ISSN: 0974438X
Imapct factor(SJIF): 6.56
A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management


Editorial Board  

Solvency Determinants of Publicsector General Insurance Firms in India By Joy Chakraborty Assistant Professor (Finance), Alliance School of Business, Alliance University, Bangalore– 562106, Karnataka, India E mail: chakjoy@gmail.com
Research Paper 2016 Solvency Determinants of Publicsector General Insurance Firms in India ABSTRACT In the prereform era, the four major publicsector general insurers, carrying on multiline operations, dominated the Indian general insurance sector with a market share close to 100 per cent. But with the enactment of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) Act in 1999, the publicsector general insurers began to face stiff competition from the entry of private and foreign players. Though the four major publicsector general insurers still remains to dominate the Indian nonlife insurance market with a collective market share of 50.24 percent at the end of the FY 201415, butan abrupt rise in the number of private players has raised concerns about the solvency position of the publicsector general insurance firms from the viewpoint of safeguarding policyholders’ interests. The present study investigated the solvency determinants of the four major publicsector general insurance firms in India. The study has employed the multiple linear regression analysis to establish a relationship between the solvency ratios, as dependent variable, and the firmspecific factors (i.e. Loss Ratio, Operating Expense Ratio, Market Shares, Return on Equity and Liquid Ratio) as independent variables. The study covers a period from 200809 to 201415, with an emphasis on the postrecessionary phase of developments in the country’s general insurance sector. The findings showed that solvency was positively related with return on equity, market shares and liquid ratios. On the contrary, solvency was negatively related with operating expense and loss ratios. The results further emphasized the need for the publicsector general insurers to focus on operational efficiencies and liquidity position for ensuring a sound solvency position. Key Words: Solvency, General Insurance, Determinants, financial crisis, IRDAI JEL Classification: C120, G220, L250
The country’s general insurance business was nationalized with the introduction of the General Insurance Business (Nationalization)Act [GIBNA], 1972 that led to the emergence of four fullyowned subsidiaries under GICI^{[1]}, namely the National Insurance Company Limited, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, New India Assurance Company Limited and the United India Insurance Company Limited. But during the year 2000, the four subsidiaries were delinked from the parent company (GICI), and were restructured as independent general insurance companies. During the prereform period, the four publicsector general insurers dominated the Indian general insurance sector with a market share close to 100 per cent. But the situation drastically changed since the enactment of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) Act in 1999. With the IRDAI in place, the country’s insurance market was opened up for private and foreign participation. The abrupt rise in the entry of private players in the country’s nonlife insurance market eventually resulted in a decline in the market shares of the publicsector general insurers during the postreform period. At the end of the FY 201415, there were 28 general insurance companies in India, with 06 publicsector and 22 privatesector firms. Among the 06 publicsector general insurers, while the four publicsector insurance companies carried on multiline operations, there are two specialized insurance companies: one for credit insurance(ECGC)[2] and the other for crop insurance (AIC)[3]. The four publicsector insurers namely the National Insurance Company Limited, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, New India Assurance Company Limited and the United India Insurance Company Limited specializes on all forms of general insurance businesses in India with a collective market share of 50.24 percent at the end of FY 201415. The opening up of the sector, for private participation, eventually raised issues about the solvency position of the general insurance companies and protection of the policyholders’ interests. A financially sound insurance firm is believed to meet its obligations towards its customers and society in a better way, and in turn may be able to retain and attract more customers. The IRDAI, in light of its mission statement published in its Annual Report in 200001, came out with several guidelines in the interest of healthy growth of the Indian insurance industry, protection of consumers’ interest and orderly management of insurance companies. This major area of concern has even prompted the regulatory authority to mandate the Indian insurance companies to maintain a statutory solvency margin[4] of 1.50, by which assets must exceed liabilities at every point of time. The solvency margins of the insurers is calculated as a ratio between the ‘available solvency margin’ (ASM)[5] and the ‘required solvency margin’ (RSM)[6]. Hence, it becomes necessary to review the solvency position of the general insurance firms in light of their operational and investmentrelated factors. The present study is an attempt made in this direction to investigate the solvency determinants of the four major publicsector general insurance firms, engaged in multiline businesses,against the backdrop of the global financial crisis of 200708 and the rapid rise in
