Dr Mini Goyal Professor of Economics Department of Economics and Sociology Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana 141004 Contact No.- +91-9464762006 Email: minig1200@yahoo.com |
Ms Maninder Khera Msc Student Department of Economics and Sociology Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana 141004 |
The present study seeks to investigate the current status of the PMJDY in India. The results showed that the contribution of rural sector in terms of accounts opened under PMJDY was relatively higher than the urban sector in all the banking sectors namely, public sector banks, regional rural banks and private banks. The results further revealed that 60 percent (1106.52 lakh) accounts were opened in PMJDY, mobilized the deposit of Rs. 24939.22 crores and rest 40 percent (747.71 lakh) accounts under PMJDY were opened with zero balance as on September 30, 2015. From the public sector banks and RRBs, the State Bank of India played an important and leading role in the opening accounts under PMJDY. The state-wise scenario of PMJDY showed that the highest number of accounts were opened in Uttar Pradesh both in rural and urban sectors due to its highest population rate.
Keywords: Financial inclusion, PMJDY, RRBs, Public and private sector banks.
JEL Classification : G21, O16, R51
Financial inclusion refers to the delivery and having access to range of financial services in a convenient manner and at an affordable cost to vast section of disadvantaged and low income group population. Rangarajan Committee, Government of India (2008) defines financial inclusion as the process of ensuring access to financial services and timely and adequate credit where needed by vulnerable groups such as weaker sections and low income groups at an affordable cost. In India, financial inclusion was first featured in 2005, when it was introduced by K C Chakraborthy, the chairman of Indian Bank. Mangalam village became the first village in India where all households were provided banking facilities. KYC Norms were relaxed for people intending to open account with annual deposits of less than Rs 50,000 (Barhate and Jagtap, 2014).
Professor and Research student, Department of Economics and Sociology, PAU,Ludhiana
Since independence, the government and the Reserve Bank of India have taken many initiatives for financial inclusion such as nationalization of banks, establishing Regional Rural banks, Cooperative banks, appointing Banking Correspondence Agents (BCA), launching of Swabhiman and Swavlambhan Schemes, introducing micro finance, opening up of no-frills account and provision of keeping 25 percent of bank branches in rural areas, initiating the model of Bharatiya Mahila Bank, simplifying the KYC norms and so on. But the objective of financial inclusion has never been achieved in entirety. Recently, the government has come up with an innovative idea of connecting people especially from rural and remote areas with banking industry by launching Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) with the vision of economic liberlization and development and growth of all. The PMJDY, roughly translated as ‘People’s Wealth Scheme’ was announced by the Prime Minister in his Independence Day speech with the slogan ‘Mera Khata – Bhagya Vidhata’ which means ‘My Bank Account – The Creator of the Good Fortune’ (Mohan, 2014).
PMJDY is a comprehensive financial inclusion programme, targeting opening up of 7.5 crore new accounts within five months with insurance and pension facilities. Under the provisions of the scheme, the account holder is entitled to get accidental insurance worth Rs 1 lakh, overdraft of up to Rs 5,000 and life insurance of Rs 30,000. On the accident insurance cover of Rs 1 lakh being offered to new account holders, it comes with the condition that before making the claim, the holder should have used his/her account during the 45 days prior to the claim date. The Rupay debit card being given to the beneficiaries will have an inbuilt accident insurance cover Rs 1 lakh and an over draft facility upto Rs 5000. The use of debit cards will allow the unbanked to start a building a transaction history, which can be a decisive step in initiating the account holder towards financial inclusion. The PMJDY also aims at eliminating corruption as it would facilitate routing of subsidies directly into the accounts of intended beneficiaries (Chowan and Pande, 2014).
