Dr. Meenu Maheshwari Assistant Professor Former Head Assistant Prof Commerce Aggarwal College Ballbhgarh Contact No.- +919891015464 Email: drmeenumaheshwari@gmail.com |
Mrs. Shobhna Goyal Research Scholar Department Of Commerce And Management University of Kota,Kota Email:shobhna2002@gmail.com |
Women emancipation and Inclusive growth have grabbed the attention of developmental economists the world over and has been on a priority in order to alleviate poverty and reaching to the most disadvantaged section of the society through formal financial institutions. For this dual objective microfinance interventions have been suggested as a measure. As through microfinance the landless labourers, marginal farmers and women can be roped in the formal financial system which has been a neglected area by the commercial banks as they are reluctant to tap this area due to high transaction costs and unassessibility. This paper attempts to explore one such microfinance intervention in the name of Self Help groups in Mewat district of Haryana and the role of SHGs in the socio-economic upliftment of women in this area which is known for the intense backwardness and the lowest female literacy rate. SHGs have been successful mainly in giving them a voice in their family, Govt. Offices and in the society against evils and violence and in making them financially independent up to some extent still there is a lot needed to achieve women emancipation. The paper will come up with some recommendations for the effective and efficient implementation of this microfinance intervention.
Keywords: words: Microfinance, SHG, Women Emancipation
Women empowerment and rural development has been the focus of almost all developmental policies of the Government. With the rural development nation’s development is consequential as per National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development(NABARD), which is very true for a country like India whose 70% population resides in 6,38,345 villages. India has over a quarter of its population below poverty line. The World Bank reports that India is still home to some 260 to 290 million poor, numbers that rise to 390 million if poverty is measured by the international standard of those living on less than US$1 a day. It is estimated that approximately 2.5 billion people around the world live in poverty and India is a home to 1/3 of world’s poor. Families living in poverty struggle to afford adequate meals, clean water or basic education. Almost half of India’s poor approximately 133 million are concentrated in 3 states namely Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh. Rural areas in India are home to ¾ of India’s poor which is strengthened by the increasing urban/rural disparities. Though many central and state Government poverty alleviation programs are currently active in India with a strategy focus on Infrastructure, Social Development (especially education and health) and rural livelihoods. But the poor access to credit markets and formal banking system has been identified as a root cause of poverty amongst the rural poor and the most disadvantaged section of the society. The credit needs of the rural masses in general and rural poor in particular are met via rural financial markets consisting commission agents, Moneylenders and landlords etc. However formal financial institutions have a low penetration due to poor infrastructure, low profitability and higher degree of risk. At this juncture Microfinance has been proposed as a possible solution for the maximum outreach and alleviation of poverty in the rural poor especially the disadvantageous sections of the society namely women, small and marginal farmers, and landless farmers. Micro financing is regarded as a tool for Socio-Economic benefit in a developing country like India. Micro finance as a means of poverty alleviation can give loans to poor individuals without sacrificing financial viability. Sivakumar Venkataramany, Balbir B. Bhasin (2009) focused on the success of the linkage between commercial banks and SHGs. The SHGs comprising predominantly women groups help in the social cause of alleviation of poverty, increased sustainability, reduction of vulnerability, improvement of capacity building and helping the weaker sections in building assets. India is the world’s 10th largest economy with Gross Domestic Product in 2012 of $1.824 trillion as reported by World Bank. The country’s growth is also strong, with real Gross Domestic Product growing in by 3.986% in 2012. Microfinance is one of the developmental approach that can contribute to achieve the National and International goal of improving the livelihoods of poor people. Nobel Laureate Mohammad Yunus is credited with laying the foundation of the modern Micro Finance Institutions with establishment of “Grameen Bank”, Bangladesh is 1976. Today it has evolved into a big industry exhibiting a variety of business models. Achieving balanced and inclusive growth is a key challenge faced by policymakers the world over. It was observed by Prasanthi, P Padma, A. (2010) that today microfinance through SHGs has become an integral part of all development programmes. The benefits of economic growth are accessible to relatively advantaged sections of the society who find it easier to participate in the growth process and the disadvantaged section has to wait much longer to reap the benefits of economic growth. Engaging these sections of the society in the economic mainstream is essential to achieve balanced growth for which access to formal financial services is a must.
