Dr. Manisha Goel Associate Professor J C BOSE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, YMCA, Faridabad Guru Nanak Dev University (GNDU), Amritsar Email: singla_manisha@rediffmail.com |
Nidhi Aggarwal J C BOSE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, YMCA, Faridabad Email: nidhiaggarwal318@gmail.com |
Abstract
Banking industry is growing at very fast pace in India.
As a result of increasing competition, number of banks going bankrupt has also
manifolded. Now a day’s many small banks have join their hands with other banks
in form of mergers and acquisitions to enjoy the benefit of financial synergy.
It has helped banks in increasing their debt capacity and revenues. Undoubtedly mergers and acquisitions help
banks to achieve their organizational objectives. But many of the merged banks have
failed to achieve their desired objectives because of the lack of consideration
towards many factors related to human resource management such as power &
conflict, lack of communication, cultural differences, job security, lack of motivation,
diminished trust etc. This article discusses the role of managing people as an
essential tool for success of any mergers & acquisitions. In this paper efforts
have been made to explore various aspects of human resource management which
are required to be considered at the time of mergers and acquisitions.
Keywords: Human
resources, Organizational, Banks, Merger, Acquisition, Dimensions.
Introduction
In the era
of globalization, mergers and acquisitions have become as an important business
strategy to order to improve the organizational performance. A merger is
generally defined as the combination of two or more organizations and formed a
new organization under the common owner and management structure. Whereas in
case of acquisition, one entity takeover another entity in which all the assets
and liabilities of the acquired bank get transferred to the acquirer bank. In
order to improve profitability, many banks follow the path of merger and
acquisition. The main aim of merger and acquisition is to diversify the risk. In
both of the cases, HR professionals have to face a lot of challenges. In the
process of merger and acquisition, the management team of both organizations
consider all implications of a proposed merger or acquisition.
Literature
Review
Swanson &
Holton, (2001) in their study stated the importance of HR
programs in training and development in order to improve employee performance.
They laid emphasis on ensuring that employees will have the competencies
required for future jobs.
Zingheim and Schuster, (2001) in their study has suggested a wide range of
alternatives to make reward system work in favor of both the companies under merger
and their workforce. They emphasized on continue paying stay bonuses to keep
people with core competencies, implement total reward solution, follow
pre-acquisition reward practice of the acquired company, blend few of the practices
or design a totally new reward solution.
Thach and Nyman (2001) stated different roles played by leaders in different
phases of the merger process. First of all, leaders must handle the emotional
fallout while encouraging their employees to continue to focus on work. They need
to ‘renegotiate performance objectives’. They should communicate with employees
about what work will stop, start, and continue. They should discuss with
employees regarding positive impact of the merger. This might mean increasing
the frequency of one-one discussions with employees. They have to supervise
implementation and working through cultural and system differences between the merged
companies.
Davenport (2002) emphasized on the integration stage to be most important
in merger and acquisition process. He stated the role of integration due to difference
in culture management practices, organization policies and work in order to
achieve the merger and acquisition goals.
Cianne (2002) stated that during the merger and acquisition process,
focus should be on the processes of integration of human capital and change
management. The study emphasized on development of a new design for the entire
combined entity focusing on organisation structures, organisation systems, and
management practice and policy.
Zhu et al (2004) emphasized that depending on the nature of information,
goals of the organization, specific needs and concerns of the employees, needs
and expectations of employees, the communication should vary in its openness. Reward
strategy should be redesigned after merger and acquisition.
Papadakis (2005) stated that there exists positive relationship between
communication frequency and successful implementation of the mergers. He
emphasized that in order to increase the success in the implementation process;
communication frequency to employees should be increased. He pointed out that the
existence of an integrated communication program was most significant factors for
successful implementation of merger related changes. He found out that high
level of communication helps in creating smooth working climate and in
understanding cultural differences.
Schweiger and Goulet (2005) pointed out that ego differences may arise in case of merger
or acquisition due to cultural differences. For the successful integration, elimination
of cultural differences is most important step. He stated that both the
acquirer and acquired must rise above their ego and develop empathy for one
another for successful merger and acquisition.
Gaughan (2005) stated that human resource departments have become very practical
and strategic. He emphasized that human resource departments can add
significant value for companies through development, managing personnel
conflict, reinforcing the new HR system and corporate culture, and providing
leadership and communication to reduce turnover.
