Pacific B usiness R eview I nternational

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management Indexed With THOMSON REUTERS(ESCI)
ISSN: 0974-438X
Imapct factor (SJIF): 6.56
RNI No.:RAJENG/2016/70346
Postal Reg. No.: RJ/UD/29-136/2017-2019
Editorial Board

Prof. B. P. Sharma
(Editor in Chief)

Dr. Khushbu Agarwal
(Editor)

Ms. Asha Galundia
(Circulation Manager)

Editorial Team

Mr. Ramesh Modi

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management

Socio- Economic Empowerment of Women through Self Help Groups: An Empirical Analysis.

Dr. Meenu Maheshwari

Assistant Professor

Former Head Assistant Prof Commerce

Aggarwal College Ballbhgarh

Contact No.- +919891015464

Email: drmeenumaheshwari@gmail.com

Mrs. Shobhna Goyal

Research Scholar

Department Of Commerce And Management University of Kota,Kota

Email:shobhna2002@gmail.com

Abstract

Women emancipation and Inclusive growth have grabbed the attention of developmental economists the world over and has been on a priority in order to alleviate poverty and reaching to the most disadvantaged section of the society through formal financial institutions. For this dual objective microfinance interventions have been suggested as a measure. As through microfinance the landless labourers, marginal farmers and women can be roped in the formal financial system which has been a neglected area by the commercial banks as they are reluctant to tap this area due to high transaction costs and unassessibility. This paper attempts to explore one such microfinance intervention in the name of Self Help groups in Mewat district of Haryana and the role of SHGs in the socio-economic upliftment of women in this area which is known for the intense backwardness and the lowest female literacy rate. SHGs have been successful mainly in giving them a voice in their family, Govt. Offices and in the society against evils and violence and in making them financially independent up to some extent still there is a lot needed to achieve women emancipation. The paper will come up with some recommendations for the effective and efficient implementation of this microfinance intervention.

Keywords: words: Microfinance, SHG, Women Emancipation

Introduction

Women empowerment and rural development has been the focus of almost all developmental policies of the Government. With the rural development nation’s development is consequential as per National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development(NABARD), which is very true for a country like India whose 70% population resides in 6,38,345 villages. India has over a quarter of its population below poverty line. The World Bank reports that India is still home to some 260 to 290 million poor, numbers that rise to 390 million if poverty is measured by the international standard of those living on less than US$1 a day. It is estimated that approximately 2.5 billion people around the world live in poverty and India is a home to 1/3 of world’s poor. Families living in poverty struggle to afford adequate meals, clean water or basic education. Almost half of India’s poor approximately 133 million are concentrated in 3 states namely Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh. Rural areas in India are home to ¾ of India’s poor which is strengthened by the increasing urban/rural disparities. Though many central and state Government poverty alleviation programs are currently active in India with a strategy focus on Infrastructure, Social Development (especially education and health) and rural livelihoods. But the poor access to credit markets and formal banking system has been identified as a root cause of poverty amongst the rural poor and the most disadvantaged section of the society. The credit needs of the rural masses in general and rural poor in particular are met via rural financial markets consisting commission agents, Moneylenders and landlords etc. However formal financial institutions have a low penetration due to poor infrastructure, low profitability and higher degree of risk. At this juncture Microfinance has been proposed as a possible solution for the maximum outreach and alleviation of poverty in the rural poor especially the disadvantageous sections of the society namely women, small and marginal farmers, and landless farmers. Micro financing is regarded as a tool for Socio-Economic benefit in a developing country like India. Micro finance as a means of poverty alleviation can give loans to poor individuals without sacrificing financial viability. Sivakumar Venkataramany, Balbir B. Bhasin (2009) focused on the success of the linkage between commercial banks and SHGs. The SHGs comprising predominantly women groups help in the social cause of alleviation of poverty, increased sustainability, reduction of vulnerability, improvement of capacity building and helping the weaker sections in building assets. India is the world’s 10th largest economy with Gross Domestic Product in 2012 of $1.824 trillion as reported by World Bank. The country’s growth is also strong, with real Gross Domestic Product growing in by 3.986% in 2012. Microfinance is one of the developmental approach that can contribute to achieve the National and International goal of improving the livelihoods of poor people. Nobel Laureate Mohammad Yunus is credited with laying the foundation of the modern Micro Finance Institutions with establishment of “Grameen Bank”, Bangladesh is 1976. Today it has evolved into a big industry exhibiting a variety of business models. Achieving balanced and inclusive growth is a key challenge faced by policymakers the world over. It was observed by Prasanthi, P Padma, A. (2010) that today microfinance through SHGs has become an integral part of all development programmes. The benefits of economic growth are accessible to relatively advantaged sections of the society who find it easier to participate in the growth process and the disadvantaged section has to wait much longer to reap the benefits of economic growth. Engaging these sections of the society in the economic mainstream is essential to achieve balanced growth for which access to formal financial services is a must.