Micro Finance originated in India in 1969 with the nationalization of banks to see that 1% of the profits of these banks goes to the poor towards their micro enterprises. The then Prime Minister Smt. Indira Gandhi envisioned it to facilitate her 20 point programme to fight poverty among the poor and she called it “Garibi Hatao”. The Micro Finance initiative in private sector in India can be traced to the initiative undertaken by Shri Mahila SEWA (self employed women’s association) Sahakari Bank set up in 1974 by registering as an urban co-operative Bank at Ahmedabad city of Gujarat State. The main aim of the SEWA Bank was to provide banking services to the poor women employed in the unorganised sector. The initiatives of NABARD in 1992 in partnership with NGOs for promoting and extending financial services through SHGs has now blossomed into a “monolith” micro finance initiative. It has been recognised as a decentralized, cost effective and fastest growing micro finance intervention in the world enabling over 103 poor households access to a variety of sustainable financial services from the formal banking system by becoming members of nearly 8 million Self Help Groups. Steady progress of the project led to the mainstream of the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP) in 1996 as a normal banking activity of the banks with widespread acceptance. As per a United Nations (2006) survey of bank managers in Madhya Pradesh revealed a perception that women borrowers were more trustworthy and less of a default risk. This can work as a benchmark for launching new schemes for women empowerment.
Microfinance activities are exercised through various models in India that can be categorised as:
1) SHG Model 2) Grameen Model 3) Co-operative Model 4) For –profit Model
SHG Model is the most popular Model in India amongst the four Models mentioned.
Out of the three models, SHG- Bank Linkage Programme (Model 1) emerged as most popular and successful over the years. About 73.41% of the credit linked SHGs (financed 81.12% of total loans) fell under Model-II followed by Model I (20%) as on 31 st March 2007. Only 5.67% of total SHGs fall under the Model III in which NGOs/ MFIs act as financial intermediaries. (RBI 2007- Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India) SHGs work on democracy principles as Dr. Sushil Kumar Mehta et al (2011) had studied that SHGs movement comes from the people’s desire to meet their needs and determine their destines through the principle ‘By the People, For the People and Of the People’
To spread the outreach of Micro Credit, NABARD has taken up intensification of SHG- Bank Linkage Programme in 13 identified priority states which account for 70% of the rural poor population viz. U.P. Maharashtra, Orissa, West Bengal, MP, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, UK, Assam and Himachal Pradesh. The programme has now assumed the form of a Micro-Finance Movement in many parts of the country and has started making inroads in the resource poor regions of the country as well. As pointed out by Rutherford (1996) that provision of financial services to poor people need not only be for increasing income, empowering women, or starting business it may simply aim to help them “manage better what little money they already have”.
The formal financial institutions in India have not been successful in outreaching to the disadvantaged sections of the society so far. Topography, structural rigidities, high overhead costs in di
Research Designocial infrastructure means community based organizations can be used as a harbinger for successful implementation of the developmental plans and thereby attaining the Milleinium Goals. Few corporates like HUL, Colgate, CEMEX has already tried community based organizations as members of their distribution channel in order to have deep penetration in the emerging Rural Markets the same model can be replicated for the promotion of social and economic welfare schemes launched by the government from time to time. Organisation of Self Help Groups is a move in this direction which motivates small farmers, artisans and entrepreneurs (Especially Women) to come together and pool their small savings to make it a large corpus for individual and group help. P. K. Singh (2001) observed a positive impact on assets value and annual income. In the Southern India SHG scheme has a widespread and has been successful in uplifting the social and economic status of women by creating awareness among the members. It has enabled women to live a healthy, hygienic and respectful life and they have learnt to participate in family decision making matter concerning to education of children, marriage, family planning, and management of economic assets of the family.
The present study is undertaken to study the performance of SHGs in Mewat district of Haryana in India. The performance has been linked with the group profile variables like age of the group, literacy level of the leader, etc.
· To explore the extent of Self Help Groups in the sample area
· To evaluate the performance of SHGs
· To analyse the impact of SHGs on women emancipation.
At the time of its formation on 1st November, 1966, Haryana State had 7 districts. Thereafter 13 new districts were notified from time to time by changing the boundaries of the existing districts. The Mewat district was carved out from Gurgaon and Faridabad districts, which came into existence on 4th April 2005 as the 20th district of the State. The district headquarter is located at Nuh. The district comprises of five blocks namely Nuh,Taaru, Nagina, Firozpur Jhirka and Punhana. Sample respondents have been selected from three blocks of district Mewat namely Nuh, Firozpur Jhirka and Punhana. Mewat is known to be a backward district in Haryana with a low female literacy rate but a high sex ratio. A sample of 304 group leaders from these three blocks were selected by simple random sampling.
