Dr. Devarajappa S Assistant Professor of Commerce University College of Arts Tumkur University, Tumkur, Karnataka Email: devutta@gmail.com |
ABSTRACT
The study attempts to examine the impact
of merger on physical performance of selected public sector banks India. For
this purpose, the researcher selected physical parameters like Deposits,
Advances, Business, Number of Branches and Number of Employees and Profit.
Total three merged banks were selected for the study. The required data have
been collected from CMIE data base, Moneycontrol.com, Capitaline data, annual
reports of all select banks, and published articles, journals and websites. To
examine the merger impact, a period five years before the merger and five years
after the merger is considered. T-test is conducted to test for equality of
means before and after the merger of bank’s selected physical indicators. The
study reveals that, the physical performance of all the banks is improved after
the merger in terms of increase in advances, deposits, business, number of
branches and number of employees. Hence it is concluded that there is a
significance difference between physical performance of merged banks pre and post-merger
period. Further the researcher made an attempt know the direction of change and
relationship among physical parameters of the banks. For this purpose the
researcher used ANOVA and Multiple correlations methods. The shows that, all
select banks are positively correlated in physical performance.
Keywords:
Mergers, Physical performance, ANOVA, Multiple Correlation.
**********
INTRODUCTION
The banking systems of many emerging
economies are fragmented in terms of the number and size of the institutions,
ownership patterns, competitiveness, use of modern technology and other structural
features. Most of Asian banks are family owned whereas in Latin America and
Central Europe, banks were historically owned by the government. Some
commercial banks in emerging economies are at cutting edge of technology and
financial innovation but many others are struggling with management of credit
liquidity risks. Banking crises in many countries have weakened the financial
systems in this situation, the natural alternative which emerged was to improve
the structure and efficiency of banking industry through consolidation and
mergers, among other financial sectors reforms (M Jayadev and Rudra Sensarma,).
The Indian banking sector has not
remained insulated from the global forces driving Mergers and Acquisitions
across the countries. Mergers and Acquisitions activity in the Indian banking
sector is not something new, as it has taken place even before the
independence. However, economic reforms introduced in the early 1990s brought
out a comprehensive change in the business strategy of banks, whereby they
resorted to Mergers and Acquisitions to enhance size and efficiency to gain
competitive strength. The concept of Mergers and Acquisitions is very much
popular concept after 1990s of LPG (Liberalization, Privatization and
Globalization) era.
The basic objectives of this paper is to
assess the success of Mergers strategy in banking sectors by analyzing physical
performance of selected merged banks in terms of changes in growth deposits,
Advances, Business, Number of Branches and Number of Employees. These physical
parameters are considered as independent variables and profit is considered a
dependent variable. It analyses how the Mergers helped the selected banks to
achieve such physical performance.
REVIEW
OF LITERATURE
Dawn
(2012)[i]
in a paper “Merger and acquisitions in Indian banks after liberalization: An
analysis” investigates the performance of merged banks in terms of its growth
of total assets, profits, revenue, deposits, and number of employees. The
performance of merged banks is compared taking four years of prior-merger and
four years of post-merger. The study findings indicate that the post-merger
periods were successful and saw a significant increase in total assets,
profits, revenue, deposits, and in the number of employees of the acquiring
firms of the banking industry in India. Burki and Niazi (2006)[ii]
studied the impact of financial reforms on
banking efficiency of state-owned, private, and foreign banks in Pakistan. They
employed DEA to measure efficiency of banks and used time series cross-section
data of 40 commercial banks from 1991 to 2000. The researchers also applied
maximum likelihood Tobit regression analysis to identify the determinants of
banking efficiency in Pakistan. The results from Tobit regression analysis
suggest a positive association between bank size and cost efficiency whereas
the size is not significantly associated with the allocative efficiency of
banks. Kamatam Srinivasa (2011)[iii] studied impact of mergers on physical
performance of Banks. For this purpose Deposits, Advances, Business, No of
Branches and No of Employees are used as physical dimensions. The private with private and private with
public sector merged banks’ physical performance was compared by using the
correlation analysis. The study reveals that the two sector physical
performance is improved after the merger but the correlation between private
with private sector merged banks is higher than the private with public sector
merged banks.