[2]Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited [3]Agricultural Insurance Company of India Limited [4]As per section 64 VA of the Insurance Act of 1938, as amended by the Insurance (Amendment) Act of 2002, every insurer is required to maintain the statutory solvency margin, as stipulated by IRDAI [5] The term ‘Available Solvency Margin’ (ASM) refers to the aggregate of the excess in policyholders’ funds and the shareholders’ funds. (Source:  IRDAI Annual Reports). [6]The term ‘Required Solvency Margin’ is referred to an amount in excess of the value of assets over the amount of life insurance liabilities and other liabilities of policyholders’ fund & shareholders’ funds, and should not be less than an amount as prescribed by the IRDAI (Assets, Liabilities and Solvency Margin of Insurers) Regulations, 2000. the entry of private players in the country’s general insurance market. The present study has identified certain firmspecific factors (i.e. Investment Performance Ratio, Expense Ratio, Market Shares and Reserves to Claims Ratio) in line with the review of past studies in the area of insurance. The influence of these factors upon the solvency position of the selected general insurance firms has been thoroughly reviewed in the present study covering the postliberalisation period from 200809 to 201415. The present study has hence been structured as follows: Section2 summarises the literature review. Section3 presents the conceptual framework of the methodology as undertaken in the present study. Section4 discussed the research objectives,sample selection, data sources and the methodology used to extract andanalyse the data. Section5 reported the findings and analysis of the results as obtained under the present research work. Section6 highlighted theconcluding observations in line with the present study. Section7 pointed out the limitations of the study and the scope for future research work. A bibliography of the references and materials usedhas been provided at the end for future references.
The literature review shows that few empirical studies have been previously carried out both in life and nonlife insurance industry, though not extensively as in the present study. At the same time, the researcher found no such studies in India or in abroad that comprehensively evaluated the solvency determinants of the Indian general insurance firms during the postrecessionary period, against the backdrop of the global financial crisis of 200708. The present study intended to fill that research gap. Some of the literatures covered by the researcher relating to the present study has been summarised below in Table1.
Table – 1: Summary of Past Studies on Insurance Firms
Source:  Compiled from the Respective Studies Source:  Compiled from the Respective Studies
Multiple linear Regression analysisis a statistical technique of deriving a mathematical relationship, in theform of an equation, between a single metricdependent variable (or, criterion variable) and two or more independent (or, predictor variables). The study employed a linear multiple regression model which is symbolically given as follows: SOLVR_{t} = ∞ + β_{1.}LOSSR_{t}+ β_{2.}OEXPR_{t} + β_{3.}MKS_{t} + β_{4.}RER_{t}+ β_{5.}LQR_{t}+ Ɛ_{t} Where, SOLVR_{t} = Solvency Ratios of the General Insurers at timeperiod ‘t’(i.e. Dependent or criterion variable); ∞ = Intercept; LOSSR_{t} = Loss Ratio; OEXPR_{t} = Operating Expense Ratios; MKS_{t} = Market Shares; RER_{t} = Return on Equity Ratioat timeperiod ‘t’ respectively; β_{i}’s (i.e. β_{1, }β_{2, }β_{3, }β_{4, }β_{5}) = regression coefficients of the respective predictor variables; and Ɛ_{t} = error term at timeperiod ‘t’ (that accounts for the probabilistic or stochastic nature of the relationship). The variables were operationalised as follows, as given in Table  2:
Table 2: List of Variables used for Multiple Regression
Source:  Compiled by the author The multiple regression analysis explains the strength of the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The strength of association in multiple regression is measured by the square of the multiple correlation coefficient, i.e. R^{2}, also called the ‘Coefficient of Multiple Determination’. It varies between 0 and 1 and signifies the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable that can be accounted for or explained by the combination of all independent variables. The Adjusted R^{2}represents the ‘Adjusted Coefficient of Multiple Determination’ which has been adjusted for the number of independent variables and the sample size to account for the diminishing returns. The Ftest helps to show the validity of the model that explains the linear relationship between allindependentvariables taken together withthe single dependent variable. The choice of the variables was based on the data provided by the IRDAI annual reports related to the solvency margins and the firmspecific factors of the selected publicsector general insurance firms. In the regression model as used in the present study, all independent variables enter the equation at once in order to determine the relationship between the dependent variable and the whole set of predictor variables. The selected variables were tested beforehand for multicollinearity and the variable(s) depicting high multicollinearity were examined based onvariance inflation factor (VIF) values exceeding 5 coupled with a tolerance level less than 0.20 (or, 20 percent)[3]. With regard to the variableselection, we must also keep in mind that the sample size ‘n’ must be greater than the number of independent variables ‘k’ for proper execution of the multiple linear regression framework.