S.N. | Item | Sex | Total | Rural | Urban |
1 | Total area (Sq. Kilometers) | 1507 | 1441.71 | 65.29 | |
2 | Total Households | 160280 | 139975 | 20305 | |
3 | Population | 1089263 | 965157 | 124106 | |
Male | 571162 | 506086 | 65076 | ||
Female | 518101 | 459071 | 59030 | ||
4 | Population (Age 0-6) | 248128 | 225069 | 23059 | |
Male | 130168 | 117967 | 12201 | ||
Female | 117960 | 107102 | 10858 | ||
5 | SC Population | 75251 | 57238 | 18013 | |
Male | 39743 | 30312 | 9431 | ||
Female | 35508 | 26926 | 8582 | ||
6 | Literate | 454897 | 384749 | 70148 | |
Male | 308435 | 266086 | 42349 | ||
Female | 146462 | 118663 | 27799 | ||
7 | Total Workers | 289964 | 258721 | 31243 | |
Male | 224642 | 197097 | 27545 | ||
Female | 65322 | 61624 | 3698 | ||
8 | Total Main Workers | 204178 | 179382 | 24796 | |
Male | 175670 | 153188 | 22482 | ||
Female | 28508 | 26194 | 2314 | ||
Cultivators | 81608 | 79292 | 2316 | ||
Male | 69305 | 67213 | 2092 | ||
Female | 12303 | 12079 | 224 | ||
Agriculture Labourers | 25426 | 24204 | 1222 | ||
Male | 20337 | 19215 | 1122 | ||
Female | 5089 | 4989 | 100 | ||
Households Industry Workers | 4034 | 3251 | 783 | ||
Male | 2938 | 2277 | 661 | ||
Female | 1096 | 974 | 122 | ||
Other Workers | 93110 | 72635 | 20475 | ||
Male | 83090 | 64483 | 18607 | ||
Female | 10020 | 8152 | 1868 | ||
9 | Marginal Workers | 85786 | 79339 | 6447 | |
Male | 48972 | 43909 | 5063 | ||
Female | 36814 | 35430 | 1384 | ||
Cultivators | 22629 | 22144 | 485 | ||
Male | 7714 | 7472 | 242 | ||
Female | 14915 | 14672 | 243 | ||
Agriculture Labourers | 29852 | 28617 | 1235 | ||
Male | 15923 | 15005 | 918 | ||
Female | 13929 | 13612 | 317 | ||
Household Industry Workers | 1989 | 1763 | 226 | ||
Male | 903 | 764 | 139 | ||
Female | 1086 | 999 | 87 | ||
Other Workers | 31316 | 26815 | 4501 | ||
Male | 24432 | 20668 | 3764 | ||
Female | 6884 | 6147 | 737 | ||
10 | Non Workers | 799299 | 706436 | 92863 | |
Male | 346520 | 308989 | 37531 | ||
Female | 452779 | 397447 | 55332 | ||
11 | Sex Ratio (Female per 1000 males) | 906 | 907 | 903 | |
12 | Literacy | 56.10: (Male-73.00%, Female-37.60%) | |||
13 | Blocks | Nuh, F.P. Jhirka, Taoru, Nagina and Punhana | |||
14 | Tehsil | Nuh, F.P. Jhirka, Punhana and Taoru | |||
15 | Sub Tehsil | Nagina | |||
16 | Sub Division | Nuh and F.P. Jhirka |
source : haryanaguv.in
The present study is an empirical one to analyse the performance and impact of SHGs on women emancipation. A structured questionnaire was developed for the primary data collection. Simple percentage and cumulative percentage method has been used to analyse the primary data collected out of 304 group leaders of Self Help Groups. However secondary data sources have also been used to have a deep understanding of the topic. Official websites of Haryana Government, Mewat development Agency and NABARD have been referred to for secondary data.
The report has been prepared on the basis of information available from the sample members and the secondary data. One of the biggest limitation of secondary data was that it was not updated, many of the Self Help Groups now have become non functional which are still shown on records. So locating the functional Self Help Groups was a problem during survey. Data of some particular months of some years were found missing which posed a problem in compiling secondary data tables. V. Batra (2012) covered 90 SHGs over the 3 sample districts in Haryana and identified the problems concerning management and governance of SHGs like irregularity in meetings, low level of skills and knowledge, absence of larger goals and lack of training. There are problems on part of banks for being unable to understand and accommodate the needs of SHGs in Haryana. To empower women and to reduce vulnerability literacy is very important.