Very
few studies available in case of physical performance merged banks and the
studies reveals that Merger and Acquisition activity improve the physical
performance of banks. The goal of this study is to examine the degree of
association between pre and post merger physical performance of banks in terms
of private with private and private with public bank mergers.
OBJECTIVES
OF THE STUDY
The basic objectives of this paper is to
assess the success of Mergers strategy in banking sectors by analyzing physical
performance of selected merged banks in terms of changes in growth deposits,
Advances, Business, Number of Branches and Number of Employees. These physical
parameters are considered as independent variables and profit is considered a
dependent variable. It analyses how the Mergers helped the selected banks to
achieve such physical performance.
HYPOTHESIS
OF THE STUDY
Based on the objectives of the study,
the following two hypotheses have been formulated and tested.
H0:There
is no significant difference between pre and post-merger physical performance
of select public sector banks in India.
H0:There
is significant difference between pre and post-merger physical performance of
select public sector banks in India.
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
a.
Sample Descriptions:
As the complete sources list of all the banks
is not available, the data for this study have been select based on the
convenience sampling method, among the banks list with RBI Report. The list of
commercial banks only three scheduled commercial banks were select based on
consistent of data, the same is presented in Table-1.
Table-1
The
list of Selected Merged Banks
S. No |
Target Bank |
Acquiring Bank |
Category |
Year |
2 |
South Gujarat Local
Area Bank Ltd. |
Bank of Baroda |
Pr-P |
2004 |
3 |
Global Trust Bank
Ltd. |
Oriental Bank of
Commerce |
Pr-P |
2004 |
4 |
Bharat Overseas Bank
Ltd. |
Indian Overseas Bank |
Pr-P |
2007 |
In
order to evaluate post-merger financial performance of the merging banks in the
long run, at least 10 years financial data is required i.e., five years pre-merger
period and five years post-merger period. Only domestic mergers taking place
were selected. Cross-border mergers, i.e., in which either bidder or the target
was based outside India were dropped. This was done to ensure homogeneity of
the economic and industrial environment so that generalizability of the results
could be achieved for Indian Mergers.
b.
Data Collection:
For
the purpose of evaluation, investigation data is collected merger of the Indian
commercial Banks. The financial and accounting data of banks is collected from
banks Annual Report to examine the impact of the mergers on the financial
performance of sample banks. Financial data has been collected from Bombay
Stock Exchange (BSE), National Stock Exchange (NSE), Securities and Exchange
Board of India (SEBI) and Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) for the
study.
c.
Data Analyses Method:
The
statistical tool like- Mean, Standard deviation, simple and multiple
correlation, Regression, t-Test, one way and two way ANOVA are used to study the Physical and financial
performance of the selected merged banks before and after merger. The year of merger
was considered as a base year and denoted as 0 and it is not considered for
analysis
ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE OF
MERGED BANK
The
physical performance of the selected six merged banks before and after merger
has been analyzed below with help of various parameters, which characterize a
commercial banks performance.