Research Methodology
Merger and acquisition activities are coming
up at very high speed in banking sector in India. Objective of the Study:
1) To find out the various dimensions of HR
perspective of merger in Banking Sector.
2) To examine the variations in employee
perception in relation to various dimensions of HR perspective of merger in
Banking Sector.
3) To compare dimensions of HR perspective of
merger between various banks.
Research
Hypotheses:
To conduct this research following hypotheses
have been formulated:
H1: There is
significant difference between in perception of employees regarding various
dimensions of HR perspective of merger in Banking Sector on the basis of their
experience.
H2: There is
significant difference between in perception of employees regarding various
dimensions of HR perspective of merger in Banking Sector on the basis of their
gender.
H3: There is
significant difference in response of employees of various banks in relation to
dimensions of HR perspective of merger in Banking Sector.
Scope of the study:
The duration of the research work is one and
a half year. The survey was limited to Delhi NCR.
Data Collection: For the purpose of study, both primary and secondary data
has been used. The secondary data has been collected through journals,
magazines, and other published research papers. The primary data has been
collected with the help of structured questionnaire. A total of 250
questionnaires have been distributed. Out of 250, 180 respondents filled the
questionnaire. Out of 180, 160 questionnaires are filled properly and qualified
for further study. The questionnaire is based on 5 point Likert scale where 1
means strongly agree, 2 means Agree, 3 means Neutral, 4 means Disagree and 5
means strongly disagree.
Sample Design:
Questionnaires have been filled by the
employees of those banks which banks have merged successfully. For the purpose
of study the size of sample taken is of 250 employees working in banks of NCR
region.
Analytical Tools:
For the purpose of data analysis, statistical
techniques such as Exploratory Factor Analysis, Reliability Testing and ANOVA
have been applied. The analysis has been carried out with the help of SPSS
software.
Analysis and Interpretation
After data collection, data preparation, and
data analysis was carried out. Total 160 questionnaires have been considered
for analysis. The captured responses were entered, coded and tabulated in SPSS
software.
Respondent’s
profile:
To get an overview of sample characteristics,
an analysis of the demographic characteristics of 60 respondents was carried
out. With the help of simple descriptive statistics the respondents’ characteristics
were summarized. Table1 presents the profile of the respondents.
Table 1 Respondent’s Profile
|
|
No. of Respondents |
Gender |
Male |
88 |
Female |
72 |
|
Experience |
Less
than 5 year |
13 |
5-10
year |
75 |
|
More
than 10 year |
72 |
|
Bank Name |
ICICI
Bank |
65 |
Kotak
Mahindra bank |
45 |
|
HDFC
Bank |
15 |
|
State
Bank of India |
45 |
|
Merged Bank Name |
Bank
of Rajasthan |
65 |
ING
Vyasya Bank |
45 |
|
Centurion
Bank of Punjab |
15 |
|
State
Bank of Indore |
45 |
The analysis results pointed out that the
sample represented the entire population as survey captured responses from
people from various banks, gender, and experience.
Various dimensions
of HR perspective of merger in Banking Sector:
The 20 items related to HR practices for
merger & acquisition as shown in Table 2 has been used for the purpose of
study. EFA has been applied to identify the factors of HR practices for merger
& acquisition in banking industry.
Table 2
ITEM CODE |
DESCRIPTION |
P1 |
Working
culture has been improved. |
P2 |
Employees’
salary or pay level has increased. |
P3 |
Job
security of the employees has increased. |
P4 |
Growth opportunities
of staff have increased. |
P5 |
Working environment has become friendlier. |
P6 |
Promotion policies have become more
unbiased and transparent. |
P7 |
Employee participation in decision making
has increased. |
P8 |
Alignment of compensation, benefits and
welfare schemes has transformed. |
P9 |
Employee’s turnover of bank has reduced. |
P10 |
HR policies and procedures of bank have
improved. |
P11 |
Organizational structure has been improved. |
P12 |
Incentives for the employees have
increased. |
P13 |
Job responsibilities of employees have
revised. |
P14 |
Retrenchment policies have been followed. |
P15 |
Employees have been reallocated their job. |
P16 |
Proper Training has been
provided before merger. |
P17 |
Induction program has
been conducted after merger. |
P18 |
Co-workers give their support after merger. |
P19 |
Sufficient Resources are provided to
perform your job. |
P20 |
Value system of bank has improved. |
Exploratory Factor
Analysis:
To identify the factors, the factor analysis
has been applied to the captured responses from 160 respondents. The variables
with loadings of at least 0.4 were considered in the analysis. Five factors
have been extracted which affect job satisfaction. The extracted factors have
been rotated using varimax rotation method. These rotated factors with their
variable constituents are given in Table 3 and factor loadings are given in Table
4.
