M. Shuaib Ahmed
P.hD Scholar,
PG & Research Department of Commerce,
C. Abdul Hakeem College (Autonomous),
Thiruvalluvar University,
Tamil Nadu State, India
Dr. S. Abdul
Sajid
Research Supervisor,
PG & Research Department of Commerce,
C. Abdul Hakeem College (Autonomous),
Thiruvalluvar University,
Tamil Nadu State, India
Abstract
The purpose of
the present demonetization study on the greater use of plastic money, we refer
to the act of eliminating the authorization of paper and currency as
"Legal Offer". It means that old coins, including bills and coins,
must be restored with new or completely new coins, such as Rs. 2000 and Rs. 500
note that was not previously available. This was a gigantic and precise
decision taken, as some said in a timely manner that it is a "master
coup" or a "surgical attack" against black money. As a result,
the appropriate number of citizens in the country has changed from cash to
plastic money (debit / credit cards). The use of credit and debit cards has
accelerated after the demonetization initiative. There is a great future for
the use of plastic money in India. Unlike providing greater convenience to
customers, plastic money can also guarantee the secrecy and integrity of transactions
to customers. For the growth of plastic cards in the Indian market, plastic
card issuers should provide greater security in customer service. This study
focuses mainly on the impact of demonetization on the increased use of plastic
money during the period. The selected sample consisted of consumers, including
students, working professionals, government officials, housewives and the
elderly. Primary data have been collected using a structured questionnaire of
450 respondents selected as random bases. Research tools for the analysis of
the data collected were analyzed with SPSS. Statistical tools such as
percentage, Pearson's correlation coefficient and unidirectional ANOVA have
been used for data analysis. It will facilitate the effective allocation of
resources with less chance of corruption. In addition, there will be no
manufacturing of plastic money that has a useful life of more than four to five
times the cash.
Keywords:Demonetization,
Currency, Plastic Money, Debit Card, Service Security.
Demonetization
is not happening for the first time in India. In early 1946, the 1000 and
10,000 banknotes were demonetized in order to eradicate the unaccounted for
money. Banknotes with the denomination of 1000, 5000 and 10,000 were reintroduced
in 1954 and once again they were demonetized in January 1978. After some 36
years,
The
demonetization took place in 2016. There are several unorganized sectors in
India that completely based on the cash economy. “In a historic move that will
add record strength in the fight against corruption, black money, money
laundering, terrorism and the financing of terrorists and counterfeit
banknotes, the Government of India has decided that the five One hundred
thousand rupee notes will cease to be legal tender from midnight on the 8th. November
2016. The Government has accepted the RBI's recommendations to issue Two
thousand rupee notes and new five hundred rupee notes will also be placed.
Circulation. "- Prime Minister, Mr. Modi, on the implementation of
demonetization on November 8th 2016. The
following table shows the volume and value of banknotes in India
Plastic money
will bring us benefits as well as problems. One major benefit of digital cash
is its increased efficiency which will open new business opportunities
especially for small businesses on the other hand it will bring in problems
like taxation and money laundering, instability of foreign exchange rate,
disturbance of money supply and the possibility of financial crisis etc.
Plastic money are being designed are Credit cards, Debit Cards, Digital Cash
and Electronic fund transfers.
Review of the Literature
The
study focuses on the concept and methods of cashless transactions in India. In
addition, the study examines the benefits and limitations of the cashless
economy for the general public and also cashless transactions help develop the
Indian economy is stronger (Rudresha C.E, 2019). Therefore, each and every one
must access and use the digital-based transaction. The Government will need more
financial education campaign efforts from time to time so that the population
becomes aware of the benefits of electronic payments.
This study
focuses primarily on the impact of demonetization on the increased use of
plastic money during the demonetization period. The selected sample consisted
of consumers, including students, working professionals, government officials,
housewives and the elderly. In addition, there will be no counterfeit plastic
money that has a useful life of more than four to five times the cash. From the
study we can conclude that in the coming years people would prefer plastic
money in a greater proportion than hard money (E. Megha et al., 2018).
In this research
paper, it is found that most respondents use plastic money generally to buy and
buy online and also to buy expensive products (Dr. M. Rifaya Meera et al.,
2017). It was discovered that customers prefer plastic money over paper money
and the greatest benefit that the card provides to customers is comfort and
accessibility.