[1]The term ‘Available Solvency Margin’ (ASM) refers to the aggregate of the excess in policyholders’ funds and the shareholders’ funds. (Source:  IRDAI Annual Reports). [2]The term ‘Required Solvency Margin’ is referred to an amount in excess of the value of assets over the amount of life insurance liabilities and other liabilities of policyholders’ fund & shareholders’ funds, and should not be less than an amount as prescribed by the IRDAI (Assets, Liabilities and Solvency Margin of Insurers) Regulations, 2000. [3]Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J., Carr, J.C. & Griffin, M. (2010): ‘Business Research Methods (8^{th} Edition)’, South Western College Publishers.
4.1 Objectives of the Study The present study has threefold objectives which are listed as follows: (a)To examine the solvency determinants of the four publicsector nonlife insurance companies in India for the period from 200809 to 201415. (b) To determine the nature of relationship between the selected firmspecific factors (i.e. Loss Ratio, Operating Expense Ratio, Market Shares, Return on Equity and Liquid Ratio) with the solvency position of the publicsector general insurance companies during the period under review. (c) To identify the areas where the Indian general insurance companies’ under review needs to focus upon in improving their longterm solvency position. 4.2 Research Hypotheses In addition, the present study attempts to provide answers to the following hypotheses: H_{0}: No significant relationship exists between the dependent variable (i.e. SOLVR) and the five predictor variables (i.e. LOSSR, OEXPR, MKS, RER and LQR). Against an alternative hypothesis which is defined as follows: H_{1}:There is presence of significant relationship between the dependent variable (i.e. SOLVR) and the five predictor variables (i.e. LOSSR, OEXPR, MKS, RER and LQR). 4.3 Sample Selection The objective of the present study is confined only in the postreform period after the liberalization of the country’s insurance sector since the financial year 19992000, so the subsequent period of reforms has only been considered. The purposive sampling approach has been employed in the selection of the sample that comprises of 04 publicsector general insurance firms in India, who has been consistently in operation since the nationalization of the general insurance business in India. The US financial crisis occurred during the year 200708 and its ripples were even felt in the Indian insurance sector that led to a setback in the performances of the country’s general insurance firms. The reason behind the selection of the timeperiod from 200809 to 201415 was to judge the extent of the impact of the global financial crisis upon the performances of the nonlife insurance firms under review. Like most of the studies in financial services, data availability for this study is also restricted to the information submitted by the nonlife insurers in compliance with the regulatory authority, IRDAI. 4.4 Research Tools While deciding on the most suitable tool of analysis, the researcher has found that extensive literature review reveals the application of the multiple linear regression as the appropriate model for studies determining the nature of relationship between the dependent and predictor variables. Hence, the present study has adopted the application of the multiple linear regression frameworks, using the statistical softwareIBMSPSS, version 20. In this regard, a multiple linear regression analysis has been conducted by taking the solvency ratios of the publicsector general insurers (as published by IRDAI) as the single dependent variable (abbreviated as SOLVR), and the 05 other factors as independent variables (abbreviated as LOSSR, OEXPR, MKS, RER and LQR), based on the inputs obtained from various research studies. Descriptive statistics and tests for multicollinearity among the independent variables were further presented for proper execution of the multiple regression analysis.
4.5 Data Sources The secondary data for the present research work has been collected from the IRDA Annual Reports from 200809 to 201415, and from the websites of the respective nonlife insurers. The datasources were based on the financial statements (i.e. Policyholders’ Account, Shareholders’ Account and the Balance Sheet) of the 04 listed publicsector nonlife insurance companies in India for the period under review.
