Young Employee’s Retention in Ceramic
Sanitary Ware Manufacturing Factories in India
Dr. S.Umamaheswari
Assistant Professor,
School of Management
Studies, Sathyabama,
Institute of Science
and Technology, Chennai,
umaaishwarya99@gmail.com
Abstract
Organizations
are evaluating suitable strategies to retain their trustful employees, by giving
importance to the factors, which improves satisfaction of employees towards their
organization. Generally non-financial factors get priority due to their lesser financial
implications. This article evaluate the
effects of four retention factors work environment, organization commitment,
training and development and work life balance over the employees of different
tenures and explore what factors exert more influence over young employees with
minimum years of, service (0-5).Employees of fast-growing, unattended Ceramic sanitary ware factories were taken for
analysis. Result concludes that retention factors influence varies over
employees of different tenures while the factors work environment and training
&development exerts more retention influence over young employees with
minimum years of service (0-5).Suggestions for the industries are also
proposed.
Keywords:
Employee Retention, Young Employees, Work Environment, Organization Commitment,
Training &Development, Work Life Balance
Introduction
For
any organization to survive in today's ever increasing competition, where
employee poaching in on the rise, it is very important to retain their best
employees and keep them committed towards their organization. (Mehta, 2014).The
impact of different levels of seniority of employees varies on retention
factors (Govaerts, Kyndt, Dochy & Baert 2011).The aim is to retain young
employees of minimum years of service (below 5 years), Indeed pay and
compensation packages will play a vital role. But this paper deviates and
focused its attention to non-monetary factors which were also exerted
reasonable retention influence over employees (Boxall 2003; Yiu and Saner
2014).Non-financial factors work environment, organization commitment, training
and development and work life balance
are taken for analysis to predict what factors exerts more retention influence over young employees working.
Literature
Review
Working
environment is a useful tool for
retention of employees (Anis.et.al,
2011, Umamaheswari and Jayasree krishnan
,2016) and it is a major factor affecting employee’s determination to continuation. (Zeytinoglu and
Denton 2006).Organization commitment was found to be most important for their continuation (Nasyira.et.a1,2014, Umamaheswari
and jayasree Krishnan, (2015)and this is allow significantly related (Neininger et al.2010).Training programs
improves better yield and lower employee
turnover (Huselid 1995).Further training and development opportunities are
having positive association with
employee retention (Chew and Chan 2008). Boxall et.al(2003), predicted that better work life
balance induces employees to change their job and retention can be improved by better work life
balance and by providing flexibility in work timings (Richman et.al, 2008).From the above literature
surveys, work environment organization commitment training & development
and work life balance are important factors for employee retention.
Objectives
of the, study
1. To
explore whether retention factor's influence differs over employees of different category
2. What
factors influence more on young employees with minimum service of below 5 years?
Hypothesis
H1-
There is no notable difference between years of experience with work
environment.
H2-There
is no notable difference between years of experience with organization
commitment.
H3-There
is no notable difference between years of experience with training &
development
H4-There
is no notable difference between years of experience with work life balance
& polices.
1. Sample
and procedure
Ceramic
manufacturing sector is an unattended one and provides employment to 5.5lakh’s
of people (Ceramic industry in India ) .As
it is fast growing (FICCI. 2014),it
has been taken for analysis. Respondents
were staff of ceramic sanitary ware manufacturing industries in India. Employees of ceramic sanitary ware companies
utilized for survey. Simple random is
used to pick out the respondence. 5 to 10 years of experience accounts for 29%
and 28% are having 10-15 years of experience while more than fifteen years of
service comes to 23%.
Likert
scale 1-5 used for rating preference of employees appropriate tools were used
for analysis.
Work
environment was measured using 5 items (α=0.717) adopted from the researcher
chew (2004) and organization commitment was measured using 8 items (α=0.829)
adopted from the researchers Mowday and Streers (1979). Similarly 7 items
(α=0.818) adopted from the researchers Dockel (2003) and chew (2004) were used
to measure training & development and 5 items (α=0.766) were used to
measure work life balance adopted from Olafsdottir ,(2008) and
Atkinson,(2011).To measure employee retention, 10 items (a=0.902) were used
adopted from Wang(2012) and Njoroge (2007).The reliability coefficient (α) of
all variables are above the acceptable limit.
