ISSN: 0974-438X
Imapct factor(SJIF): 5.889

Home | About Us| Invitation For Manuscript| Review Process| Indexing| Subscription | Disclaimer

 

 

PBRI is now indexed in ESCI by THOMSON REUTERS. Pacific Business Review International is included in the UGC List of Recommended Journals (D.O. No. F. 1-1/2016 (PS) Amendment dated 10th January 2017) (S.No. 36785).

 
Editorial Board A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management
Prof. B. P. Sharma
(Editor in Chief)
Prof. Mahima Birla
(Group Editor)
Dr. Khushbu Agarwal
(Editor)
Ms. Asha Galundia
(Circulation Manager)

 Editorial Team

Dr. Devendra Shrimali
Dr. Dharmesh Motwani
Mr. Jinendra Vyas
 

Cover Page for Research Paper

 

Title of Paper

:

An Examination of the Relationship Among Store Image Attributes, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Behaviour

 

Paper Type

:

Research Paper

Author Name

:

Dr. Pankaj Kumar1

Designation

:

1Assistant Professor

Affiliation

:

1Department of Management Studies, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science & Technology. Murthal, Sonipat, Haryana. India

 

E-mail

:

pankaj3950@yahoo.co.in

Phone No.

:

+91 9911593376

 

 

I Pankaj Kumar, the author of this paper certified that the material is not published, copyrighted, accepted or under review elsewhere.

 

 

(Dr. Pankaj Kumar)

 

An Examination of the Relationship Among Store Image Attributes Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Behaviour

 

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine the significance relationship among store image attributes, consumer satisfaction, behavioral response and intentions. A structured questionnaire was successfully distributed to 600 respondents, who had made purchases from sixty retail formats operated in Delhi and Gurugram belonging to the domain of Shopping Malls, Hypermarket, Supermarket, Department Stores, Discount stores and Category Killers through systematic stratified sampling for the collection of data. Factor analysis was used to determine how many factors related to dimensions of store image as perceived by customers towards retail formats were being measured by the instrument. Correlation analysis was employed to examine the significance relationship among store image attributes, customer satisfaction, behavioral response and intentions. The results of the study are concluded that customer satisfaction is significantly associated with the entire fourteen facets store image, whereas word-of-mouth communication, intention to switch, and customers’ loyalty intention are partially significant with store image attributes, furthermore word-of-mouth communication, intention to switch, and customers’ loyalty intention are also significantlycorrelated with customers’ satisfaction.

 

Keywords:Retail store, Store Image, Customer Satisfaction, behavioral Intention,            

Loyalty Intention

 

Paper Type: Research paper

_____________________________________________________________

 

  1. Introduction

With the changing behaviour of Indian customers due to favorable demography, higher disposable income of middle-class consumers, increasing number of working women, easier consumer credit with low interest rates, high brand consciousness, rising internet penetration, aggressive marketing by companies and change in consumption pattern with high aspiration levels allowing them to spend more on new products and brands have also changed the growth scenario of retail sector in India, furthermore India as a developing economy has availability of resources, ease access to credit, rapid real estate infrastructural development, political stability, and safe environment for investment is the growing key drivers of retail sector. In the year 2013, the Indian retail sector was estimated at USD 520 billion with largest employees in the country and by 2018, the sector is likely to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13 per cent to reach a size of USD 950 billion (PwC research, 2014). But on the other side margin of retailers have started to decrease due to dynamic market structure and world-wide stiff competition, therefore, store image, customer satisfaction and subsequently store loyalty have gained great importance in the retail stores setting, which aim to survive in the competitive market. The concept of store image has an important role on the success of retailing organisation, because it’s not only create true image of store which leads to sales and profitability of retailers, but also significantly influence customer’s preference towards store, customers’ satisfaction with the store (Theodoris and Chatzipanagiotu, 2009), and store loyalty (Bloemer and Ruyter, 1998; Bloemer and Odekerken-Schroder, 2002), moreover customer satisfaction, which has been considered by many firms to be a powerful intangible asset for competitive advantage in the global arena (Ueltschy et al., 2009) and loyal consumers offer a steady streamof revenue to firm by remaining loyal and rejecting competitor offerings (Rauyruen and Miller, 2007). Therefore retail organisations work hard to build the positive store image of its goods and services through huge spending on advertisements and sales attempts. After the reviewing of existing literature, it is found that most of the studies on retail sector are reported from developed countries and no studies were identified to examine the relationship among store image attributes, customer satisfaction and loyalty behaviour collectively in the context of retail store setting in India. Thus, the validity of theories and previous findings on customer satisfaction and loyalty behaviour needs to be tested in different economy and socio cultural environment in order to assess their universal applicability, so the present study aims to fill this gap and the findings of this study will be of interest with existing and would-be multinational and domestic retailers of organised retail sector in India.