The crux of the plan is to link every household with the bank. The Prime Minister through his mails to CEOs of all PSU Banks made it clear that a bank account for every household was a national priority. It envisages that anyone who was not having bank account in any bank may open a account, just by presenting the identity card either by Aadhaar card, MGNREGA card or Voter card, Ration card, Driving License, PAN Card, copy of passport etc. A number of subsidies being provided by government such as scholarships and pensions under various schemes do not reach to the beneficiaries in the total. A number of times, it had been debated that about 40 percent of such relief reaches to the real beneficiaries. The proposals to deposit the amount of subsidy directly into the account of the person was having big obstacle of the bank accounts with majority of the citizens in the country. It was felt that once every household is connected with bank, there would be no chance of such malpractice of retaining 60 percent of the sanctioned relief by the corrupt officials or person occupying responsible posts for serving the purpose. The money would then reach directly to the beneficiaries at the specific point for which it was meant. Thus, it would help in controlling and eroding and eradicating corruption to a large extent. This scheme of financial inclusive would be a revolutionary step in this regard, as the lady of the households has been given priority in opening a bank account and the women get an opportunity to fulfill their needs through the micro finances facility also, being offered under this scheme. The scheme has been envisioned with gender equality and women empowerment. The bank account opening drive has to be followed up with a more sustained financial literacy drive and consumer protection initiatives. PMJDY would touch the lives of everyone in a positive and constructive way. Financial literacy enables them to be more informed about their financial decisions (Singh and Shahid, 2015).
Subramanya and Alfia (2015) carried out analysis on the awareness of Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana with special reference to Hassan district of Karnatka state. In order to conduct this study 50 respondents were considered. The study revealed that PMJDY was almost successful as 76 percent of people were aware about the scheme and still 24 percent of people were not aware of the scheme in in the area under study. Anonymous (2015) revealed that about 12.65 crore bank accounts were opened under PMJDY in the country. But an astounding 8.5 crore of such accounts were found dormants.
i. To study the current status and recent progress of Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana in India.
As the study is descriptive in nature, secondary data have been employed to accomplish the objectives of present study. The secondary data have been collected from www.pmjdy.gov.in. The secondary data pertaining to number of accounts opened by public sector banks, RRBs, private banks, amount deposited in the accounts, accounts with zero balance, etc. have been collected and compiled from the official website of PMJDY (www.pmjdy.gon.in). The data were further analyzed using various descriptive statistics such as average, percentage, etc.
The information regarding the details of accounts opened in Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) has been presented in Table 1. The results revealed that the contribution of rural sector in terms of accounts opened under PMJDY was relatively higher than the urban sector in all the banking sectors namely, public sector banks, regional rural banks and private banks. In rural sector, total accounts opened under PMJDY public sector banks, regional rural banks and private banks were 70.95, 25.24 and 3.81 percent respectively. Whereas, in urban sector, 89.45 percent, 6.62 percent and 3.93 percent accounts were opened in public sector banks, regional rural banks and private banks respectively.
Table
1: Distribution of accounts opened in Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana in India up to
September 30, 2015.
(Lakhs)
Particulars | Accounts | Balance in accounts(Rs. Crore) | Accounts with zero balance | ||
Rural | Urban | Total | |||
Public Sector Banks | 798.83 (70.95) | 651.54 (89.45) | 1450.37 (78.21) | 19562.95 | 580.75 |
Regional Rural Banks | 284.22 (25.24) | 48.22 (6.62) | 332.44 (17.93) | 4268.75 | 136.90 |
Private Banks | 42.81 (3.81) | 28.61 (3.93) | 71.42 (3.85) | 1107.52 | 30.06 |
Total | 1125.86 (100.00) | 728.37 (100.00) | 1854.23 (100.00) | 24939.22 | 747.71 |
Source: www.pmjdy.gov.in
On the overall level, 78.21 percent of the total accounts were opened in public sector banks, 17.93 percent were opened in regional rural banks and only 3.85 percent accounts were opened in private banks. The results further revealed that 60 percent accounts were opened in PMJDY, mobilized the deposit of Rs. 24939.22 crores and rest 40 percent accounts opened with zero balance under the scheme as on September 30,2015.