In these studies
of Cashless Transaction: the methods, applications and challenges concluded
that, like the demonetization applied by the Indian government, the government
tried to get to know its people to conduct cashless transactions through
various types of advertising methods, but still a large number of people are
waiting for the introduction of transactions without cash (Deepika Kumari,
2016). This document is a study of transactions without cash, its different
methods, advantages and challenges. This document will help you understand the
basics of the transaction without cash.
In his
demonetization studies - Transformation for Cashless India ‘, he concludes that
cashless transactions will lead to electronic transactions. There has been a
dramatic improvement in electronic transactions that can drive cybercrime, so
we make people aware of ways to keep credit and debit cards safe and train them
to teach them the steps to keep our transactions smoothly (BM Saini, 2015). We
need a specially trained cyber police, forensic laboratories with
state-of-the-art tools to gather evidence, prosecutors who understand the
technology and cyber courts to punish cybercriminals. Hope India will be in the
line of developed countries in the coming days.
In his research
paper, the "Impact of plastic money on the banking trend in India"
examined that plastic money refers to the credit or debit cards we use to make
purchases. The study highlights the role of these cards as an electronic
payment tool to be used by customers and discusses the penetration of these
cards instead of cash and paper money. Indian customers find it easier to pay
with plastic cards instead of carrying too much cash, which contributes to the
growth of plastic money in the country (Patil Sushma, 2014).
In
his research paper "Plastic Money a form of cashless payment system"
he examined that plastic money, especially credit cards, is used by high-income
groups. However, the fixed income group or the salaried classes are also
beginning to use it. The installation was extended to both urban and rural
áreas (Manivannan, 2013).
Research Scope
The present
study is an analysis of the study related to the impact of the increase in the
demonetization of the use of plastic money in banking services, which consists
of the government movement to challenge the threat of black money, corruption,
terrorist financing and the false currency of the same notes. In the economy.
The circulation of counterfeit coins remains a threat to India because it is a
cash-based economy. False notes are being used for illegal activities.
Problem statement
Plastic money
has also become part of the modern lifestyle of people today. All this
highlights the scope and potential of plastic money as a payment instrument in
India. The growing recognition of plastic money increases its use and
acceptance in companies around the world. The success of the use of the card
depends on the awareness of the cardholder about the characteristics and
benefits of the cards, the various problems / risks related to the card, their
level of satisfaction and the decision to choose the cards instead of cash.
Promotional measures taken by the banking authorities and, above all, to what
extent merchants are willing to accept it as a means of payment in commercial transactions.
The present study is carried out to analyze the impact of demonetization on the
greater use of Plastic Money in the Vellore district region.
Research Objectives
·
Examine consumer
preference for using plastic money instead of liquid cash.
·
Analyze the risk
associated with plastic money.
·
Evaluate the level of
satisfaction of various modes of transactions without cash.
·
Assess the awareness
and use of cashless payment by consumers after demonetization.
Research Limitations
·
This study is limited
to the Vellore district only.For raw data, the non-response error cannot be
discarded.
·
Obtaining information
from interested parties is not an easy job, since they do not find time to
spare and also feel reluctant.
·
Despite best efforts to minimize all
limitations that may arise in the course of research there were time
constraints for investigation.
Research Design And Methodology
The study is
descriptive and is mainly based on primary data. Descriptive research explains
the state of things as it exists in the present.
Sources of data: Theprimary
data has been collected through a self-structured questionnaire of 450
respondents selected from the Vellore district.Secondary data related to the
study have been collected from websites, books, magazines, magazines and
periodicals.
Statistical Tools for Data Analysis
The data
collected were analyzed using statistical packages for the social sciences
(SPSS) and statistical tools such as percentage, Pearson's correlation
coefficient and the unidirectional ANOVA were used for data analysis.
Percentage
Analysis
Percentage
analysis is the method to represent raw streams of data as a percentage (a part
in 100 - percent) for better understanding of collected data.
