Mergers
& Acquisitions in Indian Banking Sector during Pre and Post Global
Financial Crisis: An Empirical Analysis
Mr. Ghanshyam Chand
Yadav
Research
Scholar,
Department
of Commerce and Business Management,
VKSU, ARA
Dr. Manish Kumar
Assistant
Professor,
Dept. of
Commerce,
Shaheed Bhagat
Singh Evening College, University of Delhi
Prof D. K Tiwary
Professor,
Department
of Commerce and Management,
VKSU, ARA
Abstract
Merger and acquisition is a vital tool for the growth and
expansion in any industry. It is needful for the survival of the weak banks by
merging into the larger banks. The recent research shows the effect of mergers
and acquisitions in the Indian Bank sector weather Mergers & Acquisitions has
led to a gainful condition or not. For this purpose the comparison between pre
and post-merger performance in terms of camel models. CAMEL model as a
technique is very operative and resourceful and accurate to be used as a
performance evaluation in banking industry future and relative risk CAMEL model
stands for capital adequacy, Asset quality, Management Earning and Liquidity.
In the current research some significant ratios are selected and intended to
estimate banks performance. Data which is used in this study gathered from
annual financial reports of sample Bank and after that data is compared with
other bank’s ratios and reports. The Primary motive of this experiment is to
assess the influence of Mergers and Acquisitions in Indian banking sector, their
situation before and after Mergers and Acquisitions and concluding out the details
after these Mergers and Acquisitions with the benefit of CAMELmethod. In the
current study secondary data is used which has been taken from articles,
magazines, newspapers, books and websites, etc.
Keywords: Mergers and Acquisitions, CAMEL approach, Indian Banking Sector,
banks have Private sector and Public sector banks.
Introduction
In
the present globalized economy, aggressiveness and upper hands have become the trendy
expressions for corporate around the globe. Organizations are dynamically
utilizing Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) basically for ingoing new markets,
coordinating resource development, gathering more noteworthy piece of the
overall industry/extra modern limits, and picking up adjusting blessings and
capacities, and to turn out to be progressively unobtrusive in the commercial
center. Mergers and acquisitions are utilized for refining astuteness of
organizations and increasing aggressive advantage over different firms however
increasing more prominent piece of the overall industry, extension the
portfolio to lessen business hazard and entering new markets. There is contrast
as far as effect on introduction following mergers, dependent upon the firm gained
– inland or cross-fringe.
Indian Banking Scenario
Like
all business elements, banks need to guard against dangers, just as adventure
accessible possibilities assigned by present and unsurprising patterns. Indian
banks are progressively concentrating on receiving incorporated way to deal
with hazard the board. M&As in the financial segment have been on the
ascent in the ongoing past, both all around and in India. In this foundation of
creating worldwide and Indian inclinations in the financial segment, this
investigation lights the key issues encompassing M&As in banking division
with the accentuation on India. It likewise looks to clarify the articles
behind some M&As that have happened in India during pre and post worldwide
budgetary emergency. [i]
Deregulation has been the principle
driver, following three significant courses:
Ø Dismantling
of loan cost controls,
Ø Elimination
of hindrances among banks and other monetary mediators,
Ø Dropping
of passage obstructions.
Mergers
and Acquisitions is the main route for quick unassuming preferred position in
India and all inclusive and in that capacity the entire grouping of
preparations are hoping to consider acquisitions inside India and abroad. So as
to accomplish the frugalities of scale and furthermore to battle the
insalubrious restriction inside the division other than unindustrialized as a
modest power to number with in the transnational economy. Relationship of
Indian financial part through mergers and acquisitions on lucrative thoughts
and business stratagems – is the fundamental pre-essential. Today, the
financial business is considered as a real part of the quickly developing
enterprises in India. It has twisted itself from a torpid business substance to
an approval industry. The development rate in this area is remarkable and along
these lines, it has become the most favored banking terminuses for global
investors. Over the most recent multi decade, there have been model move in Indian
financial enterprises. The Indian financial part is developing at a stunning
pace. A generally new estimation in the Indian financial industry is quicker
through mergers and acquisitions. It will empower banks to accomplish world
class status and toss more prominent incentive to the speculators.
Merger:
Merger
is mix of at least two organizations into a solitary organization where one
endures and the others lose their corporate presence. The survivor gains every
one of the advantages just as liabilities of the consolidated organization or
organizations. For the most part, the enduring organization is the purchaser,
which holds its personality, and the smothered organization is the dealer.
Merger is additionally named as amalgamation. All benefits, liabilities and the
load of one organization stand moved to transferee Company with regards to
installment as:
Ø Equity
partakes in the transferee organization,
Ø Debentures
in the transferee organization,
Ø Cash,
or
Ø A
blend of the above modes.
