Pacific B usiness R eview (International)

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management Indexed With Web of Science(ESCI)
ISSN: 0974-438X(P)
Impact factor (SJIF):8.603
RNI No.:RAJENG/2016/70346
Postal Reg. No.: RJ/UD/29-136/2017-2019
Editorial Board

Prof. B. P. Sharma
(Principal Editor in Chief)

Prof. Dipin Mathur
(Consultative Editor)

Dr. Khushbu Agarwal
(Editor in Chief)

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management

Young Employee’s Retention in Ceramic Sanitary Ware Manufacturing Factories in India

 Dr. S.Umamaheswari

Assistant Professor,

School of Management Studies, Sathyabama,

Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai,

umaaishwarya99@gmail.com

 

Abstract

Organizations are evaluating suitable strategies to retain their trustful employees, by giving importance to the factors, which improves satisfaction of employees towards their organization. Generally non-financial factors get priority due to their lesser financial implications. This   article evaluate the effects of four retention factors work environment, organization commitment, training and development and work life balance over the employees of different tenures and explore what factors exert more influence over young employees with minimum years of, service (0-5).Employees of fast-growing, unattended   Ceramic sanitary ware factories were taken for analysis. Result concludes that retention factors influence varies over employees of different tenures while the factors work environment and training &development exerts more retention influence over young employees with minimum years of service (0-5).Suggestions for the industries are also proposed.

Keywords: Employee Retention, Young Employees, Work Environment, Organization Commitment, Training &Development, Work Life Balance

Introduction

For any organization to survive in today's ever increasing competition, where employee poaching in on the rise, it is very important to retain their best employees and keep them committed towards their organization. (Mehta, 2014).The impact of different levels of seniority of employees varies on retention factors (Govaerts, Kyndt, Dochy & Baert 2011).The aim is to retain young employees of minimum years of service (below 5 years), Indeed pay and compensation packages will play a vital role. But this paper deviates and focused its attention to non-monetary factors which were also exerted reasonable retention influence over employees (Boxall 2003; Yiu and Saner 2014).Non-financial factors work environment, organization commitment, training and development and work life balance  are taken for analysis to predict what factors exerts more retention  influence over young employees working.

Literature Review

Working  environment is a useful tool for retention of employees (Anis.et.al, 2011, Umamaheswari  and Jayasree krishnan ,2016) and it is a major factor affecting employee’s  determination to continuation. (Zeytinoglu and Denton 2006).Organization commitment was found to be most important  for their continuation (Nasyira.et.a1,2014, Umamaheswari and jayasree Krishnan, (2015)and this is allow significantly  related (Neininger et al.2010).Training programs improves better yield  and lower employee turnover (Huselid 1995).Further training and development opportunities are having positive association  with employee  retention  (Chew and Chan 2008). Boxall et.al(2003), predicted that better work life balance  induces employees  to change their job and  retention can be improved by better work life balance and by providing flexibility in work timings (Richman et.al, 2008).From the above literature surveys, work environment organization commitment training & development and work life balance are important factors for employee retention.

Objectives of the, study

1.      To explore whether retention factor's influence differs over  employees of different  category

2.      What factors influence more on young employees with minimum service of below 5 years?

Hypothesis

H1- There is no notable difference between years of experience with work environment.

H2-There is no notable difference between years of experience with organization commitment.

H3-There is no notable difference between years of experience with training & development

H4-There is no notable difference between years of experience with work life balance & polices.

1. Sample and procedure

Ceramic manufacturing sector is an unattended one and provides employment to 5.5lakh’s of people (Ceramic industry in India ) .As  it is  fast growing (FICCI. 2014),it has been  taken for analysis. Respondents were staff of ceramic sanitary ware manufacturing industries in India.  Employees of ceramic sanitary ware companies utilized for survey.  Simple random is used to pick out the respondence. 5 to 10 years of experience accounts for 29% and 28% are having 10-15 years of experience while more than fifteen years of service comes to 23%.