  1. Review of Literature

This research explores the relationship among three major constructs namely store image, customer satisfaction and loyalty behaviour towards retail store formats. The major past research on these constructs are reviewed below.

Store image has been recognised firstly by Martineau (1958), defined store image as the personality of retail store composed of psychologicalandfunctional attributes and retail store image is represented by a multi-attribute construct (James et al., 1976; Marks, 1976). Store image can be considered as customers’ overall perception towards a store based on the tangible and intangible stores’ features (Osman, 1993; Faircloth et al., 2001; Jin and Kim, 2003).Hartman and Spiro (2005) stated store image as result of the impression of the whole perceived and expected experience in customers’ memory that gained currently or in the past. Yoo and Chang (2005) categorize the most important store image attributes which are concluded through many researches are product (quality, price, and diversity), store atmosphere, store facilities, store service (sales personnel service and loan service), store brand, facilities (ease of shopping, transportation) and promotion.Customer satisfaction is a function of the difference between a customer’s expectations prior to purchase and their perception of the same product and service after purchase (Oliver, 1977; Anderson and Sullivan, 1993). Literature confirms that customersatisfactionhasthreestages:thepre-salesstagewhenexpectationsareabout theproduct, service, benefits, priceandavailability;thesalesperiodstage whencustomer experiencestheenvironment,theproduct,typeofservice, delivery,qualityandredress frombuying;theafter-salesstage whenthecustomerexpectssupport oradvice, replacementorrefund,repairorusesthecomplaintsprocedures and is one of the tools to increase value for customers (Sivadas and Baker-Prewitt, 2000). Morschett et al. (2005) found that customers satisfaction is affected by physical environment, various service aspects such as cashiers, queues, traffic and trolleys, the moments of contact with personnel and the core offer i.e. product variety, assortment, quality and pricing policy of store.Whilethesatisfiedcustomer may influence otherstobuy,on other side dissatisfied customers may lead complaints,legalactionornegativeword-of-mouthcommunication(Engel et al. 1990).Customer loyalty is a situation where repeat purchase behaviour is accompanied by a psychological bond, repeat purchase intentions and behaviours. Day (1969) defined loyalty as a favourable attitude of a customer towards a brand in addition to purchase it repetitively. Loyal customers are less likely to move to other firms and make more buying as compared to less loyal customers (Baldinger and Rubinson, 1996) and they recommends the product or service to others (Pearson, 1996), moreover loyalty is the combination of intention to repurchase, willingness to pay more and positive word-of-mouth communication (Cronin and Taylor, 1992; Zeithaml et al., 1996; Yoon et al., 2010). Reviewed of extant literature has been found as product range, store ambience, attractive layout, in-store promotion, frequent loyalty programmes, price and convenience are the key drivers of loyalty behaviour (Sirohi et al., 1998; Koo, 2003; Miranda et al., 2005), moreover interactionbetweencustomersandsalespersonscouldhaveastrong impactonretailcustomerloyalty(Darian et al., 2001).The behavioral loyalty includes positive word-of-mouth communication andwillingness to recommend to others (Andreassen andLindestad, 1998; Rauyruen and Miller, 2007), while attitudinal loyalty intention consists repurchase intention,demonstrating resistance to switch to the competitors (Cronin and Taylor, 1992; Prus and Brandt, 1995), and even willingness to pay a price premium (Narayandas, 1996; Zeithaml, Berryand Parasuraman, 1996).

 

