Dubai
House Prices and Macroeconomic Fluctuations: A Time Series Analysis
Farhan
Ahmed
Department of Economics & Management Sciences,
NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Sindh
– Pakistan
Email: fahmed.ned@gmail.com
SandhiaMaheshwari
EFU Life Assurance Ltd.
Karachi, Sindh – Pakistan
Email: sandhiamaheshwari93@gmail.com
Sajid
Hussain Mirani
Department of Public Administration
Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh – Pakistan
Email:sajidmerani@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
This paper aims to examine the
relationship between selected macroeconomic indicators with the real estate
industry (house prices index as proxy) of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Time
series regression has been applied to achieve the objectives using monthly data
from 2008-2017 collected from Thomson Reuters DataStream. Findings show the negative
impact of the exchange rate (ER) and oil prices (COP) on house price index
(HPI) and positive impact of inflation (CPI) and money supply (M2). To the best
of authors’ knowledge, the real estate market in Dubai has received less
attention from researchers. The empirical findings of this study encourage
policymakers, researches, real estate stakeholders and foreign investors to look
for various investment opportunities in the real estate industry of Dubai. The
research will also help investors other Middle East countries to explore this
sector and can be recommended to develop the housing price index for making
real estate markets structured in their economies.
Keywords:
House price index, Crude Oil, Money Supply, Exchange Rate, United Arab Emirates
INTRODUCTION
Contingent
upon the idea of the property, a proprietor of property takes the privilege to
use, share, alter, rent, redefine, sell, mortgage, exchange or transfer it and
property is that which belongs to somebody. There are two subunits of property
known as real property and individual property according to the English
precedent-based regulation. Real property, land, realty or immovable properties
are lands and the improvements made to it (usually buildings).
According to Scottish law, the real
property is known as heritable property; and as per the French-based law, it is
called 'immobilizer' (undaunted). Enduring property is moreover the term used
in Canada, the US, India, and in countries where common law structures win,
including the greater part of Europe, Russia and South America (Baum, 2015).
The impact of global financial crises in
2007-2008 resulted in a sharp decline in residential real estate prices. After August
2008, a decline of approximately 14.8% in residential sales index observed at
peak levels. However, by October of 2014 peaks sales of the residential index
declined by 6.4%. Dubai land department’s data indicates that the volume of the
sales was declined by 30% by the end of November 2015 compared in the same
period of 2014. Another report indicated that average sales price in few
locations experienced a decline of up to 13% in 2015. However, more reasonable
housing areas incurred minor declines and, in some cases, even upheld value or rental yield. Subsequently, project deliveries have been
unresponsive in the reports of 2015 which suggested that estimation of 26000
new units to be entered in the market by 2016 in Dubai. However, on the safe
side, based on the market environment only 30% of these deliveries may
materialize (Mehta, 2016).The market was being affected by the external factors
i.e. global uncertainty which includes regional uncertainty, US economic
climate, circumstances in china Russia and Iran and the oil prices (Mehta, 2016).
Dubai’s real estate market is the extensive
market of the Middle East region. The land division of Dubai may have a
negative effect because of political insecurity in the Middle East. Constant
political and social agitation in countries like; Syria, Egypt, Yemen and
Lebanon may have affected centre eastern money related experts to redirect
their speculations.
CBRE published data which indicated that
Middle East’s outbound investments were around the US $11.5 billion in the
first half of 2015 contrasted with the investment around the US $4 billion in
the entire of 2009. These statistics recommend that liquidity requirements (as
in 2009) are not exclusively in charge of diminishing speculation inside the
neighbourhood advertise. Investors appear to settle on conscious choices to put
resources into steadier and develop markets amid a time of relative
uncertainty.
While Dubai’s economy is relatively more
diversified, declining oil prices will affect the decisions of the buyers to
invest in the local residential market. According to the information, 2017 was a
challenging year for Dubai’s hospitality market, with slow growth from the
markets composite by local currency, making Dubai a more expensive destination
for the visitors. Notwithstanding, the demand for tourism is high.
The decline in average daily rates and
occupancy was observed because of the enhanced supply and the competition
between the same players in the market. This impact had led market-wide to fall
in average revenue per available room of 6.2% in the 3rd quarter of 2016 and 2017. Different
segments include luxury, upper-scale and upper-midscale experienced decline in
occupancy between 0.6% and 6.3% between the 3rd quarter of 2016 and 2017. During the same
period, an increase in occupancy of midscale economy sectors was observed i.e.
from 78% to 82%. This is an indicator of the demand sustainability for the affordable
product across Dubai’s hospitality market. Economic intelligence unit (EIU)
suggested that sales volume was declined by 2.8% in 2017. The declined sales
were probably driven by the declining disposable incomes and local currency
making the purchases expensive for foreign visitors. The demand for the
domestic retail industry of Dubai is being controlled by a shrink on disposable
incomes.
In 2017, approximately 71% of the residents
of Dubai expected to have the same or less disposable income in 2018 whereas
only 29% expected to have more income. In January 2018, VAT was introduced in
Dubai in which it is expected to raise the cost of living in the same between
2.7% and 3.7% as per the IMF forecasts (Khan, 2018).
The investment for the value of the market
depends on two factors; first its recent economic conditions and second it is
market share with future perspective. The oil sector has been dominant in the
economy of the UAE. As per the recent evidence, Dubai’s residential prices have
fallen by 3.8% since September 2017. During 2017 in Abu Dhabi, average sales
prices fell by 9.3%. Dollar’s continuous strengthening and introduction of VAT
will certainly limit the potential to drive attainable rates in the short term.
Dubai pulled in approximately Dh 17.76bn through foreign direct investments
during initial half-year of the 2018 and placed it in 10th position in the worldwide rankings in
terms of value. Depending on the Greenfield ventures supported and launched
including the FDI and putting the emirate in the 3rd spot in global rankings (Google Chrome,
2018). Deloitte (2018) statistics indicate that Dubai ranked 4th in the greenfield FDI projects. Following
graph shows the downward trend for the period 2013-2017 of the sales price for
the residential property (See figure 1.1).
Figure
1.1
Dubai has bifurcated the retail industry
into sub-sections to get clear growth or lacking the sector and its impact over
the economy. The statistics for the retail market for the malls can be seen in
figure 1.2.
Figure.1.2
Dubai’s office market is one of the
bifurcations. During the year 2017, demand was slow for the market from
newcomers which led the landlords to increase the incentive to attract and
retain tenants. Due to this, a decline in the rents of the commercial offices
has been observed in 2017 with the average rents which declined by 3%
city-wide. Following figure showing the Dubai employment in financial and
business services which had a major impact on the sector (See figure 1.3).
Figure
1.3
As per the researches with the statistics,
it has been observed that Dubai’s economy is not mainly based on the oil.
Figure 1.4 shows the trends of the economy being oil economy since 2008.
Figure
1.4
The market of Qatar ended on a high note by
2017 with worth 20% more real estate transactions than last year: 2016 as shown
in figure 1.5. However, Qatar may face difficulties this year due to lack of
demand and plentiful supply which will probably lead to a fall in the rental
and sale prices (Weetas, 2018). The stocks of real estate in the middle east
market, the researchers had little interest in the real estate market thus far
(Thomson Reuters Zawya, 2018). Following graph shows the real estate industry
of Qatar:
Figure
1.5
From the market evidence of Turkey, the
lira has collapsed in recent weeks triggered by the announcement from the U.S.
administration that the tariffs will be doubled on Turkish steel and aluminium. The 75% discount came
over the fall of the Turkish lira, which has lost nearly 40% of its value this
year. This may be a double benefit for the purchasers of real estate property
to acquire the citizenship of turkey. The statistics of the Turkish government
shows that major source of foreign exchange since 2012 was the sales of
property to the immigrants. From the years 2012 to 2017, foreign property
purchases amounted nearly $22.7 Billion. So far, the increase in the share of
properties in foreign direct investments proposed that foreign interest is
productive investment is reducing. As per the information of last year, i.e.