Likert scale 1-5 used for rating preference of employees appropriate tools were used for analysis.

Work environment was measured using 5 items (α=0.717) adopted from the researcher chew (2004) and organization commitment was measured using 8 items (α=0.829) adopted from the researchers Mowday and Streers (1979). Similarly 7 items (α=0.818) adopted from the researchers Dockel (2003) and chew (2004) were used to measure training & development and 5 items (α=0.766) were used to measure work life balance adopted from Olafsdottir ,(2008) and Atkinson,(2011).To measure employee retention, 10 items (a=0.902) were used adopted from Wang(2012) and Njoroge (2007).The reliability coefficient (α) of all variables  are above the  acceptable limit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Analysis

Table. A: Retention between grouping of services with factors

Factors

Group

details

Sum of

square

Df

Mean

square

f

p

Work Environment

 

Between Groups

69.053

3

23.018

6.065

 

0.006

 

Within Groups

1563.706

412

3.795

Total

1632.760

415

 

Organization Commitment

 

Between Groups

142.340

3

47.447

4.402

0.006

Within Groups

4440.570

412

10.778

Total

4582.913

415

 

Training & Development

 

Between Groups

83.178

3

27.713

4.094

 

0.007

 

Within Groups

2789.083

412

6.770

Total

2872.221

415

 

Work Life Balance

 

Between Groups

53.749

3

17.916

4.169

0.006

Within Groups

1771.472

412

4.300

Total

1825.221

415

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From Table. A It is inferred that all the four factors are rejected at 1% level of significance and concluded that years of experience differs with all the four factors.

 

Table. B: Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and work environment

Experience in years

N

Subset for Alpha =0.05

1

2

5-10

122

21.11

 

Above 15

94

 

21.84

10-15

117

 

22.04

Below 5

83

 

22.06

 

Table. B shows that employee of different service groups are having different opinions.  It is also inferred that employees of below 5 years’ experience employees are more concerned about work environment for their retention.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table: C Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and organization commitment

Experience

in years

N

Subset for α=0.05

1

2

5-10

122

33.48

 

Below 5

83

34.04

34.04

Above 15

94

 

34.70

10-15

117

 

34.89

 

Table C illustrates different service group views differently with the retention factor organization commitment. The result also indicates that youngster’s significance towards organization commitment is not so predominate as seniors.

 

Table: D: Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and training & development

Experience

in years

N

Subset for α=0.05

1

2

Above 15

94

24.78

 

5 – 10

122

24.80

 

10-15

117

25.51

25.51

Below 5

83

 

25.86

 

Table D it is reveals that different age group employees feels differently and also young employees are giving more preference to training and development for their retention than others.

 

Table E: Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and work life balance

Experience

in years

N

Subset for α=0.05

1

2

5-10

122

21.08

 

Below

83

21.31

 

Above 15

94

21.39

 

10-15

117

 

22.00

Table E reveals that  there exists different level of significance between different service groups. The result also indicates that youngsters with 0-5 years of service are not having remarkable influence with work life balance on employee retention when compared to employees of more service.

 

 

 

 

 


Conclusion and recommendation

The analysis concluded that retention factors work environment, organization commitment, training & development and work life balance exerts different level of influence over employees of different service groups. Further the study gives evidence that factors work environment and training &development exerts more retention influence over young employees with minimum years of service (0-5 years) in ceramic sanitary ware manufacturing industries in India

Probably  these may be due to the  fact  that  employees  of  minimum service obviously  need  training  to develop their skills. Availability of such opportunities motivates their continuation. Also young employees preference of work environment as a predominate factor may be to due lesser family commitments, and perception of getting employment elsewhere easily due to   their age. It is suggested that organizations by providing employee-friendly and hygienic environments of working place and giving importance to needful training programs, young employees of the factories can be made to opt the decision of continuation in the same firm.