Analysis
of Physical Performance of Bank of Baroda
Bank
of Baroda is a 107 years old state owned bank with a modern and contemporary
personality offering banking products and services to large industrial, SME,
retail and agricultural customers across the country. In 2004 Bank of Baroda
acquired the failed Gujarat Local Area Bank. In order to examine the impact of
this acquisition on physical performance of bank five years before the merger
and five years after merger data has been selected; same are presented in
Table-2 and 3
Table-2
Pre and Post Merger Physical
Performance of Bank of Baroda
Period* |
Deposits |
Advances |
Business |
No of Branches |
No of Employees |
Profit |
-5 |
51276 |
24393 |
75874 |
2666 |
47527 |
503 |
-4 |
53986 |
27421 |
107606 |
2757 |
48345 |
275 |
-3 |
61804 |
33663 |
86651 |
2718 |
38899 |
546 |
-2 |
66366 |
35348 |
95812 |
2798 |
40313 |
773 |
-1 |
72967 |
35601 |
100507 |
2770 |
39803 |
967 |
0 |
81333 |
43400 |
124912 |
2775 |
39529 |
677 |
1 |
93662 |
59912 |
153545 |
2777 |
38774 |
827 |
2 |
124916 |
83621 |
214252 |
2812 |
38604 |
1026 |
3 |
152034 |
106701 |
266222 |
2931 |
37496 |
1436 |
4 |
192397 |
143251 |
333062 |
3006 |
36440 |
2227 |
5 |
241262 |
175035 |
374271 |
3182 |
38152 |
3058 |
Source: BOB Annual
Report, RBI Repor-2012-13, CMIE data base
*-5 to -1=Pre Merger
Period, 0=Merger year, 1 to 5= post-Merger Period
Table-3
Group Statistics and Independent
Sample Test of BOB (Assuming Equal Variance)
Indicator |
Merger |
Mean |
SD |
N |
df |
t Stat* |
P(T<=t) two-tail |
t Critical two-tail |
Deposits |
pre |
61280 |
8889 |
5 |
8 |
-3.810 |
0.005 |
2.31 |
post |
160854 |
57759 |
5 |
|||||
Advances |
pre |
31285 |
5080 |
5 |
8 |
-3.978 |
0.004 |
2.31 |
post |
113704 |
46049 |
5 |
|||||
Business |
pre |
93290 |
12357 |
5 |
8 |
-4.366 |
0.002 |
2.31 |
post |
268270 |
88767 |
5 |
|||||
No of Branches |
pre |
2742 |
51 |
5 |
8 |
-2.684 |
0.031 |
2.31 |
post |
2942 |
163 |
5 |
|||||
No of Employees |
pre |
42977 |
4564 |
5 |
8 |
2.436 |
0.041 |
2.31 |
post |
37893 |
951 |
5 |
|||||
Profit |
pre |
613 |
266 |
5 |
8 |
-2.578 |
0.033 |
2.31 |
post |
1715 |
923 |
5 |
Source:
Compiled from Table-2
*5%
level of significance
Table-4:
Regression of Analysis of BOB
Bank |
Multiple R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Standard Error |
BOB |
0.992* |
0.984 |
0.969 |
147.725 |
Source:
Compiled from Table 2
Table-5:
ANOVA of BOB
Bank |
df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Significance F |
|
BOB |
Regression |
5 |
6833570.309 |
1366714.062 |
62.629 |
0.000165 |
Residual |
5 |
109112.7172 |
21822.54344 |
|
|
|
Total |
10 |
6942683.026 |
|
|
|
From
the table -2, the following observation can be made;
Pre
and Post merger average deposits are Rs. 61 280 crores and 160 854 crores
respectively. The average growth of the deposits of the bank is found to be
162.5 percent after the merger. The Mean Advances disbursed by the bank to
various parties before and after merger is Rs. 31,285 crores and Rs 1,13,704
crores respectively. And the mean percentage increases was at 264 percent after
the merger. The average number of branches observed before and after the merger
are 2742 and 2942 respectively. The mean percentage increases in number of
branches was 7.3 percent. The average number of employees before and after
merger is recorded at 42,977 and 37,893 respectively but there is a decrease in
number of employees with 5084 after the merger. The overall business of the bank
increased after the merger with an average growth rate of 187.56 percent.
There
is a tremendous growth observed in first three physical indicators (i.e,
Deposits, Advances and Business) and less growth in number branches and number
of employees are decreased after the merger. This is indicates that, the
productivity and efficiency of the banks increased after the merger
T-test
is conducted to test for equality of means before and after the merger of
bank’s selected physical indicators. The t-value of different parameters of the
bank is given in Table-3. the t value of all the physical parameters before and
after merger period are significant at 5 percent level. This indicates that
there is a significance difference between means of pre and post-merger deposits,
advances, business, number of branches and number of employees.Further the
researcher, attempted to know the direction of change and relationship among
the physical parameters of the bank. For analyzing relationship among the
selected physical parameters of the bank, profit is considered as dependent
variable and other variables (deposits, advances, business, number of branches
and number of employees) are taken as independent variables. For this analysis
multiple correlation and multiple regression technique has been worked out (see
table 4) and the study found that, there is a high degree positive correlation
(R=0.992) between the variable. The researcher also examined ANOVA by selecting
independent variable (deposits, advances, business, number of branches and
number of employee) and dependent variable profit (see table 5). This test is
significant at 5 percent level.