  1. Store Image, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Behaviour- A Linkage

Regarding store image attributes and their relationship with customer satisfaction and loyalty behaviour various researches have been done and Demirgunes (2014) explained that product related attributes influence positively to customer satisfaction towards retail store, more extensively product assortment was the single most significant variable affecting the store image, customer satisfaction and choice of retail format across hypermarkets, supermarkets, conventional store and discount stores (Carpenter and Moore, 2006) and apparel stores (Anselmsson, 2006). However physical evidence or facilities (Groeppel-Klein and Germelmann, 2003), promotion factors (Carroll et al.,2007), sales personnel (Darian et al., 2001), and store design & ease factors have been found significant toward store image and customer satisfaction (Turhan, 2014). Price is found most important store image attribute for customers to decide where to shop (Desai and Talukdar, 2003), and price levels of products have been also found to be a significant reason to determine the choice of retail format across different customer groups (Carpenter and Moore, 2006). Naderian (2012) examined the effect of store image attributes on customer satisfaction among Malaysian customers towards 7-Eleven retail stores and found merchandise as most significant attribute influencing customer satisfaction followed by price, personnel and store atmosphere, because 7-Eleven store provides different products at low prices,easy accessibility, valuable information and customer handling than other small and local supermarkets. Thomas (2013) proposed and validated a model linking customer satisfaction, retail store image and loyalty of the customers of supermarket stores in Cochin and confirmed that product quality is most important dimension of store image which influence customer satisfaction closely, followed by store service, price of products, and product assortment in Indian context and store image to impact store loyalty indirectly through the customer satisfaction as mediator role.Watanabe (2013) conducted a study on supermarket customers at Brazil and as result product, personnel, and prices were found significant in relation to customers’ satisfaction, whereas environment and promotions were not significant for the determination of customer satisfaction and reason can be that the half of the sample was from lower class (almost 50 per cent),and low income group attaches low expectations and importance to the dimension environment especially in the case Brazil , where the purchasing power is low compared to developed countries. Roy and Ghosh (2014) developed and validated a scale to investigated the image of apparel store on customer satisfaction and their visit frequency in Indian context and found that factors such as people, merchandize, physical evidence, conviences, promotions and brand strengthen the composition of apparel store image and increase customer satisfaction and patronage by increasing visit frequency.

  1. Conceptual formation

Based on the reviewed of marketing literature on store image attributes, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty behaviour the conceptual framework of this study preliminary consisted of two sections: the first section concerning with the attributes of store image as perceived by the customers, towards various retail formats (Shopping Malls, Hypermarket, Supermarket, Department Stores, Discount stores and Category Killers). In this section store image was categorized in fourteen dimensions namely “merchandise contains three items”, “service contains four items”, “shopping atmosphere contains four items”, “pricing contains four items”, “product innovation contains three items”, “sales personnel competence contains seven items”, “reliability contains six items”, “physical evidence contains eleven items”, “convenience contains four items”, “location contains four items”, “after sale services contains four items”, “product availability contains three items”, “crowding contains two items”, and “peripheral services contains two items”. The second part includes “customers’ satisfaction contains three items” and customer loyalty towards retail formats. In the study customer loyalty was comprised of three aspects: “customers’ behavioral response (word-of-mouth communication) contains three items”, “customers’ intention to switch contains four items and “customers’ loyalty intention contains four items”. This research explores the linkages among three major constructs namely store image, customer satisfaction and loyalty behaviour and main emphasis of the present study is to examine the significance relationship among store image attribute, consumer satisfaction, behavioral response and intentions.

 

  1. Research Methodology

The purpose of the study is to examine the significance relationship among store image attribute, consumer satisfaction, behavioral response and intentions. A structured questionnaire was successfully distributed to 600 respondents, who had made purchases from sixty retail formats operated in Delhi and Gurugram belonging to the domain of Shopping Malls, Hypermarket, Supermarket, Department Stores, Discount stores and Category Killers through systematic stratified sampling for the collection of data, reason being Delhi and Gurugram as the area has a high migrated and heterogeneous residents with various dimensions such as religious, caste, traditions, social hierarchy, language, literacy, education, occupation and income etc. Out of 600 distributed questionnaires, 461 questionnaires were filled by respondents, 84 incomplete questionnaires were not used for analysis and 377 questionnaires were valid ones; thus the effective recovery rate was 62.83 per cent and respondents were personally administered. The five-point Likert Scale was used to with 1 indicating “strongly disagree” and 5 indicating “strongly agree” examining the store image attributes, customers’ satisfaction, behavioral response and intentions towards retail store formats. SPSS (Version17.0) was used for analysis in this study. Internal consistency analysis was used to access the reliability of measurements. Cronbach’s α-value is commonly used for this purpose and α-value must be higher than 0.70 (Nunnally, 1978). Factor analysis was used to determine how many factors related to dimensions of store image as perceived by customers towards retail formats were being measured by the instrument. Correlation analysis was employed to examine the significance relationship among store image attribute, consumer satisfaction, behavioral response and intentions. Percentage, mean and standard deviation were also used to explain the direction of variable.

 

A.Internal Consistency Analysis

Internal consistency was used to assess the reliability of the measurements (five constructs) depicting the degree to which they indicate a common latent (unobserved) construct. The value of each variable, as measured by each statement on the five point Likert scale, was computed using the reliability analysis procedure. Description of the variables (V1 to V5) those used in the study are shown in Table-1.

 

Table-1: Description of the Store Image,Customers’Satisfaction,Behavioral Response

and Intentions Related Variables with Internal Consistency Results

Variable No.