Consolidated S.H.G. Financial information as on 31-03-2014
PARTICULAR | SMVS | SMVS | EMVS | NKMVS | NRMVS | JMVS | MDA |
F.P.Jhirka | Punhana | NUH | TAURU | NAGINA | HATHIN | ||
Total No. of Village | 82 | 85 | 108 | 81 | 67 | 82 | 505 |
Village Covered | 82 | 85 | 64 | 81 | 67 | 82 | 461 |
Total No of SHGs | 372 | 354 | 340 | 383 | 417 | 347 | 2213 |
Total Members | 4419 | 3930 | 4171 | 4603 | 5421 | 4121 | 26665 |
Total Saving | 22840354 | 20029510 | 25629950 | 30590483 | 28137203 | 19865480 | 147092980 |
Amount of Loan issued | 50114900 | 112831100 | 135408800 | 168801577 | 152720649 | 68526500 | 688403526 |
No. of Loans | 3794 | 9159 | 8390 | 8385 | 11770 | 7841 | 49339 |
No.of SHGs issued Loans | 267 | 325 | 247 | 338 | 418 | 289 | 1884 |
Amount Repaid | 31044730 | 83918915 | 17905966 | 121128599 | 127703349 | 57425634 | 439127193 |
Interest collected | 4362152 | 9341469 | 10220811 | 13627359 | 10353098 | 1443521 | 49348410 |
Credit from Bank | 11954000 | 26270500 | 41890500 | 58561500 | 43195400 | 10245435 | 192117335 |
No. of Benifited SHGs | 355 | 420 | 319 | 274 | 406 | 148 | 1922 |
MDA Matching Grant | 2267265 | 2872850 | 1594384 | 1689581 | 1713088 | 2310829 | 12447997 |
No. of Benifited SHGs | 204 | 422 | 204 | 215 | 224 | 305 | 1574 |
GDF | 2168484 | 2727200 | 1279800 | 1630100 | 1759400 | 2100000 | 11664984 |
No. of Benifited SHGs | 336 | 422 | 252 | 302 | 368 | 388 | 2068 |
NMDFC Loan Amounts | 10485000 | 105300000 | 15255000 | 10935000 | 13903500 | 4360500 | 160239000 |
No of Benifited SHGs | 55 | 66 | 91 | 63 | 69 | 23 | 367 |
No. of Loans to members | 432 | 394 | 618 | 394 | 508 | 201 | 2547 |
Source: MDA, march 2014
It is evident from the above table that there is good spread of SHGs in the sample area. Total saving corpus is Rs. 147092980. Amount of loan issued is Rs.688403526 out of which Rs. 439127193 has been repaid i. e. repayment rate is 64%
CONSOLIDATED SHG INFORMATION AS ON 31-03-2014
Sr.No. | Particular | Unit | Achi. | Achievement | Achievement |
Withdrawl SHG | Running SHG | Cumulative- MDA | |||
1 | Total No. of Village | No. | 505 | 505 | |
2 | Covered Village | No. | 461 | 461 | |
3 | Total No of SHGs | No. | 1813 | 2213 | 4026 |
4 | Total Members | Person | 25195 | 26665 | 51860 |
5 | Total Saving | Rs. In Crore | 6.56 | 14.7 | 21.26 |
6 | Amount of Loan issued | Rs. In Crore | 24.44 | 68.84 | 93.28 |
7 | No. of Loans to Members | No. | 24027 | 49339 | 73366 |
8 | No. of SHGs issude Loans | No. | 1484 | 1884 | 3368 |
9 | Amount Repaid | Rs. In Crore | 21.53 | 43.91 | 65.44 |
10 | Interest Collected | Rs. In Crore | 3.67 | 4.93 | 8.6 |
11 | Credit from Bank | Rs. In Crore | 4.35 | 19.21 | 23.56 |
12 | No. of Benifited SHGs | No. | 1164 | 1922 | 3086 |
13 | MDA Matching Grant | Rs. In Crore | 1.24 | 1.24 | |
14 | No. of Benifited SHGs | No. | 1574 | 1574 | |
15 | GDF | Rs.. In Crore | 1.16 | 1.16 | |
16 | No. of Benifited SHGs | No. | 2068 | 2068 | |
17 | NMDFC Loan Amount | Rs.In Crore | 16.02 | 16.02 | |
18 | No. of Benifited SHGs | No. | 367 | 367 | |
19 | No. of Loans to Members | No. | 2547 | 2547 |
Source: MDA, March 2014
It is clear from the table that nearly 45% of the SHGs had withdrawn so the amount withdrawn is 30%. 62% of the total SHGs 62% received the benefits.
CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION ABOUT SHGs LOANS AS ON 31-03-2014
Particular | SMVS,Punhna | SMVS, F.PJhirka | JMVS, Hathin | NRMVS, Nagina | NKMVS, Tauru | EMVS, Nuh | MDA,Cummulative | |||||||
Loan | Amount | Loan | Amount | Loan | Amount | Loan | Amount | Loan | Amount | Loan | Amount | Loan | Amount | |
Buffalo | 1978 | 25795850 | 921 | 14185500 | 3867 | 41805625 | 3974 | 66688401 | 2267 | 52272455 | 1785 | 47217152 | 14792 | 247964983 |
Sheep/Goat | 207 | 1206300 | 112 | 1904750 | 92 | 280421 | 528 | 3127058 | 98 | 726550 | 370 | 2425980 | 1407 | 9671059 |
House Repair | 545 | 6635550 | 117 | 1330300 | 445 | 4025484 | 399 | 5351650 | 568 | 14154845 | 722 | 11769960 | 2796 | 43267789 |
Purchasing Land | 113 | 2707800 | 81 | 2313500 | 25 | 202531 | 133 | 2493000 | 47 | 1026300 | 131 | 997320 | 530 | 9740451 |
Paying loans | 365 | 3620200 | 115 | 766500 | 131 | 1365500 | 204 | 2217800 | 192 | 2414600 | 324 | 3833160 | 1331 | 14217760 |
Petty Shop/Busin | 2292 | 36600350 | 964 | 16181700 | 512 | 5061764 | 2074 | 31102600 | 1306 | 37269200 | 1598 | 35364580 | 8746 | 161580194 |
Education | 30 | 491500 | 91 | 1256250 | 238 | 1167926 | 59 | 638100 | 96 | 1833250 | 178 | 1390420 | 692 | 6777446 |
Medicine | 185 | 1042600 | 122 | 796650 | 314 | 2195351 | 156 | 829900 | 212 | 4335600 | 324 | 3013720 | 1313 | 12213821 |
Fooder | 83 | 445000 | 105 | 925350 | 461 | 1860900 | 285 | 2103800 | 270 | 2679447 | 525 | 3363520 | 1729 | 11378017 |
Marriage | 663 | 10482550 | 204 | 2700000 | 261 | 2730450 | 464 | 6860500 | 567 | 14390800 | 572 | 8089880 | 2731 | 45254180 |
Consumption | 1473 | 7050450 | 307 | 1471450 | 913 | 4118436 | 2486 | 13390570 | 2323 | 29529540 | 641 | 3852600 | 8143 | 59413046 |
Agriculture | 436 | 4204550 | 398 | 2661950 | 481 | 3307570 | 642 | 9519960 | 205 | 3326350 | 421 | 8112480 | 2583 | 31132860 |
Mudha Making | 42 | 414000 | 3 | 22500 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 25000 | 1 | 2500 | 84 | 250240 | 133 | 714240 |
Flour mill | 26 | 246500 | 35 | 791000 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 229000 | 12 | 323440 | 109 | 471360 | 194 | 2061300 |
Shoe Making | 107 | 1034000 | 10 | 18500 | 4 | 7600 | 29 | 148200 | 34 | 276500 | 17 | 68000 | 201 | 1552800 |
Cycle-Ricshaw | 38 | 354000 | 17 | 45250 | 8 | 43200 | 55 | 633400 | 57 | 1431000 | 93 | 284240 | 268 | 2791090 |
Sewing Machine | 85 | 606300 | 42 | 293250 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 264700 | 20 | 243900 | 87 | 316132 | 251 | 1724282 |
Camel Cart | 81 | 824100 | 11 | 222000 | 18 | 22742 | 38 | 615300 | 9 | 140000 | 16 | 262000 | 173 | 2086142 |
Milk Purchasing | 146 | 3016000 | 55 | 1295500 | 59 | 90250 | 49 | 725500 | 13 | 468000 | 105 | 1135600 | 427 | 6730850 |
Festival | 1 | 2000 | 5 | 45500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 256800 | 146 | 1043256 | 186 | 1347556 |
Diesel Engine | 81 | 1908500 | 40 | 312750 | 4 | 137500 | 121 | 4872000 | 30 | 1165500 | 50 | 917240 | 326 | 9313490 |
FooderCutt.Mechine | 1 | 30000 | 4 | 22500 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 77000 | 5 | 37000 | 16 | 152320 | 29 | 318820 |
Pigery | 4 | 47000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 23710 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 214880 | 33 | 285590 |
Poultry Farm | 35 | 735500 | 18 | 423000 | 8 | 103250 | 18 | 722500 | 6 | 208000 | 21 | 350200 | 106 | 2542450 |
Diesel Eng.Rep. | 98 | 1612000 | 16 | 108750 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 61000 | 11 | 163000 | 3 | 99800 | 134 | 2044550 |
Fisheries | 16 | 349500 | 1 | 20500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 127000 | 38 | 412760 | 57 | 909760 |
Cop. Job | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Sanitation | 6 | 77000 | 6 | 77000 | ||||||||||
Bakery | 6 | 300000 | 6 | 300000 | ||||||||||
Comp. Job | 1 | 10000 | 1 | 10000 | ||||||||||
Vechile Purchase | 2 | 500000 | 2 | 500000 | ||||||||||
Tent | 1 | 100000 | 1 | 100000 | ||||||||||
Hand Fan | 11 | 282000 | 11 | 282000 | ||||||||||
Marval Machine | 1 | 100000 | 1 | 100000 | ||||||||||
Total | 9159 | 112831100 | 3794 | 50114900 | 7841 | 68526500 | 11770 | 152720649 | 8385 | 168801577 | 8390 | 135408800 | 49339 | 688403526 |
Source: MDA
Demographic profile of sample respondents:
Table -1: Religion wise distribution of sample members
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | Hindu | 231 | 76.0 | 76.0 |
Muslim | 71 | 23.4 | 99.4 | |
Meo | 2 | 0.6 | 100.0 | |
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source : Primary Data
It shows that majority of the sample members are hindus i.e. 76% and 23.4% are muslim and a mere .7% are meos. The results are quite surprising in a sense that despite of a Meos dominant region they are not indulged in saving-lending activities.