From
the above analysis the following conclusion can be drawn about physical
performance of Bank of Baroda;there is
tremendous increase in average growth rate of deposits, Advances and Business
after the merger there is decline percentage in number branches and numbers of
employees were recorded in the banks. This is positive sign for performance of
banks and it indicates that, the less number of branches and employees were
expanding more amount of growth in business. Therefore the productivity and
efficiency of the bank has increased after the merger.Finally, it can conclude
that there is a significant difference between pre and post-merger physical
performance of bank.
Analysis
of Physical Performance of Oriental Bank of Commerce
Oriental
Bank of Commerce is one of the public sector bank India. The bank was
nationalized on 15 April 1980. The bank has witnessed many ups and downs since
its establishment (1943). In 1997, OBC acquired Bari Doab Bank and Punjab
Cooperative Bank. The acquisition of these two banks brought with it no
additional branches. On August 2004, OBC amalgamated Global Trust Bank. Global
Trust Bank was a leading private sector bank in India that was associated with
various financial institutions. To
examine the impact of merger between OBC and GTB on physical performance of
banks five years before the merger and five years after the merger data has taken
and presented in Table-6.
Table-6
Pre and Post Merger Physical
Performance of Oriental bank of Commerce
Perod* |
Deposits |
Advances |
Business |
No of Branches |
No of Employees |
Profit |
-5 |
22095 |
9,326 |
120327 |
962 |
15195 |
278.62 |
-4 |
24680 |
11,076 |
151851 |
989 |
15358 |
202.89 |
-3 |
28488 |
14,158 |
432130 |
1005 |
13589 |
320.55 |
-2 |
29809 |
15,677 |
463290 |
1028 |
13507 |
456.95 |
-1 |
35674 |
19,681 |
565261 |
1051 |
13588 |
686.07 |
0 |
47850 |
25,299 |
745669 |
1168 |
14563 |
726.07 |
1 |
50197 |
33,577 |
853223 |
1191 |
14962 |
557.16 |
2 |
63996 |
44,138 |
1093879 |
1334 |
14730 |
580.81 |
3 |
77857 |
54,566 |
1368452 |
1376 |
14804 |
353.22 |
4 |
98369 |
68,500 |
1674301 |
1472 |
14656 |
890.42 |
5 |
120258 |
83,489 |
2044457 |
1580 |
15358 |
1134.68 |
Source:
BOB Annual Report, RBI Repor-2012-13, CMIE data base
*-5
to -1=Pre Merger Period, 0=Merger year, 1 to 5= post Merger Period
Table-7
Group Statistics and Independent
Sample Test of Oriental Bank of Commerce
(Assuming Equal Variance)
Indicators |
Merger |
Mean |
SD |
N |
df |
t Stat |
P(T<=t) two-tail |
t Critical two-tail |
Deposits |
Pre |
28149.324 |
5200.205 |
5 |
8 |
-4.273 |
0.003 |
2.306 |
Post |
82135.314 |
27767.807 |
5 |
|||||
Advances |
Pre |
13983.561 |
4046.781 |
5 |
8 |
-4.764 |
0.001 |
2.306 |
Post |
56854.240 |
19709.166 |
5 |
|||||
Business |
Pre |
346571.820 |
198665.032 |
5 |
8 |
-4.646 |
0.002 |
2.306 |
Pst |
1406862.565 |
470106.591 |
5 |
|||||
No of Branches |
Pre |
1007.000 |
34.387 |
5 |
8 |
-5.703 |
0.000 |
2.306 |
Post |
1390.600 |
146.420 |
5 |
|||||
No of Employees |
Pre |
14247.400 |
941.789 |
5 |
8 |
-1.490 |
0.175 |
2.306 |
Post |
14902.000 |
278.944 |
5 |
|||||
Profit |
Pre |
389.016 |
189.983 |
5 |
8 |
-1.941 |
0.088 |
2.306 |
Post |
703.258 |
308.229 |
5 |
Source:
Compiled from Table 6
*5%
level of significance
Table-8:
Regression of Analysis of OBC
Bank |
Multiple R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Standard Error |
OBC |
0.892 |
0.796 |
0.593 |
180.615 |
Source:
Compiled from Table 6
Table-9:
ANOVA of OBC
Bank |
Df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Significance F |
|
OBC |
Regression |
5 |
637587.06 |
127517.41 |
3.91 |
0.08 |
Residual |
5 |
163108.81 |
32621.76 |
|||
Total |
10 |
800695.87 |
Source:
Compiled from Table 6
From
the table 6, the following observation can be made;
Pre
and Post merger average deposits are Rs. 28,149.324 crores and 82,135.314crores