The information pertaining to the contribution of public sector banks in the opening of account under PMJDY has been presented in Table 2. The results revealed that State Bank of India played an important and lead role in PMJDY with the opening of 444.65 lakh accounts. Out of 444.65 lakh accounts, 188.97 lakh accounts were opened in rural sector and 255.68 lakh accounts were opened in urban sector. Though 236.52 lakh accounts opened with zero balance, the deposit comprised Rs. 2931.97 crores in State Bank of India.
Table
2: Distribution of accounts opened in Public Sector Banks under PMJDY scheme in India up
to September 30, 2015
(Lakhs)
Name of Bank | Accounts | Balance in accounts(Rs. Crore) | Accounts with zero balance | ||
Rural | Urban | Total | |||
State Bank of India | 188.97 | 255.68 | 444.65 | 2931.97 | 236.52 |
Punjab National Bank | 97.48 | 19.48 | 116.96 | 1060.88 | 43.25 |
Bank of Baroda | 45.96 | 59.75 | 105.71 | 1804.03 | 29.64 |
Bank of India | 40.42 | 51.85 | 92.27 | 808.27 | 42.59 |
Central Bank of India | 52.83 | 14.34 | 67.17 | 566.96 | 18.10 |
Canara Bank | 41.74 | 19.83 | 61.57 | 921.48 | 17.67 |
UCO Bank | 29.76 | 30.92 | 60.68 | 1139.59 | 19.32 |
United Bank of India | 34.42 | 23.26 | 57.68 | 2644.77 | 10.88 |
Union Bank of India | 43.07 | 12.10 | 55.17 | 583.52 | 26.17 |
Syndicate Bank | 26.62 | 12.57 | 39.19 | 677.14 | 13.73 |
Punjab and Sind Bank | 8.46 | 4.25 | 12.71 | 407.35 | 1.83 |
State Bank of Patiala | 4.25 | 7.81 | 12.06 | 229.02 | 4.57 |
Total | 613.98 | 511.84 | 1125.82 | 13774.98 | 464.27 |
Source: www.pmjdy.gov.in
The other public sector banks those performed well in the opening of accounts under PMJDY were Punjab National Bank (116.96 lakh), Bank of Baroda (105.71 lakh), Bank of India (92.28 lakh), Central Bank of India (67.17 lakh), Canara Bank (61.57 lakh), UCO Bank (60.68 lakh), United Bank of India (57.68 lakh) and Union Bank of India (55.17 lakh). In terms of balance, State Bank of India had mobilised the highest deposits of Rs. 2931.97 crore followed by United Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, UCO Bank, Punjab National Bank , Canara Bank, Bank of India and Syndicate Bank with the deposits of Rs. 2644.77 crore, Rs. 1804.03 crore, Rs. 1139.59 crore, Rs. 1060.88 crore, Rs. 921.48 crore, Rs. 808.27 crore and Rs. 677.14 crore respectively.
Table
3: Distribution of accounts opened in Regional Rural Banks under PMJDY scheme in India
up to September 30, 2015
(Lakhs)
Name of Bank | Accounts | Balance in accounts(Rs. Crore) | Accounts with zero balance | ||
Rural | Urban | Total | |||
State Bank of India | 51.60 | 8.89 | 60.49 | 582.21 | 27.36 |
United Bank of India | 40.86 | 0.70 | 41.56 | 568.56 | 18.65 |
Central Bank of India | 34.83 | 6.47 | 41.3 | 713.09 | 14.16 |
Bank of Baroda | 26.40 | 7.50 | 33.90 | 438.70 | 15.12 |
Punjab National Bank | 26.01 | 3.53 | 29.54 | 484.94 | 12.57 |
Bank of India | 20.33 | 6.70 | 27.03 | 98.52 | 11.17 |
Syndicate Bank | 15.55 | 3.98 | 19.53 | 345.20 | 8.07 |
State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur | 14.26 | 0.33 | 14.59 | 167.12 | 5.93 |
Canara Bank | 5.11 | 3.54 | 8.65 | 211.80 | 2.01 |
Allahabad Bank | 6.04 | 1.42 | 7.46 | 64.50 | 2.73 |
Union Bank of India | 5.25 | 1.31 | 6.56 | 34.96 | 2.37 |
Punjab and Sind Bank | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 1.87 | 0.02 |
Total | 246.38 | 44.39 | 290.77 | 3711.47 | 120.16 |
Source: www.pmjdy.gov.in
The performance of regional rural banks in the opening of account under PMJDY as on September 30, 2015 has been presented in Table 3.