Table 2: Caste wise distribution of sample members
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | SC | 39 | 12.8 | 12.8 |
ST | 27 | 8.9 | 21.7 | |
OBC | 94 | 30.9 | 52.6 | |
BC | 55 | 18.1 | 70.7 | |
GEN | 61 | 20.1 | 90.8 | |
Meo | 28 | 9.2 | 100 | |
. | ||||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
In the region almost all categories exist and woman belonging to any community can become a member. However majority of them belong to OBC category i.e.30.9%.
Table 3: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of tenure of SHGs
Tenure | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | <12 months | 29 | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
12-24 mojths | 53 | 17.4 | 27.0 | ||
24-36 months | 89 | 29.3 | 56.3 | ||
> 36 months | 133 | 43.8 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
It was observed during survey that 43.8% groups are more than 3 years old and 29.3% are 2 to 3 years old. However new formation of groups is disappointing which indicates that to keep the scheme alive Government should encourage women to open SHGs.
Table-4: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of educational qualification of Leader
Educational Qualification of the leader | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | Illiterate | 2 | .7 | .7 | |
Primary | 123 | 40.5 | 41.1 | ||
Middle | 83 | 27.3 | 68.4 | ||
H.Sc and above | 96 | 31.6 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
Most of the group leaders were observed to be literate but poorly i.e. 40.5% of them are literate upto primary level 31.6% are Higher secondary passed. Qualification of the group leader plays an important role in formation as well as in functioning of the group.
Table 5: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of size of the group
Size of the group | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | < 12 members | 190 | 62.5 | 62.5 | |
12-15 members | 110 | 36.2 | 98.7 | ||
> 15 member | 4 | 1.3 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
Majority of the SHG s were having 10 to 11 members that means a moderate size is supposed to be the best practice in the sample area. Only 1.3% of the total sample were found to be having more than 15 members. The result are different as compared to the prescribed limit of membership is 10-20 member by NABARD.
It was also found that 16.8% of total groups have a sole purpose of SHG formation as to increase their income which is supposed to be the most justifiable purpose of this scheme. Secondly 16.4% groups have been formed to start entrepreneurial activity in the form of shops and dairy mainly. Both purposes are complementing each other i.e. increasing income by setting up some enterprise. Formation of groups to promote savings took third place i.e. 11.3% and to uplift the social status of the members is also a purpose to form SHGs. The results are satisfactory in a sense that these have been designated as the primary objectives to initiate this scheme.
Table6: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of group meetings held
Frequency of SHG Meetings | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | Once in a week | 122 | 40.1 | 40.1 | |
once in a month | 181 | 59.5 | 99.7 | ||
twice in a month | 1 | .3 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
As per the guidelines group leader has to organise group meetings to discuss various issues and collection of mandatory monthly savings and disbursement of credit at least once a month. 59. 5 % groups are following the norms of holding the meeting once a month and 40% groups are even holding meetings once in a week which is quite interesting to know as more and more meetings give women a confidence to speak and share her problems with other members which they were unable to before becoming members of SHG i.e. SHG ( women collectives) give them a voice. Increased self confidence and communication are strong indicators of social upliftment.
Table 7: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of regularity of meetings
Regularity of meetings in last 6 months | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | 100% meeting held | 202 | 66.4 | 66.4 | |
75-99% meetings held | 102 | 33.6 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
SHGs were found to be regular in holding meeting at least once in a month. 66.4% groups held 100% meetings and 33.6% of the groups were also found to hold more than 75% of the mandatory meetings. Regularity in meetings is a most desirable feature of a Self Help Group to have a congenial group working and cohesion.
Table 8: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of attendance at meetings
Attendance at meeting | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | >90 % | 270 | 88.8 | 88.8 | |
75-89% | 34 | 11.2 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
The results are encouraging. Majority of the groups record more than 90% attendance which shows that women want to get together to discuss problems of their own and of others and possibly came out with solutions. 88.8% of the sample groups have recorded more than 90% attendance and minimum attendance recorded is also not disappointing it is still not less than 75%.