respectively. The average growth of the deposits of the bank is found to be
191.78 percent after the merger. The Mean Advances disbursed by the bank to
various parties before and after merger is Rs. 13983.561 crores and Rs
56854.240 crores respectively. And the mean percentage increases was at 306.58
percent after the merger. The average number of branches observed before and
after the merger are 1007 and 1390 respectively. The mean percentage increases
in number of branches was 38 percent. The average number of employees before
and after merger is recorded at 14 247 and 14902 respectively. The number of
employees increases with 655 after the merger. The overall business of the bank
increased after the merger with an average growth rate of 305.3 percent.
There
is a tremendous growth observed in first three physical indicators (i.e,
Deposits, Advances and Business) and less growth in number branches and very
less number of employees are inceased after the merger. This is indicates that,
the productivity and efficiency of the banks increased after the mergerT-test
is conducted to test for equality of means before and after the merger of
bank’s selected physical indicators. The t-value of different parameters of the
bank is given in Table-7. The t values of all the physical parameters before
and after merger period are significant at 5 percent level. This indicates that
there is a significance difference between means of pre and post-merger
deposits, advances, business, number of branches and number of
employees.Further the researcher, attempted to know the direction of change and
relationship among the physical parameters of the bank. For analyzing
relationship among the selected physical parameters of the bank, profit is
considered as dependent variable and other variables (deposits, advances,
business, number of branches and number of employees) are taken as independent
variables. For this analysis multiple correlation and multiple regression technique
has been worked out (see table 8) and the study found that, there is a high
degree positive correlation (R=0.992) between the variable. The researcher also
examined ANOVA by selecting independent variable (deposits, advances, business,
number of branches and number of employee) and dependent variable profit (see
table-9). This test is significant at 5 percent level.
From
the above analysis the following conclusion can be drawn about physical
performance of Oriental Bank of Commerce;there is tremendous increase in
average growth rate of deposits, Advances and Business after the merger. There
is less percentage of growth in number branches and numbers of employees were
recorded in the banks. This is positive sign for performance of banks and it
indicates that, the less number of branches and employees were expanding more
amount of growth in business. Therefore the productivity and efficiency of the
bank has increased after the merger.Finally, it can conclude that there is a
significant difference between pre and post-merger physical performance of
bank.
Analysis of Physical Performance of
Indian Overseas Bank
Indian
Overseas Bank is a leading public sector bank in India. It provides a wide range of
consumer and commercial banking services, including Savings Account, Current
Account, Depositary Services, VISA Cards, Credit Cards, Debit Cards, Online
Banking, Any Branch Banking, Home Loans, NRI Account, Agricultural Loans,
Payment of Bills / Taxes, Provident Fund Scheme, Forex Collection Services,
Retail Loans, etc. IOB was the first bank to venture into consumer credit, as
it introduced the popular personal loan scheme in 1964. Since its inception,
IOB has absorbed various banks including the latest acquisition of Bharat
Overseas Bank in 2007. Bharat overseas Bank was one of Private bank in
India. The impact of this Merger on
Physical performance of Banks has analyzed below.