Description

No. of items/statements

Cronbach’s Alpha

V1

Store Image

61

0.8243

V2

Customer Satisfaction

03

0.8942

V3

Word-of-mouth communication

03

0.8719

V4

Intention to switch

04

0.8238

V5

Loyalty intentions

04

0.8407

 

The alpha values range from 0.8238 to 0.8942, which indicates an internal consistency with the alpha value of more than 0.70, so no items were dropped from above list. These results are therefore acceptable and are a reliable measure of the constructs. Overall, this section of the instrument has been proven to be an acceptable instrument through this test.

 

  1. Descriptive Statistic

From a total of 377 respondents, the representation was noted higher of male respondents (54.11 per cent), who were married (35.81 per cent), Bachelor degree(22.81 per cent), in the age group of 25-35 years (26.00 per cent) and 36-45 years (15.12 per cent), belonging to salaried class (28.65 per cent) and earn more than rupees 10 lakhs (22.55 per cent) being surveyed from the premises of Malls (11.94 per cent), Department Stores (5.57 per cent), Discount Stores (8.49 per cent) or Category Killer Stores (11.41 per cent) as compared to their female counterparts under study. On the other side, female representation was slightly higher of those holding master degree or above (25.20 per cent), within an annual income group of rupees5-10 lakhs (18.04 per cent) and who participated from the premises of Hypermarkets (10.34 per cent) or Supermarkets (9.55 per cent) in the survey (table-2).

 

Table 2:  Retail Formats-wise Distribution of Surveyed Customers and their

Demographic Profile

 

Basic Classification

Numbers of Respondents (Percentage)

Male

Female

Total (N=377)

Formats of Store

Malls

45 (11.94)

34 (9.01)

79 (20.95)

Hypermarket

33 (8.75)

39 (10.34)

72 (19.10)

Supermarket

30 (7.96)

36 (9.55)

66 (17.51)

Department Store

21 (5.57)

19 (5.04)

40 (10.61)

Discount Store

32 (8.49)

15 (3.98)

47 (12.47)

Category Killers

43 (11.41)

30 (7.96)

73 (19.36)

Age

< 25 years

21 (5.57)

23 (6.10)

44 (11.67)

25-35 Years

98 (26.00)

65 (17.24)

163 (43.24)

36-45 Years

57 (15.12)

49 (13.00)

106 (28.12)

> 45Years

28 (7.42)

36 (9.55)

64 (16.97)

Highest Level of Education

Diploma or below

31 (8.22)

11 (2.92)

42 (11.14)

Bachelor Degree

86 (22.81)

67 (17.80)

153 (40.57)

Master Degree or above

87 (23.08)

95 (25.20)

182 (48.28)

Marital Status

Single

69 (18.30)

56 (14.85)

125 (33.16)

Married

135 (35.81)

117 (31.04)

252 (66.84)

Occupation

Student

17 (4.51)

06 (1.59)

23 (6.10)

Housewife

0 (0.0)

18 (4.77)

18 (4.77)

Salaried

108 (28.65)

101 (26.79)

209 (55.44)

Self-Business

79 (20.95)

48 (12.73)

127 (33.69)

Annual Income (In Rupees)

<Rupees5 lakhs

52 (13.79)

57 (15.12)

109 (28.91)

Rupees5-10 lakhs

67 (17.77)

68 (18.04)

135 (35.81)

>Rupees10 lakhs

85 (22.55)

48 (12.73)

133 (35.29)

Total (N= 377)

204 (54.11)

173 (45.89)

377 (100)

 

Furthermore, out of 377 respondents, 20.95 per cent from the premises of Shopping Malls, 19.36 per cent from Category Killers, 19.10 per cent from Hypermarkets, 17.51 per cent from Supermarkets, 12.47 per cent from Discount Stores and 10.61 per cent from Department Stores, were the participants in the final survey.

 

  1. Analysis

Using the sample of 377 responses, a factor analysis was used to analyze the data using principal component analysis as the extraction method and varimax as a technique of rotation to determine how many factors were being measured by the instrument.

Table 3: Factor Analysis of Indicators Used for Assessing Store Image as Perceived by

Retail Customers

Factors

Statements

Factor Score

Eigen values

Variance explained

(per cent)

Cronbach’s Alpha

Merchandise

Products at this store are highly dependable.

0.74

3.12

67%

0.82

Products at this store are of highly quality.

0.72

Products at this store are of high value.

0.67

Service

This store offers customized service to its customers.

0.68

3.16

61%

0.81

Descriptive information about the products on display is provided by this store.

0.71

Contacting the employees at this store is easy.