Current Status of Micro Finance in India

Micro Finance originated in India in 1969 with the nationalization of banks to see that 1% of the profits of these banks goes to the poor towards their micro enterprises. The then Prime Minister Smt. Indira Gandhi envisioned it to facilitate her 20 point programme to fight poverty among the poor and she called it “Garibi Hatao”. The Micro Finance initiative in private sector in India can be traced to the initiative undertaken by Shri Mahila SEWA (self employed women’s association) Sahakari Bank set up in 1974 by registering as an urban co-operative Bank at Ahmedabad city of Gujarat State. The main aim of the SEWA Bank was to provide banking services to the poor women employed in the unorganised sector. The initiatives of NABARD in 1992 in partnership with NGOs for promoting and extending financial services through SHGs has now blossomed into a “monolith” micro finance initiative. It has been recognised as a decentralized, cost effective and fastest growing micro finance intervention in the world enabling over 103 poor households access to a variety of sustainable financial services from the formal banking system by becoming members of nearly 8 million Self Help Groups. Steady progress of the project led to the mainstream of the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP) in 1996 as a normal banking activity of the banks with widespread acceptance. As per a United Nations (2006) survey of bank managers in Madhya Pradesh revealed a perception that women borrowers were more trustworthy and less of a default risk. This can work as a benchmark for launching new schemes for women empowerment.

Microfinance activities are exercised through various models in India that can be categorised as:

1) SHG Model 2) Grameen Model 3) Co-operative Model 4) For –profit Model

SHG Model is the most popular Model in India amongst the four Models mentioned.

Performance of Microfinance through SHG

Out of the three models, SHG- Bank Linkage Programme (Model 1) emerged as most popular and successful over the years. About 73.41% of the credit linked SHGs (financed 81.12% of total loans) fell under Model-II followed by Model I (20%) as on 31 st March 2007. Only 5.67% of total SHGs fall under the Model III in which NGOs/ MFIs act as financial intermediaries. (RBI 2007- Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India) SHGs work on democracy principles as Dr. Sushil Kumar Mehta et al (2011) had studied that SHGs movement comes from the people’s desire to meet their needs and determine their destines through the principle ‘By the People, For the People and Of the People’

To spread the outreach of Micro Credit, NABARD has taken up intensification of SHG- Bank Linkage Programme in 13 identified priority states which account for 70% of the rural poor population viz. U.P. Maharashtra, Orissa, West Bengal, MP, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Bihar, UK, Assam and Himachal Pradesh. The programme has now assumed the form of a Micro-Finance Movement in many parts of the country and has started making inroads in the resource poor regions of the country as well. As pointed out by Rutherford (1996) that provision of financial services to poor people need not only be for increasing income, empowering women, or starting business it may simply aim to help them “manage better what little money they already have”.

Research Design

The formal financial institutions in India have not been successful in outreaching to the disadvantaged sections of the society so far. Topography, structural rigidities, high overhead costs in di

Research Designocial infrastructure means community based organizations can be used as a harbinger for successful implementation of the developmental plans and thereby attaining the Milleinium Goals. Few corporates like HUL, Colgate, CEMEX has already tried community based organizations as members of their distribution channel in order to have deep penetration in the emerging Rural Markets the same model can be replicated for the promotion of social and economic welfare schemes launched by the government from time to time. Organisation of Self Help Groups is a move in this direction which motivates small farmers, artisans and entrepreneurs (Especially Women) to come together and pool their small savings to make it a large corpus for individual and group help. P. K. Singh (2001) observed a positive impact on assets value and annual income. In the Southern India SHG scheme has a widespread and has been successful in uplifting the social and economic status of women by creating awareness among the members. It has enabled women to live a healthy, hygienic and respectful life and they have learnt to participate in family decision making matter concerning to education of children, marriage, family planning, and management of economic assets of the family.