Table-10
Pre
and Post Merger Physical Performance of Indian Overseas Bank
Period* |
Deposits |
Advances |
Business |
No of Branches |
No of Employees |
Profit |
-5 |
36699 |
17447 |
49982 |
1512 |
24458 |
567 |
-4 |
41483 |
20295 |
56691 |
1544 |
24382 |
1050 |
-3 |
44241 |
25205 |
65661 |
1583 |
24366 |
1073 |
-2 |
50529 |
34756 |
85767 |
1601 |
24178 |
707 |
-1 |
68740 |
47060 |
111486 |
1777 |
23861 |
1326 |
0 |
84326 |
60424 |
144300 |
1951 |
24764 |
1202 |
1 |
100116 |
74885 |
175905 |
2012 |
25512 |
1008 |
2 |
110795 |
78999 |
190332 |
2099 |
26732 |
783 |
3 |
145229 |
111833 |
257541 |
2281 |
25626 |
651 |
4 |
178435 |
140724 |
319884 |
2733 |
27201 |
513 |
5 |
202135 |
160364 |
364246 |
3042 |
28280 |
416 |
Source:
BOB Annual Report, RBI Repor-2012-13, CMIE data base
*-5
to -1=Pre Merger Period, 0=Merger year, 1 to 5= post Merger Period
Table-11
Group Statistics and Independent
Sample Test of Indian Overseas Bank
Indicators |
Merger |
Mean |
SD |
N |
df |
t Stat |
P(T<=t) two-tail |
t Critical two-tail |
Deposits |
pre |
48338.428 |
12453.075 |
5 |
8 |
-4.901 |
0.001 |
2.306 |
post |
147341.900 |
43415.2885 |
5 |
|||||
Advances |
pre |
28952.708 |
12072.1641 |
5 |
8 |
-4.792 |
0.001 |
2.306 |
post |
113361.194 |
37488.3443 |
5 |
|||||
Business |
pre |
73917.365 |
24947.914 |
5 |
8 |
-4.940 |
0.001 |
2.306 |
post |
261581.708 |
81198.0511 |
5 |
|||||
No of Branches |
pre |
1603.400 |
103.00631 |
5 |
8 |
-4.111 |
0.003 |
2.306 |
post |
2433.400 |
439.539873 |
5 |
|||||
No of Employees |
pre |
24249.000 |
240.12705 |
5 |
8 |
-4.601 |
0.002 |
2.306 |
post |
26670.200 |
1152.04219 |
5 |
|||||
Profit |
pre |
944.530 |
304.833575 |
5 |
8 |
1.575 |
0.154 |
2.306 |
post |
674.399 |
232.823771 |
5 |
Source:
Compiled from Table 10
*5%
level of significance
Table-12:
Regression of Analysis of IOB
Bank |
Multiple R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Standard Error |
IOB |
0.796 |
0.633 |
0.266 |
258.619 |
Source:
Compiled from Table 10
Table-13:
ANOVA of IOB
Bank |
Df |
SS |
MS |
F |
Significance F |
|
IOB |
Regression |
5 |
576846.064 |
115369.213 |
1.725 |
0.282 |
Residual |
5 |
334419.283 |
66883.857 |
|
|
|
Total |
10 |
911265.347 |
|
|
|
Source:
Compiled from Table 10
From
the table 10, the following observation can be made;
Pre
and Post merger average deposits are Rs. 48,338.428 crores and 147341.90
respectively. The average growth of the deposits of the bank is found to be
204.81 percent after the merger. The Mean Advances disbursed by the bank to
various parties before and after merger is Rs. 28952.708 crores and Rs
113361.194 crores respectively. And the mean percentage increases was at 291.54
percent after the merger. The average number of branches observed before and
after the merger are 1603 and 2433 respectively. The mean percentage increases
in number of branches was 51.78 percent. The average number of employees before
and after merger is recorded at 24249 and 26670 respectively. There is an
increase in number of employees with 2421 after the merger. The overall business
of the bank increased after the merger with an average growth rate of 253.89
percent.