0.66

This store offers convenient product delivery/ shipping/ tracking facility.

0.72

Shopping Atmosphere

Privacy and security of customers is maintained by this store.

0.61

2.76

63%

0.78

Shopping process at this store is convenient and time saving.

0.73

Merchandize display at this store is very good.

0.71

This store has an easy-to-follow layout for customers to find what they need.

0.70

Pricing

This store provides appropriate prices for merchandize they sell.

0.75

1.93

58%

0.73

This store offers fair/competitive prices.

0.71

This store offers manufacturer coupons and free samples.

0.62

This store offers lot of discounts and special sales promotions.

0.69

Product Innovation

This store sells extensive variety of products.

0.61

2.76

63%

0.79

I find unique products available in this store.

0.72

I find out about new products in this store.

0.70

Sales Personnel Competence

Sales personnel know what my needs are and how the retailer's products can satisfy them.

0.73

2.49

61%

0.86

Sales personnel do not hesitate to find the time to serve me better.

0.72

Sales personnel are experienced and trustworthy.

0.61

Sales personnel know very well about the products in this retail store.

0.63

Sales personnel at this store give customers individual attention.

0.71

I receive good advice from the salespeople at the time of purchase.

0.72

I receive prompt service from the Sales personnel in this store.

0.62

Reliability

This store has merchandise available when you want it.

0.75

3.21

62%

0.81

This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records.

0.62

When this store promises to do something (offering discount etc.) by a certain time, it will do so.

0.68

I am satisfied with the answer to a complaint I lodged.

0.69

Creditability of sales personnel to me is unquestionable.

0.62

This store provides its services at the time it promises to do so.

0.69

Physical Evidence

I find the setting inside the store is pleasant.

0.61

2.67

68%

0.83

Sales personnel of this store are well dressed and appear neat.

0.66

Interior design of the premises facilitates the transactions.

0.70

I find the outside aspect of the store is pleasant.

0.78

I find the lighting of the store is pleasant.

0.61

I find the colors of the store match perfectly.

0.62

Store uses appropriate combination of layout for customers to find what they need.

0.69

This store has modern-looking equipments and fixtures/racks.

0.69

This store has clean, attractive, and convenient public areas (e.g. trial room, rest room).

0.68

I find the store smells nicely.

0.72

I enjoy time with my family and friends in this store.

0.69

Convenience

Opening days and hours of this store are convenient for me as per my time and shopping needs.

0.61

1.69

61%

0.86

This store offers home delivery of products which makes me comfortable to place purchase order at any time and from any location.

0.71

This store accepts debit and credit cards at multiple billing counters which help me to avoid payment complexities.

0.72

Layout of this store is easy to go around.

0.62

Location

This store is conveniently located to meet people.

0.66

2.61

57%

0.85

This store is located close to my house.

0.72

It is convenient to take a transport to get to this store.

0.61

Varieties of stores are located near this store.

0.63

After Sale Service

This store has appropriate return policy and easy to return defected products.

0.64

2.28

65%

0.81

Refund policy of this store is appropriate.

0.67

Contacting the employees in this store is easy.

0.61

This store offers excellent and easy exchange services for products I purchased.

0.62

Product Availability

All products and brands I expect to buy are available in the store.

0.71

1.86

58%

0.82

I find the products easily what I need.

0.71

All products placed in racks are easy to reach (neither too high, nor too low).

0.73

Crowding

I am happy with the number of people mostly found purchasing at the store.

0.64

3.82

66%

0.84

The waiting time at the check-out is short in this store.

0.69

Peripheral Services

Store provides facilities such as trolley, basket, and shopping bags in appropriate numbers.

0.67

3.51

58%

0.82

Store provides other services such as gift wrapping, bank, photo processing, restaurant, snack corner.

0.72

It was revealed that fourteen factors of store image account for 62 per cent of the variance in the instrument. Two of the factors that accounted for smaller amounts of variance were consolidated with other factors reducing the instrument to fourteen factors. The fourteen factors were the following: Merchandise; Service; Shopping atmosphere; Pricing; Product innovation; Sales personnel competence; Reliability; Physical evidence; Convenience; Location; After Sale Service; Product availability; Crowding; and Peripheral Services. Table-3 depicts the loading of the 61 items on each factor (for factor loading greater than .50). Moreover, the 61-item instrument had a reliability of 0.82. The result also indicate 67 percentage of variance in Merchandise, 61 percentage of variance in Service, 63 percentage of variance in Shopping atmosphere, 58 percentage of variance in Pricing, 63 percentage of variance in Product innovation, 61 percentage of variance in Sales personnel competence, 62 percentage of variance in Reliability, 68 percentage of variance in Physical evidence, 61 percentage of variance in Convenience, 57 percentage of variance in Location, 65 percentage of variance in After Sale Service, 58 percentage of the variance in Product availability, 66 percentage of variance in Crowding, and 58 percentage of the variance in Peripheral Services.