2017, real estate property by foreigners chased record of $4.6 billion and
accounting for 42% of the $10.8 billion foreign investments. The inflow of
foreign exchange might be uplifting news for Ankara but not all Turks would be
happy with expansion in the real estate deals especially from Middle East
(Centigulec, 2018).
As per the study which found out that real
estate industry prices are adversely affected by the gold prices. However, on
the other hand, evidence of a negative relationship between exchange rate
volatility and immovable property (Kirikkaleli, Athari&Ertugrul, 2018).
According to the study made it clear that world stock prices
indexes don not hurtthe UAE real estate price index (Al-Mohana&Hatemi-J,
2016). A study about emerging markets in middle AGCC region has more volatility
persistence within the domestic market (Rao, 2008). The research resulted in
the first and foremost understanding that the UAE’s economy is primarily is
based on the oil sector. Hence, the UAE had put forwarded strategies to expand
its economy mainly on real estate and other several areas
(Karnik&Fernandes, 2009). A study carried out about the impact on the UAE
economy of reducing independence on the oil sector. Hence, the estimations
clarified that UAE is critically dependent on the oil (Fernandes&Karnik,
2009). The study about the exchange pass-through to economic indicators have
undergone the research with monthly data for 10 years (2005-2015). This study
observed the effects of exchange rate shocks to the macroeconomic variables.
The outcomes from the Granger causality test illustrate the existence of
causality between cash supply and swapping scale, oil costs and import.
Moreover, the finding indicated that there is a significant relationship
between money supply and exchange rate (Ahmed, Owais, Kumari and Rajjani,
2018). The study of capital scarcity and industrial decline evidence from real
estate booms in China indicated that local real estate booms pushup the costs
of capital for local businesses and cause strong underinvestment relative to
industry peers located in cities with low real estate inflation (Hau&
Ouyang, 2018). The study about the integration of real estate and the stock
market in Asia. The empirical study attempted to identify the exact
cointegration in 9 Asian countries for the period 1980 to 2012 between stock
and land through exchange-based property lists. The outcomes determine that
direct real estate market is linearly cointegrated with the stock market in
Taiwan and slightly integrated in Singapore and Hong Kong.
However, through differentiation, the segmentation was observed in China,
Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. The empirical results
indicate that the integration level differs crosswise Asian countries. The
incorporation between the stock and property showcase is seen in the most
thickly populated zones of the economies i.e. Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong
(Choudhry, S. Hassan and Shabi, 2015). Followed by these highly populated real
estate sectors designated that these countries have frequent transactions. (Lin
&Fuerst, 2014). The research about the period for the financial crisis in
which researchers used non-linear causality test and evidence confirmed that
gold has been a haven before the crisis. On the contrary, the results were
opposite after the crisis. Amid the emergency time frame, results demonstrated
the proof of causality between the factors. The result gave proof in the
inconsistency with a capacity of gold to go about as safe house amid the
emergency and comparable nature of results saw between stock unpredictability
and gold returns. The study about the gold win which the data used was from the
U.S. and results showed that volatility index is affected by gold return,
indicating that the rising in gold prices lead to higher fear level.
Furthermore, from investigations, it’s been clear that low volatile periods
during which the index of volatility index fluctuates, and stability/ rise in
prices observed in the capital market. Findings from the study indicated that
for the investors, gold is still a substitute investment when there is high
uncertainty in the capital market (Cohen & Qadan, 2010).
The property is the source of income by
investing in it. According to the recent study of the real estate industry
indicated that the oil prices have an adverse effect of the land stock costs in
the market. Be that as it may, a similar report neglected to give the solid
proof to acknowledge the negative impact of swapping scale
unpredictability on steadfast property. Therefore, the study could not gauge
any relevant relationship between the exchange rate volatility and the real
estate market. And the investors estimate their future investments and the
possible alternatives for them to get the benefit out of it.
The study aims to analyze and explore the
impact of exchange rate, money supply and inflation rate on house price index
in the United Arab Emirates market. The study aims to determine the impact of
crude oil prices, exchange rate, money supply (M2) and the inflation rate on the
house price index in the UAE.
The paper comprises of several sections, the
first section covered introduction with the motivation of the study and
objectives, the second section covers literature review, data and methods have
been discussed in section three, section four and five cover analysis and
conclusion respectively.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The study is
about the impact of different macroeconomic indicators on the house price
index. Different works of the literature suggest various views on the
macroeconomic indicators i.e. crude oil prices, inflation rate, exchange rate
and money supply. For this study, different perspectives were highlighted on
the fluctuations of macroeconomic indicators like; exchange rate and the stock
market, global real estate market, gold prices fluctuations. The investigation
was about sure industry i.e. Land in Turkey. The investigation led with the
assistance of gold costs', conversion scale and securities exchange of turkey's
information i.e. from 2004 January to May 2016 which was gathered from the
Central bank of Turkey. To discover the connection between the factors,
distinctive tests were connected which included Phillips and Perron, Unit Root
Test, Toda and Yamamoto's Test, Modified Wald Test Statistic, bound test and
the Autoregressive circulated slack model ARDL Model) was utilized. The study
somehow filled the gap in finding the impact of the exchange rate and gold
prices on the real estate industry of Turkey which was not previously tested in
developing markets. The results from the study show that there is an inverse
relationship between gold prices and real estate stock in the Turkish market
i.e. rise in the gold price led to the decrease in the land stock cost.
Moreover, the examination neglected to give solid proof concerning the negative
impact of swapping scale instability on steadfast property. Comprehensively,
the outcomes and commitments of the examination show that there is a long haul
balance relationship among land stock cost and swapping
scale, gold cost and BIST100 in turkey (Kirikkaleli, Athari&Ertugrul,
2018).
Blose, (2010) estimated the connection
between gold prices and inflation. In this research, the data used was the Consumer
price index for 20 years’ time period. However, it also noted that changes in
expected inflation will lead to immediate changes in the price of gold and that
the gold price will not change as a result of changes in expectations regarding
future inflation and that there is no way to meet expectations of market
inflation & to be determined by analysis of the gold. During the study, the
study also showed the correlation between bond yields and unexpected changes in
CPI. The connection between gold and stock market, data was collected from
several indices i.e. FTSE100 (UK), Nikkei 225 (Japan) and S&P 500 (US). The
gold returns based on the US dollar, UK pound, and Japanese Yen were used by
them. The frequency of data was daily data for the period of January 2000 to
March 2014. The research was studying the bi-directional nonlinear vigorous
co-movements among the gold returns, stock returns and stock
volatility in the US, UK and Japan (pre and post-crisis). The findings
evidenced that before the crisis, minor causality between the gold returns and
stock returns. However, the relationship between both variables has been observed
during the crisis. Furthermore, the homogenous results were observed between
stock volatility and stock returns, indicating the same conclusion (Choudhry,
Hassan, &Shabi, 2015).
Pakistan based study on evaluation of gold
investment as inflationary hedge worked on the possible relationship between
gold and inflation with it carrying cost and interest rate. The frequency of
the data used in the study was monthly for the period from January 2001 to
December 2013. All the data was collected from SBP Statistical bulletin and
business recorder, International financial statistics and SBP annual reports.
The variables used by the study were the interest rate, actual inflation and
gold return. Along with this, the econometric models applied in the study were
autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and generalized autoregressive conditional
heteroscedasticity (GARCH). As per the estimations which resulted in a direct
relationship between gold returns and expected inflation. Moreover, the
direct/positive relationship found between the actual inflation and gold
returns (Zafar &Javid, 2015).
The research conducted to discover the
relationship between the real estate markets in the world. To do so, the data
was collected from different countries i.e. USA, Japan, UK and Australia.