Forms of Mergers
Merger
or obtaining relies on the reason for the offeror organization it needs to
accomplish. In view of the offerors' destinations profile, blends could be
vertical, level, roundabout and conglomeratic as decisively portrayed beneath
concerning the reason in perspective on the offeror organization.
(a) Vertical mix
An
organization might want to assume control over another organization or look for
its merger with that organization to extend upholding in reverse joining to
acclimatize the assets of supply and advance incorporation towards advertise
outlets. The getting organization through merger of another unit endeavors on
decrease of inventories of crude material and completed merchandise, actualizes
its creation designs according to the targets and conserves on working capital
speculations. As it were, in vertical blends, the combining undertaking would
be either a provider or a purchaser utilizing its item as middle person
material for definite creation.
(b) Circular mix
Organizations
creating unmistakable items look for amalgamation to share regular
appropriation and research offices to acquire economies by end of cost on
duplication and advancing business sector amplification. The securing
organization acquires benefits as economies of asset sharing and expansion.
(c) Conglomerate mix
It
is amalgamation of two organizations occupied with irrelevant businesses like
DCM and Modi Industries. The essential reason for such amalgamations remains
use of money related assets and broadens obligation limit through re-arranging
their monetary structure in order to support the investors by expanded
utilizing and EPS, bringing down normal expense of capital and accordingly
raising present worth of the remarkable offers. Merger upgrades the general strength
of the acquirer organization and makes balance in the organization's all out
arrangement of various items and generation forms.
The
accompanying fundamental advantages accumulate from the vertical blend to the
acquirer organization for example
1. It increases a solid position in view
of flawed market of the go-between items, shortage of assets and bought items;
2. Has authority over items particulars.
(d) Horizontal mix
It
is a merger of two contending firms which are at a similar phase of mechanical
procedure. The procuring firm has a place with a similar industry as the
objective organization. The fundamental reason for such mergers is to get
economies of scale underway by taking out duplication of offices and the tasks
and widening the product offering, decrease in interest in working capital, end
in rivalry fixation in item, decrease in publicizing costs, increment in
showcase sections and exercise better control on advertise.
Acquisition:
Acquisition
in basic terms, is securing the possession in the property. With regards to
business blends, procurement is the buy by one organization of a controlling
enthusiasm for the offer capital of another current organization.
Strategies for Acquisition:
An
Acquisition might be influenced by:
Ø Agreement
with the people holding greater part enthusiasm for the organization the
executives like individuals from the board or significant investors instructing
dominant part of casting a ballot power;
Ø Purchase
of offers in open market;
Ø To
make takeover offer to the general collection of investors;
Ø Purchase
of new offers by private settlement;
Ø Acquisition
of offer capital through the accompanying types of contemplations viz. Methods
for money, issuance of credit capital, or protection of offer capital.
Potential Motives behind
Consolidation:
In
view of the cases, we can limit the intentions behind M&As to the
accompanying:
Development
- Organic development requires significant investment and dynamic firms favor
acquisitions to develop rapidly in size and land reach.
Cooperative energy
- The blended substance, as a rule, has better capacity as far as both income improvement
and cost decrease.
Administrative effectiveness
- Acquirer can all the more likely deal with the assets of the objective whose
worth, thus, ascends after the securing.
Key thought processes
- Two manages an account with corresponding business premiums can reinforce
their situations in the market through merger.
Market section
- Cash rich firms utilize the obtaining course to buyout a set up player in
another market and afterward expand upon the current stage.
Assessment shields and monetary
protections - Tax concessions go about as an
impetus for a solid bank to procure troubled banks that have amassed
misfortunes and unclaimed devaluation benefits in their books.
Administrative intercession
- To secure contributors, and forestall the de-adjustment of the budgetary
administrations part, the RBI steps in to constrain the merger of a troubled
bank.
M&A in Indian Banking as a
Corporate Strategy
The
financial business is a significant territory wherein mergers and acquisitions
do make colossal monetary profits. Because of changes in the desire for the
corporate client, banks are presently obliged to reconsider their business and
devise new techniques. Then again, contenders both from India and abroad are
infringing upon each territory of business in the common approach of LPG. Along these lines, Indian brokers are to
battle to get by in a focused situation, and consequently they receive various methodologies.[ii]
Banking M&A stays particular from other M&A on account of industry
explicit highlights of banks including their valuation, their way to benefit
and their treatment of capital, utilizing stores and assets as crude material
revenue driven creating items. They have no other choice but to decrease their
costs (both operational expenses and the expense of credit) the best way to
oversee intensity, which empowers the financiers to spread its overhead expense
over an enormous client base. To increase focused cost advantage, union of
activity as M&A is one of the powerful procedures generally embraced by the
brokers. The Indian financial area is experiencing a procedure of confining,
for the most part determined by inescapable patterns, for example, deregulation,
disintermediation, mechanical advancement, development and extreme challenge.