Analysis
Table.
A: Retention between grouping of services with factors
Factors |
Group details |
Sum
of square |
Df |
Mean square |
f |
p |
Work Environment |
Between Groups |
69.053 |
3 |
23.018 |
6.065 |
0.006 |
Within Groups |
1563.706 |
412 |
3.795 |
|||
Total |
1632.760 |
415 |
|
|||
Organization Commitment |
Between Groups |
142.340 |
3 |
47.447 |
4.402 |
0.006 |
Within Groups |
4440.570 |
412 |
10.778 |
|||
Total |
4582.913 |
415 |
|
|||
Training & Development |
Between Groups |
83.178 |
3 |
27.713 |
4.094 |
0.007 |
Within Groups |
2789.083 |
412 |
6.770 |
|||
Total |
2872.221 |
415 |
|
|||
Work Life Balance |
Between Groups |
53.749 |
3 |
17.916 |
4.169 |
0.006 |
Within Groups |
1771.472 |
412 |
4.300 |
|||
Total |
1825.221 |
415 |
|
From
Table. A It is inferred that all the four factors are rejected at 1% level of
significance and concluded that years of experience differs with all the four
factors.
Table.
B: Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and work environment
Experience in years |
N |
Subset for Alpha =0.05 |
|
1 |
2 |
||
5-10 |
122 |
21.11 |
|
Above
15 |
94 |
|
21.84 |
10-15 |
117 |
|
22.04 |
Below
5 |
83 |
|
22.06 |
Table.
B shows that employee of different service groups are having different
opinions. It is also inferred that
employees of below 5 years’ experience employees are more concerned about work
environment for their retention.
Table:
C Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and organization commitment
Experience in years |
N |
Subset for α=0.05 |
|
1 |
2 |
||
5-10 |
122 |
33.48 |
|
Below
5 |
83 |
34.04 |
34.04 |
Above
15 |
94 |
|
34.70 |
10-15 |
117 |
|
34.89 |
Table
C illustrates different service group views differently with the retention
factor organization commitment. The result also indicates that youngster’s
significance towards organization commitment is not so predominate as seniors.
Table:
D: Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and training &
development
Experience in years |
N |
Subset
for α=0.05 |
|
1 |
2 |
||
Above
15 |
94 |
24.78 |
|
5
– 10 |
122 |
24.80 |
|
10-15 |
117 |
25.51 |
25.51 |
Below
5 |
83 |
|
25.86 |
Table
D it is reveals that different age group employees feels differently and also
young employees are giving more preference to training and development for
their retention than others.
Table
E: Statistical test of Duncan for years of experience and work life balance
Experience in years |
N |
Subset for α=0.05 |
|
1 |
2 |
||
5-10 |
122 |
21.08 |
|
Below
|
83 |
21.31 |
|
Above
15 |
94 |
21.39 |
|
10-15 |
117 |
|
22.00 |
Table
E reveals that there exists different
level of significance between different service groups. The result also
indicates that youngsters with 0-5 years of service are not having remarkable
influence with work life balance on employee retention when compared to employees
of more service.
Conclusion
and recommendation
The
analysis concluded that retention factors work environment, organization
commitment, training & development and work life balance exerts different
level of influence over employees of different service groups. Further the
study gives evidence that factors work environment and training
&development exerts more retention influence over young employees with
minimum years of service (0-5 years) in ceramic sanitary ware manufacturing
industries in India
Probably these may be due to the fact
that employees of
minimum service obviously
need training to develop their skills. Availability of such
opportunities motivates their continuation. Also young employees preference of
work environment as a predominate factor may be to due lesser family
commitments, and perception of getting employment elsewhere easily due to their age. It is suggested that organizations
by providing employee-friendly and hygienic environments of working place and
giving importance to needful training programs, young employees of the
factories can be made to opt the decision of continuation in the same firm.
References
1. Anis,
A., Ijaz-Ur-Rehman, A. N., & Safwan, N. (2011). Employee retention
relationship to training and development: A compensation perspective. African
Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2679-2685.