Findings from the cointegration indicated that real markets on the international
level are interrelated. And the interrelation was observed by every market with
the market of the USA. Additionally, the relationship between real estate
markets across the globe may not be different from supplementary types of
financial assets (Wilson &Zurbruegg, 2002).
The study of the relationship between real
estate prices and the macro-economy in Croatia in which the goal was to
research the interrelation between the real estate sector and macro-economy in
Croatia. It emphasized on real estate sector as a wellspring of volatility.
Besides, it also researched how domestic variable has an impact on the real
estate prices. For the study, the model which was used to conduct the research
was Structural VAR model was used and the quarterly data of both foreign and
domestic variables in Croatia was used i.e. from 2002-2011. The estimations
indicated that the growth of foreign GDP is the primary driver of the domestic
variables in the following literature. The decrease in the growth of GDP
represents loosening finance. Though, the impact was
observed in the initial 7 quarters. The positive impact was observed in the
growth of house prices over the GDP and CPI. The findings indicated that prices
of the real estates are mostly related to the lower interest rates on housing
loans, growth of credit and favourable macroeconomic conditions (Dumičić,
Časni, &Šprajaček, 2012).
The research of the interaction between the
real estate prices and stock prices in the Malaysian market. During the
research, the quarterly data i.e. from the 1st quarter of 2000 to the 3rd quarter of 2013 was collected from Malaysian housing price
index. The different test applied on augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root test,
Perron test and LM unit root test. Furthermore, the cointegration and Granger
causality and bound test were used. According to the findings of the research, the
relation between the house prices and stock prices were observed. In the
Malaysian market, no long-term relation was observed between house prices and
stock prices. The research evidenced that stock prices leading house prices and
with of effect consistent wealth, in Kuala Lumpur’s developed regions. Finally,
the study concluded with the importance of the emphasis that stock price and
the house prices have a direct relationship with a consistent effect of wealth
(Lean & Smyth, 2014).
The aim of
the current study is empirically examining the relationship or interdependency
of the real estate market on the exchange rate, gold prices, inflation and
stock change or vice versa. Different researches use the model which may vary
study to study and the nature of the research. For the investigation of the
impact of the crude oil prices, exchange rate, money supply and consumer price
index on the prices of the real estate industry in middle east countries. We
use the following Equation:
HPIit = α0 + α1COPit +
α2ERit + α3M2it + α4CPIit+
eit
Whereas HPI represents house price index, COP
represents crude oil price, ER represents exchange rate, M2 is money supply,
CPI represents consumer price index, ‘e’ is error term and all at cross-section
‘i’ and time ‘t’.
H1: Crude Oil Prices has a negative impact
on house prices index.
H2: Money supply has a positive impact on house
prices index.
H3: Exchange rate has a negative impact on
the house prices index.
H4: Inflation has a positive relationship
with the house prices index.
DATA
AND METHOD
The study aims to assess the impact of a house
price index (HPI) of UAE on its exchange rate (ER), crude oil prices (COP),
inflation (CPI) and money supply (M2). The monthly data was collected from
Thomson Reuters DataStream and sample period is from December 2008 to May 2017.
For examination of the impact of crude oil
prices, general rice in prices and money supply on the housing prices in
Dubai’s real estate market. Stationary testing has been on the data and
variables/series have been taken on 1st difference using the following
equation:
DHPIit = α0 + α1DCOPit
+ α2DERit + α3DM2it + α4DCPIit+
eit
Wherein the DHPI i,t is the difference of housing price index,
DCOP i,t is the difference of crude oil prices, DER
i,t is the
difference of exchange rates, DCPI i,t is the difference of consumer price index and DM2i,t is the money supply. Єi,t is usually the error term. To check the
stationarity level of the time series variables, unit root test was used. Based
on this study, time series regression has been used for the investigation of
causality between macroeconomic variables and house prices in the UAE market.
Different factors considered in
macroeconomics, money related financial matters and monetary financial aspects were
non-stationary time arrangement (Hil, 2001). At the point when the time
arrangement information is stationary, at that point stuns are considered as
short-lived. The fluctuation relies upon time and way to deal with
boundlessness as time goes to endlessness (Asteriou& Hall, 2006). Expanded
Dickey-Fuller test (Dickey and Fuller, 1981) unit root tests were connected to
test the stationarity of the time arrangement information.
EMPIRICAL
FINDINGS
Table
1. Descriptive Statistics
Measures |
COP |
CPI |
ER |
HPI |
M2 |
Mean |
79.35706 |
99.10225 |
5.491315 |
102.8845 |
956296.9 |
Median |
77.50000 |
97.14500 |
5.584370 |
101.2950 |
894850.0 |
Maximum |
122.2800 |
107.7800 |
5.897710 |
114.6700 |
1274500. |
Minimum |
27.25000 |
93.53000 |
4.947280 |
96.24000 |
674310.0 |
Std. Dev. |
26.99194 |
4.361253 |
0.266280 |
5.873041 |
188427.7 |
Skewness |
-0.212474 |
0.648368 |
-0.579451 |
0.731713 |
0.207408 |
Kurtosis |
1.559593 |
1.966506 |
2.056690 |
2.148488 |
1.462556 |
Table 1. indicates descriptive statistics
for each series including the mean and the standard deviation. As the
statistics showing that there is a reasonable difference between the mean and
the standard deviation under the crude oil prices.
To find the relationship between the
variables, it is essential to test the time series data for the stationary
check. In this research, the test used was the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF)
test to obtain the unit roots in the time series and after testing, all
variables got stationary at 1st difference.
Graph 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
COP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCOP |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
The above graphs showing the
non-stationarity and stationarity of the data. In the first graph, it has been
observed that crude oil prices data from 2008- 2017 was non-stationary on the
level. However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, we obtained the
stationary data (tables in the appendix). The data was converted into
stationary to get better results. Non-stationary time series data gives
unreliable and false results which would lead to poor understanding and
anticipations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
CPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Graphs number 4 and 5 showing the
non-stationarity and stationarity of the data. In the first graph, it has been
observed that the consumer price index had been increasing since 2008, but the
data is non-stationary on the level. However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, we obtained the
stationary data to find the impact of the indicators on the real estate market
of Dubai.
Graph 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
EXR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEXR |
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
-.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
The above graphs indicating whether the
data is non-stationarity or stationarity. In the first graph, the exchange
rates of the past 10 years’ trend and data was non-stationary on the level.
However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, we obtained stationary data.
Graph 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
HPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DHPI |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
|
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
The above demonstrates that data was
initially non-stationarity and tested on different levels to obtain the
stationarity. In the first graph, it has been observed that the housing price
index was non-stationary on the level. However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, the stationary data
obtained.
Graph 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
M2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
Graphs 9 and 10 represent the
non-stationarity and stationarity of the data. In the first graph, it has been
observed that data of money supply was non-stationary on the level.
Time series regression helps in predicting
the behaviour of dynamic systems from observations. To find out the impact of
macroeconomic indicators on house price index, time series regression has been
estimated in Table 2..
Table 2. Time Series Regression
Variable |
Coefficient |
Std.
Error |
t-Statistic |
Prob. |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
-0.118747 |
0.058969 |
-2.013732 |
0.0468 |
DCOP |
-0.020592 |
0.010255 |
-2.008055 |
0.0474 |
DCPI |
1.235864 |
0.158010 |
7.821404 |
0.0000 |
DER |
-2.047152 |
0.904266 |
-2.263883 |
0.0258 |
DM2 |
9.15E-06 |
3.88E-06 |
2.354589 |
0.0206 |
|
|
|
|
|
R-squared |
0.466889 |
Mean Dependent Var |
0.094257 |
|
Adjusted
R-squared |
0.444676 |
S.D. Dependent Var |
0.679750 |
|
S.E.
of regression |
0.506551 |
Akaike info
criterion |
1.525852 |
|
Sum
squared resid |
24.63297 |
Schwarz criterion |
1.655314 |
|
Log-likelihood |
-72.05555 |
Hannan-Quinn
criteria. |
1.578262 |
|
F-statistic |
21.01875 |
Durbin-Watson stat |
2.034931 |
|
Prob(F-statistic) |
0.000000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
According to the statistics, the significance
level is below 5%, the null hypothesis is rejected. The negative relationship
between the oil prices and the real estate prices (house price index) in Dubai
and when there will be a rise in the crude oil price in the Dubai market, real
estate prices (house price index) will fall and vice versa.