Table 1:
Demographic Profile
Demographic |
Classifications |
Frequency |
Total |
Percentage |
Cum % |
Gender |
Men |
258 |
450 |
57.3 |
100 |
Women |
192 |
42.7 |
|||
Age |
18-22 |
0 |
450 |
0 |
100 |
23-26 |
0 |
0 |
|||
27-32 |
96 |
21.3 |
|||
33-36 |
129 |
28.7 |
|||
37-42 |
161 |
35.8 |
|||
Above 43 |
64 |
14.2 |
|||
Education
Qualification |
Illiterate |
128 |
450 |
28.4 |
100 |
High school |
64 |
14.2 |
|||
Degree |
96 |
21.3 |
|||
Master’sDegree |
162 |
36.0 |
|||
Others |
0 |
0 |
|||
Marital Status |
Married |
322 |
450 |
71.6 |
100 |
Single |
128 |
28.4 |
|||
Profession |
College Students |
0 |
450 |
0 |
100 |
Salaried
Employee |
226 |
50.2 |
|||
Businessman |
160 |
35.6 |
|||
Senior Citizen |
64 |
14.2 |
|||
Income |
Below 30,000 |
32 |
450 |
7.1 |
100 |
30,001- 40,000
|
225 |
50.0 |
|||
40,001-50,000 |
161 |
35.8 |
|||
50,001-60,000 |
32 |
7.1 |
|||
Above 60, 001 |
0 |
0 |
[Source: Primary
Data]
Data Interpretation:Table
1 above shows that the age of the clients indicates that 35.8 percent, which
belonged to the age group of 37-42 years, followed by the age group under 32
years. 21.3 percent, 57.3 and 42.7 percent Men and women respectively. The
educational qualification of the respondents 28.4 percent who were illiterate
14.2 percent who were studied up to HSC, 21.3 percent who had degrees and 36.0
percent who responded are teachers. The wise classification of the marital
status of the respondents shows that 71.6 percent of the clients were married
and the remaining 28.4 percent of the unmarried. A maximum of 40 percent of the
clients were salaried employees followed by professionals and 35.6 percent,
made up of businessmen, and 14.2 percent were seniors representing 24.2 and
20.8 percent, respectively. The monthly income of the clients was Rs.30,
001-40,000 and 40,001-50,000, which constitute 50.0 percent and 35.8 percent
respectively.
Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient
Correlation
coefficients are used in statistics to portion how strong a relationship
is between two variables, in this research, the two variables are Reasons for
not preferring plastic money and Different modes of plastic money. One of
the most commonly used formulae for Pearson’s correlation coefficient is:
Hypothesis 0
(Ho): There is no relationship between reasons for not preferring plastic money
and different modes of plastic money.
Hypothesis 1
(H1): There is a relationship between reasons for not preferring plastic money
and different modes of plastic money.
Table 2:
Relationship between reasons for not preferring plastic money andDifferent
modes of plastic money.
Factors |
Correlation Co-efficient |
T Value |
P value |
Reasons
for not preferring plastic money. |
.446 |
23.6473 |
<0.001 |
Different
modes of plastic money. |
[Source: Primary Data]
Data Interpretation: On
the basis of above Table 2 results, P-Value is less than the 0.001, so the null
hypothesis is rejected at 1% Level Significance. Hence it's concluded that
there is a relationship between reasons for not preferring plastic money and
different modes of plastic money. Based on correlation coefficient value .446
there is a positive correlation.
One - Way Anova
It means of two
or more independent groups like Education and preference behind uses os plastic
money, in order to determine whether there is statistical evidence that the
associated population means are significantly different.
Hypothesis 0
(Ho): There is no significant difference between the Education Qualification
and Lack of awareness.
Hypothesis 1
(H1): There is a significant difference between the Education Qualification and
Lack of awareness.
Table 3: Significant difference
between the Education Qualification and Lack of awareness
Sources |
Sum of square |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
Between
Groups Within
Groups Total |
8.391 85.333 93.724 |
3 446 449 |
2.797 .191 |
14.619 |
<.001 |
[Source: Primary
Data]
Data Interpretation: On
the basis of above Table 3 results, one can be interpreted that there is a
statistically significant difference between groups as by one-way ANOVA. Since
P-Value is less 0.001 the null hypothesis is rejected at 1%Level of
significance.Hence conclude that there is a significant difference between
education and Lack of awareness.
Research Findings
Demonetization
Previously, cash was widely used as a form of payment.
• Demonetization
has acted as a motivator in digitalization.
• People widely
use plastic cards and Net Banking services to carry out their transactions.
• People, even
after the serious effects of demonetization, continue to use the digital
payment service to settle their transactions.
• The best parts
of the respondents are of the opinion that plastic money is the safest mode of
the transaction and creates about 66 percent of the entire population.
• Most
respondents preferred the PIN as security for the configuration of their
plastic money.
• There has been
a valid struggle in the use of the bank's plastic card after demonetization.
Research suggestion
Cashless
transaction activity took an important step to improve transparent economic
development, improve financial inclusion and integrate the parallel economy
with the mainstream. In the current scenario, the country needs to move away
from traditional cash-based transactions to a digital or cashless payment
system. Therefore, the following suggestions will help improve cashless
transactions between consumers.