The present study is undertaken to study the performance of SHGs in Mewat district of Haryana in India. The performance has been linked with the group profile variables like age of the group, literacy level of the leader, etc.

Objectives of the Study

· To explore the extent of Self Help Groups in the sample area

· To evaluate the performance of SHGs

· To analyse the impact of SHGs on women emancipation.

Area of the Study

At the time of its formation on 1st November, 1966, Haryana State had 7 districts. Thereafter 13 new districts were notified from time to time by changing the boundaries of the existing districts. The Mewat district was carved out from Gurgaon and Faridabad districts, which came into existence on 4th April 2005 as the 20th district of the State. The district headquarter is located at Nuh. The district comprises of five blocks namely Nuh,Taaru, Nagina, Firozpur Jhirka and Punhana. Sample respondents have been selected from three blocks of district Mewat namely Nuh, Firozpur Jhirka and Punhana. Mewat is known to be a backward district in Haryana with a low female literacy rate but a high sex ratio. A sample of 304 group leaders from these three blocks were selected by simple random sampling.

Demography of sample district

S.N. Item Sex Total Rural Urban
1 Total area (Sq. Kilometers) 1507 1441.71 65.29
2 Total Households 160280 139975 20305
3 Population 1089263 965157 124106
Male 571162 506086 65076
Female 518101 459071 59030
4 Population (Age 0-6) 248128 225069 23059
Male 130168 117967 12201
Female 117960 107102 10858
5 SC Population 75251 57238 18013
Male 39743 30312 9431
Female 35508 26926 8582
6 Literate 454897 384749 70148
Male 308435 266086 42349
Female 146462 118663 27799
7 Total Workers 289964 258721 31243
Male 224642 197097 27545
Female 65322 61624 3698
8 Total Main Workers 204178 179382 24796
Male 175670 153188 22482
Female 28508 26194 2314
Cultivators 81608 79292 2316
Male 69305 67213 2092
Female 12303 12079 224
Agriculture Labourers 25426 24204 1222
Male 20337 19215 1122
Female 5089 4989 100
Households Industry Workers 4034 3251 783
Male 2938 2277 661
Female 1096 974 122
Other Workers 93110 72635 20475
Male 83090 64483 18607
Female 10020 8152 1868
9 Marginal Workers 85786 79339 6447
Male 48972 43909 5063
Female 36814 35430 1384
Cultivators 22629 22144 485
Male 7714 7472 242
Female 14915 14672 243
Agriculture Labourers 29852 28617 1235
Male 15923 15005 918
Female 13929 13612 317
Household Industry Workers 1989 1763 226
Male 903 764 139
Female 1086 999 87
Other Workers 31316 26815 4501
Male 24432 20668 3764
Female 6884 6147 737
10 Non Workers 799299 706436 92863
Male 346520 308989 37531
Female 452779 397447 55332
11 Sex Ratio (Female per 1000 males) 906 907 903
12 Literacy 56.10: (Male-73.00%, Female-37.60%)
13 Blocks Nuh, F.P. Jhirka, Taoru, Nagina and Punhana
14 Tehsil Nuh, F.P. Jhirka, Punhana and Taoru
15 Sub Tehsil Nagina
16 Sub Division Nuh and F.P. Jhirka

source : haryanaguv.in

Methodology

The present study is an empirical one to analyse the performance and impact of SHGs on women emancipation. A structured questionnaire was developed for the primary data collection. Simple percentage and cumulative percentage method has been used to analyse the primary data collected out of 304 group leaders of Self Help Groups. However secondary data sources have also been used to have a deep understanding of the topic. Official websites of Haryana Government, Mewat development Agency and NABARD have been referred to for secondary data.