Furthermore, the direct relationship was
observed between the consumer price index and the real estate prices (house
price index) and when there is a rise in the consumer price index (weighted
average of prices of a basket of goods and services) then the real estate
prices (house price index) increases. Meanwhile, when there is a decline in the
consumer price index then there will be a fall in real estate prices (house
price index).
As per the statistics, the probability is
0.025 i.e. less than 5% leads to rejection of the null hypothesis and accept
alternative hypothesis. Exchange rate have negative impact on house price index
of Dubai. The exchange rate would be AED/USD, which means that whenever the
exchange rate is higher than the real estate prices (house price index) will be
lower and vice versa.
The money supply is directly related to the
real estate prices (house price index) in Dubai, as the statistics suggest that
significance level is below 5%, the null hypothesis is rejected hence there is
a direct relationship between the money supply in Dubai and real estate prices
(house price index). If the money supply in the economy increases which will
lead to an increase in the real estate prices (house price index).
R-Square gives estimations of the
applicable factors to enhance the model fit more than anticipated outcomes here,
in this case, analysis shows that there is around 46% impact on house price
index due to selected macroeconomic indicators and overall model is significant
(F Statistics = 21.01). Furthermore, the model’s likelihood stands 0, which implies that nothing is going ahead here or can be said that
every one of the coefficients of free factors is zero.
CONCLUSION
To
investigate the relationship between the macroeconomic variables (Exchange
rate, crude oil prices, money supply and consumer price index) and the house
price index of Dubai using time series regression model. The results indicate
that two macroeconomic indicators have a negative relationship and other two
macroeconomic indicators have apositive relationship with the house price index
of Dubai. Increase in oil prices and exchange rates will lead to a decline in
housing prices and the positive impact of money supply and consumer price index
on housing price have been found. Rise in the money supply and consumer price
index of Dubai will lead to the rise in prices housing sector and fall in the
money supply and consumer prices index will lead to falling
in the prices of the housing sector. The results are supporting the literature
review particularly in case of Dubai housing market.
The research findings derived different
aspects of the real estate market in the United Arab Emirates. As the real
estate market analysis indicated that the real estate market has different
indexes for the measurement of efficiency. Policymakers should increase the
number of units (houses) and money supply which will lead to the rise in house
prices. This will result in raised investments by decreasing the interest rate.
There is a major portion of investment from all over the world in UAE
residential and commercial properties. Considering this fact, the tourism
industry should be more developed as the demand is already high for tourism. The
education sector is more developed by introducing different international
schools or universities leading to more individuals coming from all over the
world with different investment purposes.
The research was limited to the house price
index of Dubai at the United Arab Emirates. During the research, it was learnt
that Dubai has developed its real estate industry which consists of different
sub-sectors and its indexes like; house price index, commercial property index
and helps in measurement of the effectiveness and efficiency of the market.
Furthermore, this research also directed to different researchers in the future
which may include finding out other macroeconomic indicator’s relation with
house prices, indicators can relate to the real estate sector and sub-sectors.
UAE have different divisions like; House Price index, Villa Index, Commercial
Property index etc. Considering these factors, the policies may be mapped or revised
in other Muslim or developing countries.
REFERENCES
Al-Mohana, S.,
&Hatemi-J, A. (2016). The Impact of Recent Crisis on the Real Estate Market
on the UAE: Evidence from Asymmetric Methods. EconomiaInternazionale/International
Economics, 69(4), 389-428.
Asteriou, D., &
Hall, S. G. (2006). A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Microfit, Applied
Econometrics.
Baum, A. (2015). Real
estate investment: A strategic approach. Routledge.
Blose, L. E.
(2010). Gold prices, cost of carry, and expected inflation. Journal of
Economics and Business, 62(1), 35-47.
Centigulec,
M. (2018, October 2). Al-Monitor; the pulse of Middle East. Retrieved from
Foreigners purchasing more Turkish property: https://www.al
monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/10/turkey-attracts-foreign-property-buyers-but-not-all-happy.html.
Choudhry, T., Hassan, S. S., &Shabi, S. (2015). Relationship between
gold and stock markets during the global financial crisis: Evidence from
nonlinear causality tests. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41,
247-256.
Cohen, G.,
&Qadan, M. (2010). Is gold still a shelter to fear. American Journal of
Social and Management Sciences, 1(1), 39-43.
Deloitte. (2018).
Middle East Real Estate Predictions: Dubai. Dubai
Dickey, D. A.,
& Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time
series with a unit root. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society,
1057-1072.
Dumičić, K.,
ČehČasni, A., &Šprajaček, P. (2012). The linkage between real estate prices
and the macro-economy in Croatia: VAR approach. Croatian Operational
Research Review, 3(1), 289-299.
Fernandes, C.,
&Karnik, A. (2009). Assessing UAE's oil dependence: an optimal control approach.
Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 2(2),
138-152.
Google Chrome.
(2018, October 6). Retrieved from Gulf business news:
https://gulfnews.com/business/dubais-fdi-soars-26-to-dh1776b-1.228697
Hau, H., &
Ouyang, D. (2018). Capital Scarcity and Industrial Decline: Evidence from 172
Real Estate Booms in China. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper,
(18-38).
Karnik, A. V.,
&Fernandes, C. (2009). Natural resource dependence: a macroeconometric
model for the United Arab Emirates. Applied Economics, 41(9),
1157-1174.
Khan, T.
(2018). Retrieved from Knight Frank UAE Market Review and Forecast https://content.knightfrank.com/research/1064/documents/en/uae-market-review-forecast-2018-5172.pdf
Kirikkaleli, D.,
Athari, S. A., &Ertugrul, H. M. (2018). The real estate industry in Turkey:
a time series analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 1-13.
Lean, H. H., &
Smyth, R. (2014). Dynamic interaction between house prices and stock prices in
Malaysia. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(2),
163-177.
Lin, P. T.,
&Fuerst, F. (2014). The integration of direct real estate and stock markets
in Asia. Applied Economics, 46(12), 1323-1334.
Mehta, S.
(2016). A review of Dubai's Residential Real Estate Market. UAE: KPMG.
Rao, A. (2008).
Analysis of volatility persistence in Middle East emerging equity markets. Studies
in Economics and Finance, 25(2), 93-111.
Thomson
Reuters Zawya. (2018, January 17). Retrieved from Qatar Real Estate Market
Overview: Q4 2017:https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/press-releases/story/Qatar_Real_Estate_Market_Overview_Q4_2017-ZAWYA20180117054448/
Weetas. (2018, January 31). Retrieved from Qatar Real Estate
Market to face anotherdifficult year In 2018: https://www.weetas.com/gccnews/qatar-real-estate-market-face-another-difficult-year-2018/
Wilson, P. J.,
&Zurbruegg, R. (2002). Structural breaks, diversification and international
real estate markets—some new evidence. Briefings in Real Estate Finance: An
International Journal, 1(4), 348-366.
Zafar, S.,
&Javid, A. Y. (2015). Evaluation of Gold Investment as an Inflationary
Hedge in Case of Pakistan (No. 2015: 118). Pakistan Institute of
Development Economics.