From 1961-2004, 71 mergers occurred among different banks in India.
Elements Explaining Rising M&A
in the Financial Sector
M&A,
principally in the money related division, are increasing tremendous
significance in the ongoing occasions because of related powers of
deregulation, globalization and monetary development (Berger, Demsetz and
Strahan, 1999; Kohers et al., 2000; Group of Ten Report, 2001; Amel et al., 2004;
How et al., 2005; Mohan, 2005). In what follows, the remaining of these powers
in controlling M&A movement is talked about. Deregulation: The decrease of
Bretton Woods System during the 1970s brought about deregulation in monetary
area of cutting edge and rising economies (Rangarajan, 2009). For example, in
USA, disassembling of different financial confinements, for example, the
Riegle-Neale Inter-state Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 prepared
for cutting edge number of mergers crosswise over natural limits.
Correspondingly, the Glass Stegall Act of 1933 opened probability of mergers
crosswise over separated money related exercises (Hagendorff and Keasey, 2009).
Because of different proportions of deregulation in the money related segment, prominently,
deregulation of financing costs, decrease of sacred prerequisites (in view of
liquidity, holds, credit and so on.) and a general decrease in passage wall for
local and outside firms caused in free market powers and more prominent
challenge
M&A in Indian Banking Sector
during Pre and Post Global Financial Crisis
(MISAL
D.M, 2013) India also needs to withstand the negative effect of the budgetary
emergency. It is the aggregate test for the brokers, and the RBI to react to
this phenomenal circumstance successfully and return India to its way of
development and neediness decrease. Combination through M&A might be
necessity of future. M&A is one of the most prestigious procedures to make
appropriation with those evolving organizations.[iii]
M&A of future should focus on making of solid element and to create
capacity to withstand the market stuns as opposed to securing the premiums of
investors of feeble banks. The M&As in the financial segment ought to be
driven by showcase related parameters, for example, size and scale;
topographical and dissemination collaborations and aptitudes and limit.
Current Scenario in banking
Industry
(Singhal,
2017) The Indian financial segment contains fundamentally in excess of 26 open
segment banks, in excess of 25 private part banks, in excess of 43 remote
banks, in excess of 56 territorial rustic banks, in excess of 1,589 urban
helpful banks and in excess of 93,550 country agreeable banks, in summation of
helpful credit associations. The level of consumer awareness is significantly
higher as compared to previous years. [iv] Now-a-days
they need internet banking, mobile banking and ATM services. Open part banks
control generally 80 percent of the market, accordingly leaving relatively a
lot littler offers for its private companions. Banks are likewise confident
their clients deal with their accounts utilizing cell phones the credit nature
of huge borrowers has weakened impressively. The framework level credit danger
financial part against macroeconomic pressure uncovered that the GNPA may
increment to 9.8 percent by March 2017 and further to 10.1 percent by (March
2018).
Objectives of the study
The main motive of the study is to assess the situation before and
after Mergers and Acquisitions of selected banks. So the objective of the study
is as-
I.
To analyze the pre- merger versus post-merger
performance of selected banks.
Methodology
Scope of the Study
The
present examination covers the 15 years of period beginning from the year 2001
to 2015 to decide the effect of mergers and acquisitions on the exhibition of
chose banks. For examination, we take information before 3 years and following
3 years of merger and securing of chosen banks. Money related emergency is
utilized to characterize the time of the examination just for example Pre
Global Financial Crisis period is from the year 2000 to 2007 and Post Global
Financial Crisis period is from the year 2008 to 2015.
Information Collection
The
total investigation depends on the auxiliary information accessible in the two
structures; electronic and material. The information required and data looked
for has been gathered from the diaries and the money related reports accessible
online on the site of Banks, Reserve bank of India and other related sites.
Test of the Study
There
are in excess of 11 mergers and obtaining held during worldwide budgetary
emergency period for example from 2001 to 2015. Yet, with the end goal of the
investigation 3 Public part banks and 3 private segment bank had been taken.
Pujab National Bank, Bank of Baroda and Oriental Bank of Commerce acquirer of
Nedungadi Bank, Benaras State Bank and Global Trust Bank individually if there should
arise an occurrence of Public Sector banks while ICICI, HDFC and Kotak Mahindra
Bank are private segment banks. ICICI is procureSangli Banks and Bank of
Rajasthan. HDFC and Kotak Mahindra Bank are obtaining Centurion Bank of Punjab
and ING Vyasa Bank individually.