Limitations

The report has been prepared on the basis of information available from the sample members and the secondary data. One of the biggest limitation of secondary data was that it was not updated, many of the Self Help Groups now have become non functional which are still shown on records. So locating the functional Self Help Groups was a problem during survey. Data of some particular months of some years were found missing which posed a problem in compiling secondary data tables. V. Batra (2012) covered 90 SHGs over the 3 sample districts in Haryana and identified the problems concerning management and governance of SHGs like irregularity in meetings, low level of skills and knowledge, absence of larger goals and lack of training. There are problems on part of banks for being unable to understand and accommodate the needs of SHGs in Haryana. To empower women and to reduce vulnerability literacy is very important.

Consolidated S.H.G. Financial information as on 31-03-2014

PARTICULAR SMVS SMVS EMVS NKMVS NRMVS JMVS MDA
F.P.Jhirka Punhana NUH TAURU NAGINA HATHIN
Total No. of Village 82 85 108 81 67 82 505
Village Covered 82 85 64 81 67 82 461
Total No of SHGs 372 354 340 383 417 347 2213
Total Members 4419 3930 4171 4603 5421 4121 26665
Total Saving 22840354 20029510 25629950 30590483 28137203 19865480 147092980
Amount of Loan issued 50114900 112831100 135408800 168801577 152720649 68526500 688403526
No. of Loans 3794 9159 8390 8385 11770 7841 49339
No.of SHGs issued Loans 267 325 247 338 418 289 1884
Amount Repaid 31044730 83918915 17905966 121128599 127703349 57425634 439127193
Interest collected 4362152 9341469 10220811 13627359 10353098 1443521 49348410
Credit from Bank 11954000 26270500 41890500 58561500 43195400 10245435 192117335
No. of Benifited SHGs 355 420 319 274 406 148 1922
MDA Matching Grant 2267265 2872850 1594384 1689581 1713088 2310829 12447997
No. of Benifited SHGs 204 422 204 215 224 305 1574
GDF 2168484 2727200 1279800 1630100 1759400 2100000 11664984
No. of Benifited SHGs 336 422 252 302 368 388 2068
NMDFC Loan Amounts 10485000 105300000 15255000 10935000 13903500 4360500 160239000
No of Benifited SHGs 55 66 91 63 69 23 367
No. of Loans to members 432 394 618 394 508 201 2547

Source: MDA, march 2014

It is evident from the above table that there is good spread of SHGs in the sample area. Total saving corpus is Rs. 147092980. Amount of loan issued is Rs.688403526 out of which Rs. 439127193 has been repaid i. e. repayment rate is 64%


CONSOLIDATED SHG INFORMATION AS ON 31-03-2014

Sr.No. Particular Unit Achi. Achievement Achievement
Withdrawl SHG Running SHG Cumulative- MDA
1 Total No. of Village No. 505 505
2 Covered Village No. 461 461
3 Total No of SHGs No. 1813 2213 4026
4 Total Members Person 25195 26665 51860
5 Total Saving Rs. In Crore 6.56 14.7 21.26
6 Amount of Loan issued Rs. In Crore 24.44 68.84 93.28
7 No. of Loans to Members No. 24027 49339 73366
8 No. of SHGs issude Loans No. 1484 1884 3368
9 Amount Repaid Rs. In Crore 21.53 43.91 65.44
10 Interest Collected Rs. In Crore 3.67 4.93 8.6
11 Credit from Bank Rs. In Crore 4.35 19.21 23.56
12 No. of Benifited SHGs No. 1164 1922 3086
13 MDA Matching Grant Rs. In Crore 1.24 1.24
14 No. of Benifited SHGs No. 1574 1574
15 GDF Rs.. In Crore 1.16 1.16
16 No. of Benifited SHGs No. 2068 2068
17 NMDFC Loan Amount Rs.In Crore 16.02 16.02
18 No. of Benifited SHGs No. 367 367
19 No. of Loans to Members No. 2547 2547

Source: MDA, March 2014

It is clear from the table that nearly 45% of the SHGs had withdrawn so the amount withdrawn is 30%. 62% of the total SHGs 62% received the benefits.


CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION ABOUT SHGs LOANS AS ON 31-03-2014

Particular SMVS,Punhna SMVS, F.PJhirka JMVS, Hathin NRMVS, Nagina NKMVS, Tauru EMVS, Nuh MDA,Cummulative
Loan Amount Loan Amount Loan Amount Loan Amount Loan Amount Loan Amount Loan Amount
Buffalo 1978 25795850 921 14185500 3867 41805625 3974 66688401 2267 52272455 1785 47217152 14792 247964983
Sheep/Goat 207 1206300 112 1904750 92 280421 528 3127058 98 726550 370 2425980 1407 9671059
House Repair 545 6635550 117 1330300 445 4025484 399 5351650 568 14154845 722 11769960 2796 43267789
Purchasing Land 113 2707800 81 2313500 25 202531 133 2493000 47 1026300 131 997320 530 9740451
Paying loans 365 3620200 115 766500 131 1365500 204 2217800 192 2414600 324 3833160 1331 14217760
Petty Shop/Busin 2292 36600350 964 16181700 512 5061764 2074 31102600 1306 37269200 1598 35364580 8746 161580194
Education 30 491500 91 1256250 238 1167926 59 638100 96 1833250 178 1390420 692 6777446
Medicine 185 1042600 122 796650 314 2195351 156 829900 212 4335600 324 3013720 1313 12213821
Fooder 83 445000 105 925350 461 1860900 285 2103800 270 2679447 525 3363520 1729 11378017
Marriage 663 10482550 204 2700000 261 2730450 464 6860500 567 14390800 572 8089880 2731 45254180
Consumption 1473 7050450 307 1471450 913 4118436 2486 13390570 2323 29529540 641 3852600 8143 59413046
Agriculture 436 4204550 398 2661950 481 3307570 642 9519960 205 3326350 421 8112480 2583 31132860
Mudha Making 42 414000 3 22500 0 0 3 25000 1 2500 84 250240 133 714240
Flour mill 26 246500 35 791000 0 0 12 229000 12 323440 109 471360 194 2061300
Shoe Making 107 1034000 10 18500 4 7600 29 148200 34 276500 17 68000 201 1552800
Cycle-Ricshaw 38 354000 17 45250 8 43200 55 633400 57 1431000 93 284240 268 2791090
Sewing Machine 85 606300 42 293250 0 0 17 264700 20 243900 87 316132 251 1724282
Camel Cart 81 824100 11 222000 18 22742 38 615300 9 140000 16 262000 173 2086142
Milk Purchasing 146 3016000 55 1295500 59 90250 49 725500 13 468000 105 1135600 427 6730850
Festival 1 2000 5 45500 0 0 0 0 34 256800 146 1043256 186 1347556
Diesel Engine 81 1908500 40 312750 4 137500 121 4872000 30 1165500 50 917240 326 9313490
FooderCutt.Mechine 1 30000 4 22500 0 0 3 77000 5 37000 16 152320 29 318820
Pigery 4 47000 0 0 0 0 15 23710 0 0 14 214880 33 285590
Poultry Farm 35 735500 18 423000 8 103250 18 722500 6 208000 21 350200 106 2542450
Diesel Eng.Rep. 98 1612000 16 108750 0 0 6 61000 11 163000 3 99800 134 2044550
Fisheries 16 349500 1 20500 0 0 0 0 2 127000 38 412760 57 909760
Cop. Job 0 0 0 0
Sanitation 6 77000 6 77000
Bakery 6 300000 6 300000
Comp. Job 1 10000 1 10000
Vechile Purchase 2 500000 2 500000
Tent 1 100000 1 100000
Hand Fan 11 282000 11 282000
Marval Machine 1 100000 1 100000
Total 9159 112831100 3794 50114900 7841 68526500 11770 152720649 8385 168801577 8390 135408800 49339 688403526

Source: MDA


Demographic profile of sample respondents:

Table -1: Religion wise distribution of sample members

Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Hindu 231 76.0 76.0
Muslim 71 23.4 99.4
Meo 2 0.6 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source : Primary Data

It shows that majority of the sample members are hindus i.e. 76% and 23.4% are muslim and a mere .7% are meos. The results are quite surprising in a sense that despite of a Meos dominant region they are not indulged in saving-lending activities.

Table 2: Caste wise distribution of sample members

Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid SC 39 12.8 12.8
ST 27 8.9 21.7
OBC 94 30.9 52.6
BC 55 18.1 70.7
GEN 61 20.1 90.8
Meo 28 9.2 100
.
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

In the region almost all categories exist and woman belonging to any community can become a member. However majority of them belong to OBC category i.e.30.9%.