Dubai
House Prices and Macroeconomic Fluctuations: A Time Series Analysis
Farhan
Ahmed
Department of Economics & Management Sciences,
NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Sindh
– Pakistan
Email: fahmed.ned@gmail.com
SandhiaMaheshwari
EFU Life Assurance Ltd.
Karachi, Sindh – Pakistan
Email: sandhiamaheshwari93@gmail.com
Sajid
Hussain Mirani
Department of Public Administration
Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh – Pakistan
Email:sajidmerani@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
This paper aims to examine the
relationship between selected macroeconomic indicators with the real estate
industry (house prices index as proxy) of Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Time
series regression has been applied to achieve the objectives using monthly data
from 2008-2017 collected from Thomson Reuters DataStream. Findings show the negative
impact of the exchange rate (ER) and oil prices (COP) on house price index
(HPI) and positive impact of inflation (CPI) and money supply (M2). To the best
of authors’ knowledge, the real estate market in Dubai has received less
attention from researchers. The empirical findings of this study encourage
policymakers, researches, real estate stakeholders and foreign investors to look
for various investment opportunities in the real estate industry of Dubai. The
research will also help investors other Middle East countries to explore this
sector and can be recommended to develop the housing price index for making
real estate markets structured in their economies.
Keywords:
House price index, Crude Oil, Money Supply, Exchange Rate, United Arab Emirates
INTRODUCTION
Contingent
upon the idea of the property, a proprietor of property takes the privilege to
use, share, alter, rent, redefine, sell, mortgage, exchange or transfer it and
property is that which belongs to somebody. There are two subunits of property
known as real property and individual property according to the English
precedent-based regulation. Real property, land, realty or immovable properties
are lands and the improvements made to it (usually buildings).
According to Scottish law, the real
property is known as heritable property; and as per the French-based law, it is
called 'immobilizer' (undaunted). Enduring property is moreover the term used
in Canada, the US, India, and in countries where common law structures win,
including the greater part of Europe, Russia and South America (Baum, 2015).
The impact of global financial crises in
2007-2008 resulted in a sharp decline in residential real estate prices. After August
2008, a decline of approximately 14.8% in residential sales index observed at
peak levels. However, by October of 2014 peaks sales of the residential index
declined by 6.4%. Dubai land department’s data indicates that the volume of the
sales was declined by 30% by the end of November 2015 compared in the same
period of 2014. Another report indicated that average sales price in few
locations experienced a decline of up to 13% in 2015. However, more reasonable
housing areas incurred minor declines and, in some cases, even upheld value or rental yield. Subsequently, project deliveries have been
unresponsive in the reports of 2015 which suggested that estimation of 26000
new units to be entered in the market by 2016 in Dubai. However, on the safe
side, based on the market environment only 30% of these deliveries may
materialize (Mehta, 2016).The market was being affected by the external factors
i.e. global uncertainty which includes regional uncertainty, US economic
climate, circumstances in china Russia and Iran and the oil prices (Mehta, 2016).
Dubai’s real estate market is the extensive
market of the Middle East region. The land division of Dubai may have a
negative effect because of political insecurity in the Middle East. Constant
political and social agitation in countries like; Syria, Egypt, Yemen and
Lebanon may have affected centre eastern money related experts to redirect
their speculations.
CBRE published data which indicated that
Middle East’s outbound investments were around the US $11.5 billion in the
first half of 2015 contrasted with the investment around the US $4 billion in
the entire of 2009. These statistics recommend that liquidity requirements (as
in 2009) are not exclusively in charge of diminishing speculation inside the
neighbourhood advertise. Investors appear to settle on conscious choices to put
resources into steadier and develop markets amid a time of relative
uncertainty.
While Dubai’s economy is relatively more
diversified, declining oil prices will affect the decisions of the buyers to
invest in the local residential market. According to the information, 2017 was a
challenging year for Dubai’s hospitality market, with slow growth from the
markets composite by local currency, making Dubai a more expensive destination
for the visitors. Notwithstanding, the demand for tourism is high.
The decline in average daily rates and
occupancy was observed because of the enhanced supply and the competition
between the same players in the market. This impact had led market-wide to fall
in average revenue per available room of 6.2% in the 3rd quarter of 2016 and 2017. Different
segments include luxury, upper-scale and upper-midscale experienced decline in
occupancy between 0.6% and 6.3% between the 3rd quarter of 2016 and 2017. During the same
period, an increase in occupancy of midscale economy sectors was observed i.e.
from 78% to 82%. This is an indicator of the demand sustainability for the affordable
product across Dubai’s hospitality market. Economic intelligence unit (EIU)
suggested that sales volume was declined by 2.8% in 2017. The declined sales
were probably driven by the declining disposable incomes and local currency
making the purchases expensive for foreign visitors. The demand for the
domestic retail industry of Dubai is being controlled by a shrink on disposable
incomes.
In 2017, approximately 71% of the residents
of Dubai expected to have the same or less disposable income in 2018 whereas
only 29% expected to have more income. In January 2018, VAT was introduced in
Dubai in which it is expected to raise the cost of living in the same between
2.7% and 3.7% as per the IMF forecasts (Khan, 2018).
The investment for the value of the market
depends on two factors; first its recent economic conditions and second it is
market share with future perspective. The oil sector has been dominant in the
economy of the UAE. As per the recent evidence, Dubai’s residential prices have
fallen by 3.8% since September 2017. During 2017 in Abu Dhabi, average sales
prices fell by 9.3%. Dollar’s continuous strengthening and introduction of VAT
will certainly limit the potential to drive attainable rates in the short term.
Dubai pulled in approximately Dh 17.76bn through foreign direct investments
during initial half-year of the 2018 and placed it in 10th position in the worldwide rankings in
terms of value. Depending on the Greenfield ventures supported and launched
including the FDI and putting the emirate in the 3rd spot in global rankings (Google Chrome,
2018). Deloitte (2018) statistics indicate that Dubai ranked 4th in the greenfield FDI projects. Following
graph shows the downward trend for the period 2013-2017 of the sales price for
the residential property (See figure 1.1).
Figure
1.1
Dubai has bifurcated the retail industry
into sub-sections to get clear growth or lacking the sector and its impact over
the economy. The statistics for the retail market for the malls can be seen in
figure 1.2.
Figure.1.2
Dubai’s office market is one of the
bifurcations. During the year 2017, demand was slow for the market from
newcomers which led the landlords to increase the incentive to attract and
retain tenants. Due to this, a decline in the rents of the commercial offices
has been observed in 2017 with the average rents which declined by 3%
city-wide. Following figure showing the Dubai employment in financial and
business services which had a major impact on the sector (See figure 1.3).
Figure
1.3
As per the researches with the statistics,
it has been observed that Dubai’s economy is not mainly based on the oil.
Figure 1.4 shows the trends of the economy being oil economy since 2008.
Figure
1.4
The market of Qatar ended on a high note by
2017 with worth 20% more real estate transactions than last year: 2016 as shown
in figure 1.5. However, Qatar may face difficulties this year due to lack of
demand and plentiful supply which will probably lead to a fall in the rental
and sale prices (Weetas, 2018). The stocks of real estate in the middle east
market, the researchers had little interest in the real estate market thus far
(Thomson Reuters Zawya, 2018). Following graph shows the real estate industry
of Qatar:
Figure
1.5
From the market evidence of Turkey, the
lira has collapsed in recent weeks triggered by the announcement from the U.S.
administration that the tariffs will be doubled on Turkish steel and aluminium. The 75% discount came
over the fall of the Turkish lira, which has lost nearly 40% of its value this
year. This may be a double benefit for the purchasers of real estate property
to acquire the citizenship of turkey. The statistics of the Turkish government
shows that major source of foreign exchange since 2012 was the sales of
property to the immigrants. From the years 2012 to 2017, foreign property
purchases amounted nearly $22.7 Billion. So far, the increase in the share of
properties in foreign direct investments proposed that foreign interest is
productive investment is reducing. As per the information of last year, i.e.