Table 3
Component Matrix |
||||||
|
Component |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
p1 |
|
.408 |
.527 |
|
|
|
p2 |
|
|
.705 |
|
|
|
p3 |
.616 |
|
|
|
|
-.501 |
p4 |
.591 |
|
|
|
|
|
p5 |
.636 |
|
|
|
|
|
p6 |
.736 |
|
|
|
|
|
p7 |
.833 |
|
|
|
|
|
p8 |
.511 |
|
|
|
.514 |
|
p9 |
.667 |
|
|
|
|
|
p10 |
.527 |
.414 |
|
-.418 |
|
|
p11 |
.500 |
.475 |
|
-.480 |
|
|
p12 |
.407 |
|
.497 |
|
|
|
p13 |
.623 |
|
|
|
|
|
p14 |
.502 |
-.477 |
|
|
|
|
p15 |
.657 |
-.445 |
|
|
|
|
p16 |
.653 |
|
|
|
|
|
p17 |
.631 |
|
|
|
|
|
p18 |
.627 |
|
|
|
|
|
p19 |
.589 |
|
|
|
.437 |
|
p20 |
.466 |
|
|
|
|
|
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis. |
||||||
a. 6 components extracted. |
Table 4
Factor Loading based on Rotational Matrix
S.NO. |
Factors |
Item |
Loading |
1. |
Job
Design |
Incentives for the employees have
increased. |
.468 |
Job responsibility of employee has revised. |
.828 |
||
Retrenchment policies have been followed. |
.812 |
||
Employees have been reallocated their job. |
.675 |
||
2 |
Employee participation, development and welfare |
Employee participation in decision making
has increased. |
.590 |
Alignment
of compensation, benefits and welfare schemes has transformed. |
.807 |
||
Proper
Training has been provided before merger. |
.636 |
||
Induction
program has been conducted after merger. |
.529 |
||
3 |
Supportive HR
System |
HR
policies and procedures of bank have improved. |
.753 |
Organizational
structure has been improved. |
.736 |
||
co-workers give their support after merger |
.475 |
||
sufficient Resources are provided to
perform your job |
.763 |
||
4 |
Working
Environment |
Working
environment has become more friendly. |
.804 |
Promotion policies have become more
unbiased and transparent. |
.499 |
||
Value system of bank has improved. |
.729 |
||
5 |
Career
Advancement |
Job security of the employees has
increased. |
.777 |
Growth
opportunities of staff have increased. |
.754 |
||
6 |
Job Satisfaction |
Working culture has been improved. |
0.704 |
Employees salary or pay level has increased |
.831 |
Reliability of the factors was calculated
using the Cronbach’s alpha test and values are presented in Table 5. A
Cronbach’s alpha value of greater than or equal to 0.7 is considered acceptable
for the factor to be reliable. In this research, five factors affecting job
satisfaction after merger and acquisition have been found to have a
satisfactory value of Cronbach’s alpha.
Table 5
Reliability test results
S.No. |
Factors |
Cronbach’s Alpha (Reliability Coefficient) |
1 |
Job Design |
.764 |
2 |
Employee
participation, development and welfare |
.805 |
3 |
Supportive HR System |
.756 |
4 |
Working Environment |
.719 |
5 |
Career Advancement |
.720 |
6 |
Job Satisfaction |
.499 |
Overall Scale |
|
.865 |
Taking into consideration variables loaded on
different factors and relevant literature, six dimensions are named as Job
Design, Employee participation,
development and welfare, Supportive HR System, Working Environment,
Career Advancement, and Job Satisfaction.
1. Job Design :
Total four items loaded on this factor, which
was a maximum number of items on any factor in this study. The factor included
following items: Incentives for the employees have increased, Job responsibility
of employee has revised, Retrenchment policies have been followed and Employees
have been reallocated their job. The reliability coefficient of this factor was
0.764 which is more than the acceptable value of 0.7.