• Banks
should organize an intensive awareness program about the benefits and the need
for a transaction without cash or digital payments to university students,
higher education intuitions and common men.
• Banks
must organize camps in the village to educate people about the digital payment
system.
• The
Government of India should take the necessary measures to improve broadband
speed and broad Internet coverage in all areas.
• The
government must continue and give some incentive benefits to those who use
regular digital payments because it will motivate not only the regular user but
also the new user.
Reserach Conclusion
The Government
of India has implemented various transformations for sustainable and
transparent economic development. Demonetization and digital payments are the
most important among the reforms. The impact of demonetization was felt more in
the social sector and the most affected were also the poor and the common
people. Cashless transactions are not only a requirement, but also an emerging
need today for transparent economic development. The cashless transaction
system is growing day by day, as soon as the market globalizes and the growth
of the banking sector, more and more people move from cash to the plastic money
system. The cashless system is not only a requirement, but also a necessity of
today's society. The entire online market basically depends on the cashless
transaction system. The transition without cash is not only safer than the cash
transaction, but it consumes less time and is not the hassle of carrying it, and
the hassle of wear and tear like paper money. It also helps to record all
transactions made. Therefore, it is undoubtedly said that the future
transaction system is a cashless transaction system. Finally, we can conclude
that in the coming years people would prefer plastic money in a greater
proportion than hard money.
Future Research
As usual, all
research has some future scope, the current study was not free from that scope
either. First, due to time constraints, the sample size could not be increased
from 450 by increasing the sample size, results may vary. The adjusted Chi
square value indicates that there is a limitation and the need for a more
in-depth study in this field.
Acknowledgements
The authors
thanked the members of our faculty who provided ideas and experience that
greatly assisted in the writing of the research article. We would also like to
extend our greatest gratitude to Dr.S. Shamsuddin and Dr. A. Afasr Basha for
their genuine and continued support. Fianlly we thanks to our Valuable respondents
for their support and cooperation to provide information related to these
research articles.
Ananya Mitra,
Sonali Rath, & Jayant Kumar Nayak. (2017). Impact of demonetization on
cashless transactions, International Journal of Engineering and Management
Invention 02(03), 246-251.
Ashima Dominic,
K. Saranya and K.G. Rajani, (2018). A Study on Transformation in Behaviour of
Individuals towards Cashless Economy, International Journal of Pure and Applied
Mathematics Volume 118 No. 18, 1365-1372 ISSN: 1311-8080; ISSN: 1314-3395. http://www.ijpam.eu
Balaji K.C.,
Balaji K. (2017). A Study on Demonetization and its Impact on Cashless
Transactions, International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research &
Development, 58-64.
Bernthal, M. J.,
Crockett, D., & Rose, R. L. (2005). Credit cards as lifestyle facilitators.
Journal of consumer research, 32(1), 130-145.
Bist A., Nair
P., Dubey R., Hajela T. (2015). Analysis of Use of Plastic Money: A Boon or a
Bane, SIMS Journal of Management Research 1(2), 34-51.
Blankson, C.,
Paswan, A., &Boakye, K. G. (2012).College students' consumption of credit
cards. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 30(7), 567-585.
Chahal, H.,
KaurSahi, G., & Rani, A. (2014).Moderating role of perceived risk in credit
card usage and experience link. Journal of Indian Business Research, 6(4),
286-308.
Chelladurai, M
and Sornaganesh, V. (2016). Demonetization, Unified Payment Interface &
Cashless Economy. International Journal of Informative & Futuristic
Research, 4 (3), pp. 5654 – 5662.
Deepika Kumari, (2016).
Cashless Transaction: Methods, Applications and Challenges, International
Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development (IJERED) Vol. 4 Issue
6,http://www.erpublications.com
Feinberg, R. A.
(1986). Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: A conditioning
interpretation. Journal of consumer research, 13(3), 348-356.
Gurpreet Kaur,
Mrs. Rashmi Sharma, (2017).Plastic Money– A Way Forward for Cashless
Transactions, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, e-ISSN: 2278-487X,
p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 19, Issue 3. Ver. III, PP 15-18, www.iosrjournals.org
Halemani S.S,
Importance of Banks in Cashless Transaction under Digitalisation System,
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
ISSN: 2456-6470.