Table 3: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of tenure of SHGs

Tenure
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid <12 months 29 9.5 9.5
12-24 mojths 53 17.4 27.0
24-36 months 89 29.3 56.3
> 36 months 133 43.8 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

It was observed during survey that 43.8% groups are more than 3 years old and 29.3% are 2 to 3 years old. However new formation of groups is disappointing which indicates that to keep the scheme alive Government should encourage women to open SHGs.

Table-4: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of educational qualification of Leader

Educational Qualification of the leader
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Illiterate 2 .7 .7
Primary 123 40.5 41.1
Middle 83 27.3 68.4
H.Sc and above 96 31.6 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

Most of the group leaders were observed to be literate but poorly i.e. 40.5% of them are literate upto primary level 31.6% are Higher secondary passed. Qualification of the group leader plays an important role in formation as well as in functioning of the group.

Table 5: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of size of the group

Size of the group
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid < 12 members 190 62.5 62.5
12-15 members 110 36.2 98.7
> 15 member 4 1.3 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

Majority of the SHG s were having 10 to 11 members that means a moderate size is supposed to be the best practice in the sample area. Only 1.3% of the total sample were found to be having more than 15 members. The result are different as compared to the prescribed limit of membership is 10-20 member by NABARD.

It was also found that 16.8% of total groups have a sole purpose of SHG formation as to increase their income which is supposed to be the most justifiable purpose of this scheme. Secondly 16.4% groups have been formed to start entrepreneurial activity in the form of shops and dairy mainly. Both purposes are complementing each other i.e. increasing income by setting up some enterprise. Formation of groups to promote savings took third place i.e. 11.3% and to uplift the social status of the members is also a purpose to form SHGs. The results are satisfactory in a sense that these have been designated as the primary objectives to initiate this scheme.

Table6: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of group meetings held

Frequency of SHG Meetings
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Once in a week 122 40.1 40.1
once in a month 181 59.5 99.7
twice in a month 1 .3 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

As per the guidelines group leader has to organise group meetings to discuss various issues and collection of mandatory monthly savings and disbursement of credit at least once a month. 59. 5 % groups are following the norms of holding the meeting once a month and 40% groups are even holding meetings once in a week which is quite interesting to know as more and more meetings give women a confidence to speak and share her problems with other members which they were unable to before becoming members of SHG i.e. SHG ( women collectives) give them a voice. Increased self confidence and communication are strong indicators of social upliftment.

Table 7: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of regularity of meetings

Regularity of meetings in last 6 months
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 100% meeting held 202 66.4 66.4
75-99% meetings held 102 33.6 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

SHGs were found to be regular in holding meeting at least once in a month. 66.4% groups held 100% meetings and 33.6% of the groups were also found to hold more than 75% of the mandatory meetings. Regularity in meetings is a most desirable feature of a Self Help Group to have a congenial group working and cohesion.

Table 8: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of attendance at meetings

Attendance at meeting
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid >90 % 270 88.8 88.8
75-89% 34 11.2 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

The results are encouraging. Majority of the groups record more than 90% attendance which shows that women want to get together to discuss problems of their own and of others and possibly came out with solutions. 88.8% of the sample groups have recorded more than 90% attendance and minimum attendance recorded is also not disappointing it is still not less than 75%.

Table 9: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of member participation in decision making

Participation of members in decision making
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid >75% members participate 162 53.3 53.3
55-75% member participate 142 46.7 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

It is evident from the above table that SHGs have a positive social impact on women as most of them started participating in decision making which was earlier supposed to be male domain. SHGs have helped in women emancipation. In 53.3% cases more than 75% of the group members participate in decision making when it comes to credit disbursements, getting together for a social cause, or solving some individual problem with the group efforts.

Table 10: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of training program conducted

Whether any training program conducted for SHG
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Yes 5 1.6 1.3
No 299 98.4 100.0
Total 304 100

Source: Primary Data

The response is disheartening as Government has not spent much on training programmes in this area although it was found during survey that women are keenly interested in taking up some work but the two main issues what to make and where to market? 98.4% of the respondents said the no training was ever given to them whereas a mere 1.6% said they attended 1-2 days training about formation of SHGs and account opening and keeping minutes of meetings which again was not to undertake any entrepreneurial activity.