 

Correlation Analysis

Inter-correlations among all the fourteen attributes of retail store image, customer satisfaction, behavioral response and intentions was performed to check the significance relationship among store image attribute, customer satisfaction, behavioral response and intentionssummarized in table-4.As expected all the dependent variables are significantly correlated at p < 0.05, except‘word-of-mouth communication’ with ‘loyaltyintention’, ‘pricing’, ‘physical evidence’, ‘location’, ‘after sales service’, ‘crowding’, ‘product availability’ and ‘peripheral services’; ‘intention to switch’ with ‘service’, ‘shopping atmosphere’, ‘pricing’, ‘product innovation’, ‘physical evidence’, ‘convenience’, ‘after sales service’, ‘product availability’ and ‘peripheral services’; and ‘loyaltyintention’ with ‘pricing’, ‘product innovation’, ‘reliability’, ‘crowding’, ‘product availability’ and ‘peripheral services’, moreover, all the independent variables are negatively correlated with ‘intention to switch’. The result of the study also reported that all dependent variable are significantly correlated at p < 0.05, with merchandise and sales personnel competence; while only customers’ satisfaction is significantly correlated with pricing, product availability and peripheral services.Customers’ satisfaction is most significantly correlated with merchandise andshopping atmosphere followed by sales personnel competence, after sales services, product availability, conviences, service, location, crowding and reliability among store image attributes (table-4). Furthermore word of mouth communication is most significantly correlated with service and merchandise; intention to switch is most significantly correlated with reliability and merchandise, whereas loyalty intention is most significantly correlated with shopping atmosphere and merchandise among store image attributes. The result of study also showed that extremely significant correlation exist between “product innovation and pricing” and “sales personnel competence and crowding”.

 

Table-4: Means, Standard Deviations and Inter Correlations among Retail Store Image attributes, Customers’ Satisfaction, behavioral

Response and Intentions(N=377)

 

Sr. No.

Variables

 Mean

S.D

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

1

Customer Satisfaction

 

3.93

3.928

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

WOM Communication

 

3.49

4.735

.43*

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

Intention to switch

 

2.73

3.827

-.51*

-.48*

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

LoyaltyIntention

 

3.91

4.522

.29*

NS

-.52*

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

Merchandize

 

3.27

2.136

.43*

.32*

-.45*

.37*

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

Service

 

3.64

3.182

.26*

.46*

NS

.34*

NS

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

Shopping Atmosphere

 

3.36

2.089

.43*

.22*

NS

.39*

.42*

.37*

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

Pricing

 

2.83

0.963

.21*

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

Product Innovation

 

2.99

1.245

.23*

.26*

NS

NS

.34*

NS

NS

.52

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

Sales Personnel Competence

 

3.62

3.276

.32*

.27*

-.22*

.36*

NS

NS

.34*

NS

.42*

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

Reliability

 

3.35

3.084

.23*

.22*

-.48*

NS

NS

.34*

NS

NS

NS

NS

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

Physical Evidence

 

3.16

2.828

.21*

NS

NS

.31*

.37*

NS

NS

.28*

.32*

.31*

NS

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

Convenience

 

2.98

1.361

.27*

.22*

NS

.22*

.29*

.21*

NS

.33*

NS

.23*

NS

.24*

1

 

 

 

 

 

14

Location

 

2.79

1.063

.25*

NS

-.21*

.31*

.22*

.21*

.24*

.25*

NS

.21*

NS

NS

.31*

1

 

 

 

 

15

After Sale Service

 

3.53

3.914

.32*

NS

NS

.32*

.34*

.38*

.26*

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

1

 

 

 

16

Crowding

 

2.69

0.766

.24*

NS

-.22*

NS

NS

NS

.23*

NS

NS

.46*

NS

NS

.24*

NS

NS

1

 

 

17

Product Availability

 

3.01

1.623

.28*

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

1

 

18

Peripheral Services

 

3.12

1.022

.21*

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

.31*

NS

NS

NS

NS

1

Annotations: *p ≤ .05; r=Value of correlation coefficient; NS= Not Significant; Mean= Weighted Mean Score; S.D = Standard Deviation;and N = Number of respondents