2. Atkinson
C, M.(2011) Examining Differences in Work-life Balance, Job Satisfaction,
Organizational Commitment, and Learning
Goal Orientation in in Baby Boomers and Generation Xers .Doctoral
dissertation, San Diego State University.
3. Boxall,
P., Macky, K., & Rasmussen, E.(2003) Labour turnover and retention in New
Zealand: The causes and consequences of leaving and staying with employers,
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 41,196-214.
4. Ceramic
industry in India a trade perspective [online] URL:http://newsletters.cii.in/newsletters/mailer/trade_talk/pdf/Ceramics%20Industry%20in%20India.pdf.
5. Chew,
J., & Chan, C. C. (2008) Human resource practices, organizational
commitment and intention to stay, International Journal of Manpower, 29(6):
503-522
6. Chew,
J. C. L. (2004). The influence of human resource management practices on the
retention of core employees of Australian organizations: An empirical study.
Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University.
7. Dockel,
A.(2003) The effect of retention factors on organizational commitment, an
investigation of high technology employees. Masters dissertation, University of
Pretoria. http://Pretoria.upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-08282003-103618/.../dissertation.pdf.
8. FICCI.
(2014) Quarterly survey on Indian manufacturing sector May 2014, Federation of
Indian chambers of commerce and industry manufacturing division. Retrieved from
URL:http://www.FICCI.com./manufacturing- survey-report-2014.pdf.
9. Govaerts,
N., Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Baert, H.(2011) Influence of learning and
working climate on the retention of talented employees. Journal of
Workplace Learning, 23(1), 35-55.
10. Huselid,
M. A.(1995)The impact of human resource management practices on turnover,
productivity, and corporate financial performance, Academy of management
journal. 38, 635-672.
11. Mehta,
M., Kurbetti, A., & Dhankhar, R. (2014). Review Paper–Study on Employee
Retention and Commitment, International Journal of Advance Research in
Computer Science and Management Studies, 2(2):
154-164.
12. Mowday,
R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W.(1979) The measurement of
organizational commitment, Journal of vocational behavior. 14,224-247.
13. Nasyira,
M. N., Othman, M., & Ghazali, H. (2014). Predictors of intention to stay
for employees of casual dining restaurant in Klang Valley area. International
Food Research Journal, 21
14. Neininger,
A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Kauffeld, S., & Henschel, A.(2010) Effects of
team and organizational commitment–A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational
Behavior. 76, 567-579.
15. Njoroge,
S. W.(2007) A Survey of factors that influence employee retention in
manufacturing firms in Nairobi, Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.
16. Olafsdottir,
S.(2008) The role of organizational culture in employees´ work-life balance as
an aspect of health. Master’s thesis, Nordic School of Public Health, Sweden.
17. Richman,
A. L., Civian, J. T., Shannon, L. L., Jeffrey Hill, E., & Brennan, R.
T.(2008) The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work–life
policies, and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to
employee engagement and expected retention. Community, work and
family. 11, 183-197
18. Wang,
Y. H.(2012) Recruitment and Retention of Knowledge Workers in Taiwan’s High
Technology Industry’, Doctoral dissertation, Section of Cardiff Business
School, Cardiff University
19. Yiu,
L., & Saner, R. 2014. Talent Attrition and Retention: Strategic Challenges
for Indian Industries in the Next Decade, Elite Research Journal of Accounting
and Business Management, 2(1): 1-9.
20. Zeytinoglu,
I. U., & Denton, M.(2006) Satisfied workers, retained workers: Effects
of work and work environment on homecare workers' job satisfaction, stress,
physical health, and retention. Research Institute for Quantitative Studies in
Economics and Population, McMaster University.
21. Umamaheswari,
S., & Krishnan, J. (2015). Retention factors and their relative
significance in ceramic manufacturing industries in India. Asian Social Science,
11(13), 260.
22. Umamaheswari,
S., & Krishnan, J. (2016). Retention of Employees in Ceramic Sanitary Ware
Factories in India: Role of Work Life Balance, Career Development and
Supervisor Support. TEM Journal, 5(2), pp. 217.