2. Employee
participation, development and welfare :
Total four items loaded on this factor, which was a
maximum number of items on any
factor in this study. The factor included following items: Employee
participation in decision making has increased, Alignment of compensation, benefits and
welfare schemes has transformed, Proper Training has been provided before
merger, Induction programme has been conducted after merger. The reliability coefficient of this factor was 0.805
which is more than the acceptable value of 0.7.
3. Supportive HR System :
Total four items loaded on this factor, which
was a maximum number of items on any factor in this study. The factor included
following items: HR
policies and procedures of bank have improved, Organizational structure has
been improved, co-workers give their support after merger, and sufficient
Resources are provided to perform your job. The
reliability coefficient of this factor was 0.756 which is more than the
acceptable value of 0.7.
4. Working Environment :
Total three items loaded on this factor,
which was a maximum number of items on any factor in this study. The factor
included following items: Working environment has become friendlier, Promotion policies have
become more unbiased and transparent, and Value system of bank has improved. The reliability coefficient of this factor was 0.719
which is more than the acceptable value of 0.7.
5. Career Advancement :
Total two items loaded on this factor, which
was a maximum number of items on any factor in this study. The factor included
following items: Job security of the employees has increased, Growth opportunities of staff have increased. The reliability
coefficient of this factor was 0.720 which is more than the acceptable value of
0.7.
6. Job Satisfaction: Total two items
loaded on this factor, which was a maximum number of items on any factor in this study. The
factor included following items: Working culture has been improved; Employees
salary or pay level has increased.
Variations in
employee perception in relation to various dimensions of HR perspective of
merger in Banking Sector:
To examine the variations in employee
perception in relation to various dimensions of HR perspective of merger in
Banking Sector, various hypotheses have been formulated and ANOVA has been
applied for Hypothesis testing.
H1: There is significant difference between perceptions
of employees regarding various dimensions of HR perspective of merger in
Banking Sector on the basis of their experience.
Perception of employees regarding various
dimensions of HR perspective of merger in Banking Sector on the basis of their
experience has been presented in Table 6.
Table 6
Difference in perception of employees about HR Perspective based on experience
Dependent Variable |
F |
Sig. |
F1 (Job Design) |
.499 |
.610 |
F2 (Employee participation,
development and welfare) |
.731 |
.486 |
F3 (Supportive HR System) |
1.102 |
.339 |
F4 (Working Environment) |
.483 |
.619 |
F5 (Career Advancement) |
.342 |
.712 |
F6 (Job Satisfaction) |
.074 |
.928 |
As per the Table 6, the results indicate that
the p value for Job design, Employee participation, Development and welfare, Supportive HR System, working
environment, career advancement and job satisfaction are higher than 0.05. It indicates
that there is no significance difference in perception of employees for various
HR perspective in case of merger in banking sector on the basis of their
experience.
H2: There is significant difference between in
perception of employees regarding various dimensions of HR perspective of merger
in Banking Sector on the basis of their gender.
Perception of employees regarding various
dimensions of HR perspective of merger in Banking Sector on the basis of their
gender has been presented in Table 7.
Table 7
Difference in perception of employees about HR Perspective on the basis of Gender
Dependent Variable |
F |
Sig. |
F1
(Job Design) |
.064 |
.801 |
F2
(Employee participation, development
and welfare) |
4.783 |
.033 |
F3
(Supportive HR System) |
1.891 |
.174 |
F4
(Working Environment) |
1.824 |
.182 |
F5
(Career Advancement) |
.194 |
.661 |
F6
(Job Satisfaction) |
.055 |
.816 |
As per the Table 7, the results indicate that p value for
Job design, Supportive HR System, working environment, career advancement and
job satisfaction are higher than 0.05 whereas p value for Employee
participation, Development and welfare
is less than 0.05. It indicates that there is no significance difference in
perception of employees towards dimensions such as; Job design, Supportive HR
System, working environment, career advancement and job satisfaction on the
basis of their gender. It also indicates that there is significance difference
in perception of employees towards Employee participation, Development and
welfare on the basis of their gender.