There
is a tremendous growth observed in first three physical indicators (i.e.,
Deposits, Advances and Business) and less growth in number branches and number
of employees are decreased after the merger. This is indicates that, the
productivity and efficiency of the banks increased after the merger. T-test is
conducted to test for equality of means before and after the merger of bank’s
selected physical indicators. The t-value of different parameters of the bank
is given in Table- the t value of all the physical parameters before and after
merger period is significant at 5 percent level. This indicates that there is a
significance difference between means of pre and post-merger deposits,
advances, business, number of branches and number of employees.
Further
the researcher, attempted to know the direction of change and relationship
among the physical parameters of the bank. For analyzing relationship among the
selected physical parameters of the bank, profit is considered as dependent
variable and other variables (deposits, advances, business, number of branches
and number of employees) are taken as independent variables. For this analysis
multiple correlation and multiple regression technique has been worked out (see
table-12) and the study found that, there is a high degree positive correlation
(R=0.992) between the variable. The researcher also examined ANOVA by selecting
independent variable (deposits, advances, business, number of branches and
number of employee) and dependent variable profit (see table 13). This test is
significant at 5 percent level.
From
the above analysis the following conclusion can be drawn about physical
performance of Indian Overseas Bank;There is tremendous increase in average
growth rate of deposits, Advances and Business after the merger There is a less
percentage of growth in number branches and numbers of employees were recorded
in the banks. This is positive sign for performance of banks and it indicates
that, the less growth in number of branches and employees were expanding more
amount of growth in business. Therefore the productivity and efficiency of the
bank has increased after the merger.Finally, it can conclude that there is a
significant difference between pre and post merger physical performance of
bank.
FINDINGS
From the above analysis and
interpretation, the following important findings of each bank are identified.
Name of Merged Bank |
Findings |
Bank of Baroda |
1.
The average growth in deposits,
advances, business and number of branches is 162.5, 264, 187.56, and 7.3
percent after the merger respectively. 2.
The average percent decreases
after the merger in number of employees is 11.82 percent. |
Oriental Bank of Commerce |
The average growth in deposits,
advances, business, number of branches and number of employees is 191.78,
306.58, 305.3, 38 and 4.6 percent respectively. |
Indian Overseas Bank |
The average growth in deposits,
advances, business, number of branches and number of employees is 204.8,
291.54, 253.85, 51.78 and 9.8 percent respectively. |
CONCLUSION:
Merger is a useful tool for the growth
and expansion in any industry and the Indian banking sector is no exception. It
is helpful for the survival of the weak banks by merging into larger bank. In
this chapter, the researcher examined the impact of merger on physical
performance of selected commercial banks in India. Total three merged banks
have been taken for the study as sample for this purpose, a comparison between
pre and post merger physical performance in terms of deposits, advances,
business, number of branches and number of employees has been made in all the
cases. And the study reveals that, there is a significant improvement in
physical performance of the banks after the merger.
Madan
Mohan Dutta and Suman Kumar Dawn. (2012), “Merger and Acquisitions in Indian
Banks after Liberalization: An Analysis,” Indian Journal of Commerce and
Management Studies, Vol. 3, No.1, (January), pp. 108-14.
Burki A, Niazi GSK (2006). “Impact
of financial reforms on efficiency of state-owned, private and foreign banks in
Pakistan” CMER Working Paper No.06-49, Lahore University of Management
Sciences.
Kamatam Srinivas
(2011) “M&A in Indian Banking Sector-A Study of Selected Banks”
Himalaya Publication House, Bengaluru, Pp. 111-141.
Altunbas,
Y., & Marques, D. (2008). Mergers and Acquisitions and Bank Performance
inEurope: The Role Of Strategic Similarities. Journal of Economics &
Business, 60, 204 222
Muhammad
Usman Kemal (2010). Post-Merger Profitability: A Case of Royal Bank of Scotland
(RBS), International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 5, March
2011
Antony
Akhil, K. (2011), “Post-Merger Profitability of Selected Banks in India,”
International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics and Management, Vol.
1, No. 8, (December), pp. 133-5.
Pramod
& Reddy (2007) “Relative size in mergers and operating performance: Indian
Experience”, Economic and political weekly, Pp 2936-3942.