2017, real estate property by foreigners chased record of $4.6 billion and
accounting for 42% of the $10.8 billion foreign investments. The inflow of
foreign exchange might be uplifting news for Ankara but not all Turks would be
happy with expansion in the real estate deals especially from Middle East
(Centigulec, 2018).
As per the study which found out that real
estate industry prices are adversely affected by the gold prices. However, on
the other hand, evidence of a negative relationship between exchange rate
volatility and immovable property (Kirikkaleli, Athari&Ertugrul, 2018).
According to the study made it clear that world stock prices
indexes don not hurtthe UAE real estate price index (Al-Mohana&Hatemi-J,
2016). A study about emerging markets in middle AGCC region has more volatility
persistence within the domestic market (Rao, 2008). The research resulted in
the first and foremost understanding that the UAE’s economy is primarily is
based on the oil sector. Hence, the UAE had put forwarded strategies to expand
its economy mainly on real estate and other several areas
(Karnik&Fernandes, 2009). A study carried out about the impact on the UAE
economy of reducing independence on the oil sector. Hence, the estimations
clarified that UAE is critically dependent on the oil (Fernandes&Karnik,
2009). The study about the exchange pass-through to economic indicators have
undergone the research with monthly data for 10 years (2005-2015). This study
observed the effects of exchange rate shocks to the macroeconomic variables.
The outcomes from the Granger causality test illustrate the existence of
causality between cash supply and swapping scale, oil costs and import.
Moreover, the finding indicated that there is a significant relationship
between money supply and exchange rate (Ahmed, Owais, Kumari and Rajjani,
2018). The study of capital scarcity and industrial decline evidence from real
estate booms in China indicated that local real estate booms pushup the costs
of capital for local businesses and cause strong underinvestment relative to
industry peers located in cities with low real estate inflation (Hau&
Ouyang, 2018). The study about the integration of real estate and the stock
market in Asia. The empirical study attempted to identify the exact
cointegration in 9 Asian countries for the period 1980 to 2012 between stock
and land through exchange-based property lists. The outcomes determine that
direct real estate market is linearly cointegrated with the stock market in
Taiwan and slightly integrated in Singapore and Hong Kong.
However, through differentiation, the segmentation was observed in China,
Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. The empirical results
indicate that the integration level differs crosswise Asian countries. The
incorporation between the stock and property showcase is seen in the most
thickly populated zones of the economies i.e. Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong
(Choudhry, S. Hassan and Shabi, 2015). Followed by these highly populated real
estate sectors designated that these countries have frequent transactions. (Lin
&Fuerst, 2014). The research about the period for the financial crisis in
which researchers used non-linear causality test and evidence confirmed that
gold has been a haven before the crisis. On the contrary, the results were
opposite after the crisis. Amid the emergency time frame, results demonstrated
the proof of causality between the factors. The result gave proof in the
inconsistency with a capacity of gold to go about as safe house amid the
emergency and comparable nature of results saw between stock unpredictability
and gold returns. The study about the gold win which the data used was from the
U.S. and results showed that volatility index is affected by gold return,
indicating that the rising in gold prices lead to higher fear level.
Furthermore, from investigations, it’s been clear that low volatile periods
during which the index of volatility index fluctuates, and stability/ rise in
prices observed in the capital market. Findings from the study indicated that
for the investors, gold is still a substitute investment when there is high
uncertainty in the capital market (Cohen & Qadan, 2010).
The property is the source of income by
investing in it. According to the recent study of the real estate industry
indicated that the oil prices have an adverse effect of the land stock costs in
the market. Be that as it may, a similar report neglected to give the solid
proof to acknowledge the negative impact of swapping scale
unpredictability on steadfast property. Therefore, the study could not gauge
any relevant relationship between the exchange rate volatility and the real
estate market. And the investors estimate their future investments and the
possible alternatives for them to get the benefit out of it.
The study aims to analyze and explore the
impact of exchange rate, money supply and inflation rate on house price index
in the United Arab Emirates market. The study aims to determine the impact of
crude oil prices, exchange rate, money supply (M2) and the inflation rate on the
house price index in the UAE.
The paper comprises of several sections, the
first section covered introduction with the motivation of the study and
objectives, the second section covers literature review, data and methods have
been discussed in section three, section four and five cover analysis and
conclusion respectively.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The study is
about the impact of different macroeconomic indicators on the house price
index. Different works of the literature suggest various views on the
macroeconomic indicators i.e. crude oil prices, inflation rate, exchange rate
and money supply. For this study, different perspectives were highlighted on
the fluctuations of macroeconomic indicators like; exchange rate and the stock
market, global real estate market, gold prices fluctuations. The investigation
was about sure industry i.e. Land in Turkey. The investigation led with the
assistance of gold costs', conversion scale and securities exchange of turkey's
information i.e. from 2004 January to May 2016 which was gathered from the
Central bank of Turkey. To discover the connection between the factors,
distinctive tests were connected which included Phillips and Perron, Unit Root
Test, Toda and Yamamoto's Test, Modified Wald Test Statistic, bound test and
the Autoregressive circulated slack model ARDL Model) was utilized. The study
somehow filled the gap in finding the impact of the exchange rate and gold
prices on the real estate industry of Turkey which was not previously tested in
developing markets. The results from the study show that there is an inverse
relationship between gold prices and real estate stock in the Turkish market
i.e. rise in the gold price led to the decrease in the land stock cost.
Moreover, the examination neglected to give solid proof concerning the negative
impact of swapping scale instability on steadfast property. Comprehensively,
the outcomes and commitments of the examination show that there is a long haul
balance relationship among land stock cost and swapping
scale, gold cost and BIST100 in turkey (Kirikkaleli, Athari&Ertugrul,
2018).
Blose, (2010) estimated the connection
between gold prices and inflation. In this research, the data used was the Consumer
price index for 20 years’ time period. However, it also noted that changes in
expected inflation will lead to immediate changes in the price of gold and that
the gold price will not change as a result of changes in expectations regarding
future inflation and that there is no way to meet expectations of market
inflation & to be determined by analysis of the gold. During the study, the
study also showed the correlation between bond yields and unexpected changes in
CPI. The connection between gold and stock market, data was collected from
several indices i.e. FTSE100 (UK), Nikkei 225 (Japan) and S&P 500 (US). The
gold returns based on the US dollar, UK pound, and Japanese Yen were used by
them. The frequency of data was daily data for the period of January 2000 to
March 2014. The research was studying the bi-directional nonlinear vigorous
co-movements among the gold returns, stock returns and stock
volatility in the US, UK and Japan (pre and post-crisis). The findings
evidenced that before the crisis, minor causality between the gold returns and
stock returns. However, the relationship between both variables has been observed
during the crisis. Furthermore, the homogenous results were observed between
stock volatility and stock returns, indicating the same conclusion (Choudhry,
Hassan, &Shabi, 2015).
Pakistan based study on evaluation of gold
investment as inflationary hedge worked on the possible relationship between
gold and inflation with it carrying cost and interest rate. The frequency of
the data used in the study was monthly for the period from January 2001 to
December 2013. All the data was collected from SBP Statistical bulletin and
business recorder, International financial statistics and SBP annual reports.
The variables used by the study were the interest rate, actual inflation and
gold return. Along with this, the econometric models applied in the study were
autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and generalized autoregressive conditional
heteroscedasticity (GARCH). As per the estimations which resulted in a direct
relationship between gold returns and expected inflation. Moreover, the
direct/positive relationship found between the actual inflation and gold
returns (Zafar &Javid, 2015).
The research conducted to discover the
relationship between the real estate markets in the world. To do so, the data
was collected from different countries i.e. USA, Japan, UK and Australia.
