation. However, there is no significant impact of IND-AS
implementation on the liquidity and solvency position of selected Indian metal
sector companies.
Table 4 : Summary of Results of Paired T-Test
Pairs |
Paired
Differences |
t |
df |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
||||
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference |
|||||
Lower |
Upper |
|||||||
NPR |
9.72683E1 |
206.70429 |
84.38667 |
-119.65452 |
314.19118 |
1.153 |
5 |
.301 |
ROA |
2.82667 |
4.95974 |
2.02480 |
-2.37826 |
8.03159 |
1.396 |
5 |
.222 |
ROE |
1.06668E3 |
1977.08127 |
807.14005 |
-1008.13955 |
3141.49955 |
1.322 |
5 |
.244 |
ROCE |
4.98833 |
9.23659 |
3.77082 |
-4.70487 |
14.68154 |
1.323 |
5 |
.243 |
ITR |
-.44667 |
.31722 |
.12950 |
-.77957 |
-.11377 |
-3.449 |
5 |
.018 |
RTR |
1.49167 |
13.91270 |
5.67983 |
-13.10881 |
16.09215 |
.263 |
5 |
.803 |
TATR |
-.01000 |
.06957 |
.02840 |
-.08301 |
.06301 |
-.352 |
5 |
.739 |
FATR |
.01333 |
.08756 |
.03575 |
-.07855 |
.10522 |
.373 |
5 |
.724 |
CR |
.08500 |
.19766 |
.08069 |
-.12243 |
.29243 |
1.053 |
5 |
.340 |
LR |
.06667 |
.19325 |
.07890 |
-.13614 |
.26947 |
.845 |
5 |
.437 |
D/ER |
-.02500 |
.18802 |
.07676 |
-.22231 |
.17231 |
-.326 |
5 |
.758 |
Source: Author’s Computation using SPSS version 2016.
Table 4 presents the results of Paired T-test, which
is conducted on the data presented in Table 1. The results of the test shows
that there is no significant impact of IND-AS implementation on the financial performance
indicators viz. profitability, efficiency, liquidity and solvency except
on Inventory Turnover ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies, as the
p-value is .018 in case of Inventory Turnover ratio which is less than 0.05 (i.e.
at 5% level of significance).
In accordance with the results, null hypothesis H05has
been rejected which concludes that there is a significant impact of IND-AS on
inventory turnover ratio of selected Indian metal sector companies. On the
other hand, all other ten null hypotheses have been accepted, which infers that
there is no significant impact of IND-AS implementation on profitability,
efficiency (except on Inventory Turnover ratio), liquidity and solvency position
of the Indian metal sector companies.
Conclusion
The present study is an attempt being made to find out
if the IND-AS implementation leads to any changes in the financial performance
of the metal sector companies of India. To empirically analyze the impact,
financial ratios have been computed under categories: profitability, efficiency,
liquidity and solvency. Afterwards, Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test and Paired T-test
have been applied for testing the statistical significant difference among the financial
ratios calculated under the two regimes that is IGAAP and IND-AS.
According to Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test results, it
can be concluded that IND-AS implementation has some significant impact on the
profitability and efficiency of the metal sector companies while liquidity and
solvency position of the companies do not get affected by IND-AS
implementation. As the results of the test disclose that Return on Assets,
Return on Equity, Return on Capital Employed and Inventory Turnover ratios have
a significant impact of IND-AS implementation.
The results of the Paired T-test indicate that there are
no significant differences between the financial ratios computed under the two
regimes. More specifically, significant difference has been found in Inventory
Turnover ratio only, though the impact hasn’t been found for any other ratio
under profitability, efficiency, liquidity and solvency.
As far as the comparison of the two tests, it can be
argued that there is no significant impact of IND-AS implementation on the
financial ratios except on Inventory Turnover ratio of selected metal sector
companies of India.