Table 11: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of regularity of savings

Regularity in Savings
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
0 1 .3 .3
100% 303 99.7 100.0
Total 304 100

Source: Primary Data

Members were found to be very regular about their savings with the group. 99.7% of the respondents were found regular in depositing their monthly savings on the meeting day. This has resulted in a big group corpus with the banks and some groups even need not to take any loan from the bank. Most of the groups were found to be in no loan category in the sample area.

Table 12: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of set of rules and regulations

Do the group has a set of Rules and Regulations
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
0 42 13.8 13.8
Yes 262 86.2 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

86.2% of the respondents replied that they had group norms in the form of rules and regulations which comprise of attending group meetings at least once in a month, repayment of the credit allocated to avoid heavy rate of interest and priority based lending out of group corpus.

Table 13: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of existence of rules

Rules are in existence only
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Yes 2 .7 .7
No 302 99.3 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

Majority of the respondents said that rules are not just existent but are followed as well. Each and every member follows the group rules and regulations not by force but by their choice. They know it is an effort of the members, for the members and by the members.

Table 14: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of implementation of rules

Rules have been implemented as well
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Yes 304 100.0 100.0 100.0

Source: Primary Data

It is evident from the above table that rules are not just framed they are implemented as well for the smooth functioning of the group. The results are 100%.

Table 15: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of election of office beares

Do you conduct periodic elections for the office
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Election conducted once a year 151 49.7 49.7
Once in two years 9 3.0 52.6
Beyond two year 88 28.9 81.6
Never held 56 18.4 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

49.7% of the groups hold election once in a year to elect office beares namely the group leader and treasurer. 28.9% groups do not change their leaders every year and 18.4% of the groups never held elections rather their office bearers are unanimously chosen.

Table 16: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of books of accounts maintained

Are the books of accounts and documents maintained
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Cash book 1 .3 .3
Cash book and Ledger 128 42.1 42.4
cash Book and Member Passbook 175 57.6 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

57.6% of the groups maintain journal and bank pass book for recording savings , disbursements and interest. 42.1% maintains journal and cash book. Overall each and every group maintains at least two books of records which is a healthy practice.

Table 17: Distribution of SHGs on the basis of status of recording in these books

Mention the status of recording in these book
Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent
Up to date and correct recording 277 91.1 91.1
Up to date but incorrect recording 27 8.9 100.0
Total 304 100.0

Source: Primary Data

It was found that 91.1% groups have up to date and correct recording in the books maintained by the group. This correlates the fact that at least some of the group members are literate enough to enter the transactions correctly and preparing the minutes of the meetings. It was also explored that even if no member is capable of recording then any educated child of any member of the group can be asked for doing this work which shows the group is specific about recording and updating the transactions.