Similar observations were found in case of regional rural banks as the State Bank of India contributed highest in terms of accounts opened under PMJDY with the opening of 60.49 lakh accounts. The contribution of rural sector was found to be higher as compared to urban sector which implied the large branch network of RRBs in the rural area. The other major banks in terms of accounts opened in PMJDY were United Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India, Syndicate Bank, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur with 41.56, 41.3, 33.90, 29.54, 27.03,19.53, 14.59 lakh accounts opened under the scheme respectively. Among the RRBs, the highest deposits were accounted by Central Bank of India (Rs. 713.09 crore) followed by State Bank of India (Rs. 582.21 crore), United Bank of India ( Rs. 568.56 crore) and Punjab National Bank (484.94) as on September 30, 2015.
The contribution of Private Banks in the opening of account under PMJDY as by the end of September, 2015 has been presented in Table 4. The results revealed that ICICI bank showed dominance with 25.27 lakh accounts opened under PMJDY over the other banks in private banking sector of India. Out of 25.27 lakh bank accounts opened in ICICI Bank, 22 lakh bank accounts were in rural sector while 3.27 lakh accounts were in urban sector opened under PMJDY.
HDFC Bank ranked 2nd among private sector banks with opening up of 15.22 lakh accounts under PMJDY. The other private banks those played a key role in PMJDY were Jammu and Kashmir Bank, Axis Bank, Federal Bank, Induslnd Bank, Kotak Mahindra bank with 12.34, 5.35, 3.44, 2.36, 1.78 lakh accounts respectively.In terms of balance, HDFC Bank had the highest deposits of 49766.78 lakhs followed by Jammu and Kashmir Bank, ICICI Bank, Federal Bank, Axis Bank, Induslnd Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank with the deposit of 21263.14, 16442.89, 11335.31, 5281.41, 1060.40, 1145.14 lakhs respectively.
Table 4: Distribution of accounts opened in Private Banks under PMJDY scheme in India up to September 30, 2015
(Lakhs)
Name of Bank | Accounts | Balance in accounts(Rs. Lacs) | Accounts with zero balance | ||
Rural | Urban | Total | |||
ICICI Bank | 22.00 | 3.27 | 25.27 | 16442.89 | 10.16 |
HDFC Bank | 2.90 | 12.32 | 15.22 | 49766.78 | 5.61 |
Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd | 11.15 | 1.19 | 12.34 | 21263.13 | 6.56 |
Axis Bank Ltd | 1.17 | 4.18 | 5.35 | 5281.41 | 2.03 |
Federal Bank Ltd | 2.79 | 0.65 | 3.44 | 11335.31 | 1.50 |
Induslnd Bank Ltd | 0.22 | 2.14 | 2.36 | 1060.40 | 0.90 |
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd | 0.88 | 0.90 | 1.78 | 1145.14 | 1.07 |
Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd | 0.53 | 0.91 | 1.44 | 991.03 | 0.48 |
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd | 0.16 | 1.1 | 1.27 | 857.44 | 0.60 |
South Indian Bank Ltd | 0.17 | 0.87 | 1.04 | 1118.74 | 0.35 |
Ratnakar Bank Ltd | 0.60 | 0.35 | 0.95 | 440.85 | 0.46 |
City Union Bank Ltd | 0.14 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 914.09 | 0.25 |
Total | 42.71 | 28.51 | 71.22 | 110617.21 | 29.97 |
Source: www.pmjdy.gov.in
The state-wise scenario of PMJDY depicting the status of different states and Union Territories of India regarding the accounts opened under PMJDY was presented in Table 5.