Table 9: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of member participation in decision making
Participation of members in decision making | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | >75% members participate | 162 | 53.3 | 53.3 | |
55-75% member participate | 142 | 46.7 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
It is evident from the above table that SHGs have a positive social impact on women as most of them started participating in decision making which was earlier supposed to be male domain. SHGs have helped in women emancipation. In 53.3% cases more than 75% of the group members participate in decision making when it comes to credit disbursements, getting together for a social cause, or solving some individual problem with the group efforts.
Table 10: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of training program conducted
Whether any training program conducted for SHG | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Valid | Yes | 5 | 1.6 | 1.3 | |
No | 299 | 98.4 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100 |
Source: Primary Data
The response is disheartening as Government has not spent much on training programmes in this area although it was found during survey that women are keenly interested in taking up some work but the two main issues what to make and where to market? 98.4% of the respondents said the no training was ever given to them whereas a mere 1.6% said they attended 1-2 days training about formation of SHGs and account opening and keeping minutes of meetings which again was not to undertake any entrepreneurial activity.
Table 11: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of regularity of savings
Regularity in Savings | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
0 | 1 | .3 | .3 | ||
100% | 303 | 99.7 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100 | |||
Source: Primary Data
Members were found to be very regular about their savings with the group. 99.7% of the respondents were found regular in depositing their monthly savings on the meeting day. This has resulted in a big group corpus with the banks and some groups even need not to take any loan from the bank. Most of the groups were found to be in no loan category in the sample area.
Table 12: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of set of rules and regulations
Do the group has a set of Rules and Regulations | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
0 | 42 | 13.8 | 13.8 | ||
Yes | 262 | 86.2 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
86.2% of the respondents replied that they had group norms in the form of rules and regulations which comprise of attending group meetings at least once in a month, repayment of the credit allocated to avoid heavy rate of interest and priority based lending out of group corpus.
Table 13: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of existence of rules
Rules are in existence only | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Yes | 2 | .7 | .7 | ||
No | 302 | 99.3 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
Majority of the respondents said that rules are not just existent but are followed as well. Each and every member follows the group rules and regulations not by force but by their choice. They know it is an effort of the members, for the members and by the members.
Table 14: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of implementation of rules
Rules have been implemented as well | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Yes | 304 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
It is evident from the above table that rules are not just framed they are implemented as well for the smooth functioning of the group. The results are 100%.
Table 15: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of election of office beares
Do you conduct periodic elections for the office | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Election conducted once a year | 151 | 49.7 | 49.7 | ||
Once in two years | 9 | 3.0 | 52.6 | ||
Beyond two year | 88 | 28.9 | 81.6 | ||
Never held | 56 | 18.4 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
49.7% of the groups hold election once in a year to elect office beares namely the group leader and treasurer. 28.9% groups do not change their leaders every year and 18.4% of the groups never held elections rather their office bearers are unanimously chosen.
Table 16: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of books of accounts maintained
Are the books of accounts and documents maintained | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Cash book | 1 | .3 | .3 | ||
Cash book and Ledger | 128 | 42.1 | 42.4 | ||
cash Book and Member Passbook | 175 | 57.6 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
57.6% of the groups maintain journal and bank pass book for recording savings , disbursements and interest. 42.1% maintains journal and cash book. Overall each and every group maintains at least two books of records which is a healthy practice.
Table 17: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of status of recording in these books
Mention the status of recording in these book | |||||
Frequency | Percent | Cumulative Percent | |||
Up to date and correct recording | 277 | 91.1 | 91.1 | ||
Up to date but incorrect recording | 27 | 8.9 | 100.0 | ||
Total | 304 | 100.0 |
Source: Primary Data
It was found that 91.1% groups have up to date and correct recording in the books maintained by the group. This correlates the fact that at least some of the group members are literate enough to enter the transactions correctly and preparing the minutes of the meetings. It was also explored that even if no member is capable of recording then any educated child of any member of the group can be asked for doing this work which shows the group is specific about recording and updating the transactions.