Conclusion and Recommendations

The research on Microfinance and women empowerment depicts that SHG based micro finance has contributed as a catalyst of the social change and empowerment of poor is proved to be a boon for the rural women in some states of India. Moreover it has created opportunities for promotion of income generating activities and have enabled them to come above poverty line. There is a geographic/Regional concentration of the SHG concept which needs to be scattered across the nation as poverty has a global concern. Poor people’s access to formal banking system would act as a key to economic growth and sustainable development. It is evident that SHGs have touched the lives of rural women in all respects whether it is social, economic or personal thereby contributing effectively in women emancipation. SHGs are seen to confer many social and economic benefits which can be community platforms for women to become active in village affairs, stand for local election or take action to address social and community issues like – abuse of women, alcohol, the dowry system, the schools and water supply (Umakanata; Padhi, Pragnya Laxmi (2011) of late the women have started recognising their immense potential and have learnt that self dependence is the best form dependence. Joining a Self Help Group has given them enough confidence to speak, to come forward to be a part in family decision making which is supposedly a male domain, assessing the banks for loans and discussing with the managers without taking their husbands along (in the sample district women were seen discussing gold loan provisions with the Bank manager and that too without their husbands accompanying them) which is indeed an indicator of upgradation of self confidence which can be attributed to Self Help Groups. Aloysisus P. Fernandez (2007) (MYRADA) observed that SHGs are not only an instrument for the empowerment of poor and marginalized sectors but they have proved to be an effective instrument for changing oppressive relationships in the home and in the society. As far as the performance of SHGs is concerned the results are very much encouraging in almost all respects except the training part which needs government’s attention as out of total expenditure from the allocated fund nothing has been spent on marketing and very less on imparting training. In Haryana out of 8308 swarozgaris 6150 i.e. 74.02% are engaged in primary sector and only 25.98% are engaged in secondary sector like village industry, handicrafts, Handloom etc. There is a need to make SHG movement more entrepreneurial. SHG members can be roped in as a member of distribution channel by the corporate in order to have deep penetration in the rural market in a cost effective manner without inventory piling up. This would be a two way strategy of empowering rural women and having a better outreach. Some of the insurance companies are also now targeting Self Help Groups to sell their insurance products in rural markets. So in near future association with the Self Help Groups will help rural women to (2007) (MYRADA) observed that SHGs are not only an instrument for the empowerment of poor and marginalized sectors but they have proved to be an effective instrument for changing oppressive relationships in the home and in the society. As far as the performance of SHGs is concerned the results are very much encouraging in almost all respects except the training part which needs government’s attention as out of total expenditure from the allocated fund nothing has been spent on marketing and very less on imparting training. In Haryana out of 8308 swarozgaris 6150 i.e. 74.02% are engaged in primary sector and only 25.98% are engaged in secondary sector like village industry, handicrafts, Handloom etc. There is a need to make SHG movement more entrepreneurial. SHG members can be roped in as a member of distribution channel by the corporate in order to have deep penetration in the rural market in a cost effective manner without inventory piling up. This would be a two way strategy of empowering rural women and having a better outreach. Some of the insurance companies are also now targeting Self Help Groups to sell their insurance products in rural markets. So in near future association with the Self Help Groups will help rural women to have avenues for larger incomes apart from the saving lending mechanism which will benefit their families and society as a whole in terms of better and respectable living.

Reference

Entrepreneurship among Women? Microfinance and Microentrepreneurship First Edition, Vista International Publishing House, 204-209.

Minakshi Ramji , (26 January 2009) ”Financial Inclusion in Gulbarga: Finding Usage in Access”, Working Paper Series no.

MYRADA , (July 2007) Occassional Papers, “History and Spread of the self help affinity group movement in India”.

Painoli,Girish Kumar, Losarwar, Sunil G (Nov2011) Paper Presentation on Self Help Groups and Women Empowerment. International Journal of Business Economics and Business Research 2.11, 125-130

Rutherford, Stuart, (2002) Money Talks: Conversations With Poor Households In Bangladesh About Managing Money,” University Of Manchester Institute For Development Policy And Management, Finance AndDevelopment Research Programme Paper 45.

Sarma, Sri Gunindra Nath (Oct 2012) Constraints of Women's Empowerment through Self-Help Groups: A Case Study in Lakhimpur District of Assam.International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research 3.10: 13-24.

Satish, P., (July-Sept., 2001) Some Issues In the Formation of SHG's. Indian Journal Of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 56 (3).

Sheel, Ranjana, Krishna, Sangeeta (Jul 2002)Towards Women's Empowerment Role of Self Help Groups and Micro-Credit. Philosophy and Social Action28.3, 23-39

Sivakumar Venkataramany, Balbir B. Bhasin , (Nov 2009) Path to Financial Inclusion: The Success of Self-Help-Groups- Bank Linkage Program

Thakral, Shefali Verma, Uppal Nitima, Chawla Esha (Dec 2010) Empowerment of Women through Micro Finance: A Boon for Development of Economy. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management 1.8: 146-150.

Tripathy, Umakanta, Padhi,Pragnya Laxmi (Dec 2011) Socio-economic Conditions of Self-Help Groups: A Study on Litimunda Village of Sambalpur District. International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research 2.12: 90-111.

V Savitha, Rajashekhar H (Apr 2012) Role of Self Help Groups on the Development of Women Entrepreneurs--A Study of Mysore District, Karnataka State. International Journal of Research in commerce and Management 3.4: 77-80

Vikas Batra , (March 2012) Management and Governance of Self Help Groups in Rural Areas: A study of Microfinance Programmes in Haryana,IJMRS vol.01, Issue 01

www.mda.in

www.nabard.in

www.nirc.in

www.haryanaguv.in