Table 5: State-wise scenario of PMJDY in India up to September 30, 2015
(Thousands)
State and UT | Rural | Urban | Total | % total |
Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 36.65 | 14.90 | 51.55 | 0.03 |
Andhra Pradesh | 3965.15 | 2910.09 | 6875.24 | 3.71 |
Arunachal Pradesh | 83.28 | 28.30 | 111.58 | 0.06 |
Assam | 4262.75 | 1486.26 | 5749.01 | 3.1 |
Bihar | 10094.35 | 4043.48 | 14137.83 | 7.62 |
Chandigarh | 41.79 | 162.97 | 204.76 | 0.11 |
Chattisgarh | 5669.14 | 2782.99 | 8452.13 | 4.57 |
Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 42.48 | 8.32 | 50.80 | 0.03 |
Goa | 89.36 | 30.87 | 120.23 | 0.06 |
Gujrat | 3795.57 | 3312.35 | 7107.92 | 3.83 |
Haryana | 2813.99 | 2062.73 | 4876.72 | 2.63 |
Himachal Pradesh | 707.42 | 98.30 | 805.72 | 0.43 |
Jammu and Kashmir | 1386.67 | 246.22 | 1632.89 | 0.88 |
Jharkand | 3364.16 | 1417.79 | 4781.95 | 2.58 |
Karnatka | 5220.84 | 3318.61 | 8539.45 | 4.60 |
Kerala | 1215.50 | 1057.10 | 2272.6 | 1.22 |
Lakshadweep | 4.52 | 0.45 | 4.97 | 0.02 |
Madhya Pradesh | 7951.18 | 7968.27 | 15919.45 | 8.59 |
Maharastra | 5640.61 | 6292.40 | 11933.01 | 6.44 |
Manipur | 242.28 | 289.53 | 531.81 | 0.29 |
Meghalaya | 163.51 | 53.89 | 217.40 | 0.12 |
Mizoram | 53.02 | 67.57 | 120.59 | 0.06 |
Nagaland | 85.34 | 65.70 | 151.04 | 0.08 |
NCT of Delhi | 339.62 | 2501.01 | 2840.63 | 1.53 |
Orissa | 5253.37 | 1786.40 | 7039.77 | 3.80 |
Pondicherry | 52.40 | 53.75 | 106.15 | 0.06 |
Punjab | 2688.81 | 1805.08 | 4493.89 | 2.42 |
Rajasthan | 9171.96 | 5163.15 | 14335.11 | 7.73 |
Sikkam | 59.37 | 10.70 | 70.07 | 0.04 |
Tamil Nadhu | 3992.24 | 3336.95 | 7329.19 | 3.95 |
Telangana | 4400.89 | 3072.95 | 7473.84 | 4.03 |
Tripura | 425.49 | 178.98 | 604.47 | 0.33 |
Uttar Pradesh | 17400.35 | 11541.11 | 28941.46 | 15.61 |
Uttarakand | 1139.40 | 521.80 | 1661.20 | 0.90 |
West Bengal | 10718.12 | 5138.16 | 15856.98 | 8.55 |
Total | 112571.58 | 72829.83 | 185401.41 | 100.00 |
Source: www.pmjdy.gov.in
The results showed that the highest number of accounts (15.61 percent) were opened in state of Uttar Pradesh including both rural and urban sectors due to its highest population rate. The other states having large number of accounts opened under the scheme were Madhya Pradesh (8.59 percent), West Bengal (8.56 percent), Rajasthan (7.73 percent), Bihar (7.62 percent), Maharastra (6.44 percent) and Karnatka (4.60 percent).