Comparison of dimensions
of HR perspective of merger between various banks:
H3: There is significant difference in response of
employees of various banks in relation to dimensions of HR perspective of
merger in Banking Sector.
The responses of employees of various banks
in relation to dimensions of HR perspective of merger in Banking Sector has
been presented in Table 8.
Table 8
Difference
in perception of employees of different banks
Regarding
various dimensions of HR Perspective of merger
Dependent
Variable |
F |
Sig. |
F1 (Job Design) |
3.681 |
.017 |
F2 (Employee participation,
development and welfare) |
3.663 |
.018 |
F3 (Supportive HR System) |
5.872 |
.001 |
F4 (Working Environment) |
3.341 |
.026 |
F5 (Career Advancement) |
.896 |
.449 |
F6 (Job Satisfaction) |
7.031 |
.000 |
As per the Table 8,
the results indicate that the p value of career advancement is higher than 0.05
whereas p value for Job design, Employee participation, Development and
welfare, Supportive HR System, working environment and job satisfaction are
less than 0.05. It indicates that there is no significance difference in
perception of employees of different banks towards the career advancement. It
also indicates that there is significance difference in perception of employees
of different banks towards the Job design, Employee participation, Development and
welfare, Supportive HR System, working environment and job satisfaction.
Conclusion
In this article, it has been pointed out that during merger and
acquisition various HR aspects like communication, working culture, pay scale,
job security, growth opportunity, motivation, leadership, power & conflict,
incentives, training, retrenchment policies, induction programmes, value system
etc. should be duly taken care of for successful implementation of merger. Based
on results of the study, the role of various aspects of human resource
management has been emphasized in the process of merger and acquisition.
References
Aharon
David Y, Gavious Ilanit & Yosefa Rami (2010), ‘Stock Market Bubble Effects
on Mergers and Acquisitions’, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,
50, 456– 470.
Goyal Dr. K.A. & Joshi Vijay (2011), ‘Mergers
in Banking Industry of India: Some Emerging Issues’, Asian Journal of Business
and Management Sciences, Issn: 2047-2528, Vol. 1 No. 2, pg.no. 157-165.
Dr. K B Das and CA (Dr) Sanjeev Singhal (2013),
‘Impact of Reforms on Efficiency of the Commercial Banks in India’, Indian
Journal of Accounting, Vol. XLV (1) Dec 2013, Pg no.32-44.
Dr. KA Goyal and Vijay Joshi (2012), ‘Mergers
and Acquisition in Banking Industry: A Case Study of ICICI Bank Ltd.’,
International Journal of Research in Management, Vol. 2, March 2012, Pg. No.
30-40.
Kuriakose Sony & Gireesh Kumar G. S
(2010), ‘Assessing the Strategic and Financial Similarities of Merged Banks:
Evidence from Voluntary Amalgamations in Indian Banking Sector’, Sci. &
Soc, 8(1), pg. no. 49-62.
M. Selva Kumar, K. jegatheesan and G. Aruna
(2013), ‘A Performance Evaluation of Regional Rural Banks in India’, The Indian
Journal of Commerce, Vol. 66, Jan – March 2013.
Mantravadi Pramod & Reddy A Vidyadhar
(2007), ‘Relative Size In Mergers And Operating Performance: Indian Experience’,
Economic and Political Weekly, September 29.
Nidhi Natwaya and Rahul Vyas(2012), ‘Post
Merger Financial Performance Analysis of ICICI Bank and Erstwhile bank of
Rajasthan Ltd., Pacific Business Review International, Vol. 5, Issue 6, Dec
2012, Pg. No. 64-72.
Dr. SM Tariq Zafar(2012), ‘A Study on
Universal Banking and its impact on Indian Financial Market’, Journal of
Business Management & Social Sciences Research, Vol. 1, No. 2 Nov 2012, Pg.
No. 81-91.
Dr. T. Anitha Devi and S. Sridevi(2007), ‘Impact
of Human Resources on Mergers and Acquisitions’, Osmania Journal of
International Business Studies, Vol. II No. 1 Jan – June 2007, Pg no. 261-265.
Dr. Manisha goel & Nidhi Aggarwal, ‘HR
perspectives of merger and acquisition in banking industry in India’, Emerging
trends in HR, Rajdhani business school, ISBN: 978-93-5258-996-8, pg no. 7-16.