Instruments utilized for
investigation
So
as to discover the targets some exploration hypothesis has been figured and
CAMEL model is being utilized during the time spent research. CAMEL represents
Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Efficiency, Earnings Efficiency and
Liquidity. There are 22 proportions for dissecting CAMEL however we take some
particular proportion like-Capital Adequacy, Debt-Equity Ratio, Net NPA to Net
Advances, Expenditure to Income Ratio, Assets Turnover Ratio, Net Profit
Margin, and Return on Equity and Interest Expended to Interest Earned. For
figuring proportion, we determined information for a long time when merger and
take their mean. The information investigation was does by utilizing SPSS, and
MS-Excel. Checking the degree of importance of Hypothesis, we utilized the
understudy's T test. To check any huge distinction between Pre Merger and Post-Merger
Performance of procuring banks exit or not following hypothesis checked with
the assistance of T test. All hypothesiss kept an eye on 95% certainty level
with 5 level of opportunity.
Hypothesis
1
H0:
There is no huge contrast in Pre and Post-merger Capital Adequacy Ratio of
obtaining banks
Hypothesis
2
H0:
There is no huge contrast in Pre and Post-merger Debt Equity Ratio of obtaining
banks
Hypothesis
3
H0:
There is no huge contrast in Pre and Post-merger NPA to Net Advance Ratio of
obtaining banks
Hypothesis
4
H0:
There is no huge contrast in Pre and Post-merger Total Expenditure to Total
Income Ratio of obtaining banks
Hypothesis
5
H0:
There is no critical contrast in Pre and Post-merger Assets Turnover Ratio of
securing banks
Hypothesis
6
H0:
There is no critical contrast in Pre and Post-merger Net Profit Margin Ratio of
securing banks
Hypothesis
7
H0:
There is no critical contrast in Pre and Post-merger Return on Equity of
securing banks
Hypothesis
8
H0:
There is no critical contrast in Pre and Post-merger Interest Expended to
Interest Earned of securing banks
Limitations of the Study
The
time span of the examination is constantly a limitation from the perspective of
point of confinement on its result. Also, various sources utilized for
assortment of information may have a few constraints which have sway on the
present examination yet it is normal that the above impediments don't influence
the helpfulness of the investigation. The examination utilized measurable
system, which acquires its own constraint. In the above examination just chose
proportions of CAMEL approach had been taken for the correlation of pre and
post-merger execution of banks. Be that as it may, just six chose banks had
been taken from the whole financial segment.
Investigation of the selected bank's
information based on chosen proportion
In
the present investigation some proportion as Capital Adequacy, Debt-Equity
Ratio, Net NPA to Net Advances, Expenditure to Income Ratio, Assets Turnover
Ratio, Net Profit Margin, and Return on Equity and Interest Expended to
Interest Earned to survey the presentation of banks when merger during
budgetary emergency had been taken.
Table 1: Capital Adequacy Ratio,
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean (%) |
Rank |
Mean (%) |
Rank |
||
PNB |
10.42 |
6 |
13.38 |
3 |
Increase |
BOB |
13.26 |
1 |
12.69 |
5 |
Decrease |
OBC |
12.40 |
2 |
10.92 |
6 |
Decrease |
PSB-Mean |
12.03 |
|
12.33 |
|
Increase |
ICICI |
11.73 |
4 |
16.30 |
2 |
Increase |
HDFC |
12.22 |
3 |
16.45 |
1 |
Increase |
KMB |
11.06 |
5 |
13.09 |
4 |
Increase |
PvtSB-Mean |
11.67 |
|
15.28 |
|
Increase |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, Pvt SB- Private Sector
Banks
Interpretation of Table 1
Capital
Adequacy is huge presentation of the fiscal prosperity of a financial item.
This demonstrates the banks volume to keep up capital proportionate with the
nature and level of a wide range of dangers, as likewise the capacity of the
bank's chiefs to classify measure, screen and control these dangers. This
proportion goes about as a showcase of bank impact. According to RBI standards,
Indian SCBs ought to have a CAR of 9% i.e., 1% more than indicated Basel
standards while according to the most recent RBI standards, open division banks
are featured to keep this proportion at 12%. It is landed at by isolating the
aggregate of Tier-I, Tier-II and Level III capital by total of hazard weighted
resources (RWA).
Representatively,
CAR=
(Tier-I + Tier-II + Tier-III)/RWA
Level
I capital incorporates value capital and free saves. Level II capital contains
optional obligation of 5-7 years residency, amendment holds, half and half
obligation capital instruments and undisclosed stores and total ceaseless
inclination shares. Level III capital includes momentary subordinate
obligation. Higher the CAR, more grounded is the bank. Table 1 shows the
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of chose bank. If there should arise an occurrence
of open segment bank, CAR expanded for PNB just and diminished for BOB and OBC
after merger. On the off chance that we talk about private area bank, its show
an expanding pattern for chosen private banks. In the event that we think about
mean of open and private area banks, both are expanded after merger.