To check the efficacy of the PMJDY scheme, the Government of India conducts various surveys in different states of India. The information pertaining to the district-wise survey on the access to the banking facility in Punjab has been presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Access to banking facility in Punjab: the district-wise survey
(thousand)
District name | Household surveyed | Household having A/Cs | District level Coverage (%) |
Amritsar | 232.64 | 181.73 | 78.12 |
Barnala | 105.09 | 96.03 | 91.38 |
Bathinda | 223.58 | 214.50 | 95.94 |
Faridkot | 106.39 | 95.09 | 89.38 |
Fatehgarh Sahib | 92.29 | 88.64 | 96.04 |
Fazilka | 123.76 | 103.37 | 83.52 |
Firozpur | 92.91 | 74.79 | 80.50 |
Gurdaspur | 234.66 | 211.86 | 90.28 |
Hoshiarpur | 265.48 | 141.48 | 53.29 |
Jalandhar | 429.18 | 411.61 | 95.91 |
Kapurthala | 57.50 | 53.37 | 92.81 |
Ludhiana | 351.30 | 307.27 | 87.46 |
Mansa | 116.92 | 112.25 | 96.01 |
Moga | 161.66 | 144.55 | 89.42 |
Muktsar | 154.84 | 132.42 | 85.52 |
Pathankot | 59.27 | 54.04 | 91.18 |
Patiala | 301.09 | 288.58 | 95.85 |
Rupnagar | 246.95 | 244.69 | 99.08 |
Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar | 158.91 | 149.91 | 94.34 |
Sangrur | 284.30 | 271.16 | 95.38 |
Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar | 112.85 | 108.76 | 96.37 |
Tarn Taran | 146.87 | 128.22 | 87.30 |
Source: www.pmjdy.gov.in
The results revealed that all the districts of Punjab were having more than 80 percent of households having access to banking facility except Amritsar (78.12 percent) and Hosiharpur (53.29 percent). The highest percentage of households having access to banking facility was reported in Rupnagar district (99.08 percent) followed by SBS Nagar (96.04 percent), Fatehgarh Sahib (96.04 percent), Mansa (96.01 percent), and Bathinda (95.94 percent).
PMJDY scheme has been started with an objective to provide universal access to banking facilities for all household through a bank branch or fixed point i.e business correspondent. The crux of scheme is to link every household with the bank. The present study tried to investigate the current status of the PMJDY in India. The results revealed that the contribution of rural sector in terms of accounts opened under PMJDY was relatively higher than the urban sector in all the banking sectors namely public sector banks, regional rural banks and private banks. In rural sector, total accounts opened under PMJDY public sector banks, regional rural banks and private banks were 70.95, 25.24 and 3.80 percent respectively. Whereas, in urban sector, 89.45 percent, 6.62 percent and 3.93 percent accounts were opened in public sector banks, regional rural banks and private banks respectively. The results further revealed that 60 percent accounts were opened in PMJDY, mobilized the deposit of Rs. 24939.22 crores and rest 40 percent accounts opened under PMJDY were opened with zero balance as on September 30, 2015 in India. Among the public sector banks and RRBs, the State Bank of India plays an important and leading role in the opening of the accounts under PMJDY. The state-wise scenario of PMJDY showrd that the highest number of accounts were opened in Uttar Pradesh including both rural and urban sectors due to its high population rate.
Anonymous (2015) Bank on Money. The Sunday Express 13: 14.
Barhate G H and Jagtap V R (2014) Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: National Misson on financial inclusion. Ind J Appli Res 12: 340-42.
Chowan S S and Pande J C (2014) Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: A giant leap towards financial inclusion. Int J Res Mgt and Bus Stud 1: 19-22.
Government of India (2008) Rangarajan Committee:Report on Financial Inclusion.
Mohan B (2014) Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: Features, needs and challenges. Int J Mktg Fin Services and Mgt. Res 13:111-17.
Shahid A and Singh T (2015) Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: A vehicle for financial inclusion. Ind J Econ Dev 2: 499-508.
Subramanya P R and Alfia T H N (2015) Awareness level toward Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana. Int Multidisci Res J 2: 1-7.
http: // www.pmjdy.gov.in/account-statistics-bankwise- retrived on October 3 , 2015.