Findings from the cointegration indicated that real markets on the international
level are interrelated. And the interrelation was observed by every market with
the market of the USA. Additionally, the relationship between real estate
markets across the globe may not be different from supplementary types of
financial assets (Wilson &Zurbruegg, 2002).
The study of the relationship between real
estate prices and the macro-economy in Croatia in which the goal was to
research the interrelation between the real estate sector and macro-economy in
Croatia. It emphasized on real estate sector as a wellspring of volatility.
Besides, it also researched how domestic variable has an impact on the real
estate prices. For the study, the model which was used to conduct the research
was Structural VAR model was used and the quarterly data of both foreign and
domestic variables in Croatia was used i.e. from 2002-2011. The estimations
indicated that the growth of foreign GDP is the primary driver of the domestic
variables in the following literature. The decrease in the growth of GDP
represents loosening finance. Though, the impact was
observed in the initial 7 quarters. The positive impact was observed in the
growth of house prices over the GDP and CPI. The findings indicated that prices
of the real estates are mostly related to the lower interest rates on housing
loans, growth of credit and favourable macroeconomic conditions (Dumičić,
Časni, &Šprajaček, 2012).
The research of the interaction between the
real estate prices and stock prices in the Malaysian market. During the
research, the quarterly data i.e. from the 1st quarter of 2000 to the 3rd quarter of 2013 was collected from Malaysian housing price
index. The different test applied on augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root test,
Perron test and LM unit root test. Furthermore, the cointegration and Granger
causality and bound test were used. According to the findings of the research, the
relation between the house prices and stock prices were observed. In the
Malaysian market, no long-term relation was observed between house prices and
stock prices. The research evidenced that stock prices leading house prices and
with of effect consistent wealth, in Kuala Lumpur’s developed regions. Finally,
the study concluded with the importance of the emphasis that stock price and
the house prices have a direct relationship with a consistent effect of wealth
(Lean & Smyth, 2014).
The aim of
the current study is empirically examining the relationship or interdependency
of the real estate market on the exchange rate, gold prices, inflation and
stock change or vice versa. Different researches use the model which may vary
study to study and the nature of the research. For the investigation of the
impact of the crude oil prices, exchange rate, money supply and consumer price
index on the prices of the real estate industry in middle east countries. We
use the following Equation:
HPIit = α0 + α1COPit +
α2ERit + α3M2it + α4CPIit+
eit
Whereas HPI represents house price index, COP
represents crude oil price, ER represents exchange rate, M2 is money supply,
CPI represents consumer price index, ‘e’ is error term and all at cross-section
‘i’ and time ‘t’.
H1: Crude Oil Prices has a negative impact
on house prices index.
H2: Money supply has a positive impact on house
prices index.
H3: Exchange rate has a negative impact on
the house prices index.
H4: Inflation has a positive relationship
with the house prices index.
DATA
AND METHOD
The study aims to assess the impact of a house
price index (HPI) of UAE on its exchange rate (ER), crude oil prices (COP),
inflation (CPI) and money supply (M2). The monthly data was collected from
Thomson Reuters DataStream and sample period is from December 2008 to May 2017.
For examination of the impact of crude oil
prices, general rice in prices and money supply on the housing prices in
Dubai’s real estate market. Stationary testing has been on the data and
variables/series have been taken on 1st difference using the following
equation:
DHPIit = α0 + α1DCOPit
+ α2DERit + α3DM2it + α4DCPIit+
eit
Wherein the DHPI i,t is the difference of housing price index,
DCOP i,t is the difference of crude oil prices, DER
i,t is the
difference of exchange rates, DCPI i,t is the difference of consumer price index and DM2i,t is the money supply. Єi,t is usually the error term. To check the
stationarity level of the time series variables, unit root test was used. Based
on this study, time series regression has been used for the investigation of
causality between macroeconomic variables and house prices in the UAE market.
Different factors considered in
macroeconomics, money related financial matters and monetary financial aspects were
non-stationary time arrangement (Hil, 2001). At the point when the time
arrangement information is stationary, at that point stuns are considered as
short-lived. The fluctuation relies upon time and way to deal with
boundlessness as time goes to endlessness (Asteriou& Hall, 2006). Expanded
Dickey-Fuller test (Dickey and Fuller, 1981) unit root tests were connected to
test the stationarity of the time arrangement information.
EMPIRICAL
FINDINGS
Table
1. Descriptive Statistics
Measures |
COP |
CPI |
ER |
HPI |
M2 |
Mean |
79.35706 |
99.10225 |
5.491315 |
102.8845 |
956296.9 |
Median |
77.50000 |
97.14500 |
5.584370 |
101.2950 |
894850.0 |
Maximum |
122.2800 |
107.7800 |
5.897710 |
114.6700 |
1274500. |
Minimum |
27.25000 |
93.53000 |
4.947280 |
96.24000 |
674310.0 |
Std. Dev. |
26.99194 |
4.361253 |
0.266280 |
5.873041 |
188427.7 |
Skewness |
-0.212474 |
0.648368 |
-0.579451 |
0.731713 |
0.207408 |
Kurtosis |
1.559593 |
1.966506 |
2.056690 |
2.148488 |
1.462556 |
Table 1. indicates descriptive statistics
for each series including the mean and the standard deviation. As the
statistics showing that there is a reasonable difference between the mean and
the standard deviation under the crude oil prices.
To find the relationship between the
variables, it is essential to test the time series data for the stationary
check. In this research, the test used was the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF)
test to obtain the unit roots in the time series and after testing, all
variables got stationary at 1st difference.
Graph 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
COP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCOP |
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
The above graphs showing the
non-stationarity and stationarity of the data. In the first graph, it has been
observed that crude oil prices data from 2008- 2017 was non-stationary on the
level. However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, we obtained the
stationary data (tables in the appendix). The data was converted into
stationary to get better results. Non-stationary time series data gives
unreliable and false results which would lead to poor understanding and
anticipations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
CPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
Graphs number 4 and 5 showing the
non-stationarity and stationarity of the data. In the first graph, it has been
observed that the consumer price index had been increasing since 2008, but the
data is non-stationary on the level. However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, we obtained the
stationary data to find the impact of the indicators on the real estate market
of Dubai.
Graph 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
EXR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEXR |
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
-.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
The above graphs indicating whether the
data is non-stationarity or stationarity. In the first graph, the exchange
rates of the past 10 years’ trend and data was non-stationary on the level.
However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, we obtained stationary data.
Graph 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
HPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DHPI |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
|
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
The above demonstrates that data was
initially non-stationarity and tested on different levels to obtain the
stationarity. In the first graph, it has been observed that the housing price
index was non-stationary on the level. However, after testing the data on the 1st level difference, the stationary data
obtained.
Graph 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graph 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
M2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
Graphs 9 and 10 represent the
non-stationarity and stationarity of the data. In the first graph, it has been
observed that data of money supply was non-stationary on the level.
Time series regression helps in predicting
the behaviour of dynamic systems from observations. To find out the impact of
macroeconomic indicators on house price index, time series regression has been
estimated in Table 2..
Table 2. Time Series Regression
Variable |
Coefficient |
Std.
Error |
t-Statistic |
Prob. |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
-0.118747 |
0.058969 |
-2.013732 |
0.0468 |
DCOP |
-0.020592 |
0.010255 |
-2.008055 |
0.0474 |
DCPI |
1.235864 |
0.158010 |
7.821404 |
0.0000 |
DER |
-2.047152 |
0.904266 |
-2.263883 |
0.0258 |
DM2 |
9.15E-06 |
3.88E-06 |
2.354589 |
0.0206 |
|
|
|
|
|
R-squared |
0.466889 |
Mean Dependent Var |
0.094257 |
|
Adjusted
R-squared |
0.444676 |
S.D. Dependent Var |
0.679750 |
|
S.E.
of regression |
0.506551 |
Akaike info
criterion |
1.525852 |
|
Sum
squared resid |
24.63297 |
Schwarz criterion |
1.655314 |
|
Log-likelihood |
-72.05555 |
Hannan-Quinn
criteria. |
1.578262 |
|
F-statistic |
21.01875 |
Durbin-Watson stat |
2.034931 |
|
Prob(F-statistic) |
0.000000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
According to the statistics, the significance
level is below 5%, the null hypothesis is rejected. The negative relationship
between the oil prices and the real estate prices (house price index) in Dubai
and when there will be a rise in the crude oil price in the Dubai market, real
estate prices (house price index) will fall and vice versa.