Table 2: Debt Equity Ratio,
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean (%) |
Rank (%) |
Mean |
Rank |
||
PNB |
22.06 |
1 |
16.13 |
1 |
Decrease |
BOB |
17.27 |
2 |
14.94 |
2 |
Decrease |
OBC |
16.84 |
3 |
12.62 |
3 |
Decrease |
PSB-Mean |
18.72 |
|
14.56 |
|
Decrease |
ICICI |
12.04 |
6 |
6.75 |
6 |
Decrease |
HDFC |
12.14 |
5 |
10.26 |
5 |
Decrease |
KMB |
12.36 |
4 |
11.77 |
4 |
Decrease |
PvtSB-Mean |
12.18 |
|
9.59 |
|
Decrease |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, PvtSB- Private Sector
Banks
Understanding of Table 2
Obligation
Equity Ratio in banks is a proportion of the significant of banks business that
is upheld through the blend of obligation and value. It is a proportion of
money related impact of a bank. It is expected as the measure of aggregate
'Outside Liabilities' to Net worth. 'Outside Liabilities' incorporates all out
borrowings, stores and different liabilities. 'Total assets' incorporates value
capital and stores and extra. Higher proportion assigns less guards for the
loan bosses and savers in the financial framework Table 2 shows the territory
of Debt value proportion. It diminished for all assigned banks after merger. It
is additionally decreased for all chosen private area banks interestingly of
pre-merger. On the off chance that we compare mean of obligation value
proportion for selected open and private division banks, both are diminished
after merger.
Table 3: Net Non-Performing Assets (NPA) to
Net Advances Ratio,
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean (%) |
Rank |
Mean (%) |
Rank |
||
PNB |
6.84 |
1 |
0.49 |
5 |
Decrease |
BOB |
5.18 |
2 |
0.97 |
2 |
Decrease |
OBC |
2.73 |
3 |
0.76 |
4 |
Decrease |
PB-Mean |
4.92 |
|
0.74 |
|
Decrease |
ICICI |
1.52 |
4 |
1.92 |
1 |
Increase |
HDFC |
0.37 |
6 |
0.47 |
6 |
Increase |
KMB |
1.35 |
5 |
0.92 |
3 |
Decrease |
PvtSB-Mean |
1.08 |
|
1.10 |
|
Increase |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, PvtSB- Private Sector
Banks
Translation of Table 3
Net
Nonperforming Assets to Net Advances Ratio is a proportion of the general
greatness of banks propels. It shows the real money related weight on the bank.
A NPA are those benefits for which intrigue is past due for over a quarter of a
year or ninety days. Net NPAs are proposed by lessening expanding parity of
arrangements uncertain toward the finish of the period just as some other
intrigue changes, from net NPAs. Higher proportion reflects rising terrible
nature of advances Table 3 portrays the image of Net Non-Performing Assets
(NPA) to Net Advances Ratio in assigned open and private bank. If there should
be an occurrence of open division bank, Net Non-Performing Assets to Net
Advances Ratio is lessened for every chosen bank after merger. Yet, it is
intensified for ICICI and HDFC banks in assessment of pre-merger. On the off
chance that we relate mean of Net Non-Performing Assets to Net Advances Ratio
for chose open and private area banks, proportion is declined for open division
banks while it enlarged after merger for private part bank.
Table 4: Total Expenditure to Total Income
Ratio,
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean (%) |
Rank |
Mean (%) |
Rank |
||
PNB |
63.32 |
6 |
72.10 |
3 |
Increase |
BOB |
66.41 |
5 |
59.03 |
6 |
Decrease |
OBC |
76.43 |
1 |
75.21 |
1 |
Decrease |
PSB-Mean |
68.72 |
|
68.78 |
|
Increase |
ICICI |
76.12 |
2 |
72.22 |
2 |
Decrease |
HDFC |
67.21 |
4 |
71.34 |
4 |
Increase |
KMB |
68.03 |
3 |
70.28 |
5 |
Increase |
PvtSB-Mean |
70.45 |
|
71.28 |
|
Increase |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, PvtSB- Private Sector
Banks
Elucidation of Table 4
An
impressive piece of working cost of banks comprises of pay rates to
representatives, innovative up shades and branch avocation, especially the new
age banks. Despite the fact that these consumptions significance into higher
Total Expenditure to Total Income Ratio, in long haul they help the bank in
elaborate its arrival to value investors. It is perfect for banks to have a
lower proportion as it will improve the benefits of the bank and afterward
upgrade comes back to the speculators. The proportion gives savers a reasonable
perspective on how expertly the bank is being run – the lower it is, the more
moneymaking the bank will be. Changes in the proportion can likewise feature
potential issues. In the event that the proportion ascends starting with one
period then onto the next, it implies that financial limits are ascending at a
higher rate than pay. Table 4 found out about the proportion of Total
Expenditure to Total Income in chose open and private bank. If there should
arise an occurrence of open division bank, Total Expenditure to Total Income
Ratio is decreased for BOB and OBC after merger and increment for PNB. If there
should arise an occurrence of Private Banks, it is increased for KMB and HDFC
banks conversely of pre-merger and decrease for ICICI. In the event that we
compare mean of Total Expenditure to Total Income Ratio for chose open and
private segment banks, proportion is expanded for both, open area banks and for
private segment bank.