Irene Elsa Mani,
(2017). A Study On The Impact Of Demonetization On Electronic Payment System,
Indian Journal Of Applied Research, Volume – 7, Issue - 7, ISSN - 2249-555x |
If: 4.894 | Ic Value: 79.96.
Jangra, A.
(2017). Demonetization in the venture of digital India. Abhinav National
Monthly Refereed, Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 6(4),
21-26.
Jain K., Pandiya
S., India: Currency Demonetisation and the Way Ahead, Management Insight 12(2).
Jill Austin, M.,
& Phillips, M. R. (2001).Educating students: an ethics responsibility of
credit card companies. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(7), 516-528.
Kalyani, P.
(2016). An Empirical Study Of The Effects Of Demonetization In India and
Analyzing Shifting Trends in Marketing / Purchasing to The Alternative Options.
Journal of Management Engineering and Information Technology, 3(6), 20-34.
Karthikeyan C. (2017).
A Meta analytical study on impact of demonetization, International Journal of
Management, IT & Engineering 7(7).
Kumudha, A.,
& Lakshmi, K. S. (2016). Digital Marketing: Will the Trend Increase in the
Post Demonetization Period, Journal of Research in Business and Management
4(10), 94-97.
Kaur, Manpreet.
(2017). Demonetisation: Impact on Cashless Payment System. International
Journal of Science, Technology and Management, 6 (1), pp. 144 – 149.
Lokesh Uke,
(2017). Demonetization in India, International Journal of Economics and
Management Feb 2017.
Megha E, Swathi
Prathap and M.B. Krishna, (2018). A Study on Impact of Demonetization on
Increased Use of Plastic Money-with Special Reference to Ernakulam District,
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 119 No. 10,
679-689 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)
url: http://www.ijpam.eu
Manivannan P,
(2013). Plastic Money a way for cash Less Payment System, Global Research Analysis,
Vol. II, No. I.8.
Nancy Prajapati,
& Sanjeev Kumar Singh. (2017). A Study on the Impact of Demonetization on
Online Transactions, International Journal for Innovative Research in
Multidisciplinary Field 3(7).
Patil Sushma.
(2014). impact of plastic money on banking trends in India, International
Journal Management Research & Business Strategy, Vol. 3, No. 1, ISSN
2319-345X. www.ijmrbs.com.
Rabhu M.P, (2017).
Demonetisation and Its Effects on Banking Sector, ISOR, Journal of Management.
Rahmath Unnisa.
& Mrs. Dhivya Kumari. G., Impact of Demonetization: Cash to Cashless -A
Study of Select Consumer, Journal of Business and Management, E-ISSN:
2278-487X, P-ISSN: 2319-7668, PP 34-40.
Ramdurg, Anil I.,
& Bassavaraj, C. S. (2016). Demonetization: Redefining Indian Econom.
International Journal of Commerce and Management Research. 2 (12), pp. 07 – 12.
Rudresha C.E.
(2019). A Study on Cashless Transaction in India, International Journal of
Scientific Development and Research (IJSDR), Volume 4, Issue 2. www.ijsdr.org
Rifaya Meera M,
R. Padmaja, and R. Mohammed Abubakkar Siddique. (2017). A Study on Customer
Attitude towards Usage of Plastic Money in Sivakasi, Asian journal of
Management, Volume No. 8, Issue No. 2, and ISSN
Print: 0976-495X, ISSN Online: 2321-5763. http://ajmjournal.com
Saini B.M,
(2015). Demonetization – Metamorphosis for Cashless India, International
Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064. https://www.ijsr.net
Suvarna Varadai
& Dr. B. S. Navi. (2017). Implications Of Demonetization On E-Banking
Services, Gjra - Global Journal For Research Analysis Volume-6, Issue-12, ISSN
No 2277 – 8160.
Smrity Baiju, C.
R. (2017). FinTech Revolution: A step towards digitization of Payments - Review
of Existing Literature. International Journal of Advanced Research and
Development. , 1(2), 1-9.
Surulivel S.T, (2014).
Customer Awareness and Preference towards E-Banking Services of Banks (A Study
of SBI). International Research Journal of Business and Management – IRJBM, 14,
59-67.
Veerakumar, K.
(2017). A Study on People Impact on Demonetization, International Journal of
Interdisciplinary Research in Arts and Humanities, Volume 2, Issue 1, Page
Number 9-12.
Viji, G. (2018).
A Study on Impact of Demonetization on Increased Use of Plastic Money - with
Special Reference to Coimbatore District. Shanlax International Journal of
Economics, 6(3), 29–37.