ISSN: 0974438X
Imapct factor(SJIF): 6.56


Editorial Board  

To
Pacific Hill, Airport Road,
Sub: Publication of Research article in journal “Pacific Business Review International”
I am enclosing herewith as an attachment of the article titled “Comparative Study on Dynamics Of CBOE VIX^{®} And India VIX ” with request for its publication in the ensuing issue of Pacific Business Review International. I assure you that this article has neither been published in any other journal and nor is its consideration for publication elsewhere.
A line of confirmation as above will highly be appreciated.
With regards,
Priyanka Sharma ExConsultant, PWC EMail: priyanka.academics@gmail.com Contact: +91 8444833213/7654614984 Mailing Address: H/o Kashinath Gupta, C/o Gopal Prasad Sharma Bakerganj Bajaja, Nataraj Gali, Bakipore, Patna800004, Bihar, India. Comparative Study on Dynamics of CBOE VIX^{®} and India VIX
Abstract The present study endeavors to compare the dynamics of CBOE and India VIX using a simple plausible framework. The study by way of showing graphical analysis for visual inspection, comparison of descriptive statistics and check of normality assumptions shows that the volatility indices of both CBOE and NIFTY shows similar features. It is more sensitive towards the negative shock in stock prices as compared to positive jolts. The instances of asymmetry between stock index and VIX as reflected by the previous studies also found to be present over the period of study. Keywords: Stock Markets, Volatility Index, Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)
Comparative Study on Dynamics of CBOE VIX^{®} and India VIX Introduction In the recent times, burgeoning scholarly work on analysis of stock market volatility in the domain of finance and economics literature is fairly evident. It has been one of the extensively researched areas by both academicians and practitioners across the globe for its impending implications on the financial system of an economy. To understand the probable volatility sentience in the stock markets an indicative measure/standard was ought to be set which is known as the Volatility Index (VIX). The Chicago Board of Exchange (CBOE) introduced CBOE VIX^{® }in the year 1993, which was intended to act as an assessment measure of expectation of the market of a shortterm (30 days) volatility implied by atthemoney Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 100^{®} Index (OEX^{®} Index) option prices. In 2003, CBOE in association with Goldman Sachs upgraded the VIX to come up with a new measure of expected volatility, that is broadly used by financial theorists, risk managers and volatility traders in a similar way. The modified VIX is based on the S&P 500® Index (SPX^{SM}), the core index for U.S. equities, and the expected volatility is estimated by averaging the weighed price of SPX puts and calls over a wide range of strike prices. This measure of volatility (VIX^{®}) has been referred as the fear estimate of investors, because of the very fact that high level of VIX corresponded to higher scale of market instability (Whaley, 2000). In the context of India, India VIX (IVIX) is used which is computed by National Stock Exchange (NSE) based on the order book of NIFTY options. For the purpose the best bidask quotes of near and nextmonth NIFTY option contracts which are traded on the Futures and Options (F&O) segment of NSE is used. Traditionally one of the underlying reasons of volatility as put forth by noted academicians is arrival of a new piece of information in the market which takes us back to the axioms of Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). Fama (1970) discernibly ratified EMH. Fama (1970) states that market in which the stock prices always “fully reflect” available information is called “efficient”. In such a form of market, when a new piece of information enter, the asset prices accurately respond to that information and integrate all information at any point of time and reach a new level of equilibrium. The theory of rational expectation is grounded upon the rational expectation theory. This theory assumes that investors attain at a rational expectation estimate about future security return. According to Fama (1970), expected returns represent the conditions of market equilibrium and such ‘expected returns equilibrium is function of its risk’. Following Fama (1970) has represented return on asset as: SR_{t }= ψ_{t1} (y^{m}_{t}) + π_{t } (1.1)_{} Where, SR_{t }is stock returns, ψ_{t1} (y^{m}_{t}) represents equilibrium return expected at_{t1} period, π_{t }is the abnormal component. To attain at the equilibrium level market captures information. Assume I_{t1 }to represent information set. Then the equation stands: ψ_{t1} (y^{m}_{t}) = ψ(y^{m}_{t}ǀI_{ t1}) _{ } (1.2)_{} The equation (1.2) implies that the stock market would stand efficient when it uses all relevant information accurately and timely in determining the market price. The prominent works of other researchers negate the fact that the prime cause of volatility is new information arrival (French and Roll, 1986). The subsequent studies have introduced various other causal factors such as investor behavior, financial performance of organizations, dynamics of macroeconomic variables and dissemination of other public information [refer Ross (1989), Andersen et al. (2006), Sen, Das and Goyal (2015)]. The previous literature also provides evidences on a significant negative correlation between stock returns and VIX with due cogency. Further the traces of asymmetric relationship between stock returns and implied volatility (i.e. higher magnitude of implied volatility on negative return shocks as compared to the positive return jolt) is also laid down (Shaikh and Padhi, 2014, Chandra and Thenmozhi, 2015). The present study endeavors to examine this phenomenon of asymmetric relationship and compare descriptive statistics of IVIX with the CBOE VIX^{®} as benchmark to appraise the performance of IVIX as a measure of market volatility. The next segment of the study briefly revisits the intellectual efforts of previous researchers, followed by the comparison of statistical properties of CBOE and IVIX and finally the results are discussed in the end segment. Brief Overview of Previous Literature In the vast literature of financial economics and allied domains considerable empirical works are reported, a snapshot of which presented as below: Whaley (2009) in his study says that volatility index is affected by increased demand to buy index, and hence, change in volatility index rises at a higher absolute rate in a situation where stock market falls than when it tends to rise. The empirical findings of the study support the view that the volatility index is to be assumed as investor’s fear index rather greed index. Followed by evidences on large negative contemporaneous correlation between volatility index and market return index Dash and Moran (2005) in their study finds a negative correlation between volatility index (VXO) and hedge fund returns, further this correlation was found asymmetric in nature. On the other hand Guo and whitelaw (2006) confirms that market returns are positively related to volatility index. In the literature base there exists some contradiction to the literature as well. Dowling and Muthuswamy (2005) in their study on Australian markets found no asymmetry between volatility and market index returns. Recent studies in Indian context, Kumar (2010) observed negative relationship between market returns and volatility only during market declines, Shaikh and Padhi (2014) concludes asymmetry prevails among IVIX and the NIFTY index; at the same time the magnitude of asymmetry is not identical. The result show that the change in IVIX occurs bigger for the negative return shocks than that of positive return shocks. Chandra and Thenmozhi (2015) examines the asymmetric relationship between IVIX and stock market returns and demonstrates that NIFTY returns are negatively related to changes in IVIX levels, but in the case of high upward movements in the market, the returns on the two indices tend to move independently. Examining the Statistical Properties Graphical Analysis This section of the study deals with the statistical property check for both IVIX and CBOE VIX for the purpose of intercomparison. The study is conducted for a period of 6 years i.e. from 28/08/2009 to 25/08/2015 for India and for U.S. the study period is 31/07/2009 to 31/07/2015. The Indian data is obtained from the NSE website and the U.S. data is extracted from the CBOE website. It is intended to study the behavior of VIX and market index returns for both NIFTY and SPX^{SM}. Figure 1. Intertemporal Relationship between India VIX and NIFTY Index
The figure 1 above is the timeseries plot of IVIX and NIFTY index for the period of study. The figure by a simple visual inspection reveals that IVIX is more sensitive to decline in index as compared to the rise. Hence, the connotation of fear index as proposed by Whaley found to be evident in this case. Figure 2. Intertemporal Relationship between CBOE VIX^{®} and SPX^{SM} Index
The figure 2 reflects the similar phenomena as reflected by figure 1. Thus it can be seen that asymmetry prevails in both the cases. A simple graphical analysis confirms that volatility index is hypersensitive to negative return shocks to positive return trends, which is consistent to the previous literature. Descriptive Statistics and Test of Normality Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of NIFTY, IVIX and Market Index Return
The above output in table 1 show the average volatility is approximately 20% with a standard deviation of 5.16% (approx.). The modal value i.e. most occurring volatility rate is 16.82%. The minimum and maximum volatility stood to be 11.565% and 37.705% respectively. The table 2 below shows the descriptive statistics for the U.S. data which shows the mean volatility is around 18.68% with a standard deviation of 6.09%. The value of mode is approximately 12.66%. However the minimum and the maximum values varies significantly, it is 10.32 and 48 respectively.
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of SPX, VIX and Market Index Return
Table 3. Tests of Normality for NIFTY, IVIX and Market Index Returnpacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left" width="106%">  
ShapiroWilk 