Table 5: Assets Turnover Ratio,
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean (%) |
Rank |
Mean (%) |
Rank |
||
PNB |
9.86 |
3 |
7.21 |
6 |
Decrease |
BOB |
11.10 |
1 |
8.41 |
4 |
Decrease |
OBC |
9.11 |
5 |
8.07 |
5 |
Decrease |
PSB-Mean |
10.02 |
|
7.90 |
|
Decrease |
ICICI |
10.23 |
2 |
9.32 |
2 |
Decrease |
HDFC |
8.14 |
6 |
9.04 |
3 |
Increase |
KMB |
9.32 |
4 |
10.22 |
1 |
Increase |
PvtSB-Mean |
9.23 |
|
9.53 |
|
Increase |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, PvtSB- Private Sector
Banks
Elucidation of Table 5
Resource
Turnover occasions how rapidly a bank risks over its bit of leeway through its
income, both mindfulness salaries just as non-premium salary. It gauges the
capacity of a bank to utilize its advantages for ingeniously produce pay. The
higher the proportion assigns that the bank is building up the entirety of its
assets expertly to make income Table 5 shows the Assets Income Ratio of chose
open and private bank. If there should arise an occurrence of open area bank,
Assets Turnover Ratio is diminished for all Public segment banks. If there
should arise an occurrence of Private Banks, it is expanded for KMB and HDFC
banks in correlation of pre-merger and diminishing for ICICI. On the off chance
that we look at mean of Assets Turnover Ratio for chose open and private
division banks, it is expanded for private segment bank yet diminished for open
area bank.
Table 6: Net Profit Margin,
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean (%) |
Rank |
Mean (%) |
Rank |
||
PNB |
6.97 |
5 |
9.88 |
4 |
Increase |
BOB |
4.52 |
6 |
9.52 |
5 |
Increase |
OBC |
7.21 |
4 |
9.04 |
6 |
Increase |
PB-Mean |
6.23 |
|
9.48 |
|
Increase |
ICICI |
10.12 |
3 |
17.28 |
2 |
Increase |
HDFC |
15.24 |
1 |
17.41 |
1 |
Increase |
KMB |
13.14 |
2 |
14.37 |
3 |
Increase |
PV-Mean |
12.83 |
|
16.35 |
|
Increase |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, PvtSB- Private Sector
Banks
Translation of Table 6
Net
revenue is a significant standard to quantify the pays greatness in banks.
Expanding benefits is the best showcase that the bank can pay additional items
because of which the offer cost will inclination rising. Investors see net
revenue efficiently on the grounds that it implies the greatness of the bank
that is repeated in its ability in redesigning pay into benefits offered for
partners. It is depicted as estimation of salary that is suffering after every
single working use, consideration, imposes and supported stock rewards other
than shared stock reward is taken from the all-out pay of the bank. A high Net
Profit Margin without a doubt demonstrates that the bank has steady and
relentless earnings. Table 6 shows the circumstance of Net Profit Margin
proportion for chosen banks. It is improved for every single chosen bank after
merger, for example both for open just as private bank. After examination mean
of Net Profit Margin proportion for chosen open and private segment banks are
expanded after merger.
Table 7: Return on Equity,
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean (%) |
Rank |
Mean (%) |
Rank |
||
PNB |
13.02 |
3 |
15.24 |
2 |
Increase |
BOB |
12.34 |
4 |
11.42 |
5 |
Decrease |
OBC |
13.63 |
2 |
10.87 |
6 |
Decrease |
PB-Mean |
12.99 |
|
|
12.51 |
Decrease |
ICICI |
8.12 |
6 |
12.30 |
4 |
Increase |
HDFC |
16.41 |
1 |
18.11 |
1 |
Increase |
KMB |
12.14 |
5 |
14.06 |
3 |
Increase |
PV-Mean |
12.22 |
|
14.82 |
|
Increase |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, PvtSB- Private Sector
Banks
Understanding of Table 7
Profit
for Equity quantifies how much the investors earned for their interest in the
bank. This proportion demonstrates how productive a bank is by contrasting its
overall gain with its normal investors' value. On the off chance that a bank
can assemble stores at a lower rate and advance these to clients to produce
more significant yields than the expense of stores, it can make extra incomes
that accumulate to investors as expanded value. The higher the proportion rate,
the more proficient the bank is in profit and using its value base to produce
better return is to financial specialists. Table 7 portrays the proportion of Return
on Equity of chose open and private bank. If there should arise an occurrence
of open area bank, Return on Equity is expanded for PNB in Public segment banks
and decline for BOB and OBC. In the event of Private Banks, it is expanded for
all chosen private part banks for example ICICI, KMB and HDFC. In the event
that we look at mean of Return on Equity for chose open and private part banks,
it is expanded for private segment bank however diminished for open area bank.