The research on Microfinance and women empowerment depicts that SHG based micro finance has contributed as a catalyst of the social change and empowerment of poor is proved to be a boon for the rural women in some states of India. Moreover it has created opportunities for promotion of income generating activities and have enabled them to come above poverty line. There is a geographic/Regional concentration of the SHG concept which needs to be scattered across the nation as poverty has a global concern. Poor people’s access to formal banking system would act as a key to economic growth and sustainable development. It is evident that SHGs have touched the lives of rural women in all respects whether it is social, economic or personal thereby contributing effectively in women emancipation. SHGs are seen to confer many social and economic benefits which can be community platforms for women to become active in village affairs, stand for local election or take action to address social and community issues like – abuse of women, alcohol, the dowry system, the schools and water supply (Umakanata; Padhi, Pragnya Laxmi (2011) of late the women have started recognising their immense potential and have learnt that self dependence is the best form dependence. Joining a Self Help Group has given them enough confidence to speak, to come forward to be a part in family decision making which is supposedly a male domain, assessing the banks for loans and discussing with the managers without taking their husbands along (in the sample district women were seen discussing gold loan provisions with the Bank manager and that too without their husbands accompanying them) which is indeed an indicator of upgradation of self confidence which can be attributed to Self Help Groups. Aloysisus P. Fernandez (2007) (MYRADA) observed that SHGs are not only an instrument for the empowerment of poor and marginalized sectors but they have proved to be an effective instrument for changing oppressive relationships in the home and in the society. As far as the performance of SHGs is concerned the results are very much encouraging in almost all respects except the training part which needs government’s attention as out of total expenditure from the allocated fund nothing has been spent on marketing and very less on imparting training. In Haryana out of 8308 swarozgaris 6150 i.e. 74.02% are engaged in primary sector and only 25.98% are engaged in secondary sector like village industry, handicrafts, Handloom etc. There is a need to make SHG movement more entrepreneurial. SHG members can be roped in as a member of distribution channel by the corporate in order to have deep penetration in the rural market in a cost effective manner without inventory piling up. This would be a two way strategy of empowering rural women and having a better outreach. Some of the insurance companies are also now targeting Self Help Groups to sell their insurance products in rural markets. So in near future association with the Self Help Groups will help rural women to (2007) (MYRADA) observed that SHGs are not only an instrument for the empowerment of poor and marginalized sectors but they have proved to be an effective instrument for changing oppressive relationships in the home and in the society. As far as the performance of SHGs is concerned the results are very much encouraging in almost all respects except the training part which needs government’s attention as out of total expenditure from the allocated fund nothing has been spent on marketing and very less on imparting training. In Haryana out of 8308 swarozgaris 6150 i.e. 74.02% are engaged in primary sector and only 25.98% are engaged in secondary sector like village industry, handicrafts, Handloom etc. There is a need to make SHG movement more entrepreneurial. SHG members can be roped in as a member of distribution channel by the corporate in order to have deep penetration in the rural market in a cost effective manner without inventory piling up. This would be a two way strategy of empowering rural women and having a better outreach. Some of the insurance companies are also now targeting Self Help Groups to sell their insurance products in rural markets. So in near future association with the Self Help Groups will help rural women to have avenues for larger incomes apart from the saving lending mechanism which will benefit their families and society as a whole in terms of better and respectable living.
Entrepreneurship among Women? Microfinance and Microentrepreneurship First Edition, Vista International Publishing House, 204-209.
Minakshi Ramji , (26 January 2009) ”Financial Inclusion in Gulbarga: Finding Usage in Access”, Working Paper Series no.
MYRADA , (July 2007) Occassional Papers, “History and Spread of the self help affinity group movement in India”.
Painoli,Girish Kumar, Losarwar, Sunil G (Nov2011) Paper Presentation on Self Help Groups and Women Empowerment. International Journal of Business Economics and Business Research 2.11, 125-130
Rutherford, Stuart, (2002) Money Talks: Conversations With Poor Households In Bangladesh About Managing Money,” University Of Manchester Institute For Development Policy And Management, Finance AndDevelopment Research Programme Paper 45.
Sarma, Sri Gunindra Nath (Oct 2012) Constraints of Women's Empowerment through Self-Help Groups: A Case Study in Lakhimpur District of Assam.International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research 3.10: 13-24.
Satish, P., (July-Sept., 2001) Some Issues In the Formation of SHG's. Indian Journal Of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 56 (3).
Sheel, Ranjana, Krishna, Sangeeta (Jul 2002)Towards Women's Empowerment Role of Self Help Groups and Micro-Credit. Philosophy and Social Action28.3, 23-39
Sivakumar Venkataramany, Balbir B. Bhasin , (Nov 2009) Path to Financial Inclusion: The Success of Self-Help-Groups- Bank Linkage Program
Thakral, Shefali Verma, Uppal Nitima, Chawla Esha (Dec 2010) Empowerment of Women through Micro Finance: A Boon for Development of Economy. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management 1.8: 146-150.
Tripathy, Umakanta, Padhi,Pragnya Laxmi (Dec 2011) Socio-economic Conditions of Self-Help Groups: A Study on Litimunda Village of Sambalpur District. International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research 2.12: 90-111.
V Savitha, Rajashekhar H (Apr 2012) Role of Self Help Groups on the Development of Women Entrepreneurs--A Study of Mysore District, Karnataka State. International Journal of Research in commerce and Management 3.4: 77-80
Vikas Batra , (March 2012) Management and Governance of Self Help Groups in Rural Areas: A study of Microfinance Programmes in Haryana,IJMRS vol.01, Issue 01