  1. Conclusion

The results of the study are concluded into several points. First, Customer satisfaction is significantly associated with the entire fourteen facets store image, whereas word-of-mouth communication, intention to switch, and customers’ loyalty intention are partially significant with store image attributes. Customers’ satisfaction is most significantly correlated with merchandise and shopping atmosphere followed by sales personnel competence, after sales services, product availability, conviences, service, location, crowding, reliability and etc. among store image attributes, the results somewhat similar to Clottey et al. (2008) where the antecedents of customer satisfaction stood as price, product assortment, product quality and store service. So the managers are need to emphasis on tangible attributes such as product quality and assortment, layout of store to make customers move easily around the store and to find products and other facilities conveniently and not to make shelves too high), after sale service such as implementing appropriate exchange and refund policy towards defective products, moreover various offers and promotional scheme on products, so that retail store may compete with online retailers also. Second, concerning word-of-mouth communication the result shows that store attributes such as service and merchandise are most important, which make an intuitive sense that if retail store is enable to provide products as per the expectations of customers, consequently customers will act as a store ambassador for the publicity of store. Third, reliability isreverse and significantlycorrelated with intention to switch to other store, because customers’ prerequisite is trust and safe environment for shopping at a store about surely the requiring products will availiable, error-free sales transaction, committed about services offers and discounts on sales, trustworthy sales personnel and etc., which leads to stop the defection behaviour of customers to other stores. Fourth, the attributes such as shopping atmosphere, merchandise, sales personnel competence, service and after sales service leads to loyalty intention towards store and these findings are similar with (Anselmsson, 2006; Theodoridis and Chatzipanagio­tou, 2009).Furthermore word-of-mouth communication, intention to switch, and customers’ loyalty intention are also significantlycorrelated with customers’ satisfaction. This makes intuitive sense as the customer satisfaction with the store image is increasing, he/she is going to make more word-of-mouth communication and intention to switching on other store will decrease whereas possibility of loyalty of the customers to purchase from same retail store will also increase.This study, however, has some limitations also. Since the present study was conducted with a limited sample of Delhi and Gurugram, the results cannot generalize to the entire metropolitan and smart cities in India. Future research should gather a sample of retail customers from various metropolitan and smart cities across the country in order to generalize the relationship among store image attributes, customers’ satisfaction, customers’ behavioral response (word of mouth communication), customers’ intention to switch and customers’ loyalty intention. Moreover future research might include studies to identify factors influencing customer satisfaction and loyalty in other retail environments such as food courts, restaurants and hotel industry.

References

Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms. Marketing Science, 12(2), 125-143.

 

Andreassen, W., & Lindestad, B. (1998). Customer loyalty and complex services: The impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(1), 7-23.

 

Anselmsson, J. (2006). Sources of Customer Satisfaction with Shopping Malls: A Comparative Study of Different Customer Segments. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 16(1), 115-138.

 

Baldinger, A. L., & Rubinson, J. (1996). Brand loyalty: the link between attitude and behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(6), 22-34.

 

 Bloemer, J., & De-Ruyter, K. (1998). On the relationship between store image, store satisfaction and store loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 32(5/6), 499-513.

 

Bloemer, J., & Odekerken-Schroder, G. (2002). Store Satisfaction and Store Loyalty Explained by Customer and Store-Related Factors. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 15, 68-80.

 

Carpenter, M. J., & Moore, M. (2006). Consumer Demographics, Store Attributes, and Retail Format Choice in the US Grocery Market. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 34(6), 434-52.

 

Carpenter, M. J., Moore, M. (2006). Consumer Demographics, Store Attributes, and Retail Format Choice in the US Grocery Market. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 34(6), 434-52.

 

Carroll, A., Barnes, S. J., Scornavacca, E., & Fletcher, K. (2007). Consumer perceptions and attitudes towards SMS advertising: recent evidence from New Zealand. International Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 79-98.

 

Clottey, T. A., Collier, D. A., & Stodnick, M. (2008). Drivers of Customer Loyalty in a Retail Store Environment. Journal of Service Science, 1(1), 35-48.

 

Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a re-examination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(July), 55-68.

 

Darian, J. C., Tucci, L. A., & Wiman, A.R. (2001). Perceived salesperson service attributes and retail patronage intentions. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 29(5), 205-13.

 

Day, G.S. (1969). A Two-Dimensional Concept of Brand Loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(3), 29-35.

 

Demirgunes, B. K. (2014). The Antecedents of Store Image and Customer Satisfaction. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 3(3), 48-62.

 

Desai, K. K. & Talukdar, D. (2003). Relationship between product groups’ price perceptions, shoppers’ basket size, and grocery store‘s overall store price image. Psychology and Marketing, 20(10), 903-933.