Table
8: Interest Expended to Interest Earned
Bank |
Pre-Merger |
Post-Merger |
Increase/Decrease Performance on the
basis of Pre and Post Merger |
||
Mean |
Rank |
Mean |
Rank |
||
PNB |
0.26 |
2 |
0.27 |
2 |
Increase |
BOB |
0.23 |
4 |
0.26 |
3 |
Increase |
OBC |
0.16 |
5 |
0.19 |
5 |
Increase |
PSB-Mean |
0.22 |
|
0.24 |
|
Increase |
ICICI |
0.25 |
3 |
0.21 |
4 |
Decrease |
HDFC |
0.28 |
1 |
0.29 |
1 |
Increase |
KMB |
0.13 |
6 |
0.18 |
6 |
Increase |
PvtSB-Mean |
0.22 |
|
0.23 |
|
Increase |
Source:
Compiled from website of Banks PSB- Public Sector bank, PvtSB- Private Sector
Banks
Understanding of Table 8
This
proportion estimates intrigue cost as a level of intrigue pay. It quantifies
the capacity of the bank to meet the premium use on stores from the premium pay
from propels. It likewise shows the adept administration of stores and advances
of the bank. On the off chance that the proportion is under 1, the bank is
creating enough enthusiasm from advances to meet its advantage commitments of
stores which connotes sound liquidity of the bank. Table 8 shows the Interest
Expended to Interest Earned of chosen open and private bank. In the event of
open part bank, Interest Expended to Interest Earned is expanded for all chosen
Public area banks. If there should arise an occurrence of Private Banks, it is
expanded for KMB and HDFC and diminishing for ICICI. In the event that we think
about mean of Net Profit Margin proportion for chosen open and private division
banks, both are expanded after merger.
Testing of Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference Between pre-merger
and post-merger Ratio of acquiring bank. |
T-value |
P-value 95% CF.L |
Null Hypothesis Accept/Reject |
Capital
Adequacy Ratio |
1.925 |
2.571 |
Accept |
Debt
Equity Ratio |
-1.122 |
2.571 |
Accept |
NPA
to Net Advances Ratio |
-1.864 |
2.571 |
Accept |
Total
Expenditure to Total Income Ratio |
0.187 |
2.571 |
Accept |
Assets
Turnover Ratio |
-1.403 |
2.571 |
Accept |
Net
Profit Margin |
3.661 |
2.571 |
Reject |
Return
on Equity |
1.044 |
2.571 |
Accept |
Interest
Expended to Interest Earned |
0.336 |
2.571 |
Accept |
Findings and Conclusions
The
principle finding of the investigation is that if there should be an occurrence
of open area bank mean of the Capital Adequacy Ratio, Total Expenditure to
Total Income Ratio, Net Profit Margin and Interest Expended to Interest Earned
proportion is improved in examination of Pre-Merger execution additionally
diminishing pattern of mean is likewise found for Debt Equity Ratio, NPA to Net
Advances Ratio, Assets Turnover Ratio, Return on Equity. If there should arise
an occurrence of private segment bank mean of the Capital Adequacy Ratio, (NPA)
to Net Advances Ratio, Total Expenditure to Total Income Ratio, Assets Turnover
Ratio, Net Profit Margin, Return on Equity and Interest Expended to Interest
Earned proportion is expanded in examination of pre-merger execution, anyway
mean of just Debt Equity Ratio is diminished. Testing of speculation presumes
that there is no critical distinction in the presentation of pre and
post-merger of chose banks aside from in the event of Net Profit Margin on the
grounds that determined estimation of t is more prominent than arranged worth
subsequently invalid theory is dismissed in every single other case classified
worth is more noteworthy than determined worth that is the reason all theory
acknowledged with the exception of in the event of net overall revenue. Thus,
it is presumed that all proportion is improved aside from net revenue for
example execution of post-merger in correlation of pre-merger is factually
improved. Hence, based on above investigation it is presumed that the post-merger
execution of chosen bank is improved than pre-merger execution.