The descriptive statistics, as shown in the following Table – 3, depicted the mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values against each of the selected variables in the present study. Table – 3: Descriptive Statistics of Variables Used
Source:  Calculated The values of solvency ratios (SOLVR) ranged between the minimum and maximum values of 1.330 and 3.550 respectively per year, with a highest mean value of 2.150 per annum. There were wide differences observed between the values of solvency ratios across the sample firms, as indicated from the standard deviation of 0.730 (or, 73 percent) per annum, the highest among all the selected variables. The loss ratio of the selected firms (LOSSR) grew by a mean of 0.844 (or, 84.4 percent) per year with a standard deviation of 15.7 percent per annum. The operating expense ratio (OEXPR) of the sample firms ranged between the values of 0.192 and 0.372 per year, with a mean close to 30 percent per annum. The lowest standard deviation of 4.3 percent per annum was recorded against the variable OEXPR. The market shares (MKS) of the sample firms recorded a lowest mean value of 17 percent with a standard deviation close to 14 percent per annumduring the period under review. The growth per annum in the mean and standard deviation of the return on equity ratio (RER) stood at 24.9percent and 25.8 percent respectively, with the lowest value being obtained as () 0.298 (or, 29.8 percent) across the sample firms. Finally, the liquid ratios (LQR) recorded a mean value of 0.424 (or 42.4 percent) with a standard deviation of 0.153(or 15.3 percent) every year during the period under review. Nevertheless, all the mean values depicted a reasonably normal distribution across the values of the variables. For the application of the model and to ensure an absence of multicollinearity among the selected variables,a correlation analysis between the variables has been carried out covering all the years of the studyperiod. The results of the Pearson correlation matrix among the selected variables are shown in Table – 4. The results indicated a very low to moderate positive relationship between the solvency ratios and the respective independent variables i.e. RER and LQR. The relationship between the solvency ratios and the loss ratios, operating expense ratios and the market shares of sample firms were found to be negative and weak. Moreover, no signs of multicollinearity existed among the independent variables which provided a favourable platform for the execution of the multiple linear regression analysis. Table – 4: Pearson Correlation Matrix
Source:  Calculated The results of the multiple regression analysis has been presented below in Tables 5 – 7 representing the model summary, goodness of fit and the regression coefficients respectively, by taking the solvency ratios as the dependent variable and the other selected factors as the independent variables for the sample firms covering all the years of the studyperiod. Table – 5: Model Summary  Regression Results
Source:  Calculated Table – 6: Resultsof Goodness of Fit – ANOVA
Source:  Calculated Table – 7:Regression Coefficients
Dependent Variable: SOLVR Source:  Calculated The value of R^{2}, as shown in Table – 5, shows a value of 0.476 thereby indicating that all the predictors explain almost 50 percent of the variations in the dependent variable (SOLVR) across the sample firms during the period under review. The adjusted R^{2} is 35.7 percent, which accounts for the number of predictors in the model. Both the values indicate that the model fits the data well. Since the R^{2} value is close to the adjusted R^{2} value, the model does not appear to be overfit and has adequate predictive ability. The DurbinWatson statistic of 0.980 further indicates the absence of linear autocorrelation among the residuals in the given model. The goodness of fit  Anova results, as provided in Table – 6, further confirms the validity of the model with a reported Fstatistic value of 4.002 and is found to be statistically significant (based on Pvalues < 0.05) at the 5 percent level of significance, thereby indicating the existence of a linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables in the given model. The results of the regression coefficients of the selected variables at a 5 percent level of significance, as shown in Table – 7, reveals a statistically significant relationship (based on the Pvalues < 0.05)between the solvency ratios and the respective determinants i.e. operating expense and liquidity ratios. The predictor variable ‘market shares’ was found to be positively related with the solvency ratios of the sample firms, though not statistically significant (β = 0.545, pvalue = > 0.05). The independent variables ‘loss ratio’ and ‘operating expense ratio’ was found to have a negative relationship with the overall solvency status of the publicsector nonlife insurance firms. Though loss ratio was found to be statistically insignificant (β =  0.831, pvalue = > 0.05), but the operating expense ratio was found to be a significant determinant (β =  8.964, pvalue = < 0.05) though negatively related with the solvency position of the sample firms.The ‘return on equity’ ratio was even found to be statistically insignificant (β = 0.349, pvalue = > 0.05) though positively related with solvency. The variance inflation factors (VIF)[1], as provided in Table – 7, further testifies the absence of multicollinearity with factor values not exceeding ‘5’ besides having a tolerance level of more than 20 percent, as obtained against the selected independent variables in the present study. Based on the above findings, it was evident that the null hypothesis was rejected against the independent variables ‘OEXPR’ and ‘LQR’ whereas the alternative hypothesis was rejected against the predictor variables (i.e. LOSSR, MKS and RER). The linear multiple regression model, with the incorporation of the regression coefficients, can hence be simplified as follows: SOLVR_{t} = 4.161–0.831_{.}LOSSR_{t}–8.964_{.}OEXPR_{t}+0.545_{.}MKS_{t} + 0.349_{.}RER_{t} + 2.746.LQR_{t}