Furthermore, the direct relationship was
observed between the consumer price index and the real estate prices (house
price index) and when there is a rise in the consumer price index (weighted
average of prices of a basket of goods and services) then the real estate
prices (house price index) increases. Meanwhile, when there is a decline in the
consumer price index then there will be a fall in real estate prices (house
price index).
As per the statistics, the probability is
0.025 i.e. less than 5% leads to rejection of the null hypothesis and accept
alternative hypothesis. Exchange rate have negative impact on house price index
of Dubai. The exchange rate would be AED/USD, which means that whenever the
exchange rate is higher than the real estate prices (house price index) will be
lower and vice versa.
The money supply is directly related to the
real estate prices (house price index) in Dubai, as the statistics suggest that
significance level is below 5%, the null hypothesis is rejected hence there is
a direct relationship between the money supply in Dubai and real estate prices
(house price index). If the money supply in the economy increases which will
lead to an increase in the real estate prices (house price index).
R-Square gives estimations of the
applicable factors to enhance the model fit more than anticipated outcomes here,
in this case, analysis shows that there is around 46% impact on house price
index due to selected macroeconomic indicators and overall model is significant
(F Statistics = 21.01). Furthermore, the model’s likelihood stands 0, which implies that nothing is going ahead here or can be said that
every one of the coefficients of free factors is zero.
CONCLUSION
To
investigate the relationship between the macroeconomic variables (Exchange
rate, crude oil prices, money supply and consumer price index) and the house
price index of Dubai using time series regression model. The results indicate
that two macroeconomic indicators have a negative relationship and other two
macroeconomic indicators have apositive relationship with the house price index
of Dubai. Increase in oil prices and exchange rates will lead to a decline in
housing prices and the positive impact of money supply and consumer price index
on housing price have been found. Rise in the money supply and consumer price
index of Dubai will lead to the rise in prices housing sector and fall in the
money supply and consumer prices index will lead to falling
in the prices of the housing sector. The results are supporting the literature
review particularly in case of Dubai housing market.
The research findings derived different
aspects of the real estate market in the United Arab Emirates. As the real
estate market analysis indicated that the real estate market has different
indexes for the measurement of efficiency. Policymakers should increase the
number of units (houses) and money supply which will lead to the rise in house
prices. This will result in raised investments by decreasing the interest rate.
There is a major portion of investment from all over the world in UAE
residential and commercial properties. Considering this fact, the tourism
industry should be more developed as the demand is already high for tourism. The
education sector is more developed by introducing different international
schools or universities leading to more individuals coming from all over the
world with different investment purposes.
The research was limited to the house price
index of Dubai at the United Arab Emirates. During the research, it was learnt
that Dubai has developed its real estate industry which consists of different
sub-sectors and its indexes like; house price index, commercial property index
and helps in measurement of the effectiveness and efficiency of the market.
Furthermore, this research also directed to different researchers in the future
which may include finding out other macroeconomic indicator’s relation with
house prices, indicators can relate to the real estate sector and sub-sectors.
UAE have different divisions like; House Price index, Villa Index, Commercial
Property index etc. Considering these factors, the policies may be mapped or revised
in other Muslim or developing countries.
REFERENCES
Al-Mohana, S.,
&Hatemi-J, A. (2016). The Impact of Recent Crisis on the Real Estate Market
on the UAE: Evidence from Asymmetric Methods. EconomiaInternazionale/International
Economics, 69(4), 389-428.
Asteriou, D., &
Hall, S. G. (2006). A Modern Approach Using Eviews and Microfit, Applied
Econometrics.
Baum, A. (2015). Real
estate investment: A strategic approach. Routledge.
Blose, L. E.
(2010). Gold prices, cost of carry, and expected inflation. Journal of
Economics and Business, 62(1), 35-47.
Centigulec,
M. (2018, October 2). Al-Monitor; the pulse of Middle East. Retrieved from
Foreigners purchasing more Turkish property: https://www.al
monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/10/turkey-attracts-foreign-property-buyers-but-not-all-happy.html.
Choudhry, T., Hassan, S. S., &Shabi, S. (2015). Relationship between
gold and stock markets during the global financial crisis: Evidence from
nonlinear causality tests. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41,
247-256.
Cohen, G.,
&Qadan, M. (2010). Is gold still a shelter to fear. American Journal of
Social and Management Sciences, 1(1), 39-43.
Deloitte. (2018).
Middle East Real Estate Predictions: Dubai. Dubai
Dickey, D. A.,
& Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time
series with a unit root. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society,
1057-1072.
Dumičić, K.,
ČehČasni, A., &Šprajaček, P. (2012). The linkage between real estate prices
and the macro-economy in Croatia: VAR approach. Croatian Operational
Research Review, 3(1), 289-299.
Fernandes, C.,
&Karnik, A. (2009). Assessing UAE's oil dependence: an optimal control approach.
Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 2(2),
138-152.
Google Chrome.
(2018, October 6). Retrieved from Gulf business news:
https://gulfnews.com/business/dubais-fdi-soars-26-to-dh1776b-1.228697
Hau, H., &
Ouyang, D. (2018). Capital Scarcity and Industrial Decline: Evidence from 172
Real Estate Booms in China. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper,
(18-38).
Karnik, A. V.,
&Fernandes, C. (2009). Natural resource dependence: a macroeconometric
model for the United Arab Emirates. Applied Economics, 41(9),
1157-1174.
Khan, T.
(2018). Retrieved from Knight Frank UAE Market Review and Forecast https://content.knightfrank.com/research/1064/documents/en/uae-market-review-forecast-2018-5172.pdf
Kirikkaleli, D.,
Athari, S. A., &Ertugrul, H. M. (2018). The real estate industry in Turkey:
a time series analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 1-13.
Lean, H. H., &
Smyth, R. (2014). Dynamic interaction between house prices and stock prices in
Malaysia. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(2),
163-177.
Lin, P. T.,
&Fuerst, F. (2014). The integration of direct real estate and stock markets
in Asia. Applied Economics, 46(12), 1323-1334.
Mehta, S.
(2016). A review of Dubai's Residential Real Estate Market. UAE: KPMG.
Rao, A. (2008).
Analysis of volatility persistence in Middle East emerging equity markets. Studies
in Economics and Finance, 25(2), 93-111.
Thomson
Reuters Zawya. (2018, January 17). Retrieved from Qatar Real Estate Market
Overview: Q4 2017:https://www.zawya.com/mena/en/press-releases/story/Qatar_Real_Estate_Market_Overview_Q4_2017-ZAWYA20180117054448/
Weetas. (2018, January 31). Retrieved from Qatar Real Estate
Market to face anotherdifficult year In 2018: https://www.weetas.com/gccnews/qatar-real-estate-market-face-another-difficult-year-2018/
Wilson, P. J.,
&Zurbruegg, R. (2002). Structural breaks, diversification and international
real estate markets—some new evidence. Briefings in Real Estate Finance: An
International Journal, 1(4), 348-366.
Zafar, S.,
&Javid, A. Y. (2015). Evaluation of Gold Investment as an Inflationary
Hedge in Case of Pakistan (No. 2015: 118). Pakistan Institute of
Development Economics.