References
·
Ahmad Ismail, Ian Davidson & Regina
Frank (2009),“Operating performance of European bank mergers”, The Service
Industries Journal, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp. 345-351
·
Akhil Antony K. (2011), “Post-merger
profitability of selected banks in India”, International Journal of Research in
Commerce, Economics and Management, Volume 1, Issue 8, pp. 133-135
·
ASSOCHAM Report, (2012), “Merger and
Acquisition Newsletter”, ASSOCHAM National M&A Council, Volume 1,
pp. 1-10.
·
Barnabas, N., and Mekoth, N. (2010),
“Autonomy, market orientation and performance in Indian retail banking”, Asia
Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Volume22, Issue 3, pp. 330‐350.
·
Bhattacharyya Surajit and ChatriAnkit
(2012) “Efficiency of Indian Commercial Banks: Post Reform Experience from
Mergers and Acquisitions”, The Indian Economic Journal, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp
1-28.
·
Bwisa, H. M. (2008). “How to Write a
Statement Problem, Your Proposal Writing Companion”, Retrieved on 14th March
2012, from http://www.professorbwisa.com/new/free_downloads/
problem_statement.pdf
·
DuvvuriSubbarao (2013), “Structure of
banking in India- looking ahead by looking back”, speaking note at the
FICCI-IBA, Annual Banking Conference, Mumbai, August 2013.
·
Goyal K.A. and Joshi Vijay (2011),
“Merger and Acquisition in Indian Banking Industry: A case study of ICICI Bank
Ltd.” International Journal ofResearch in Management, Volume 2, Issue 2,
pp. 30-40.
·
Hoang, Thuy Vu NgaLapumnuaypon, Kamolrat
(2007), “Critical Success Factors in Merger and Acquisition Projects- A study
from the perspectives of advisory firms”, September 2007, Master Thesis.
·
KaurPardeep, KaurGian (2010), “Impact of
mergers on the cost efficiency of Indian Commercial Banks” Eurasian Journal of
Business and Economics, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp. 27-50.
·
Khan Azeem, A. and Ikram,S. (2012),
“Testing the Efficiency of Indian Stock Market Vis-À-Vis Merger and
Acquisitions - A Study of Indian Banking Sector”, International Journal of latest trends in Finance, economicsand Science,
Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 155-168.
·
Khawaja Khalid, HaimHilman and Dileep
Kumar M.(2012), “Get along with quantitative Research Process”, International Journal of Research
inManagement, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 15-29.
·
LehtoEero&Bockerman
Petri (2008), “Analyzing The Employment Effects Of Mergers And Acquisitions”,
Journal Of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 112–124.
·
Manish Khanna and SaurabhKaushal
(2013),“Growth of Banking Sector in India: A Collective Study of History and
its Operations”, Asian Journal ofAdvanced Basic Science, Volume 2, Issue
1, pp.36-45.
·
MehrozNidaDilshad (2012), “Profitability
Analysis of Mergers and Acquisitions: An Event Study Approach”, Business and
Economic Research, 2013, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 38-51.
·
Prasad K.V.N. and Ravinder G. (2012), “A
Camel Model Analysis of Nationalized Banks in India”, International Journal of
Trade and Commerce- II, Volume 1, Issue1, pp. 23-33.
·
Prasuna D G (2013), “Performance
Snapshot 2003-04”, Chartered Financial Analyst, Volume X, Issue 11,
pp.6-13.
·
Raiyani, J. R. (n.d.) (2010), “Effect of
mergers on efficiency and productivity of Indian banks : A CAMELS analysis”, Asian
Journal ofManagement Research, Volume-8, pp. 772–794.
·
Reddy Maheshwara D. and Prasad K.V.N
(2009), “Evaluating Performance of Regional Rural Banks: an Application of
CAMEL Model”,
·
S. Nirmala and Aruna,G. (2013), “A
Literature Review of Mergers and Acquisitions”, International Journal of
Management & InformationTechnology, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp. 435-439.
·
SinhaPankaj& Gupta
Sushant. (2011), “Mergers and Acquisitions: A Pre-Post Analysis for the Indian
Financial Services Sector
·
TiwariAmdhesh Kr (2011), “Mergers and
Acquisitions in Indian Banking Industry - A Case Study”, APJRBM, Volume
2, Issue 2, pp.56 - 76.
·
www.iba.org.in IBA (Indian Banks
Association) and www.rbi.org.in
·
Zhu, J. L. (n.d.) (2011), “A New Measure
for Shareholder Value Creation and the Performance, (November 2011), Available
at SSRN: http: // ssrn.com / abstract = 1968931 orhttp: // dx.doi.org / 10.2139
/ ssrn.1968931.
[ii]Amit Mittal ( 2016 ) M&A in the Indian Banking Sector: An analysis of private and public bank transactions
[iii]NazimUllah,Junaidah Abu Seman (2018) Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) in Banking Sector: A Review of the Literature
[iv]Vijay Joshi, Krishn A Goyal ( 2012 ) Indian Banking Industry: Challenges And Opportunities