References

1. Anis, A., Ijaz-Ur-Rehman, A. N., & Safwan, N. (2011). Employee retention relationship to training and development: A compensation perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2679-2685.

2. Atkinson C, M.(2011) Examining Differences in Work-life Balance, Job Satisfaction, Organizational  Commitment, and Learning Goal Orientation in in Baby Boomers and Generation Xers .Doctoral dissertation, San Diego State University.

3. Boxall, P., Macky, K., & Rasmussen, E.(2003) Labour turnover and retention in New Zealand: The causes and consequences of leaving and staying with employers, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 41,196-214.

4. Ceramic industry in India a trade perspective [online] URL:http://newsletters.cii.in/newsletters/mailer/trade_talk/pdf/Ceramics%20Industry%20in%20India.pdf.

5. Chew, J., & Chan, C. C. (2008) Human resource practices, organizational commitment and intention to stay, International Journal of Manpower, 29(6): 503-522

6. Chew, J. C. L. (2004). The influence of human resource management practices on the retention of core employees of Australian organizations: An empirical study. Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University.

7. Dockel, A.(2003) The effect of retention factors on organizational commitment, an investigation of high technology employees. Masters dissertation, University of Pretoria.  http://Pretoria.upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-08282003-103618/.../dissertation.pdf.

8. FICCI. (2014) Quarterly survey on Indian manufacturing sector May 2014, Federation of Indian chambers of commerce and industry manufacturing division. Retrieved from URL:http://www.FICCI.com./manufacturing- survey-report-2014.pdf.

9. Govaerts, N., Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Baert, H.(2011) Influence of learning and working climate on the retention of talented employees. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(1), 35-55.

10. Huselid, M. A.(1995)The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, Academy of management journal. 38, 635-672.

11. Mehta, M., Kurbetti, A., & Dhankhar, R. (2014). Review Paper–Study on Employee Retention and Commitment, International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 2(2):  154-164.

12. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W.(1979) The measurement of organizational commitment, Journal of vocational behavior. 14,224-247.

13. Nasyira, M. N., Othman, M., & Ghazali, H. (2014). Predictors of intention to stay for employees of casual dining restaurant in Klang Valley area. International Food Research Journal, 21

14. Neininger, A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Kauffeld, S., & Henschel, A.(2010) Effects of team and organizational commitment–A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 76, 567-579.

15. Njoroge, S. W.(2007) A Survey of factors that influence employee retention in manufacturing firms in Nairobi, Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.

16. Olafsdottir, S.(2008) The role of organizational culture in employees´ work-life balance as an aspect of health. Master’s thesis, Nordic School of Public Health, Sweden.

17. Richman, A. L., Civian, J. T., Shannon, L. L., Jeffrey Hill, E., & Brennan, R. T.(2008) The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work–life policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee engagement and expected retention. Community, work and family. 11, 183-197

18. Wang, Y. H.(2012) Recruitment and Retention of Knowledge Workers in Taiwan’s High Technology Industry’, Doctoral dissertation, Section of Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University

19. Yiu, L., & Saner, R. 2014. Talent Attrition and Retention: Strategic Challenges for Indian Industries in the Next Decade, Elite Research Journal of Accounting and Business Management, 2(1): 1-9.

20. Zeytinoglu, I. U., & Denton, M.(2006) Satisfied workers, retained workers: Effects of work and work environment on homecare workers' job satisfaction, stress, physical health, and retention. Research Institute for Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population, McMaster University.

21. Umamaheswari, S., & Krishnan, J. (2015). Retention factors and their relative significance in ceramic manufacturing industries in India. Asian Social Science, 11(13), 260.

22. Umamaheswari, S., & Krishnan, J. (2016). Retention of Employees in Ceramic Sanitary Ware Factories in India: Role of Work Life Balance, Career Development and Supervisor Support. TEM Journal, 5(2), pp. 217.