Statistic 
df 
Sig. 

NIFTY 
.838 
1489 
.000 

IVIX 
.951 
1489 
.000 

Market_Index_Return 
.988 
1489 
.000 

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction 

The ShapiroWilk test shows the pvalues<0.05 and hence all the three variables are found to be failing the normality tests.
Figure 3. Histogram of NIFTY, IVIX and Market Index Return
The histogram in figure 3 for NIFTY appears symmetric with two modes, the IVIX as depicted above shows a rightskewed distribution. The histogram for market index return appears normal but since it failed the normality check can be assumed to be a leptokurtic distribution.
Table 4. Tests of Normality for NIFTY, IVIX and Market Index Return
ShapiroWilk 

Statistic 
df 
Sig. 

SPX 
.913 
1510 
.000 

VIX 
.867 
1510 
.000 

Market_Index_Return 
.954 
1510 
.000 

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction 

The test for the U.S. data also fails the normality assumption. Further the histograms below show the similar depictions as above for the Indian data.
Figure 4. Histogram of SPX, VIX and Market Index Return
Figure 4 the histogram for SPX, VIX and Market index returns depicts almost similar result as for the Indian data.
Findings and Conclusion
The study intended to compare the dynamics of IVIX and VIX. The study adopted a very simple plausible framework of comparison i.e. visual interpretation of financial timeseries plotting and comparison of descriptive statistics and normality check. The outcome of the study provides the evidence that the dynamics of volatility indices and other variables considered for the purpose of this microlevel study found to be quite similar. The timeseries plot for both set data confirmed the findings of the previous studies that volatility indices are more sensitive for negative shocks. However the magnitude of upward or downward movement is a matter of further research using econometric tools. The normality tests were found to be somewhat replica to each other. Due to time constraints only 6 years could be taken as a sample which is a very small period of study indeed to generalize the findings. Hence, with increased timehorizon and using more sophisticated econometric techniques the results can be made far convincing.
References
Pacific Institute of Management, Pacific Hills, Airport Road, Udaipur  313001,
Email: edit@pbr.co.in
Phone : +912942494506, +912942494507
©Pbr.co.in, All Right Reserved
IT Department , Pacific Group