Tambi,
M. K. (2005). Impact of Mergers and Amalgamation On The Performance Of
Indian Companies. Econ WPA Finance
Vardhana
Pawaskar, (2001), Effect of Mergers on Corporate Performance in India. Vikalpa,
26 (1): 19-32.
Vidya
Sekhri, (Aug 2011), “A DEA Malmquiest Index approach to measuring productivity
and efficiency of Banks in India”, “The IUP journal of bank Management”,
Vol X, No. 3, pp 49-64.
Mohamad Akbar Noor and Nor Hayati Bt Ahamad,
(2012), “The determinants of efficiency of Islamic Bank”, “IUP Journal Of
bank Management”, May 2012, Vol XI,.
No. 2 pp 32-70.
Dr. V R Nedunchezhin, K
Premalatha (2011);“Analysis of pre and post merger public sector bank
efficiency: A DEA analysis”, International Journal of Applied Research and
S.tudies, Volume 3, Issue 1(Jan 2014), Pp-1-12.
Sathye M (2003). “Efficiency
of Banks in a Developing Economy: the Case of India.” EJOR 148(3):662-671.
Ataullah A, Cockerill T, Le
H (2004). “Financial Liberalization and Bank Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis
of India and Pakistan”. Appl. Econ. 36(17):1915-1924.
Kumar,
R., 2009. "Post-Merger Corporate Performance: an Indian Perspective",
Management Research News 32 (2), pp. 145-157.
Madan
Mohan Dutta and Suman Kumar Dawn. (2012), “Merger and Acquisitions in Indian
Banks after Liberalization: An Analysis,” Indian Journal of Commerce and
Management Studies, Vol. 3, No.1, (January), pp. 108-14.
Burki A, Niazi GSK (2006).
“Impact of financial reforms on efficiency of state-owned, private and foreign
banks in Pakistan” CMER Working Paper No.06-49, Lahore University of Management
Sciences.
Kamatam Srinivas
(2011) “M&A in Indian Banking Sector-A Study of Selected Banks”
Himalaya Publication House, Bengaluru, Pp. 111-141.
Altunbas,
Y., & Marques, D. (2008). Mergers and Acquisitions and Bank Performance
inEurope: The Role Of Strategic Similarities. Journal of Economics &
Business, 60, 204 222
Muhammad
Usman Kemal (2010). Post-Merger Profitability: A Case of Royal Bank of Scotland
(RBS), International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 5, March
2011
Antony
Akhil, K. (2011), “Post-Merger Profitability of Selected Banks in India,”
International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics and Management, Vol.
1, No. 8, (December), pp. 133-5.
Pramod
& Reddy (2007) “Relative size in mergers and operating performance: Indian
Experience”, Economic and political weekly, Pp 2936-3942.
Tambi,
M. K. (2005). Impact of Mergers and Amalgamation On The Performance Of
Indian Companies. Econ WPA Finance
Vardhana
Pawaskar, (2001), Effect of Mergers on Corporate Performance in India. Vikalpa,
26 (1): 19-32.
Vidya
Sekhri, (Aug 2011), “A DEA Malmquiest Index approach to measuring productivity
and efficiency of Banks in India”, “The IUP journal of bank Management”,
Vol X, No. 3, pp 49-64.
Mohamad Akbar Noor and Nor Hayati Bt Ahamad,
(2012), “The determinants of efficiency of Islamic Bank”, “IUP Journal Of
bank Management”, May 2012, Vol XI,.
No. 2 pp 32-70.
Dr. V R Nedunchezhin, K
Premalatha (2011);“Analysis of pre and post merger public sector bank
efficiency: A DEA analysis”, International Journal of Applied Research and
S.tudies, Volume 3, Issue 1(Jan 2014), Pp-1-12.
Sathye M (2003). “Efficiency
of Banks in a Developing Economy: the Case of India.” EJOR 148(3):662-671.
Ataullah A, Cockerill T, Le
H (2004). “Financial Liberalization and Bank Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis
of India and Pakistan”. Appl. Econ. 36(17):1915-1924.
Kumar,
R., 2009. "Post-Merger Corporate Performance: an Indian Perspective",
Management Research News 32 (2), pp. 145-157.