Furthermore, it can be said that major contributory
factors or causes of differences between the IGAAP and IND-AS financial
statements are fair value measurement, norms of revenue recognition,
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities and classification of assets
and liabilities. Therefore, it can be said that implementation of IND-AS will
not significantly affect the performance of companies who has not yet
implemented IND-AS. It will lead to greater transparency and harmonization of
accounting information.
References
Abdul-Baki,
Z., Uthman, A.B. and Sannia, M. (2014) ‘Financial ratio as performance measure:
A comparison of IFRS and Nigerian GAAP’, Accounting
and Management Information System, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp.82-94.
Abhilasha. N., Nandeesha H.G. and Sagar
M. (2016), ‘Opportunities and Challenges in adopting IND-AS’ in Proceedings
of Two-Day National Level Seminar on “IND-AS : A Road Map for IFRS in India”,
Vidyavardhaka First Grade College, Mysuru, India, pp.1-19.
Coal
India Limited. (2016). 2015-16 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.coalindia.in/
Coal
India Limited. (2017). 2016-17 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.coalindia.in/
Desai,
H. (2016) ‘IND-AS converged with IFRS’, Abhinav National Monthly Refereed
Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp.30-36.
Donwa,
P.A., Mgbame, C.O. and Idemudia, N.G. (2015) ‘Effect of IFRS on Accounting
Ratios in Nigeria Oil and Gas Companies (A Comparative Analysis)’, Journal
of Accounting and Financial Management, Vol. 1 No. 8, pp.67-76.
Emoarehi,
E., Modebe, N.J., Okoye, L.U. and Erin, O.A. (2017) ‘International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) Adoption and the Performance of Key Financial
Ratios: Evidence from Quoted Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria’, Journal of
Policy and Development Studies (JPDS), Vol.11 No. 3, pp.40-47.
Erin,
O., Oduwole, F., Olojede, P. and Arumona, J. (2018) ‘Does International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Impact Profitability Ratios of Listed
Banks in Nigeria’, Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Vol.
2 No. 2, pp.79-90.
Hindalco
Industries Limited. (2016). 2015-16 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hindalco.com/
Hindalco
Industries Limited. (2017). 2016-17 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.hindalco.com/
Ibiamke,
N.A. and Ateboh- Briggs, P.B. (2014) ‘Financial Ratios Effect of International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Adoption in Nigeria’, International
Journal of Business and Management Invention, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp.50-59.
Jain,
P. (2011) ‘IFRS Implementation in India: Opportunities and Challenges’, World
Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 125-136.
JSW
Steel Limited. (2016). 2015-16 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.jsw.in/
JSW
Steel Limited. (2017). 2016-17 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.jsw.in/
Kamath,
R. and Desai, R. (2014) ‘The Impact of IFRS Adoption on the Financial
Activities of Companies in India: An Empirical Study’, The IUP Journal of
Accounting Research & Audit Practices, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 25-36.
Lantto,
A.M. and Shalström, P. (2009) ‘Impact of International Financial Reporting
Standard Adoption on Key Financial Ratios’, Accounting and Finance, Vol.
49 No. 2, pp. 341-361.
Patil,
M.D.D. (2015) ‘Implementation of converged Indian Accounting Standards
(IND-ASs)’, Research Front, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp.39-44.
TATA
Steel Limited. (2016). 2015-16 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.tatasteel.com/
TATA
Steel Limited. (2017). 2016-17 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.tatasteel.com/
Thomas,
T. and Mathew, T. (2019) ‘A Study on Impact of Implementation of IND-AS’, Indian
Journal of Applied Research, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 25-27.
Vedanta
Limited. (2016). 2015-16 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.vedantalimited.com/Pages/Home.aspx
Vedanta
Limited. (2017). 2016-17 Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.vedantalimited.com/Pages/Home.aspx
Vinayagamoorthy,
A. (2014) ‘Opportunities and Challenges in Adopting IFRS in India’, International
Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp.
132-136.