 

Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P.W. (1990). Consumer Behaviour. 6th edition, The Dryden Press, Chicago, IL.

 

Faircloth, J. B., Capella, L.M., & Alford, B.L. (2001). The effect of brand attitude and brand image on brand equity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(3), 61-75.

 

Groeppel-Klein, A., & Germelmann, C. C. (2003). Mind the mall: do we remember what we see?, Advances in Consumer Research, 30, 56-67.

 

Hartman, K. B., & Spiro, R. L. (2005). Recapturing store image in customer-based store equity: A construct conceptualization. Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1112-1120.

 

James, D. L., Durand, R. M., & Dreves, R. A. (1976). The use of a multi-attributes attitudes model in a store image study. Journal of Retailing, 52, 23-32.

 

Jin, B., & Kim, J. (2003). A Typology of Korean Discount Shoppers: Shopping Motives, Store Attributes, and Outcomes. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(4), 396-419.

 

Koo, D. (2003). Inter-relationships among Store Images, Store Satisfaction and Store Loyalty among Korea Discount Retail Patrons. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 15(4), 42-71.

 

Liang, C. J., Wang, W. H., & Farquhar, J. D. (2009). The influence of customer perceptions on financial performance in financial services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(2), 129-49.

 

Marks, R. B. (1976). Operationalising the concept of store image. Journal of Retailing, 52, 37-46.

 

Martineau, P. (1958). The personality of the retail store. Harvard Business Review, 36(1), 47-56.

 

Miranda, M. J., Konya, L., & Havrila, I. (2005). Shoppers' satisfaction level are not the only key to store loyalty. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 23(5), 220-232.

 

Morschett, D., Swoboda, B., & Foscht, T. (2005). Perception of store attributes and overall attitude towards grocery retailers: the role of shopping motives. International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research, 15(4), 423-47.

 

Naderian, A. (2012). Study of Store Image Attributes Effect on Customer Satisfaction among Malaysian Customers. International Journal of Maketing & Business Communication, 1(3), 1-10.

 

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. Second Edition, McGraw Hill, New York.

 

Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effects of expectation and disconfirmation on post-exposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480-486.

 

Osman, M. Z. (1993). A conceptual model of retail image influences on loyalty patronage behaviour. International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research, 2, 133-48.

 

Pearson, N. (1996). Building brands directly: creating business value from customer relationships. Macmillan Business, 20(6), 68-82.

 

Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. E. (2007). Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 21-31.

 

Roy, S., & Ghosh, L. (2014). Understanding Apparel Store Image: A Scale Development Approach. Journal of Service Research, 13(2), 53-70.

 

Sirohi, N., McLaughlin, E. W., & Wittink, D. R. (1998). A model of consumer perceptions and store loyalty intentions for a supermarket retailer. Journal of Retailing, 74, 223-45.

 

Sivadas, E., & Baker-Prewitt, J. L. (2000). An examination of the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and store loyalty. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 28(2), 73-82.

 

Theodoridis, P. K., & Chatzipanagioutou, K. C. (2009). Store Image Attributes and Customer across Satisfaction Different Customer Profiles within the Supermarket Sector in Greece. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 708-734.

 

Thomas, S. (2013). Linking customer loyalty to customer satisfaction and store image: a structural model for retail stores. Decision, 40(1/2), 15-25.

 

Turhan, G. (2014). Building Store Satisfaction Centred on Customer Retention in Clothing Retailing: Store Design and Ease of Shopping. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 3(1), 89-105.

 

Ueltschy, L. C., Laroche, M., Zhang, M., Cho, H., & Yingwei, R. (2009). Is there really an Asian connection? Professional service quality perceptions and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 62, 972-79.

 

Watanabe, E. A. M., Lima-Filho, D. O., & Torres, C.V. (2013). Store Image Attributes and Customer in Satisfaction Supermarkets in Campo Grande-Ms. Revista Brasileira de Marketing. 12(4), 85-107.

 

Yoo, S. J., & Chang, J. Y.  (2005). An Exploratory Research on The Store Image Attributes Affecting Its Store Loyalty. Seoul Journal of Business, 11(1), 19-41.

 

Yoon, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, C. (2010). Measuring festival quality and value affecting visitors’ satisfaction and loyalty using a structural approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 335-342.

 

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.

 

http://www.pwc.com/us/en/retail-consumer/index.jhtml accessed on 27/10/15.

 

 
 

Pacific Institute of Management, Pacific Hills, Airport Road, Udaipur - 313001, E-mail: edit@pbr.co.in
Phone : +91-294-2494506, +91-294-2494507

©Pbr.co.in, All Right Reserved IT Department , Pacific Group