[1] Multicollinearity among the independent variables can be expected when the multiple VIF factors approach ‘5’ or ‘greater than 5’. (Source:Zikmund et. al. (2010): ‘Business Research Methods’, 8^{th} Edition)
The findings of the study contributed towards a better understanding of the factors determining the solvency status of the publicsector nonlife insurance firms in India.The findings indicated the operating expense ratio and the liquid ratio as the significant predictors of solvency. The predictor variable ‘operating expense ratio’, though significant, was found to have a negative impact on solvency and hence can lead to a possible threat on the solvent state of the sample firms. Again, the predictor variable ‘loss ratio’ was also found to have a negative impact on solvency, which can further threaten the solvent state of the sample nonlife insurance firms The study has further indicated that the solvency position of the sample firms was not significantly predicted by the factors, i.e. loss ratio, market shares and return on equity, and hence would not assist in determining the solvency position. Hence, the results of the study emphasised the need for the four dominant publicsector general insurance firms to focus on operational efficiencies and liquidityposition for ensuring a sound solvency position.
The data collected for the present studyhas been derived from the published financial statements of the respective nonlife insurers without any emphasis on primary data, and the same has not been adjusted for inflation. Hence, the study incorporates all the limitations that are inherent in the published financial statements. The study is restricted to a time span of 7 years focussing on the postrecessionary phase of the reform period from 200809 to 201415. The study included only the four major publicsector nonlife insurers who are involved in all forms of general insurance businesses, leaving aside the two specialised publicsector insurers such as ECGC (credit insurance) and AIC (crop insurance) besides the private nonlife insurers. In addition, the study has incorporated the multiple regression technique with a single dependent variable and five independent variables. However, it may be useful to consider more number of predictor variables for a longer timehorizon to arrive at more definite conclusions. Hence, the future studies of research in this area could take into account more number of variables, covering all the players in the country’s life insurance and general insurance sectors for an extended timeperiod. REFERENCES
End notes: [1]The General Insurance Corporation of India (GICI) was formed in pursuance of Section 9(1) of GIBNA for the purpose of superintending, controlling and carrying on the general insurance business in India. 2Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited 3Agricultural Insurance Company of India Limited 4As per section 64 VA of the Insurance Act of 1938, as amended by the Insurance (Amendment) Act of 2002, every insurer is required to maintain the statutory solvency margin, as stipulated by IRDAI 5The term ‘Available Solvency Margin’ (ASM) refers to the aggregate of the excess in policyholders’ funds and the shareholders’ funds. (Source:  IRDAI Annual Reports). 6The term ‘Required Solvency Margin’ is referred to an amount in excess of the value of assets over the amount of life insurance liabilities and other liabilities of policyholders’ fund & shareholders’ funds, and should not be less than an amount as prescribed by the IRDAI (Assets, Liabilities and Solvency Margin of Insurers) Regulations, 2000. 7The term ‘Available Solvency Margin’ (ASM) refers to the aggregate of the excess in policyholders’ funds and the shareholders’ funds. (Source:  IRDAI Annual Reports). 8The term ‘Required Solvency Margin’ is referred to an amount in excess of the value of assets over the amount of life insurance liabilities and other liabilities of policyholders’ fund & shareholders’ funds, and should not be less than an amount as prescribed by the IRDAI (Assets, Liabilities and Solvency Margin of Insurers) Regulations, 2000. 9Zikmund, W.G., Babin, B.J., Carr, J.C. & Griffin, M. (2010): ‘Business Research Methods (8^{th} Edition)’, South Western College Publishers. [1]^{0} Multicollinearity among the independent variables can be expected when the multiple VIF factors approach ‘5’ or ‘greater than 5’. (Source:Zikmund et. al. (2010): ‘Business Research Methods’, 8^{th} Edition)


Pacific Institute of Management, Pacific Hills, Airport Road, Udaipur  313001,
Email: edit@pbr.co.in
